• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:29
CEST 16:29
KST 23:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202537RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 750 users

How to make SC2 feelMore like BW and less like WC3

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
Drazzzt
Profile Joined September 2002
Germany999 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-28 18:38:22
February 28 2010 18:36 GMT
#1
I read Smorries post and also LunarCs post, but I still felt that there was enough room for discussion to create a new thread. If the mods don't agree, remove it or move it to smorries thread. So, on to the topic.

I dont have a beta key myself (sigh), but at least I watched quite a lot of VODs/streams and replays.

I was thinking quite a lot about what I liked about SC:BW and what I didn't like about WC3. I came to the conclusion that Smorrie was kinda right. WC3 is more about waiting to get the right army composition and then the big armies collide and if one annihilates another, the game is pretty much decided (apart from the immense power of the heros and the fateful increasing "army" cost at higher supplies).

In extreme cases, the same is true for SC:BW, but not in all cases (the game over thing when big army was annhihilated I mean). So I asked myself, why is that? One good argument is also given by smorrie. Static defense is probably not strong enough PLUS (new) buildings die too fast. Think of the PvZ games, where the toss army is so much stronger than the zerg army, but Zerg has more expansions and secures them with lots of sunkens and lurkers and later nydus/dark swarm (especially in ZvT). Then, it becomes really hard to break this defense and even though u have the bigger army, it is still no autowin. Zerg can turn the game by staying alive long enough and harrassing e.g. new expansions etc.
I have the impression that this is much harder in SC2, as buildings die soooo fast and the static defense is not as strong (or maybe it is strong, but as the buildings die so fast, you can concentrate on the hatch/nexx/CC).


But that's not all to it. There is even one more major point, why SC2 seems inferior to SC1 strategy-wise etc. It's the weakened influence of the terrain, especially chokes and high ground vs low ground. I feel that this is a major drawback. I know they added some nice stuff like smoke and forest which reduces sight etc. But, in SC1 using high ground and chokes, you were able to hold your ground even with a way inferior army, even with the "wrong" unit composition (e.g. goons vs lings or whatever). This means that even if u had lost a big battle or if u chose the wrong counter etc., when using the terrain to your advantage you could still remain in the game and come back. Additionally, you could send smaller combat groups around and keep them alive etc.
In SC2, if you have the wrong unit combination or not enough units, choke and high ground (as long as the other can see with observer w/e) won't help you that much to hold, especially when the other has the right counter. Additionally, air is sooooo strong and strong units like collossus can simply step up the high ground and you are doomed.
Unfortunately, air units don't care about terrain. So, when air gets so strong it is used more often and terrain doesnt matter anymore. which is a pity, as it adds strategical and tactical depth.

I don't know if I could explain my thoughts well enough, but I hope you get my point. Think about a little more, there are much more subtleties about which I cant go into detail here. But I feel, that this is a major problem in SC2, and unfortunately, I don't know how to solve this easily .

Thoughts?

Be Nice, Be Fair, Be Mannered.
Niten
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States598 Posts
February 28 2010 18:44 GMT
#2
In watching streams and replays, I'm already starting to see people move away from getting big army blobs and attacking. People are very much still figuring out the game, it looks like, and Blizz knows this. I'm not discounting your opinion, but I do think it's too early to say that this is definitively the case.

If this is really a problem, the metagame will show it and Blizz will patch it.
Korra: "Ok, I know that I'm not good at emotions, but that's what Tenzin's gonna teach me, right? He's gonna teach me to be happy and gentle and spiritual, and the rest of that bullsh**t."
Rothbardian
Profile Joined January 2010
United States497 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-28 18:50:37
February 28 2010 18:46 GMT
#3
On March 01 2010 03:36 Drazzzt wrote:
I read Smorries post and also LunarCs post, but I still felt that there was enough room for discussion to create a new thread. If the mods don't agree, remove it or move it to smorries thread. So, on to the topic.

I dont have a beta key myself (sigh), but at least I watched quite a lot of VODs/streams and replays.

I was thinking quite a lot about what I liked about SC:BW and what I didn't like about WC3. I came to the conclusion that Smorrie was kinda right. WC3 is more about waiting to get the right army composition and then the big armies collide and if one annihilates another, the game is pretty much decided (apart from the immense power of the heros and the fateful increasing "army" cost at higher supplies).

In extreme cases, the same is true for SC:BW, but not in all cases (the game over thing when big army was annhihilated I mean). So I asked myself, why is that? One good argument is also given by smorrie. Static defense is probably not strong enough PLUS (new) buildings die too fast. Think of the PvZ games, where the toss army is so much stronger than the zerg army, but Zerg has more expansions and secures them with lots of sunkens and lurkers and later nydus/dark swarm (especially in ZvT). Then, it becomes really hard to break this defense and even though u have the bigger army, it is still no autowin. Zerg can turn the game by staying alive long enough and harrassing e.g. new expansions etc.
I have the impression that this is much harder in SC2, as buildings die soooo fast and the static defense is not as strong (or maybe it is strong, but as the buildings die so fast, you can concentrate on the hatch/nexx/CC).


But that's not all to it. There is even one more major point, why SC2 seems inferior to SC1 strategy-wise etc. It's the weakened influence of the terrain, especially chokes and high ground vs low ground. I feel that this is a major drawback. I know they added some nice stuff like smoke and forest which reduces sight etc. But, in SC1 using high ground and chokes, you were able to hold your ground even with a way inferior army, even with the "wrong" unit composition (e.g. goons vs lings or whatever). This means that even if u had lost a big battle or if u chose the wrong counter etc., when using the terrain to your advantage you could still remain in the game and come back. Additionally, you could send smaller combat groups around and keep them alive etc.
In SC2, if you have the wrong unit combination or not enough units, choke and high ground (as long as the other can see with observer w/e) won't help you that much to hold, especially when the other has the right counter. Additionally, air is sooooo strong and strong units like collossus can simply step up the high ground and you are doomed.
Unfortunately, air units don't care about terrain. So, when air gets so strong it is used more often and terrain doesnt matter anymore. which is a pity, as it adds strategical and tactical depth.

I don't know if I could explain my thoughts well enough, but I hope you get my point. Think about a little more, there are much more subtleties about which I cant go into detail here. But I feel, that this is a major problem in SC2, and unfortunately, I don't know how to solve this easily .

Thoughts?



This is the same case in SCII also. The new high ground mechanic is really powerful, and I would argue more powerful than the SCI high ground mechanic. You have to have sight now to shoot up cliffs...

Overall, games last longer in SCII than in SCI at least to me...I've had quite a few 25-30min+ back and forths with Zerg and Protoss.

Also, as Terran the new turrets are much more powerful than their SCI counterparts, and it seems to me that photon cannons are likewise as powerful. There are a few units that can take out buildings quite fast (Reaper, Void Ray, Ultra, baneling, etc.), but they are niche. Otherwise buildings die about as fast as in SCI.

My observations from playing around 100 games.

Let me say this also....I have about 100 APM in SCII so thats like 130-150 equivalent of SCI and when I get to 3+ bases it is impossible to micro and macro, scout, harass, drop, etc. without big drop offs in either macro or micro....especially with bio + medi + viking. Even with 250-300+ APM when you get 4+ bases there is no way to play perfect. When you have 4-6 CC it is impossible to do mule/scan, micro, and macro even with the new MBS and auto-mine. Let me assure you, no one is going to be playing perfect games macro/micro wise. It's impossible.
"A tax-supported, compulsory educational system is the complete model of the totalitarian state." - Isabel Paterson <3
StarsPride
Profile Joined January 2010
United States364 Posts
February 28 2010 18:47 GMT
#4
im sure they said the same about SC when switching from wc2.
InfC.Pride
IskatuMesk
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Canada969 Posts
February 28 2010 18:52 GMT
#5
I've had one game so far where high ground really played to my advantage. I'm pretty sure Stalkers can't blink up to a place they don't have LOS of (up a cliff without an observer), which I had parked quite a few tanks on top of. They were forced to go around and blink past my wall - right into my Thors and such. Didn't end too well for him in that event, but a direct confrontation would have been really bad for me.

That said I find only in specific situations with very specific units ie colossus and tanks does terrain matter anymore. I try to use terrain as much as I can but battles are so bursty and damage is so high you really don't get that opportunity to set up and usually it doesn't make a big difference.

I also find terrain matters more in 2v2 and FFA than 1v1 because most of the 1v1 maps are extremely small and clustered imo.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15684 Posts
February 28 2010 18:55 GMT
#6
The game is still changing every week for fucks sake. Stop worrying so much. And maybe also realize that its possible SC2 won't be a direct clone of SC1, and understand that maybe that isn't a bad thing.
aycheff
Profile Joined February 2010
United States329 Posts
February 28 2010 18:57 GMT
#7
Something I think will die out in SC2 already (already noticeable imo). Playing and view streams/replays/youtubes I'm noticing as well less larger armies and people trying to contain and expanding. Games been out a week... things aren't going to stay the same.....
hf // yeahyeahyeahhh // Y.S-Y
Husky
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3362 Posts
February 28 2010 18:57 GMT
#8
Yeah, sc2 hasn't been out very long at all. Imagine the kinds of strategies people were using when SC1 was in beta, or even directly after release. I can almost guarantee you people were just massing up and going OMG SCOUTS SUCK HE BEAT ME WITH MASS GOLS!

While I think direct unit counters might be a bit high in this game, people just need time to figure out how to properly harass while not losing to a big unit blob themselves.

If the unit blob does stay then I for sure think something should be done, but really, most the maps available to play atm have a huge choke in the center with all routes leading to that one spot, so its no surprise people just move their entire army at once since its almost impossible to harass.
Commentaries: youtube.com/HuskyStarcraft
Rickilicious
Profile Joined July 2009
United States220 Posts
February 28 2010 19:04 GMT
#9
But that's not all to it. There is even one more major point, why SC2 seems inferior to SC1 strategy-wise etc. It's the weakened influence of the terrain, especially chokes and high ground vs low ground. I feel that this is a major drawback. I know they added some nice stuff like smoke and forest which reduces sight etc. But, in SC1 using high ground and chokes, you were able to hold your ground even with a way inferior army, even with the "wrong" unit composition (e.g. goons vs lings or whatever). This means that even if u had lost a big battle or if u chose the wrong counter etc., when using the terrain to your advantage you could still remain in the game and come back. Additionally, you could send smaller combat groups around and keep them alive etc.
In SC2, if you have the wrong unit combination or not enough units, choke and high ground (as long as the other can see with observer w/e) won't help you that much to hold, especially when the other has the right counter. Additionally, air is sooooo strong and strong units like collossus can simply step up the high ground and you are doomed.
Unfortunately, air units don't care about terrain. So, when air gets so strong it is used more often and terrain doesnt matter anymore. which is a pity, as it adds strategical and tactical depth.



Unfortunately, pretty much everything except that air units don't care about terrain is completely incorrect. Wait until you either play beta a lot, or get the game then throw these opinions out.
My assumption is that you're posting these based off of watching bad players mass roaches and wonder why they got killed by stalkers with blink or something. Everyone sucks at this game right now, some people just suck less.
Doug Righteous
Drazzzt
Profile Joined September 2002
Germany999 Posts
February 28 2010 19:07 GMT
#10
To be honest. You all are giving me hope^^
Be Nice, Be Fair, Be Mannered.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15684 Posts
February 28 2010 19:07 GMT
#11
On March 01 2010 03:57 HuskyTheHusky wrote:
Yeah, sc2 hasn't been out very long at all. Imagine the kinds of strategies people were using when SC1 was in beta, or even directly after release. I can almost guarantee you people were just massing up and going OMG SCOUTS SUCK HE BEAT ME WITH MASS GOLS!

While I think direct unit counters might be a bit high in this game, people just need time to figure out how to properly harass while not losing to a big unit blob themselves.

If the unit blob does stay then I for sure think something should be done, but really, most the maps available to play atm have a huge choke in the center with all routes leading to that one spot, so its no surprise people just move their entire army at once since its almost impossible to harass.


Good points. But I think the main thing is that people are just being way too presumptuous. Look at how the game is played now compared to a week ago. Are we still seeing Zerg mass Roaches every single game? Is every single Protoss just 2 gating? Obviously not. As people are gaining more and more of an understanding of the game, people are branching out more. There is only so much you can do with so little of an understanding of the game. And though it may feel like its been longer, it has only been like 10 days or something like that.

To me, making judgments about the game at this point is not only extremely naive, but perhaps even arrogant. Its not bad to recognize that things aren't as you'd like at the moment, but to bring up ideas of how to change the game is just silly. Give the game at least a month...
Klockan3
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
Sweden2866 Posts
February 28 2010 19:12 GMT
#12
On March 01 2010 04:04 Rickilicious wrote:
Everyone sucks at this game right now, some people just suck less.

Just thought of something funny, I would bet that anyone from this forum will be better at the game in one years time than everyone in the beta right now. Kinda puts things into perspective.
lololol
Profile Joined February 2006
5198 Posts
February 28 2010 19:20 GMT
#13
To me it seems like the attack speeds(and subsequentually dps) in general are too fast compared to move/build speeds, so battles end very fast, there's no time for reinforcements to arrive and delaying the enemy until you produce more units isn't really possible, e.t.c.
I'll call Nada.
Smoov
Profile Joined May 2007
United States37 Posts
February 28 2010 19:46 GMT
#14
^^^^ going point....
DragonDefonce
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States790 Posts
February 28 2010 19:49 GMT
#15
No offense but I would suggest you at least play a couple games before you decide that there is less strategy. IMHO, SC2 focuses a lot more on economy, macro, army composition, and overarching strategy than micro. Its for you to decide if thats for the better but you really can't tell until you try it out for yourself.
OverShield
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada41 Posts
February 28 2010 19:51 GMT
#16
On March 01 2010 03:36 Drazzzt wrote:
I was thinking quite a lot about what I liked about SC:BW and what I didn't like about WC3. I came to the conclusion that Smorrie was kinda right. WC3 is more about waiting to get the right army composition and then the big armies collide and if one annihilates another, the game is pretty much decided (apart from the immense power of the heros and the fateful increasing "army" cost at higher supplies).


Stopped reading here. No. Just.... no. No.

No.

The entire WC3 metagame revolves around harassing your opponent and because creeping is so imperative to the outcome of the game you are constantly in contact with the other player's army. Games are typically very back-and-forth.

I know you all hate WC3 but please stop making shit up.
wintergt
Profile Joined February 2010
Belgium1335 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-28 19:52:48
February 28 2010 19:51 GMT
#17
On March 01 2010 04:20 lololol wrote:
To me it seems like the attack speeds(and subsequentually dps) in general are too fast compared to move/build speeds, so battles end very fast, there's no time for reinforcements to arrive and delaying the enemy until you produce more units isn't really possible, e.t.c.

Yes stuff dies fast but isn't that always the case in starcraft, it's in wc3 that it often takes forever to kill anything even low tier units.

Btw I love wc3 and agree with above post, wc3 is not about "let's make a big army and meet in middle to fight ok?" generally, maybe noob games but not at a higher level.
here i am
Squeegy
Profile Joined October 2009
Finland1166 Posts
February 28 2010 19:59 GMT
#18
On March 01 2010 04:51 OverShield wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 01 2010 03:36 Drazzzt wrote:
I was thinking quite a lot about what I liked about SC:BW and what I didn't like about WC3. I came to the conclusion that Smorrie was kinda right. WC3 is more about waiting to get the right army composition and then the big armies collide and if one annihilates another, the game is pretty much decided (apart from the immense power of the heros and the fateful increasing "army" cost at higher supplies).


Stopped reading here. No. Just.... no. No.

No.

The entire WC3 metagame revolves around harassing your opponent and because creeping is so imperative to the outcome of the game you are constantly in contact with the other player's army. Games are typically very back-and-forth.

I know you all hate WC3 but please stop making shit up.


Of course what he made was an over-simplification, but actually yes, that is pretty much how Warcraft 3 is.
Stan: Dude, dolphins are intelligent and friendly. Cartman: Intelligent and friendly on rye bread with some mayonnaise.
Drazzzt
Profile Joined September 2002
Germany999 Posts
February 28 2010 20:02 GMT
#19
On March 01 2010 04:49 DragonDefonce wrote:
No offense but I would suggest you at least play a couple games before you decide that there is less strategy. IMHO, SC2 focuses a lot more on economy, macro, army composition, and overarching strategy than micro. Its for you to decide if thats for the better but you really can't tell until you try it out for yourself.

Believe me. I would LOVE to. But unfortunately. I dont have a key . What can I do? >200€ is too much for my taste.
Be Nice, Be Fair, Be Mannered.
OverShield
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada41 Posts
February 28 2010 20:13 GMT
#20
On March 01 2010 04:59 Squeegy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 01 2010 04:51 OverShield wrote:
On March 01 2010 03:36 Drazzzt wrote:
I was thinking quite a lot about what I liked about SC:BW and what I didn't like about WC3. I came to the conclusion that Smorrie was kinda right. WC3 is more about waiting to get the right army composition and then the big armies collide and if one annihilates another, the game is pretty much decided (apart from the immense power of the heros and the fateful increasing "army" cost at higher supplies).


Stopped reading here. No. Just.... no. No.

No.

The entire WC3 metagame revolves around harassing your opponent and because creeping is so imperative to the outcome of the game you are constantly in contact with the other player's army. Games are typically very back-and-forth.

I know you all hate WC3 but please stop making shit up.


Of course what he made was an over-simplification, but actually yes, that is pretty much how Warcraft 3 is.


Actually no, that's not at all how it is. Because there are so many micro opportunities in the game that is very rarely the case. Players will usually clash several times before there is a decisive battle. The fact that there is less macro/bases/defensive positioning obviously means that a decisive battle will be just that: decisive. In SC it took a lot more to break through a line of tanks, yes, but that doesn't mean that WC3 is some mindless clash that is an instant win or lose. In fact, the inclusion of town portal (being able to teleport back to base) allows you to salvage your army and live to fight another day. I'm by no means a great player but even in most of my matches I'll have to pick away at my opponent before I overtake them, unless I'm doing an all in tower push or something. Even with towerpushes though I've witnessed many pros play an extended 10-15 with several towers inside their base. And even if you lose much of your army, excellent hero usage can give you the opportunity to still win the game.
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 2
Reynor vs MaruLIVE!
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
EWC_Arena11153
ComeBackTV 2506
TaKeTV 593
Hui .551
3DClanTV 379
EnkiAlexander 238
Rex235
CranKy Ducklings169
mcanning160
Reynor138
UpATreeSC121
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena11153
Hui .551
Rex 235
mcanning 160
Reynor 138
UpATreeSC 121
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 4021
Barracks 1987
Flash 1822
BeSt 1529
Jaedong 1472
EffOrt 1051
Mini 562
Stork 504
ggaemo 401
Snow 333
[ Show more ]
Soma 269
ZerO 263
Soulkey 254
GuemChi 250
ToSsGirL 193
Rush 121
Hyun 113
soO 54
TY 52
Sea.KH 46
Sacsri 37
scan(afreeca) 25
Terrorterran 14
Movie 12
Bale 10
ivOry 8
Britney 0
Dewaltoss 0
Dota 2
syndereN332
420jenkins290
XcaliburYe273
Counter-Strike
sgares534
flusha71
edward68
Super Smash Bros
Westballz34
Other Games
singsing2077
hiko1292
B2W.Neo981
crisheroes423
Fuzer 172
ArmadaUGS77
QueenE53
KnowMe48
ZerO(Twitch)15
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 3
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH273
• Adnapsc2 1
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1297
• WagamamaTV523
League of Legends
• Nemesis3883
• TFBlade707
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
19h 32m
TBD vs Zoun
TBD vs SHIN
TBD vs ShoWTimE
TBD vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 20h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.