|
On February 03 2010 02:24 Golden Ghost wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On February 03 2010 00:12 Manit0u wrote:When thinking about Protoss carrier I'm thinking along the lines of: ![[image loading]](http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs43/f/2009/115/1/0/StarCraft___Carrier_Fleet_by_joshzerofactor.jpg) Wow. That first one is exactly how I would imagig the Protoss Carriers. The second picture gives me more a swarm feeling.
Good call. The Nephilim from Wing Commander: Prophecy were definitely swarm-like
|
I just have a problem with the size of it. It doesn't really scream "capital ship" to me, and at first I mistook it for some fighter jet or something similar. It doesn't look like it could "carry" anything, while in SC1 if you saw a carrier, you KNEW it was something to be feared and respected.
|
|
|
Are carriers like completely useless in sc2
|
On February 03 2010 00:12 Manit0u wrote:
This is clearly the Dark Templar equivalent of the Carrier and instead of Interceptors, it fires off Corsairs. They only target air but on every run, they cast Dweb on the ground units as well. Imbaaaaaa.
|
On February 25 2010 09:08 synapse wrote:
Are carriers like completely useless in sc2
I wouldn't go carrier against a Terran. Vikings are cheap air units that can be double produced at the starport and they do bonus damage to armored targets. Basically Terran viking will snipe Carriers. It might be something else though.
|
whenever i see the banshee im always reminded of the orca's from C&C
|
On February 25 2010 09:08 synapse wrote:
Are carriers like completely useless in sc2
It`s too early to say, but I don`t think they will be use frequently in PvP. Thanks to the Stalker Blink, Carriers have to be more careful in choosing which ridges to abuse. If they have nearby land where Stalkers can blink over, the Carriers will not be able to get away. Overall, it seems like Carrier usage will become even more map dependant.
|
![[image loading]](http://www.ressim.net/upload/10051f13.jpg)
I do not wanna play this sucks model...why blizz why... bad job.
|
NO don't you see the current model suits the Carrier. They suck.
To be honest buff Carriers and make them the fat model.
|
On February 25 2010 09:31 Tdelamay wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2010 09:08 synapse wrote:
Are carriers like completely useless in sc2 I wouldn't go carrier against a Terran. Vikings are cheap air units that can be double produced at the starport and they do bonus damage to armored targets. Basically Terran viking will snipe Carriers. It might be something else though.
And i think now turrect 5 shots interceptor who isnt that much with the fire rate of a turrect
|
Russian Federation1613 Posts
I dont want to make carriers just because of its model. I played only 1 or 2 carrier game since beta started...
|
GnaReffotsirk model is what happens when protoss start breeding with Americans.
|
Will this be in the promod?
|
|
|
On February 03 2010 00:12 Manit0u wrote:Both are too similar (apart from the difference in size) to be any good... When thinking about Protoss carrier I'm thinking along the lines of:
wow.. that looks Protossy. Shiny and golden.. Puts current to shame.
I seriously hope models are moddable as the textures..
|
I think the Gna's model is much sexier then Blizzards model.
But, i still think it's way off. It should look more round and bulky with two tentacle looking things under it.
The new carrier is way too detailed (i love details but this is just...), a bulkier, less edgy one would be much better. Also, the interceptors is so wierd - they are hard to spot in-game.
On April 19 2010 23:23 iounas wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2010 00:12 Manit0u wrote:Both are too similar (apart from the difference in size) to be any good... When thinking about Protoss carrier I'm thinking along the lines of: wow.. that looks Protossy. Shiny and golden.. Puts current to shame. I seriously hope models are moddable as the textures..
Hahaha, Protoss players loves shiny things 
|
Blizzard's model doesn't look like a "carrier". More like some kind of fast moving assault cruiser class
the other one looks like it carries stuff though, looks good yo
|
On April 19 2010 23:39 ToT)OjKa( wrote:
Blizzard's model doesn't look like a "carrier". More like some kind of fast moving assault cruiser class
the other one looks like it carries stuff though, looks good yo
Thats what Im thinking.. It looks like something thats meant to go fast..
|
GnaReffotsirk's is better. Could really tell it's a carrier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://www.wcnews.com/newershots/full/wallpaper_render_alien_carrier.jpg)
