EPTHOTS Closed Beta Begins - Page 51
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS |
Do not beg for keys, offer to trade things for keys, or offer to buy keys in this thread. | ||
|
M7Jagger
Sweden237 Posts
| ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
| ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
nah, it looks like bio was beating it back pretty hard, I can't see why you'd go warhound vs bio, its the same style but out of a more expensive building (factory vs rax) and in general just worse. | ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10167 Posts
On September 06 2012 03:30 HowardRoark wrote: Then Blizzard did last minute changes: "Official Blizzard description: The Warhound is a small, walking ground mech that wields an effective anti-air weapon with splash damage". I think we need a thread where the OP list the latest changes, it is hard to keep track on every change. Yes, for the motherfucking love of jesus-raptor. Everyone should check those and wait a bit before going "sky is falling" mode. | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
On September 06 2012 03:30 McFeser wrote: It'd be really nice if they buffed tank damage, and made them scary again, but I'm no expert on game balance. So the problem with Warhounds (Besides being ugly) is that they do to much damage? Warhound cost 150/75, 2 supply, have 225 life, 1 armor and do good damage against non mechanical and murder mechanical. Basicly they are juste a little bit too good in every sector. | ||
|
rebuffering
Canada2436 Posts
| ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
Warhound looks a bit OP. | ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10167 Posts
On September 06 2012 03:33 Medrea wrote: There we go. Looks like marauder reproduction is the only way. Warhound looks a bit OP. Marauder + tanks/medivacs rape warhound deathballs ezpz. Try to get to 9-range to micro your hayware missile against the tanks, i dare you :D | ||
|
Tsubbi
Germany7997 Posts
| ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
| ||
|
Conti
Germany2516 Posts
On September 06 2012 03:27 HowardRoark wrote: Uhm according to Liquipedia Warhounds does air splash, but watching the stream they don't seem to fire up? Does this mean the Thor is still in the game?  BTW, where is a thread that list the latest changes to HOTS?The Liquipedia articles on the units are currently outdated. Anyone who's got a beta account is free to updated them! Hinthint.  | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
| ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
| ||
|
enemy2010
Germany1972 Posts
| ||
|
Butterz
688 Posts
| ||
|
Treehead
999 Posts
On September 06 2012 03:31 Medrea wrote: Looks like warhounds still beat an almost maxed out bioball of exclusively marauders. They should if you look at their supply. I'm sure the Marauder comment was based on the fact that Warhounds cost 50/50 more resources than Warhounds, and the buildings that build them cost 100 more gas. And they take longer to build. A maxxed army of Carriers probably can beat a maxxed army of stalkers, too - but that doesn't mean stalkers aren't good against Carriers. It just means the stalkers need to attack within the first 20 minutes of the game. Not that I'm defending the Warhound - but just saying. | ||
|
DougJDempsey
747 Posts
On September 06 2012 03:03 Black Gun wrote: lol did forgg just drink a monster energy drink on stream while there is a huge poster of red bull, his team's sponsor, in the background? anyway, warhounds seem extremely powerful atm. but you also have to keep in mind that forgg is severly outclassing most opponents he faces right now. he could probably make nothing but marines and stomp them with the same ease. would people then also say "marines are op, he should rename to marineking".. oh snap! ^^^^^^ red bull sponsors millenium....? | ||
|
Bagi
Germany6799 Posts
On September 06 2012 03:30 McFeser wrote: It'd be really nice if they buffed tank damage, and made them scary again, but I'm no expert on game balance. So the problem with Warhounds (Besides being ugly) is that they do to much damage? Their damage isn't the worst part imo, its pretty poor against non-mechanical units like roaches. Pure roach beats hellion/warhound pretty handily when the warhounds cannot kite. The problem is that they are only 2 supply, have 220 health, 7 range, are about as fast as stalkers. You can easily pick off units like marines and zealots from a distance. | ||
|
Zdrastochye
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
On September 06 2012 03:34 Tsubbi wrote: even if its just beta its baffling how the war hound in its current form made it into the game, 1 supply roach is nothing compared to this That's not true. It's strong but not THAT strong. | ||
| ||
