EPTOn March 31 2010 04:29 spinesheath wrote:
Except that spine crawlers now do 37% more DPS.
Except that spine crawlers now do 37% more DPS.
Patch 7 Notes - Page 8
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
RumZ
United States956 Posts
| ||
|
3nickma
Denmark1510 Posts
 But maybe my crawlers will be much better now  | ||
|
mOnion
United States5660 Posts
| ||
|
SichuanPanda
Canada1542 Posts
| ||
|
Irrelevant
United States2364 Posts
| ||
|
Foreplay
United States1154 Posts
| ||
|
Wr3k
Canada2533 Posts
On March 31 2010 04:32 mOnion wrote: why are you guys getting so many spine crawlers in zvz anyway? So that we can try strategies that don't involve spamming 10000 roaches. I've won several games using spinecrawler---> muta --> broodlord/roach builds. | ||
|
Bear4188
United States1797 Posts
| ||
|
bendez
Canada283 Posts
On March 31 2010 04:34 Foreplay wrote: thats lae that organic carapace got nerfed. it was a late game upgrade and now no ones gonna get it. Yep.. good bye mini ultras.. Now there's even less reasons to go hive tech. | ||
|
mOnion
United States5660 Posts
On March 31 2010 04:35 Wr3k wrote: So that we can try strategies that don't involve spamming 10000 roaches. I've won several games using spinecrawler---> muta --> broodlord/roach builds. oh lol thats justifiable ^_^ just curious | ||
|
Slunk
Germany768 Posts
On March 31 2010 04:34 Irrelevant wrote: Roach upgrade was crazy op(they could literally stand in stacked storm and out heal it), but completely removing the regen is a bit too much So what are you going to do now as zerg? You only have the hydralisk. One unit type army, awesome diversity! | ||
|
asdfTT123
United States989 Posts
On March 31 2010 04:36 Bear4188 wrote: Everyone raging about +10 hp banshees, please keep in mind they also just buffed cannons, turrets, and spores. Yeah, except static defense sucks against Banshees. The only good response from P is Phoenix. | ||
|
mOnion
United States5660 Posts
On March 31 2010 03:55 Quixoticism wrote: As if Psi storm hasn't been nerfed enough as it is. :/ It's nice to see an improvement in the static defenses. The missile turret still seems kinda weak to me compared to the others. That is unless it's 12x2. I can't download the patch yet though, so it must not have hit the US yet. still? the turret was the best static in the game before >_< now its a tossup, prolly spines are on top. | ||
|
mOnion
United States5660 Posts
On March 31 2010 04:37 asdfTT123 wrote: Yeah, except static defense sucks against Banshees. The only good response from P is Phoenix. and stalkers and obs and sentries ohmy! | ||
|
0neder
United States3733 Posts
#1: Scout the starport. #2a: Get static D which is now stronger (and that z move around as needed) #2b: Get AA units #2c: some combo of a and b (which is also more viable because of static d buff) Zerg need to get used to the face that maybe spore crawlers will become more necessary since scourge don't exist anymore. EDIT: Also, any patch that makes roaches less used is good IMO. They are destroying racial identity as a cheap tank for what should be the expendable/fast/suicide race. | ||
|
bendez
Canada283 Posts
On March 31 2010 04:35 Wr3k wrote: So that we can try strategies that don't involve spamming 10000 roaches. I've won several games using spinecrawler---> muta --> broodlord/roach builds. No, zerg needs a real anti-armor unit. This won't stop zvz from revolving around roaches. | ||
|
FortuneSyn
1826 Posts
storm needed the nerf, however temp tech tree is still outclassed by robo early game. | ||
|
Slurgi
United States118 Posts
Preface: I'm a Terran player. I was a Protoss player but switched after getting my face pounded in by good Terrans. The banshee buff seemed unnecessary. They've been a major part of a lot of my builds and it's particularly difficult for Protoss to properly respond to them Static defense buffs in general were a good call. The Terran missile turret needed this buff vs mutas incredibly badly, and the thor splash damage is nice as well. The broodlord (GGLord?) nerf was way needed. I actually would have rather seen the overall damage stay the same but have them changed to one attack and therefore only one broodling spawn, but I suppose this works too. I still think they're a bit too high on HP, but I guess they're a "capital ship" and should stay as they are in that regard. It just feels like my units hardly hurt them. Even vikings. Even as a Terran player, and understanding the frustration of being psi stormed into our bio mass, I STILL disagree with the psi storm nerf. I would have been OK with this change if archons were made more viable, but this really makes the templar tech tree look even more abysmal. Why not add a 0.5 radius to splash damage to the archon as well? Does protoss struggle against mutas as bad as terran at the moment? I really have no idea. | ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
On March 31 2010 04:36 Bear4188 wrote: Everyone raging about +10 hp banshees, please keep in mind they also just buffed cannons, turrets, and spores. that is a good point, but I think the problem is that banshees do too much damage as it is. Even if spore crawlers were free, it still kills a drone and takes time. In that time a 2 banshee will kill your queen, and at least 90% of your drones. | ||
|
Foreplay
United States1154 Posts
| ||
| ||
