EPTSC1 had soo much better unit sounds than SC2, i wish they would have changed them in beta :S
Which Zeratul voice is better, SC1's or SC2's - Page 2
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS |
|
KinosJourney2
Sweden1811 Posts
SC1 had soo much better unit sounds than SC2, i wish they would have changed them in beta :S | ||
|
[-]Ocelot[-]
United States256 Posts
 Oh well. And perhaps it is the script that didn't do him justice. Hopefully the next iterations of the game will find him more and more improved. | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4374 Posts
| ||
ArvickHero
10387 Posts
Also, BW's opening blows SC2's out of the water, completely. It's nowhere near as pretty as SC2's intro, but the atmosphere and music is just unmatched. And this is what I'm missing in SC2.. the gritty hardcore reality of various factions just fighting eah other for supremacy in the sector. Not some gay "save teh universe from teh ebil voice!!!" theme with smatterings of "DESTINY!!" and uniting against the evil -___- Ironically, everything in SC/BW seems more realistic than SC2.. | ||
|
Bacillus
Finland1998 Posts
On September 08 2010 15:59 Stratos_speAr wrote: I don't see how this can be up for discussion. His voice in SC2 makes him sound like a crazy old man, whereas in SC1 he sounds like a wise old badass. The script didn't help him at all either. This exactly. I really loved the old Zeratul, he was radiating wisdom, calculated responsibility and tormented experience. In SC2 he's more of a random ET with weird grammar and almost meaningless dialogue. I think the modern graphic era has made it a lot more difficult for voice acting too. In SC1 the talking portraits were more than sufficient. You had good detailed character portrait and dialogue and the viewers could build up the rest through their imagination. Nowadays everything is zoomable and 3D animated. Still, the animation and character details aren't on the level where they could fluently support good character development. At that point they only shut down your imagination and the characters end up being shallow. | ||
|
LoveSponge
Australia237 Posts
| ||
|
ArvickHero
10387 Posts
On September 08 2010 18:11 LoveSponge wrote: I dont know if it's the way it was written or not but he sounds ( not just voice wise )a little wimpy and annoying in sc2 ;\ The voice is not that bad, its the horrible script :\ | ||
|
Breach_hu
Hungary2431 Posts
| ||
|
DaRkFrosT
United States407 Posts
| ||
|
EquilasH
Denmark2142 Posts
| ||
|
MangoTango
United States3670 Posts
| ||
|
aseq
Netherlands3992 Posts
I kept listening for the specific FX they used, some inverted predelay with reverb or something. Even distracted me from the content for most of the time. The sc1 voice sounded awesome in my mind, but I can't recall it. Will listen to it again soon (i'm at work now). | ||
|
Mobius
Canada1268 Posts
-"friend raynor" -sounds like an old man pretty easy choice imo | ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
Tassadar voice, good thinkg we didnt have to listen for it too long | ||
|
Seam
United States1093 Posts
| ||
|
nibbles
United Kingdom179 Posts
in sc2, he's more like zera-tool | ||
|
Ndugu
United States1078 Posts
Nostalgia blinds you fools. | ||
|
LeCastor
France234 Posts
| ||
|
kasumimi
Greece460 Posts
| ||
|
infecteddna
Slovenia243 Posts
On September 08 2010 15:16 Nephrahim wrote: SC2 by far. SC1's voice was... alright, but it was too gravely I think. His SC2 voice is pretty perfect. He spent centuries harnessing the powers of the void in the utter darkness of space, and you think his voice was too gravely? I wonder about Kerrigan though. Replacing an actor for an established role always seems wrong. | ||
| ||
