|
On November 02 2012 03:42 [17]Purple wrote:
I don't get why people hate so much on rocks when they were placed on even more obnoxious positions in BW with the strangest models (Power Generator was fine but the Xel'Naga temple always looked weird)
Agreed, people seem to have forgotten about those or something. Rocks aren't new to starcraft ;O
not sure if i would prefer them to be rocks instead of temples/etc. tho, haven't thought about it. with sc2 graphics it could be cooler with neutral buildings (then they'd have no excuse to not have neutral depots for ramps :D)
|
@lorch
ouch
i never really played bw multiplayer
and never watch tournaments but thx for the answer, never noticed that!
but still if blizzard (and they do) cares so much about the asthetical aspects of the game they shouldn't just bash up lore-wise enemy buildings into ones base
|
On November 02 2012 03:34 Ahli wrote:I found wireframes for a handful of "unbuildable" doodads in the mpq.  Death to neutral supply depot on some terrain sets! edit: 2 of those are "rocks"... enjoy ^^
Wow they might have finally fixed the pylon/bunker block? God that would be so nice lol.
|
On November 02 2012 03:48 Yoshi Kirishima wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2012 03:42 [17]Purple wrote:
I don't get why people hate so much on rocks when they were placed on even more obnoxious positions in BW with the strangest models (Power Generator was fine but the Xel'Naga temple always looked weird) Agreed, people seem to have forgotten about those or something. Rocks aren't new to starcraft ;O not sure if i would prefer them to be rocks instead of temples/etc. tho, haven't thought about it. with sc2 graphics it could be cooler with neutral buildings (then they'd have no excuse to not have neutral depots for ramps :D)
I had actually totally forgotten that. :O
|
On November 02 2012 03:48 Yoshi Kirishima wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2012 03:42 [17]Purple wrote:
I don't get why people hate so much on rocks when they were placed on even more obnoxious positions in BW with the strangest models (Power Generator was fine but the Xel'Naga temple always looked weird) Agreed, people seem to have forgotten about those or something. Rocks aren't new to starcraft ;O not sure if i would prefer them to be rocks instead of temples/etc. tho, haven't thought about it. with sc2 graphics it could be cooler with neutral buildings (then they'd have no excuse to not have neutral depots for ramps :D)
Right... but not sure if people have forgotten that a majority of the placement of destructible objects in BW had some meaning to them. Along with things like minerals that could be mined out, hidden 3rd bases through invisible eggs, glitching units over destructible temples for DT rushes or backdoor cannon rushes. All of the sort had MEANINGFUL placements. Even if it was strictly for balancing racial issues on a certain map almost always was there a "point" to having it. The reason people really hate rocks is because in SC2 they're placed at ur 3rd base, or in the way of it, when ur getting ready to take it anyway. So you just kill them and then you're done with them. There isn't anything meaningful to them.
On the other hand, collapsable rocks seem to be providing more of what we're talking about with BW - something that changes how the game is actually played, and in a strategic way rather than "stupid" one.
That said, I'm pretty QQ that this patch still isn't up. T_T At least I got my subway and brownie to eat while I wait for the 4PM EST announcement... hope it's a good one.. ;~;
|
On November 02 2012 02:48 plants wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Exactly this. On November 02 2012 02:29 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2012 02:14 Cracy wrote:On November 02 2012 02:08 virpi wrote:On November 02 2012 02:05 baldgye wrote:
well its 10 in the US it seems and still no update or even a change of notice on the beta login screen :/ mine shows the following notice: ![[image loading]](http://www.abload.de/img/asdfaoqkw.png) Heh... Was just going to post it... We're $%^&ed. Maybe they will write something more useful in 2-3 hours then. This might be a preview of someone trying to get more useful information: Community Manager: What is wrong, we want to tell people what is going on? Programmer: I don’t know what is broken. If I knew, I would fix it. They will get to know when I know. Community Manager: Well everyone is trying to connect and we want to give them an ETA. Programmer: Yeah, they should stop doing that, it isn’t helping. Community Manager: Well people have been looking forward to these changes and they are kind of unhappy it isn’t working. Programmer: You told them it was a free beta right? The kind when they don’t pay for anything. Community Manager: Well yeah, but still, we need something. Programmer: Look, it’s a massive UI overhaul with an improved back end, updated in game physics, new data collection and profile system. I am happy it even installed. Tell them we are looking into it. Just a theory, but that is kind of what it is like when stuff breaks in my office.
They just delayed it to 1 pm PDT
|
r u srsly serious?
okay
i came to the pc today this mornin, after the original patch should have been done 3 hours ago.
and now it's 20 here and still nothing works.
and ofc they couldn't say that shit won't work untill next day.
anyway i was wasting my time and so are you now tbh
|
On November 02 2012 03:59 Denda Reloaded wrote:
r u srsly serious?
PSY-SRS *puts on glasses*
|
United Kingdom1381 Posts
Sadly, he is.
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/hfES0.jpg)
|
okay i go back to BW campaign bb gurls have fun.
i will come back to 2012 2moro
|
Haha, calm down, everyone. Do something else. Watch some porn. As for me, just logged in before starting work to say, I enjoyed your two recent posts on this, Plansix. They gave me a good chuckle at 8 in the am.
Be well, chaps.
|
Time to take a 1 hour shower then.
Wish me luck.
|
On November 02 2012 04:01 iHirO wrote:Sadly, he is.
......................
|
|
|
"Now tracks gameplay performance stats such as Average Float and Combat Efficiency..."
What the hell is average float? lol
|
On November 02 2012 04:12 Demonhunter04 wrote:
"Now tracks gameplay performance stats such as Average Float and Combat Efficiency..."
What the hell is average float? lol
Probably mineral/gas float?
|
On November 02 2012 04:12 Demonhunter04 wrote:
"Now tracks gameplay performance stats such as Average Float and Combat Efficiency..."
What the hell is average float? lol
Unspent resources, I assume.
|
On November 02 2012 04:14 KrazyTrumpet wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2012 04:12 Demonhunter04 wrote:
"Now tracks gameplay performance stats such as Average Float and Combat Efficiency..."
What the hell is average float? lol Unspent resources, I assume.
Nice, thanks.
I kept thinking of float variables and it made no sense.
|
select army units button wth??!?!
|
Sorry guys, forgot to plug it in!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
