| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Simple
United States801 Posts
On March 13 2010 14:50 Psyqo wrote: Lots of bad news in that chat. Blizzard is spending time on fucking achievements, but won't have chat in until "after launch"? Whut? youre playing the beta, not the full game. you get just a taste | ||
|
Islandsnake
United States679 Posts
And im happy to see there going to address the readability of the game, not that I had a issue with it in the first place. And I think just like in the past you'll be able to connect with other servers in the full game, what there talking about is having friends list and convos between servers. Thats my take on it. | ||
|
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
| ||
|
kAra
Germany1380 Posts
 | ||
|
Vequeth
United Kingdom1116 Posts
On March 13 2010 18:06 kAra wrote: some decent questions overall, thought they would be worse > Like your average blizzcon question? | ||
|
PredY
Czech Republic1731 Posts
also hope it's true with can go to other servers but can't play ladder there, that's ok, just custom games. imagine proleague showmatch between us, eu and asia! | ||
|
Motiva
United States1774 Posts
 | ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
| ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
I can't believe some of this stuff. Some of it's good to hear but others (lack of connection/friends internationally, no map auto-mirroring, no multiple-profiles, etc) I just don't understand. | ||
|
PredY
Czech Republic1731 Posts
| ||
|
UbiNax
Denmark381 Posts
| ||
|
Scorch
Austria3371 Posts
| ||
|
DrainX
Sweden3187 Posts
On March 13 2010 17:21 Integra wrote: Blue already confirmed in the feedback forums that there WILL BE GATEWAY (Region) SELECTION with the launch of the game. You will be able to create a fresh account on each gateway and play on EU, US and Korea. What you will not get is the information. like ladder stats etc etc. It will not be shareable between regions. Now, stop making shit up. EDIT: sorry for the bold text I hope you are correct. Please provide a source if you can find that post. | ||
|
Latham
9563 Posts
| ||
|
Senx
Sweden5901 Posts
seriously though, I'm glad we're getting chat channels.. I'm concerned about the latency being too high (240 ms) I'm also worried about not being able to watch replays together :I I'm sad that the high ground mechanic wasn't brought up.. | ||
|
Yukidasu
Australia125 Posts
If you can't change gateway then that really will be a problem, but I can't believe they would artificially do that for launch. There would be absolutely no point. It's probably just a misunderstanding as people have said. | ||
|
Islandsnake
United States679 Posts
| ||
|
Artrey
Germany270 Posts
On March 13 2010 10:48 SoMuchBetter wrote: don't even bother releasing the game without this Well, any of those complaining ever thought about latency? New York to Tokio is 15.000 km. The speed of light is approx 300k km/sec That means you have an innate latency of 100 ms (as ping is roundtrip time) under _perfect_ conditions without any delays on any site with everything being fiber channel. In a real world scenario it would more likely be between 200 and 400 ms, with spikes making it even worse. Having cable internet in germany which is more or less the perfect connection type (20-30 ms eu.battle.net/europe.battle.net), my traceroute to asia.battle.net stops (as it is blocked then) at an average of 350 ms... That is unacceptable for competitive play. Unless you outsmart the speed of light, it will never be possible. Okay, you could optimize by putting the servers in the middle between the opponents, but that does not scale all over the place. | ||
|
Whalecore
Norway1110 Posts
On March 13 2010 12:43 Tiamat wrote: Well you can kiss the lurker goodbye until the zerg expansion! What also sucks is that means the mod community cannot create SC1 mod until all the expansions are out. I think you can import custom models etc. | ||
|
Icx
Belgium853 Posts
On March 13 2010 22:19 Artrey wrote: Well, any of those complaining ever thought about latency? New York to Tokio is 15.000 km. The speed of light is approx 300k km/sec That means you have an innate latency of 100 ms (as ping is roundtrip time) under _perfect_ conditions without any delays on any site with everything being fiber channel. In a real world scenario it would more likely be between 200 and 400 ms, with spikes making it even worse. Having cable internet in germany which is more or less the perfect connection type (20-30 ms eu.battle.net/europe.battle.net), my traceroute to asia.battle.net stops (as it is blocked then) at an average of 350 ms... That is unacceptable for competitive play. Unless you outsmart the speed of light, it will never be possible. Okay, you could optimize by putting the servers in the middle between the opponents, but that does not scale all over the place. counter argument: If in sc1 it also wasn't possible to play with people in other continents then the TSL wouldn't have been possible or would have been USA only. Do you start to have an idea of what b.net 2.0 is gonna do with competitive play? I don't feel like going into a technical discussion about this, but every other competitive game had the option of playing against people all over the world, removing that is a big step backwards and ridicoulus | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
Afreeca Starleague
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Wardi Open
OSC
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
PiGosaur Monday
LiuLi Cup
RSL Revival
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
RSL Revival
Zoun vs Classic
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
