| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
pzea469
United States1520 Posts
Anybody else dealing with this? And even if you're not, wouldn't you agree that it would be best to allow such a thing to be enabled/disabled in the menu? Poll: Should there be an option to disable/enable double click selection? Yes (182) No (78) 260 total votes Your vote: Should there be an option to disable/enable double click selection? | ||
NonY
8751 Posts
| ||
|
IndecisivePenguin
United States771 Posts
I know some players out there don't use ctrl+click because they're either not used to it or they don't find it necessary. Ctrl+click is probably the most efficient way to be moving certain units, but what about if you want to group certain units together in the same hotkey? It would probably be a little more difficult without double-click as well. I'm not too sure whether or not it should be a feature that can be enabled/disabled. What do you guys think? | ||
|
pzea469
United States1520 Posts
On April 20 2010 07:42 Liquid`NonY wrote: As a temporary fix, you can change the double click speed of your mouse settings to as fast as possible so that it's really difficult to double click. whoa, I might just do that, thanks. | ||
|
kickinhead
Switzerland2069 Posts
| ||
|
ComradeDover
Bulgaria758 Posts
| ||
|
Tropics
United Kingdom1132 Posts
| ||
|
Sixears
United States22 Posts
| ||
|
Daudr
Sweden275 Posts
| ||
|
Ruthless
United States492 Posts
On April 20 2010 07:42 Liquid`NonY wrote: As a temporary fix, you can change the double click speed of your mouse settings to as fast as possible so that it's really difficult to double click. You have to choose between opening folders easily and doub/e click in sc2. haha i know i would be too lazy to change the options each time | ||
|
johnnybrav0
United States61 Posts
| ||
|
pzea469
United States1520 Posts
On April 20 2010 08:19 johnnybrav0 wrote: Does CTRL+click do the same thing as double click? Yeah, theres no difference that I'm aware of | ||
|
pzea469
United States1520 Posts
On April 20 2010 08:03 ComradeDover wrote: This is stupid. Don't be as sloppy with your actions and this won't happen. maybe I'm incredibly sloppy, but that doesn't make this a stupid suggestion | ||
|
seRapH
United States9799 Posts
 ofc ppl are going to vote yes, theres no real downside. i just dont think its necessary. | ||
|
DeCoup
Australia1933 Posts
| ||
|
ComradeDover
Bulgaria758 Posts
On April 20 2010 08:23 pzea469 wrote: maybe I'm incredibly sloppy, but that doesn't make this a stupid suggestion Yes, it is a stupid suggestion. By being able to toggle this option off, Blizzard would be saying it's okay to be sloppy. And it isn't. If you're sloppy, there's some kind of penalty associated with that. | ||
|
Nytefish
United Kingdom4282 Posts
On April 20 2010 10:01 ComradeDover wrote: Yes, it is a stupid suggestion. By being able to toggle this option off, Blizzard would be saying it's okay to be sloppy. And it isn't. If you're sloppy, there's some kind of penalty associated with that. I think there's no need to be so hostile here, it's just a minor interface change and Blizzard are trying to make the game "newb-friendly" anyway so it doesn't seem like being sloppy should be punished. | ||
|
ComradeDover
Bulgaria758 Posts
On April 20 2010 10:05 Nytefish wrote: I think there's no need to be so hostile here, it's just a minor interface change and Blizzard are trying to make the game "newb-friendly" anyway so it doesn't seem like being sloppy should be punished. Nobody is hostile here. I'm just disagreeing with his statement that his suggestion isn't stupid. I don't know where everyone is getting this idea that Blizzard somehow is making the game "newb friendly". And even if they were making the game "newb friendly", that doesn't mean that sloppiness should be tolerated or encouraged with this change. | ||
|
Nytefish
United Kingdom4282 Posts
On April 20 2010 10:08 ComradeDover wrote: Nobody is hostile here. I'm just disagreeing with his statement that his suggestion isn't stupid. I don't know where everyone is getting this idea that Blizzard somehow is making the game "newb friendly". And even if they were making the game "newb friendly", that doesn't mean that sloppiness should be tolerated or encouraged with this change. Calling someone's idea stupid isn't exactly the friendliest of gestures. Words like unnecessary would suffice. It's only a minor tweak that would hardly affect anyone, no reason not to at least try suggest it. Why can't you tolerate sloppiness, Street Fighter 4 gives a lot of leeway for inputting commands but it's still a good game. Same concept here, don't fight the interface. | ||
|
ComradeDover
Bulgaria758 Posts
On April 20 2010 10:11 Nytefish wrote: Calling someone's idea stupid isn't exactly the friendliest of gestures. Words like unnecessary would suffice. It's only a minor tweak that would hardly affect anyone, no reason not to at least try suggest it. Why can't you tolerate sloppiness, Street Fighter 4 gives a lot of leeway for inputting commands but it's still a good game. Same concept here, don't fight the interface. If his idea is stupid, I'm going to tell him it's stupid instead of sugar coating it. It does him a disservice if I did otherwise. This is a different situation from your SF4 example. You can't control the amount of leeway the game gives you for inputting commands -- It is what it is and that's it, you learn to play the game in that state. To include such an option the OP suggests would be like saying "Oh? What's that? You're innaccurate with your APM? LET'S INCLUDE A CRUTCH FOR YOU". | ||
| ||
|
|
BSL
RSL Revival
Cure vs Rogue
Maru vs TBD
MaxPax vs TBD
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
BSL
Afreeca Starleague
Wardi Open
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
