• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:16
CEST 10:16
KST 17:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash8[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy13ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research6Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
Pros React To: SoulKey vs Ample BW General Discussion Build Order Practice Maps [ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group E [ASL21] Ro24 Group F 🌍 Weekly Foreign Showmatches [ASL21] Ro24 Group B
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9599 users

SC2 Optimal worker saturation

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 Next All
SubtleArt
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
2710 Posts
February 24 2010 14:30 GMT
#1
How does the worker saturation / diminishing returns system work in starcraft 2? In BW it was basically just more workers > faster mining although the rate of increase gradually went down.

How does it compare to Starcraft 2? I heard with better AI its a lot more complicated, and in some instances having more workers might lower income? I don't know much about this so I'll let the more knowledgeable post their opinions
Morrow on ZvP: "I'm not very confident in general vs Protoss because of the imbalance (Yes its imbalanced, get over it)."
magz4
Profile Joined December 2009
United States9 Posts
February 24 2010 15:31 GMT
#2
2 per field at the minimum for proper saturation. Any more than 3 per field is effectively useless for anything besides maynarding.
Volshok
Profile Joined August 2008
United States349 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-30 22:23:44
February 24 2010 16:08 GMT
#3
Previous info was incorrect, as per Orb's post:


6:
Zerg: ~248
Protoss: ~248

10:
Zerg: ~419
Protoss: ~419

14:
Zerg: ~590
Protoss: ~590

18:
Zerg: ~705
Protoss: ~705

22:
Zerg: ~762
Protoss: ~762

Here is the replay of the test game proving this:
http://www.mediafire.com/?uyqjjdymmhy

edit: also here's the ratios of going from step to stop going up 4 workers:
6>10
worker ratio: 1.6667
Mining ratio: 1.6895

10>14
worker ratio: 1.4
mining ratio: 1.4081

14>18
worker ratio: 1.2857
mining ratio: 1.1949

18>22
worker ratio: 1.2222
mining ratio: 1.0809

as you can see you're getting basically 1:1 bang for your buck up to 14 workers, but after that your payoff per worker added drops and it gets less and less efficient to add workers.


Along with Zeke's info

Also, note that each worker has a walking speed of 2.8125. Every single one. There are also NO known differences in mining speed.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=123657
tabako
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35 Posts
February 24 2010 16:48 GMT
#4
Why would it vary by race? I must be missing something pretty basic here...
Zavior
Profile Joined August 2009
Finland753 Posts
February 24 2010 16:57 GMT
#5
On February 25 2010 01:48 tabako wrote:
Why would it vary by race? I must be missing something pretty basic here...


My guess would be that it varies by race because... the workers are different! At least zerg workers move a bit faster on the creep if I'm not completely mistaken
Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-24 17:02:39
February 24 2010 16:59 GMT
#6
On February 25 2010 01:08 Volshok wrote:
I don't have Terran.

Show nested quote +
Toss:
12Probes: 457-533
16Probes: 629-686
20Probes: 725-781
22Probes: 743-819
+24Probes: 762-838+
26Probes: 762-838
30Probes: 781-857
34Probes: 781-857

24-26 Probes is full saturation on 8 minerals


Show nested quote +
Zerg
16 drones 925
17 drones 945
18 drones 990 -- 995
19 drones 1040 -- -1050
22 drones 1080
32 drones 1060

19-20 Drones is full saturation on 8 minerals



Both of these numbers were taken from posters on this board, but I didn't grab the names. Sorry to the OPs, I copy-pasted these for friends on another forum.


ill add another perspective that supports the statement above about Zerg:

According to the income tool in the replay on a 8 mineral field 8 drones gather around 300-350 minerals. 16 drones will gathers around 2x 300-350 =600-700. The soft cap of mining per base is close to 8x3 drones, after this each drone mine 50% less until you reach 8x4 which is the hard cap where additional worker won't make more resources.

Once you have reached 8x2 drones each new drone you produce after that will gather roughly half the minerals of a drone, if you make 4 additional drones after the 8x2 you will in reality only get minerals from 2 drones. If you make 8 additional drones after the 8x2 you will only be getting minerals from 4 drones. any more drones after 2x8 plus 8 is a waste of resources and supplies.
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
SubtleArt
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
2710 Posts
February 24 2010 17:11 GMT
#7
On February 25 2010 01:08 Volshok wrote:
I don't have Terran.

Show nested quote +
Toss:
12Probes: 457-533
16Probes: 629-686
20Probes: 725-781
22Probes: 743-819
+24Probes: 762-838+
26Probes: 762-838
30Probes: 781-857
34Probes: 781-857

24-26 Probes is full saturation on 8 minerals


Show nested quote +
Zerg
16 drones 925
17 drones 945
18 drones 990 -- 995
19 drones 1040 -- -1050
22 drones 1080
32 drones 1060

19-20 Drones is full saturation on 8 minerals



Both of these numbers were taken from posters on this board, but I didn't grab the names. Sorry to the OPs, I copy-pasted these for friends on another forum.


Holy shit why is it THAT much different for Zergs? Was this intentional :O?
Morrow on ZvP: "I'm not very confident in general vs Protoss because of the imbalance (Yes its imbalanced, get over it)."
Drunken.Jedi
Profile Joined June 2009
Germany446 Posts
February 24 2010 17:29 GMT
#8
On February 25 2010 01:57 Zavior wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 25 2010 01:48 tabako wrote:
Why would it vary by race? I must be missing something pretty basic here...


My guess would be that it varies by race because... the workers are different! At least zerg workers move a bit faster on the creep if I'm not completely mistaken

I'm pretty sure that drones do not move faster on creep. At least it used to be like that when the movement speed bonus for zerg units was first implemented. Also, from watching streams and vods, drones do not seem to be any faster on creep.
Apart from that, movement speed has nothing whatever to do with the amount of minerals you get from full saturation. All that increased movementspeed would do is to decrease the number of workers required for full saturation.


My best guess as to why the numbers for zerg and terran are so different is that one of the two players (or both) that tested this somehow made a mistake or that they used different methods of measuring income.
Zelniq
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States7166 Posts
February 24 2010 17:31 GMT
#9
the only zerg ground unit that does not move faster on creep is the drone.

i think the numbers are mistaken
ModeratorBlame yourself or God
MannerMan
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
371 Posts
February 24 2010 17:37 GMT
#10
Or maybe it's because it is harder for zerg to get workers because they have to focus on building other stuff so to keep it balanced their workers harvest better?

I don't know just speculating.
Queequeg
Profile Joined September 2003
Germany263 Posts
March 16 2010 17:30 GMT
#11
I just tested it for Terran, just mining minerals on 8 patches, no MULEs.

16 SCVs: 610-667, avg 639, ~39.9 per SCV
20 SCVs: 705-800, avg 753, ~37.6 per SCV, 4 more SCVs yield 29 each
24 SCVs: 781-876, avg 829, ~34.5 per SCV, 4 more SCVs yield 19 each
28 SCVs: 781-876 ==> 24 = saturated

So if you have 20 SCVs mining, and you add another SCV, it will only be half as effective.
daywiss
Profile Joined March 2010
United States83 Posts
March 16 2010 17:42 GMT
#12
those numbers for zerg are wrong, it looks more like stats for 2 bases not one. from my own testing zerg 1 base looks closer to the toss numbers, i was barely able to break 800 rpm.
sorech02
Profile Joined January 2009
United States15 Posts
March 16 2010 17:54 GMT
#13
On February 25 2010 01:08 Volshok wrote:
I don't have Terran.

Show nested quote +
Toss:
12Probes: 457-533
16Probes: 629-686
20Probes: 725-781
22Probes: 743-819
+24Probes: 762-838+
26Probes: 762-838
30Probes: 781-857
34Probes: 781-857

24-26 Probes is full saturation on 8 minerals


Show nested quote +
Zerg
16 drones 925
17 drones 945
18 drones 990 -- 995
19 drones 1040 -- -1050
22 drones 1080
32 drones 1060

19-20 Drones is full saturation on 8 minerals



Both of these numbers were taken from posters on this board, but I didn't grab the names. Sorry to the OPs, I copy-pasted these for friends on another forum.


I'm guessing that since he pasted this together from two sources, they each had a different time limit, as well as other potential factors I'm not thinking of. The two sets can't be directly compared in this case.
HolydaKing
Profile Joined February 2010
21254 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-16 18:01:16
March 16 2010 18:00 GMT
#14
On March 17 2010 02:54 sorech02 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 25 2010 01:08 Volshok wrote:
I don't have Terran.

Toss:
12Probes: 457-533
16Probes: 629-686
20Probes: 725-781
22Probes: 743-819
+24Probes: 762-838+
26Probes: 762-838
30Probes: 781-857
34Probes: 781-857

24-26 Probes is full saturation on 8 minerals


Zerg
16 drones 925
17 drones 945
18 drones 990 -- 995
19 drones 1040 -- -1050
22 drones 1080
32 drones 1060

19-20 Drones is full saturation on 8 minerals



Both of these numbers were taken from posters on this board, but I didn't grab the names. Sorry to the OPs, I copy-pasted these for friends on another forum.


I'm guessing that since he pasted this together from two sources, they each had a different time limit, as well as other potential factors I'm not thinking of. The two sets can't be directly compared in this case.

obviously you are right. it's 2 different time limits, but that doesn't matter as both show when you reach the saturation.
da_head
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada3350 Posts
March 16 2010 18:04 GMT
#15
lol drones don't move faster on creep...have u guys even played sc1?
zerg's always required fewer workers because they don't need to maynard workers unlike the other races
When they see MC Probe, all the ladies disrobe.
Chairman Ray
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States11903 Posts
March 16 2010 18:08 GMT
#16
So we can conclude that P and T have the same mining rate, which isn't surprising. In sc2, Zerg actually does have a faster movement speed on creep, that's why Z mines faster. When you have 2 probes or SCVs mining a single patch, there is about half a second in between where the mineral patch is vacant. Zerg's faster movement compensates for it so they are efficient at 16.
Tristan
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Canada566 Posts
March 16 2010 18:22 GMT
#17
due to diminishing returns and because I'm a Zerg I'd rather just nom more delicious map with a hatchery when I have 16 drones.
http://Zangano431.tumblr.com/
-orb-
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States5770 Posts
March 16 2010 19:26 GMT
#18
Holy shit only 19-20 drones mine 30% more than 24-26 probes?

WTF?
'life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery'
how sad that sc2 has no shield battery :(
TheBB
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Switzerland5133 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-16 19:37:37
March 16 2010 19:37 GMT
#19
I guess one of them was timed in-game for one minute, while the other was timed with the game clock in a replay.

On March 17 2010 03:04 da_head wrote:
lol drones don't move faster on creep...have u guys even played sc1?
zerg's always required fewer workers because they don't need to maynard workers unlike the other races

The reference to SC1 is hardly relevant, and I'm pretty sure the reason why Zerg require fewer workers is wrong. This results from using the hatchery to make both drones and army units. First off, to increase production capacity, you need to build hatcheries, which you might as well do at expansions, and if you expand more, you need fewer workers. Secondly, you will have fewer workers because you need the larvae for other units.
http://aligulac.com || Barcraft Switzerland! || Zerg best race. || Stats-poster extraordinaire.
PizzaHash
Profile Joined February 2010
Netherlands76 Posts
March 16 2010 19:38 GMT
#20
yup - sounds fair - zerg loses probe for every building
Though terran should be buffed with minerals maybe - their worker is not mining when building, but will be back when building finishes, so they lose mining time while protoss doesnt.
1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 45m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech95
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 1714
Bisu 265
Tasteless 253
actioN 169
Dewaltoss 137
Soma 103
910 60
sSak 50
Shinee 47
Shine 43
[ Show more ]
ToSsGirL 40
Sharp 26
Hm[arnc] 16
Noble 15
Sacsri 12
soO 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
Terrorterran 10
Dota 2
XaKoH 411
XcaliburYe354
canceldota74
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K841
shoxiejesuss499
olofmeister366
byalli227
Other Games
ceh9541
Liquid`RaSZi471
PiGStarcraft166
Sick137
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick483
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos595
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
45m
Afreeca Starleague
1h 45m
BeSt vs Leta
Queen vs Jaedong
Kung Fu Cup
2h 45m
Replay Cast
15h 45m
The PondCast
1d 1h
OSC
1d 15h
RSL Revival
2 days
TriGGeR vs Cure
ByuN vs Rogue
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
BSL
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W1
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.