• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 20:23
CET 02:23
KST 10:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT28Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Team Liquid Map Contest - Preparation Notice0Weekly Cups (Feb 23-Mar 1): herO doubles, 2v2 bonanza1Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles0Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0258
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest - Preparation Notice Weekly Cups (Feb 23-Mar 1): herO doubles, 2v2 bonanza Terran AddOns placement How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SEL Doubles (SC Evo Bimonthly) WardiTV Team League Season 10
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 515 Together Forever Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare
Brood War
General
It's March 3rd CasterMuse Youtube Recent recommended BW games Soma Explains: JD's Unrelenting Aggro vs FlaSh TvZ is the most complete match up
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues BWCL Season 64 Announcement The Casual Games of the Week Thread [LIVE] [S:21] ASL Season Open Day 1
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Online Quake Live Config Editor Tool Diablo 2 thread
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Just Watchers: Why Some Only…
TrAiDoS
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2028 users

Beta Balance Update #10 - Page 42

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
1835 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 40 41 42 43 44 92 Next
CYFAWS
Profile Joined October 2012
Sweden275 Posts
December 19 2012 09:18 GMT
#821
Can all you whiny turds please realize that these patches ARE NOT:
blizzards next tiny step towards the perfect sc2

but they ARE:
pushing selected units over some edge, so you can get data to see where they finally need to be

Blizzard learned their lesson from WOL beta and onwards where they were trying to put units in the right place balance wise, and by doing that, changed their designed roles, and created imbalancable overlaps.

with that said. Fuck this fungal shit. Fuck zerg in general. I don't want fungal to get balanced, i hate the spell on such a massable unit. Ofc all units are massable for Z, that's why they can't have nice things. Really, it's a huge mistake to give Z a massable caster. The viper is great, it's a flying inverted defiler, close enough. Getting tens of them are completely useless against all serious composistions. The other massable(as in easily obtainable infrastructure) casters, ghosts and HT, has needed to be nerfed into the ground as having their previously extremely strong spells en masse is just too strong. The same unnerfed spells on units that you cannot get a thousand off, no problem.

Z can mass any unit; thus they can not have "combat casters". The infestor belongs nerfed into the ground along with it's pals, ghost and HT.
dae
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada1600 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-19 09:21:09
December 19 2012 09:19 GMT
#822
What blizzard should do, is for one patch, just remove fungal entirely and replace it with some kind of support spell, like an aoe stim, or an aoe that caused your units attacks to slow the target. Something to make infesters a support caster, rather then a unit that kills entire armies.

This would primarily break up inferster broodlord synergy as well as provide a disincentive to mass infesters.
Pureaqua
Profile Joined April 2011
Germany5 Posts
December 19 2012 09:21 GMT
#823
Im sorry but this patch is ridiculous...there was a freaking reason that they nerved FG...what is Blizz thinking? Do they think the data they gathered was bogus and now buffed infestors will not cause the very same problems they did before? that makes no sense at all.
and by the way.....im i the onlyone who is astonished that they never buffed the movement speed of hightemps? why do ghosts and inf have 2.2x and temps 1.8 ? i think high temps are the bane of every fast armie movement for toss....its sort of the immobilizing treat the siegetank is for terrans. or im i just plain wrong?

Just because you don't understand me , I can still agree with you.
Crawdad
Profile Joined September 2012
614 Posts
December 19 2012 09:26 GMT
#824
Well hopefully, at least part of this change will be reverted in the next patch.

It's just distressing that Blizz is wasting time on the same units when we only have till March.
Boiler Bandsman
Profile Joined February 2012
United States391 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-19 09:34:28
December 19 2012 09:28 GMT
#825
Does Blizzard not realize that a huge portion of their potential buyers are watching this very closely, and almost unanimously hate the state of WoL right now? They are so damn worried about not making BW 2.0....might I suggest that they also get as far away from WoL 2.0 as possible? Blizzard needs to do better in this beta, end of story.

People are watching. If this beta fails, HotS fails.

Edit: Also, was any action taken against the mod who overstepped? Really, really shady thing to do.
A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head.
boxerfred
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Germany8360 Posts
December 19 2012 09:32 GMT
#826
Infestor
Fungal Growth
Range increased from 8 to 10.
Missile speed increased from 10 to 15.

Goodbye Blizzard, I'll go lol.
Atthasit
Profile Joined July 2011
Russian Federation81 Posts
December 19 2012 09:34 GMT
#827
On December 19 2012 18:28 Boiler Bandsman wrote:
Does Blizzard not realize that a huge portion of their potential buyers are watching this very closely, and almost unanimously hate the state of WoL right now? They are so damn worried about not making BW 2.0....might I suggest that they also get as far away from WoL 2.0 as possible? Blizzard needs to do better in this beta, end of story.

People are watching. If this beta fails, HotS fails.

Beta is not there to impress anyone. Beta is there to test different things and find the best possible balance between them. All the crying going on in this thread is stupid and won't affect HotS sales in any way. If you can't handle following the balancing process then I suggest you simply stick to WoL until march.
boxerfred
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Germany8360 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-19 09:39:43
December 19 2012 09:37 GMT
#828
On December 19 2012 18:34 Atthasit wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2012 18:28 Boiler Bandsman wrote:
Does Blizzard not realize that a huge portion of their potential buyers are watching this very closely, and almost unanimously hate the state of WoL right now? They are so damn worried about not making BW 2.0....might I suggest that they also get as far away from WoL 2.0 as possible? Blizzard needs to do better in this beta, end of story.

People are watching. If this beta fails, HotS fails.

Beta is not there to impress anyone. Beta is there to test different things and find the best possible balance between them. All the crying going on in this thread is stupid and won't affect HotS sales in any way. If you can't handle following the balancing process then I suggest you simply stick to WoL until march.


And where is the exact point of buffing Fungal again (Fungal range > marine sight range)? Please light my dumb (zerg playing) mind. I don't get the point of doing this in beta except sending a message: "Hello, this is blizzard. We made fungal dodgeable. So now, you won't see the infestors. Have fun, little marine."
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
December 19 2012 09:38 GMT
#829
Oh, wow. Fungal now outranges the marine sight range. WHACK, literally never knew what hit you.
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
Micro_Jackson
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany2002 Posts
December 19 2012 09:40 GMT
#830
On December 19 2012 18:28 Boiler Bandsman wrote:
Does Blizzard not realize that a huge portion of their potential buyers are watching this very closely, and almost unanimously hate the state of WoL right now? They are so damn worried about not making BW 2.0....might I suggest that they also get as far away from WoL 2.0 as possible? Blizzard needs to do better in this beta, end of story.

People are watching. If this beta fails, HotS fails.

Edit: Also, was any action taken against the mod who overstepped? Really, really shady thing to do.



Thats just wrong, sorry. 95% of the buyers don´t care at all about beta or balance because a lot of them never even think about the multiplayer.

And at the end its a Beta, yes we can discuss and complain about it but its better to do stupid things now then at release.
Parcelleus
Profile Joined January 2011
Australia1662 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-19 14:07:47
December 19 2012 09:42 GMT
#831
nvm I shall have faith and patience. xD
*burp*
Sumadin
Profile Joined August 2011
Denmark588 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-19 10:43:56
December 19 2012 09:42 GMT
#832
On December 19 2012 18:28 Boiler Bandsman wrote:
Does Blizzard not realize that a huge portion of their potential buyers are watching this very closely, and almost unanimously hate the state of WoL right now? They are so damn worried about not making BW 2.0....might I suggest that they also get as far away from WoL 2.0 as possible? Blizzard needs to do better in this beta, end of story.

People are watching. If this beta fails, HotS fails.

Edit: Also, was any action taken against the mod who overstepped? Really, really shady thing to do.


Actually i am fairly sure the number of potential buyers will stay almost unchanged. Never underesstemate the silent majority.

Besides they don't need to have a reason. Wow is going to make over 5 times the income they could expect from HOTS every year at the current numbers of subscripers. That is where they got their cashcow. SC2 and Diablo is really just a hobby. They don't got any financial reasons for caring about those games.
The basic key to beating a priest is playing a deck that is terrible.
Atthasit
Profile Joined July 2011
Russian Federation81 Posts
December 19 2012 09:44 GMT
#833
On December 19 2012 18:37 boxerfred wrote:
And where is the exact point of buffing Fungal again (Fungal range > marine sight range)? Please light my dumb (zerg playing) mind. I don't get the point of doing this in beta except sending a message: "Hello, this is blizzard. We made fungal dodgeable. So now, you won't see the infestors. Have fun, little marine."

You can't seriously suggest this is exactly what blizzard are trying to tell us, can you? Also you shouldn't ask ME or anyone else HERE what are they trying to achieve. They're obviously doing it for a reason, not just because someone in the balancing team decided overnight that he wants to screw with terrans for the sake of it. Personally I believe they're trying to get rid of muta domination in ZvZ matchup. Are they doing it wrong? Maybe. Is this final? I'm sure as hell it's not. But they have to test it. Once again, if you can't handle the process, just buy the game when it's out and THEN blame them for whatever reasons you can come up with. But not until then.
boxerfred
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Germany8360 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-19 09:48:57
December 19 2012 09:47 GMT
#834
They don't got any financial reasons for caring about those games.


But they should care. Blizz is having a kind of very good reputation on behalf of pushing e-sports to the next level.
To keep that reputation, David Kim should be replaced. I think that changing the type of fungal to a bullet (which really makes it dodgeable) is a great thing to re-establish broken ZvX matchups. Maybe also reduce the damage. But not increasing range. I am still not sure if Blizz wants to troll the community - I can't believe they are that stupid.

Edit:

Where do you see "Muta domination" on ZvZ? I see 6-8 Mutas harrassing for about 2-5 minutes, then mass roach/hydra/infestor battles. I'm even not seeing mass mutas vs protoss anymore, though it's hard to counter without a second stargate. So what are you saying?
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9433 Posts
December 19 2012 09:52 GMT
#835
On December 19 2012 18:34 Atthasit wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2012 18:28 Boiler Bandsman wrote:
Does Blizzard not realize that a huge portion of their potential buyers are watching this very closely, and almost unanimously hate the state of WoL right now? They are so damn worried about not making BW 2.0....might I suggest that they also get as far away from WoL 2.0 as possible? Blizzard needs to do better in this beta, end of story.

People are watching. If this beta fails, HotS fails.

Beta is not there to impress anyone. Beta is there to test different things and find the best possible balance between them. All the crying going on in this thread is stupid and won't affect HotS sales in any way. If you can't handle following the balancing process then I suggest you simply stick to WoL until march.


what balancing proces? Buffing the unit everybody hates is really not a very good proces.
On the other hand buffing mech tvp is what most people want, and yet they just made widow mines useless vs protoss.
I say I am getting closer and closer to cancelling my preorder.
Lukeeze[zR]
Profile Joined February 2006
Switzerland6838 Posts
December 19 2012 09:53 GMT
#836
On December 19 2012 18:40 USvBleakill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2012 18:28 Boiler Bandsman wrote:
Does Blizzard not realize that a huge portion of their potential buyers are watching this very closely, and almost unanimously hate the state of WoL right now? They are so damn worried about not making BW 2.0....might I suggest that they also get as far away from WoL 2.0 as possible? Blizzard needs to do better in this beta, end of story.

People are watching. If this beta fails, HotS fails.

Edit: Also, was any action taken against the mod who overstepped? Really, really shady thing to do.



Thats just wrong, sorry. 95% of the buyers don´t care at all about beta or balance because a lot of them never even think about the multiplayer.

And at the end its a Beta, yes we can discuss and complain about it but its better to do stupid things now then at release.


That might be the case for a new game, but hots is an extension and I reckon the majority of people who will buy it have a decent idea about the state of the game.
Terran & Potato Salad.
boxerfred
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Germany8360 Posts
December 19 2012 09:54 GMT
#837
Beta is not for "figureing out balance issues". You dont balance a game in 3 months or so. Beta is for finding bugs, for fixing small things. Not for "Huh, let's try stuff that completely switches the game" - but Blizz does (Warhound in, warhound out, massive nerfs, massive buffs...). I am probably going to cancel pre-order too, if Blizzard continues to ruin the game.
Atthasit
Profile Joined July 2011
Russian Federation81 Posts
December 19 2012 09:54 GMT
#838
On December 19 2012 18:47 boxerfred wrote:
Where do you see "Muta domination" on ZvZ? I see 6-8 Mutas harrassing for about 2-5 minutes, then mass roach/hydra/infestor battles. I'm even not seeing mass mutas vs protoss anymore, though it's hard to counter without a second stargate. So what are you saying?


Mutas against protoss is a joke. 5 reactive phoenixes kill infinite amount of mutas, what are you even talking about.

I didn't mean mass muta, I meant that players now are forced to open muta in ZvZ, because muta is the only thing that counters muta. Hydras don't work against mutas, range 8 slow projectile didn't either. People used to have a choice in ZvZ, now they don't. Blizz are giving us our choice back. Be grateful.
Boiler Bandsman
Profile Joined February 2012
United States391 Posts
December 19 2012 09:57 GMT
#839
On December 19 2012 18:34 Atthasit wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2012 18:28 Boiler Bandsman wrote:
Does Blizzard not realize that a huge portion of their potential buyers are watching this very closely, and almost unanimously hate the state of WoL right now? They are so damn worried about not making BW 2.0....might I suggest that they also get as far away from WoL 2.0 as possible? Blizzard needs to do better in this beta, end of story.

People are watching. If this beta fails, HotS fails.

Beta is not there to impress anyone. Beta is there to test different things and find the best possible balance between them. All the crying going on in this thread is stupid and won't affect HotS sales in any way. If you can't handle following the balancing process then I suggest you simply stick to WoL until march.


In what way does discussing and evaluating balance, design, and recent changes in a patch thread equate to "not handling the process"? Anything involving Infestor-centered Zerg is bad design, and it's what's ruining WoL right now. I can't exactly go back to a game that I currently hate, either. I had hopes for HotS, but if it ends up looking like WoL, I'll be pursuing my other games and leaving SC2 for good. I don't think I'm the only one.
A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head.
Umpteen
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United Kingdom1570 Posts
December 19 2012 10:01 GMT
#840
Without wishing to offend - why are so many of us throwing an epileptic Chicken Little based on changes that are:

1. Thus far untested
2. Tentative

Just like the previous N patches have been? What happened to learning? Basic pattern-recognition, even? Changes get made, ideas get tried, stuff that doesn't work gets dialed back or forward or axed entirely. How many times does that cycle need to repeat before we stop acting like Blizzard just pissed on the one tray of chips we're ever going to get to eat?

Is the fungal change actually bad? How many of those flipping tables in the thread have actually logged in, thrown fifty games at the issue, and established that two extra range and a faster projectile is bad for the game? Or is it just that any change that isn't a further nerf to fungal is auto-wrong?
The existence of a food chain is inescapable if we evolved unsupervised, and inexcusable otherwise.
Prev 1 40 41 42 43 44 92 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
LiuLi Cup Grand Finals Group C
CranKy Ducklings142
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 105
JuggernautJason79
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 10950
Sea 4249
GuemChi 917
Artosis 696
Shuttle 264
Dota 2
monkeys_forever283
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1724
taco 669
minikerr7
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe240
Other Games
summit1g12144
shahzam383
C9.Mang0288
JimRising 207
Maynarde147
ToD131
Sick83
Mew2King31
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1034
Counter-Strike
PGL93
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 420
• Berry_CruncH171
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift3132
Other Games
• imaqtpie1036
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
23h 37m
Replay Cast
1d 7h
Replay Cast
1d 22h
The PondCast
2 days
KCM Race Survival
2 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Ultimate Battle
3 days
Light vs ZerO
WardiTV Winter Champion…
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Monday Night Weeklies
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-02
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
WardiTV Winter 2026
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 21: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 21: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
CSLAN 4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.