Yes, the new 2.0 model looks great. I don't believe the overall size of the carrier needs to be increased, but the design of the new carrier is better than the design of Blizzard's current carrier.

DreaM)XeRO

Korea (South)4667 Posts

February 01 2010 22:56 GMT

#143

still looks too "shiny" imo

Black Gun

Germany4482 Posts

February 01 2010 23:08 GMT

#144

On February 01 2010 02:39 Alethios wrote:
I'd like to see something closer to the original model, but I don't think GnaReffotsirk's model is the one to do it.

qft. i dont particularly like both of them. carriers have to look like zeppelins!

leomon

Canada169 Posts

February 02 2010 02:02 GMT

#145

GnaReffotsirk's model is so dam sexy <3

da_head

Canada3350 Posts

February 02 2010 03:37 GMT

#146

the second one looks even better

McCrank

204 Posts

February 02 2010 04:58 GMT

#147

On February 01 2010 02:45 Kazius wrote:
Is it just me or is that a cartoon villain with a mustache and a big nose on the back of the carrier?

Tell that to blizzard and they might change the model to something else. If that shit goes live I'll be thinking of the cartoon villain all the time.

Cu(oCo)

Italy358 Posts

February 02 2010 05:38 GMT

#148

+ Show Spoiler [OT] +

am i the only one who thought about judge dredd seeing this?

in topic: first one is better indeed

Poly325

United States99 Posts

February 02 2010 11:30 GMT

#149

it's not just which model looks better. it's also about which model blends in with other in-game models better, blends in with the landscape, looks better with little interceptors coming out of it, has a size that is proportional to its power, and has a design that looks about right considering its size.

having a model that looks good doesn't mean anything. we can all agree that some models from movies look cool, but that doesn't mean that we should just copy/paste those models to SC2 either. same logic same concept.

Kim_Hyun_Han

706 Posts

February 02 2010 11:46 GMT

#150

i like the good old led zeppelin model

PiLLs( SLiP)

United States9 Posts

February 02 2010 15:04 GMT

#151

If we use this new model Im not sure if many peoples computers will support 20 of those things with interceptors, its almost as big as the Mothership and they limit you too 1 at a time

Manit0u

Poland17845 Posts

February 02 2010 15:12 GMT

#152

Both are too similar (apart from the difference in size) to be any good...
When thinking about Protoss carrier I'm thinking along the lines of:
[image loading]

Ozarugold

2716 Posts

February 02 2010 15:24 GMT

#153

I cannot unsee the mustached cartoon villain! ARGH~

Archerofaiur

United States4101 Posts

February 02 2010 16:20 GMT

#154

Too everyone referencing that artwork. Think about what it would look like as an ingame model. IIRC their was a part in the Blizzcon art panel about making the models clear and simple for easy recognition.

yeti

United States259 Posts

February 02 2010 17:19 GMT

#155

can't they just go back to the old sprite models?
3D models are cool and all, but honestly, how can your replace the nostalgic 8 faced sprites?

Golden Ghost

Netherlands1041 Posts

February 02 2010 17:24 GMT

#156

+ Show Spoiler +

On February 03 2010 00:12 Manit0u wrote:
When thinking about Protoss carrier I'm thinking along the lines of:
[image loading]

Wow. That first one is exactly how I would imagig the Protoss Carriers. The second picture gives me more a swarm feeling.

danieldrsa

Brazil523 Posts

February 02 2010 20:04 GMT

#157

I like the concept art too, but thats the same carrier we have today

Its a bit different from the concept because the 3d model team (dont know the real name) has some freedom when translating the concept to the game engine.

The 3d model team has space to judge if the concept really goes well to 3d or not
Many units arent "exactly" the same as their original concepts, thats common.

I hope they improve the model to look more like GnaReffotsirk's 2.0 or more like the Concept

LF9

United States537 Posts

February 02 2010 20:19 GMT

#158

On February 01 2010 02:39 Alethios wrote:
I'd like to see something closer to the original model, but I don't think GnaReffotsirk's model is the one to do it.

agreed. too bulky and intricate. A lot of people get carried away when designing something.

tancor

Barbados55 Posts

February 24 2010 22:29 GMT

#159

beta and carrier.