1st Quarter SF 14:53 Knowshon Moreno Fumble Recovery In Own End Zone Drive info: 1 plays, -14 yds, 0:12 SEA 2 - 0 DEN FG 10:25 Steven Hauschka 31 Yard Field Goal is Good Drive info: 9 plays, 51 yds, 4:27 SEA 5 - 0 DEN FG 2:21 Steven Hauschka 33 Yard Field Goal is Good Drive info: 13 plays, 58 yds, 6:15 SEA 8 - 0 DEN
2nd Quarter TD 12:08 Marshawn Lynch 1 Yard Run (Steven Hauschka Kick is Good) Drive info: 7 plays, 37 yds, 3:59 SEA 15 - 0 DEN TD 3:36 Malcolm Smith 69 Yard Interception Return (Steven Hauschka Kick is Good) Drive info: 16 plays, 49 yds, 8:39 SEA 22 - 0 DEN
3rd Quarter TD 15:00 Percy Harvin 87 Yard Kickoff Return (Steven Hauschka Kick is Good) Drive info: 0 plays, 0 yds, 0:12 SEA 29 - 0 DEN TD 3:11 Jermaine Kearse 23 Yard Pass From Russell Wilson (Steven Hauschka Kick is Good) Drive info: 6 plays, 58 yds, 2:57 SEA 36 - 0 DEN TD 0:03 Demaryius Thomas 14 Yard Pass From Peyton Manning (Peyton Manning Pass to Wes Welker For Two-Point Conversion is Good) Drive info: 6 plays, 80 yds, 2:58 SEA 36 - 8 DEN
4th Quarter TD 11:55 Doug Baldwin 10 Yard Pass From Russell Wilson (Steven Hauschka Kick is Good) Drive info: 5 plays, 48 yds, 3:15 SEA 43 - 8 DEN
I'm happy with either team winning. I just hope for a good game.
If I had to bet, I'd bet on the Broncos. I just don't trust the Seattle offense at all. Whereas I think Peyton is legendarily good and will step up for this one.
I don't particularly care who wins this since I don't have any particular attachment to either team (and they are both deserving) so I just hope its a good game and not a stomp.
I'm really pulling for the Seahawks but I don't like their odds
PFM got his, its time for the younger generation to start taking charge. I think their only hope is controlling the game with Marshawn and playing time of posession - I don't think even the LOB can stop Welker/Decker/Thomas/Thomas but if they don't have the ball they can't score.
The seahawks go HARD and I think the Broncos are in for an unpleasent surprise, and will not be allowed to play their game. You cant throw vs the Hawks, and Manning is too slow and one dimensional.
On January 31 2014 02:58 Slydie wrote: The seahawks go HARD and I think the Broncos are in for an unpleasent surprise, and will not be allowed to play their game. You cant throw vs the Hawks, and Manning is too slow and one dimensional.
Gotta agree, the Seahawk's defense is a pocket passer's nightmare.
Although if anyone can unlock them it's Peyton. Going to be an exciting game!
Rooting for a blizzard, because Peyton can't play at all in the snow. If its below 30 and snowing, expect Peyton to throw 3 picks and hand off 50 times.
On January 31 2014 06:08 KOFgokuon wrote: It's supposed to be 50
Right, even though I'm from the Netherlands and supposed to hate on your country and your sports, I'll be watching with some family members and not particularly rooting for anyone, because the 49ers got knocked out. Let's just hope for a none onesided game. Think the game might be slightly in favor of the Bronco's though.
I'm gonna start the trash talk and say outright the seahawks are going to take this game. It will not be a pretty game, and there will be some blood shed. It won't be about how well peyton manning throws the ball, but whether the receivers can catch it with that very physical Defense. I'm gonna take a full step further, and say Peyton manning will get 300 yards no problem, but 2 interceptions and 3 TD's. While on the other side Russel Wilson will step his game up and go 60 yards running with 1 running TD, and 140 passing yards with 1 TD and 1 Interception, and a fumble. But the real reason the Seahawks are going to win, is because of "The Beast" Marshawn Lynch, who will go 120 yards with 2 TD's. Bronco's don't have that big of a run stop defense, and Marshawn is gonna have a field day in this snow, as long as his legs keep churning. 27-24 final score Seahawks.
After watching the last the Seahawks vs Niner game 2 weeks ago, I'm going to go ahead and vote for the Broncos to win the Super Bowl! Manning deserves it.
I want Denver to win, but considering Seattle's run game, defense, and shitty weather for QB, Seattle's game. If I were to bet on this, I'd pick Seattle + under. But hey, could never count out the best QB in the league.
Denver is terran and Seattle is protoss, no doubt:
Denver relying on multipronged drops (Manning+WRs) vs an OP drop defence with blink stalkers, feedbacks and photon overcharge (LOB.)
Seahawks offence is chargelot-archon based (Lynch+Robinson), with occational warp prism harass (Harwin+Boldwin). Denver has a defensive Thor (Pot roast).
So superbowl is about the totally unjustified claims that more firearms lead to more shooting? Some Americans scare me. The weapons industry is strangely not mentioned by that guy...
Broncos are a -2.5 favorite and a -140 on the straight up moneyline. I'd be betting Seattle if I were a betting man, and I think the experts will be as well.
I personally think Manning's going to do as he pleases, he's just too good, and the Seattle offense isn't as good as people think.
Accounting for strength of schedule, Seattle is the slightly stronger team and should be favored to win Super Bowl XLVIII with an edge of 52 percent to 48 percent.
The smarties were waiting to see if the line got to +3 for SEA (which it is now/has been only on Bovada I think =) )..the people really want Peyton to win this.
On February 03 2014 04:19 Makro wrote: i'm very curious about this, i'm going to watch this on a french channel so i will miss most of the epic ads american viewers have :D
Here is is a fun little radio interview I heard on the CBC show "Day 6" from two professional marijuana critics: Seattle Stranger marijuana critic Ben Livingston and Mitch Shenassa, editor of Kindreviews.com in Denver, discussing the Stonerbowl. link
On February 03 2014 04:19 Makro wrote: i'm very curious about this, i'm going to watch this on a french channel so i will miss most of the epic ads american viewers have :D
It's 50 right now but supposed to start snowing late in the evening. I think it'll probably be after the game finishes, but let's hope for some snow to spice things up!
My heart says 'Hawks (Richard Sherman is my favorite player at the moment), but my head says Broncos. It's a sick, sick cosmic joke that Eli has more rings than Peyton.
I dont care much for either team, but I will pick seattle just because I dont like everyone favoring manning. Also just from records over the year I think seattle is the better team since most picked them to make it here back at the beginning.
Gosh was this an overdone version of the anthem. I hate it when they do this (regardless to which anthem) as this often takes away the true spirit and meaning of the anthem.
The TV just implored me to watch the untold story of Noah's ark. I wonder which Noah's ark they're referring to, because I'm pretty sure at least one of them has been told, like, a billion times.
On February 03 2014 08:27 NovaMB wrote: I heard you can bet on the duration of "brave" at the end of the anthem, is that true?
Not in Vegas casinos, but online you can bet on almost any aspect. In Vegas you can only bet on stuff that's like officially sanctioned sports events. I don't even think you can bet on Super Bowl MVP in the casinos cause it's determined by media vote.
On February 03 2014 08:46 Shellshock wrote: 1st quarter fgs are boring. They could have gotten the 1st
Seattle trusts their defense to get the stops and help slow down the game with their run game. Early points on the board in any playoff game is a big deal.
But Bruno Mars and Red Hot Chili Peppers no bueno. It was like Blizzard hiring Nickelback or Taking Back Sunday or whoever the fuck they got for Blizzcon.
That the Seadderall Seahawks not only get crushed but that Russel Wilson gets so depressed after the defeat that he retires, that Pete Carroll is so awed by Manning that he quits to be the Defensive Coordinator for the Broncos so he can help Manning go out with a 2peat next year and finally that Sherman gets a year long suspension for his 2nd (or is it 3rd?) PED test failure. However he's so cocky that he's the greatest that he doesn't work out in the off season, comes back, gets cut and is never heard from again. Well, I pry don't need that last one on there.. but he already got off once so we should probably play it safe.
On February 03 2014 08:50 Akamu wrote: What i want out of this game.
That the Seadderall Seahawks not only get crushed but that Russel Wilson gets so depressed after the defeat that he retires, that Pete Carroll is so awed by Manning that he quits to be the Defensive Coordinator for the Broncos so he can help Manning go out with a 2peat next year and finally that Sherman gets a year long suspension for his 2nd (or is it 3rd?) PED test failure. However he's so cocky that he's the greatest that he doesn't work out in the off season, comes back, gets cut and is never heard from again. Well, I pry don't need that last one on there.. but he already got off once so we should probably play it safe.
On February 03 2014 08:49 jeeeeohn wrote: Well, the Chevy commercial wasn't so bad.
But Bruno Mars and Red Hot Chili Peppers no bueno. It was like Blizzard hiring Nickelback or Taking Back Sunday or whoever the fuck they got for Blizzcon.
RHCP are pretty awesome! But it will be weird to see them with Bruno Mars...
On February 03 2014 08:52 caelym wrote: Well damn. That Seattle defense made short work.
Seattle going to start tiring out the Bronco's defense and their own defense getting plenty of rest. 2 Denver possessions -2 pts, 4 plays approx 8 yards.
god damn i just realized i hate both teams. peyton cause he always fucked over ravens while at colts and seahawks cause the seahawks hype train is annoying as fuck. I hope its a really good close game that gets ruined by a ref call at the end so I can drink tears tmr at work. though just watch manning get crushed is satisfying in its own right
On February 03 2014 08:59 Count9 wrote: god damn i just realized i hate both teams. peyton cause he always fucked over ravens while at colts and seahawks cause the seahawks hype train is annoying as fuck. I hope its a really good close game that gets ruined by a ref call at the end so I can drink tears tmr at work. though just watch manning get crushed is satisfying in its own right
On February 03 2014 09:02 SoSexy wrote: Do you guys have any good website where they explain the rules super fast so that a complete stranger to the sport can enjoy this final?
4 tries to get past the yellow line. If they do, yellow moves forward and they get 4 tries again. Teams don't like to use the 4th try so they kick it so that the other team starts farther back.
denver didn't even show up yet. they might have to blow a time out to actually talk this shit over if this continues, too bad they just blew one on challenege
On February 03 2014 09:12 GoTuNk! wrote: the entire defense looks like a bunch of bulls on steroids
Whats crazy is that steroids were super prevalent 30-5ish years ago. All players get drug tested heavily in the NFL these days so what you see is genetics + a ridiculous amount of time in the gym
On February 03 2014 09:13 Musicus wrote: Oh wow what was that. This is my first live Superbowl or even NFL game ever, wasn't Manning supposed to be super good? Second big mistake.
Peyton Manning known his whole career for an inability to win the "big games" such as playoff games and the superbowl
On February 03 2014 09:12 GoTuNk! wrote: the entire defense looks like a bunch of bulls on steroids
Whats crazy is that steroids were super prevalent 30-5ish years ago. All players get drug tested heavily in the NFL these days so what you see is genetics + a ridiculous amount of time in the gym
On February 03 2014 09:13 Musicus wrote: Oh wow what was that. This is my first live Superbowl or even NFL game ever, wasn't Manning supposed to be super good? Second big mistake.
Peyton Manning known his whole career for an inability to win the "big games" such as playoff games and the superbowl
Ah too bad, I'm rooting for the Seahawks (I don't know anything about the teams but Seahawks tweet starcraft stuff :D) but I still want a game!
Statistically btw Seattle Defense allows the fewest points in the NFL per game in the first quarter (1.4 ish for the entire season). Most likely since their defense is fresh rest-wise and amped to go play. So this kind of defensive domination early is very typical for Seattle's defense.
On February 03 2014 09:12 GoTuNk! wrote: the entire defense looks like a bunch of bulls on steroids
Whats crazy is that steroids were super prevalent 30-5ish years ago. All players get drug tested heavily in the NFL these days so what you see is genetics + a ridiculous amount of time in the gym
On February 03 2014 09:13 Musicus wrote: Oh wow what was that. This is my first live Superbowl or even NFL game ever, wasn't Manning supposed to be super good? Second big mistake.
Peyton Manning known his whole career for an inability to win the "big games" such as playoff games and the superbowl
Ah too bad, I'm rooting for the Seahawks (I don't know anything about the teams but Seahawks tweet starcraft stuff :D) but I still want a game!
I know InControl is a huge Seahawks fan and the Seahawks are owned by Paul Allen (co-founder of Microsoft) who also owns the Portland Trailblazers of the NBA.
remember last year... that looked also quite onesided and suddenly became quite a close one in the end... and as long as the seahawks are unable to properly score... game is open
On February 03 2014 09:18 mahrgell wrote: remember last year... that looked also quite onesided and suddenly became quite a close one in the end... and as long as the seahawks are unable to properly score... game is open
I remember something unique happening last year... can't put my finger on it but I doubt that'll happen again.
Meh, used to like the Bears, till last year I decided to root for Seattle based teams in all American sports because of Valve. Haven't watched a game all season and see Seahawks in Superbowl. Am pleasantly surprised.
Feels weird how I used to watch a game every week the season before this one.
On February 03 2014 09:20 SpikeStarcraft wrote: how am i supposed to stay awake until the half time show? i dont understand a lot of american football but this just looks like a terrible game to me.
From a spectator standpoint its terrible. From a football fan standpoint its a very good game especially if you like defense.
On February 03 2014 09:20 SpikeStarcraft wrote: how am i supposed to stay awake until the half time show? i dont understand a lot of american football but this just looks like a terrible game to me.
Nothing new for divisional/championship games to be better than the Superbowl.
Pretty much what I predicted. I was really surprised the odds in vegas had broncos as 2 point favorites because I really felt seahawks are the better team and the much mentioned defense wins championships is usually true. The seahawks lost one game the entire year I mean how could broncos be favored. I dont get it
I can't believe there are actually people who believe he is the greatest quarterback of all-time. guy got his only ring off of REX GROSSMAN and LOVIE SMITH
On February 03 2014 09:41 Otolia wrote: Thank God I'm living in France, I couldn't possibly withstand the amount of smugness these dirty birds fans are going to display for the rest of year.
Sadly, France does seem to have to deal with butthurt Saints fans.
So here is a question: how many mores retarded screen plays are the Broncos going to run? It is like they didn't bother watching the Saints/Seahawks tape.
On February 03 2014 09:46 xDaunt wrote: So here is a question: how many mores retarded screen plays are the Broncos going to run? It is like they didn't bother watching the Saints/Seahawks tape.
On February 03 2014 09:46 xDaunt wrote: So here is a question: how many mores retarded screen plays are the Broncos going to run? It is like they didn't bother watching the Saints/Seahawks tape.
On February 03 2014 09:46 Seeker wrote: If Broncos can't score on this drive then they're done for. No momentum whatsoever for them going into the 2nd half.
haha, the giants ravens game, I remember inc saying that was the last superbowl party he held cause the game was so fucking boring
welp, i guess ima get drunk an eat a lot to make up for it. i can either make pork chop sliders or some kind of weird layered dip with what I have left
On February 03 2014 09:57 Dreamer.T wrote: Lol, Mayweather betting that 20 million. Must be feeling a little bit sweaty now xD.
There is a quote by jay-z that applies perfectly to this situation: "I lost 30 mil, so I spent another 30. Cause unlike Hammer, thirty million can't hurt me."
so broncos are gonna have to put up like 30 points in this half against one of the best defenses ever and hope seahawks don't score more than +15 points :E
I have a solution for anyone not happy with the halftime show. 1. mute your tv 2. pull up video of a concert of a musician you like on your computer 3. watch that and pretend they are playing at the super bowl 4. unmute your tv when the football is back on. 5. Congrats! You enjoyed the halftime show.
On February 03 2014 09:57 Dreamer.T wrote: Lol, Mayweather betting that 20 million. Must be feeling a little bit sweaty now xD.
There is a quote by jay-z that applies perfectly to this situation: "I lost 30 mil, so I spent another 30. Cause unlike Hammer, thirty million can't hurt me."
bahahaaha, good one. Mayweather is an ass and deserves to lose money.
On February 03 2014 10:11 Count9 wrote: I thought bruno mars sang sappy love songs, wtf is this
Some are, others are raunchy I have some respect for the dude because hes not a fake like most pop artists nowadays, but I cant get over the fact that he think hes the second coming of michael jackson
On February 03 2014 10:02 sezuNg wrote: Dear god what is going on, did anyone expect this?
It was pretty obvious that nobody else in the NFL was a match for the Seahawks or 49ers. As much as I'm rooting for the Broncos since I'm a Niner fan, I expected this.
My phone autocorrected Super as Sorry. Calling it the Sorry Bowl is probably the best Freudian Autocorrect I've ever accidentally written, especially if only one team is going to continue to perform for the second half.
[QUOTE]On February 03 2014 10:18 Yezzus wrote: [QUOTE]On February 03 2014 10:17 jeeeeohn wrote: I'm going to be so disappointed if they don't play Californication. [/QUOTE] I have a feeling they wont.....its not an upbeat party song like they want in these shows lol[/QUOTE
If Bruno Mars can play this slow sappy shit, they can play Californication lol
On February 03 2014 10:21 Darkhoarse wrote: At least Bruno Mars is pretty talented even if you don't like his music. Better than the black eyed peas.
I agree...you may not like happy love type songs but that actually sounded like people playing musical instruments really well. I'm impressed even though im not into pop music.
People complain so much about half time shows that the nfl should just roll with it and get yoko ono for 2015 to show what 'bad' really means
On February 03 2014 10:22 zoLo wrote: Bruno Mars performed well. He sounds great live whenever I watch his shows.
Yeah... i don't understand how anyone could say this was bad. Bruno is really good at live performances. People saying it was bad probably just don't enjoy this type of music.
The thing that always impresses me about the half time is how quickly they set up and remove all the stuff for it. That shit has to be a logistical nightmare.
On February 03 2014 10:22 dmnum wrote: People complain so much about half time shows that the nfl should just roll with it and get yoko ono for 2015 to show what 'bad' really means
Backup vocals for Awolnation while they play "Sail".
On February 03 2014 10:26 ketchup wrote: Is that a new 24 season coming out? Is that what that British flag shooting thing is about?(so 24 in london or some such?)
If so, please just let that show die. It was good, and it was milked enough already!
On February 03 2014 10:26 ketchup wrote: Is that a new 24 season coming out? Is that what that British flag shooting thing is about?(so 24 in london or some such?)
If so, please just let that show die. It was good, and it was milked enough already!
On February 03 2014 10:28 HeadlessWonder wrote: What was the point of bringing the RHCP? I don't like Bruno Mars, but like others have said at least there were guys playing instruments.
On February 03 2014 10:24 LosingID8 wrote: bruno mars was good, dunno what people are complaining about
Really nice drums at the start from him. I think that his style of music is just not for some people though so if people don't like him nothing will change their mind.
On February 03 2014 10:29 andrewlt wrote: It was a good performance. Some people may not like his type of music, but it wasn't a train wreck like some recent past shows.
it was pretty meh. good performers make you watch them, i alt tabbed 1/4th of the way through his show. sure, it wasn't bad, the guy can sing, all that, it was just, in retrospect, pretty forgettable. so i guess by half time standards it was good :/
On February 03 2014 10:26 ketchup wrote: Is that a new 24 season coming out? Is that what that British flag shooting thing is about?(so 24 in london or some such?)
If so, please just let that show die. It was good, and it was milked enough already!
Jerry Ricecake is a great commercial gimmick. The Leon Sandcastle one last year was great as well. Not quite as good as the Dwight vs. LeBron dunk contest for McDonald's, but still good.
NOOOO NOT SHERMAN GET UP ROCK, GET UP, YOU'RE A WRECKING MACHINE.
I feel like my Washington Redskins are playing in the Superbowl right now in place of the Broncos. Their propensity for fucking up is virtually the same right now.
On February 03 2014 10:40 SoSexy wrote: I'm curious, do kids play football in parks like people here do with soccer? Do you need 11 vs 11 or can you also play like 4 vs 4?
You can play 4v4 or 5v5 etc. One person is usually the QB and then the other people can be whatever the hell they want ^^
On February 03 2014 10:40 SoSexy wrote: I'm curious, do kids play football in parks like people here do with soccer? Do you need 11 vs 11 or can you also play like 4 vs 4?
Kids play. You don't really need 11 on 11 because you generally don't use linemen of either side in pickup games. At least we didn't as kids.
On February 03 2014 10:40 SoSexy wrote: I'm curious, do kids play football in parks like people here do with soccer? Do you need 11 vs 11 or can you also play like 4 vs 4?
every middle school and up has a pretty serious squad usually. there's also camps in the south
On February 03 2014 10:40 SoSexy wrote: I'm curious, do kids play football in parks like people here do with soccer? Do you need 11 vs 11 or can you also play like 4 vs 4?
You can even do 2v2, did it all the time at recess in grade school, though usually 4vs4 or something. =]
On February 03 2014 10:40 SoSexy wrote: I'm curious, do kids play football in parks like people here do with soccer? Do you need 11 vs 11 or can you also play like 4 vs 4?
You can play 4v4 or 5v5 etc. One person is usually the QB and then the other people can be whatever the hell they want ^^
On February 03 2014 10:40 SoSexy wrote: I'm curious, do kids play football in parks like people here do with soccer? Do you need 11 vs 11 or can you also play like 4 vs 4?
Yeah, we did in gym/recess during elementary school all the time during the spring, anywhere from like 8 people to 30
On February 03 2014 10:37 Musicus wrote: I just hope it's a new record at this point. What was the biggest point difference in a superbowl so far?
Before about 10 years ago it was quite common for the Super Bowl to be really unbalanced and a bad game and people were like surprised when there was actually a good Super Bowl. Only recently, like the past decade, has it swung the other way and now people are really surprised that there's a blowout.
On February 03 2014 10:40 SoSexy wrote: I'm curious, do kids play football in parks like people here do with soccer? Do you need 11 vs 11 or can you also play like 4 vs 4?
Kids play. You don't really need 11 on 11 because you generally don't use linemen of either side in pickup games. At least we didn't as kids.
Yeah instead you count like a certain number of seconds (Mississippis) and then the one guy guarding the QB is allowed to cross the line of scrimmage and chase him (but then there would be rules like 1 blitz and 1 QB sneak allowed per 4 downs). And it would be like, a certain tree in someone's yard is a first down marker.
On February 03 2014 10:37 qotsager wrote: so i dont usually watch football. this manning guy is good?
even the greats shit the bed every now and then
bit unfortunate to do it during the biggest game of the season i suppose.
I mean Brady's last two efforts in Super Bowls weren't this bad, but they weren't particularly good, so sometimes the Super Bowl just ends up being a bad game.
On February 03 2014 10:49 Yezzus wrote: This game will haunt Peytons legacy forever....poor fucking guy
this is ammo for the brady peyton debate for the next 10 years. I'm already tired of hearing how peyton fucked up this game
I'm a pretty die hard Pats and Brady fan and I wouldn't use this as ammunition knowing Brady's recent super bowls (and the fact that Manning outplayed him two weeks ago)
On February 03 2014 10:49 Yezzus wrote: This game will haunt Peytons legacy forever....poor fucking guy
this is ammo for the brady peyton debate for the next 10 years. I'm already tired of hearing how peyton fucked up this game
you mean you don't blame peyton as much as most people on here, or are you just tired of hearing it?
imo the whole team is playing like crap. They have been beaten in every single segmant of the game.
I mean when you think about it the defense is only responsible for 13 out of 29 points and the turnovers didn't help them much with the Seahawks getting some good field position.
On February 03 2014 10:49 Yezzus wrote: This game will haunt Peytons legacy forever....poor fucking guy
this is ammo for the brady peyton debate for the next 10 years. I'm already tired of hearing how peyton fucked up this game
I'm a pretty die hard Pats and Brady fan and I wouldn't use this as ammunition knowing Brady's recent super bowls (and the fact that Manning outplayed him two weeks ago)
Pats O-line went from being one of the best to playing like shit against the Giants both games. Denver O-line isn't playing well but the entire team is just collapsing.
On February 03 2014 10:56 On_Slaught wrote: Seattle offense doesn't have to do a thing to win this game. The defense/special teams are out of this world.
Explain the term special teams to me pls, I'm a nub :/.
On February 03 2014 10:56 On_Slaught wrote: Seattle offense doesn't have to do a thing to win this game. The defense/special teams are out of this world.
Explain the term special teams to me pls, I'm a nub :/.
Kicking team/punting team are called "special teams" as in not the offense or the defense
On February 03 2014 10:56 On_Slaught wrote: Seattle offense doesn't have to do a thing to win this game. The defense/special teams are out of this world.
Explain the term special teams to me pls, I'm a nub :/.
Special teams are the units that come out for punts, punt return, kick, kick return, and extra point.
On February 03 2014 10:56 On_Slaught wrote: Seattle offense doesn't have to do a thing to win this game. The defense/special teams are out of this world.
Explain the term special teams to me pls, I'm a nub :/.
On February 03 2014 10:56 On_Slaught wrote: Seattle offense doesn't have to do a thing to win this game. The defense/special teams are out of this world.
Explain the term special teams to me pls, I'm a nub :/.
Kicking team/punting team are called "special teams" as in not the offense or the defense
On February 03 2014 10:56 On_Slaught wrote: Seattle offense doesn't have to do a thing to win this game. The defense/special teams are out of this world.
Explain the term special teams to me pls, I'm a nub :/.
The 3rd part of a team. They deal with kickoffs, punts and field goals. The runback for a touchdown at the start of the 2nd half was special teams scoring. They've also done well defending against Broncos special teams.
What an embarrassment for the Broncos. The scariest thing is that the Broncos are the team that is aging and has a limited window to win the super bowl, while the Seahawks are so damn young...
On February 03 2014 10:56 On_Slaught wrote: Seattle offense doesn't have to do a thing to win this game. The defense/special teams are out of this world.
Explain the term special teams to me pls, I'm a nub :/.
The 3rd part of a team. They deal with kickoffs, punts and field goals. The runback for a touchdown at the start of the 2nd half was special teams scoring. They've also done well defending against Broncos special teams.
So since the games over, who's gonna be mvp? I can't think of a Seattle offensive player that really stood out, but defense has also been more of a team effort than one outstanding player. Standart cop out to the QB or just give it to Manning as a participation trophy?
On February 03 2014 10:49 Yezzus wrote: This game will haunt Peytons legacy forever....poor fucking guy
this is ammo for the brady peyton debate for the next 10 years. I'm already tired of hearing how peyton fucked up this game
you mean you don't blame peyton as much as most people on here, or are you just tired of hearing it?
I don't hate manning I hate the nfl giving the MVP to an undeserving player
...
Look at the regular season and tell me who deserved the Mvp more than Peyton.
Nick foles, Tom Brady, Richard Sherman, etc.
Defensive players would have to be absolutely spectacular to win, and Sherman (through not a ton of fault of his own) just doesn't have the stat line or huge plays to win it based on the fact that when you're good as a corner people don't throw at you.
Foles is not as great a quarterback as his stupidly good quarterback rating on the year suggests and he didn't play for what 5-6 games?
I'm a big Brady fan and think you deserve respect for doing what he does with no weapons, but ultimately you can't give someone MVP based on that when someone broke the single season TD passes and Passing yards record.
On February 03 2014 11:01 sneirac wrote: So since the games over, who's gonna be mvp? I can't think of a Seattle offensive player that really stood out, but defense has also been more of a team effort than one outstanding player. Standart cop out to the QB or just give it to Manning as a participation trophy?
pass defense domination like this is usually to the credit of the coaching staff and their ability to break down the other team's precise routes via film study.
On February 03 2014 11:01 sneirac wrote: So since the games over, who's gonna be mvp? I can't think of a Seattle offensive player that really stood out, but defense has also been more of a team effort than one outstanding player. Standart cop out to the QB or just give it to Manning as a participation trophy?
On February 03 2014 11:01 sneirac wrote: So since the games over, who's gonna be mvp? I can't think of a Seattle offensive player that really stood out, but defense has also been more of a team effort than one outstanding player. Standart cop out to the QB or just give it to Manning as a participation trophy?
On February 03 2014 10:59 mahrgell wrote: so this could be the first blowout superbowl? Broncos going for the record!
There have been a couple blowouts before
not a single one...
Super Bowl XXIV San Fransisco 55 - 10 Denver Super Bowl XXVII Dallas 52 - 17 Buffalo Super Bowl XXIX San Fransisco 49 - 26 San Diego Super Bowl XXXVII Tampa 48 - 20 Oakland Super Bowl XXXV Baltimore 34 - 7 NYG
That's a quick look didn't even go back that far. You were saying?
On February 03 2014 11:01 sneirac wrote: So since the games over, who's gonna be mvp? I can't think of a Seattle offensive player that really stood out, but defense has also been more of a team effort than one outstanding player. Standart cop out to the QB or just give it to Manning as a participation trophy?
pass defense domination like this is usually to the credit of the coaching staff and their ability to break down the other team's precise routes via film study.
but with that last play it's russell wilson lol
Yeah Wilson made a few great plays so it would be okay but it still feels more like the defence and special teams won this.
On February 03 2014 11:01 sneirac wrote: So since the games over, who's gonna be mvp? I can't think of a Seattle offensive player that really stood out, but defense has also been more of a team effort than one outstanding player. Standart cop out to the QB or just give it to Manning as a participation trophy?
All these years of pretty good superbowls have spoiled us. There was a time when you expected the superbowl to be shit. Karmic justice for good close games over the last decade.
With modern sports being the way it is and having two weeks to mentaly prepare... the two teams that made it to the final should not have this much of a difference between them...
On February 03 2014 11:07 zeo wrote: With modern sports being the way it is and having two weeks to mentaly prepare... the two teams that made it to the final should not have this much of a difference between them...
Football is a high variance game. If they were to play 1000 times, I bet this is the one or two times this happens.
Plus if you watch the guy throw it's a miracle that receivers ended up under those lobs so often. Really not nearly as good a passer as someone like Manning.
Seattle was the best team the whole year so I figured they would win, but its hard to say it would be this one sided. How did vegas odds have broncos as 2 point favorites again?
On February 03 2014 10:51 Count9 wrote: [quote] this is ammo for the brady peyton debate for the next 10 years. I'm already tired of hearing how peyton fucked up this game
you mean you don't blame peyton as much as most people on here, or are you just tired of hearing it?
I don't hate manning I hate the nfl giving the MVP to an undeserving player
...
Look at the regular season and tell me who deserved the Mvp more than Peyton.
Nick foles, Tom Brady, Richard Sherman, etc.
you think another qb will get mvp over the td and yards record season?
Foles had a better qb and passing rating than manning with less help. What nick did is far more worthy of the MVP IMO.
On February 03 2014 11:18 Helios.Star wrote: God....now I feel like I need to stay up to watch the BW Afreeca matches just to watch an actual competition....
im glad its not bisus group today. I got school in 4 hours. I'm in a slight coma already.
On February 03 2014 10:52 HeadlessWonder wrote: [quote] you mean you don't blame peyton as much as most people on here, or are you just tired of hearing it?
I don't hate manning I hate the nfl giving the MVP to an undeserving player
...
Look at the regular season and tell me who deserved the Mvp more than Peyton.
Nick foles, Tom Brady, Richard Sherman, etc.
you think another qb will get mvp over the td and yards record season?
Foles had a better qb and passing rating than manning with less help. What nick did is far more worthy of the MVP IMO.
On February 03 2014 11:28 Titusmaster6 wrote: Broncos can't do anything right, couldn't even give us a proper shut out. We deserve to witness some history after watching this entire game.
On February 03 2014 11:28 Titusmaster6 wrote: Broncos can't do anything right, couldn't even give us a proper shut out. We deserve to witness some history after watching this entire game.
On February 03 2014 11:16 snakeeyez wrote: Seattle was the best team the whole year so I figured they would win, but its hard to say it would be this one sided. How did vegas odds have broncos as 2 point favorites again?
Casual bettors, Vegas sets lines to try to get action on both sides.
At least when my team loses the super bowl they do it with some measure of dignity intact. And we can say shit like "If only that guy hadn't made a ridiculously improbable catch on his helmet..."
The Broncos fans have to say, "If only we didn't get outplayed in every possible aspect..."
On February 03 2014 11:35 Darkhoarse wrote: Eli helped the Seahawks win because he wants to keep Peyton from winning two rings so he still has one reason to say he is better.
On February 03 2014 11:39 On_Slaught wrote: Damn... no immediate post-game interview from Sherman.
Here's hoping they give SB MVP to someone else and Sherman runs up and snatches the trophy and the mic saying, "IM THE BEST! I SHOULD BE MVP! DON'T TRY TO TAKE MVP FROM THE BEST!"
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
On February 03 2014 11:39 On_Slaught wrote: Damn... no immediate post-game interview from Sherman.
Here's hoping they give SB MVP to someone else and Sherman runs up and snatches the trophy and the mic saying, "IM THE BEST! I SHOULD BE MVP! DON'T TRY TO TAKE MVP FROM THE BEST!"
On February 03 2014 11:39 On_Slaught wrote: Damn... no immediate post-game interview from Sherman.
Here's hoping they give SB MVP to someone else and Sherman runs up and snatches the trophy and the mic saying, "IM THE BEST! I SHOULD BE MVP! DON'T TRY TO TAKE MVP FROM THE BEST!"
he would deserve the mvp if he did that. hope his ankle is sound enough
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
On February 03 2014 11:51 Darkhoarse wrote: Well the Seahawks about to be crossed off the list of teams to never win a super bowl! Congrats to them I guess.
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
Yeah I think the 49ers seahawks game was the best game of the year, and I said back then the winner of the that game would win the superbowl. Both those teams are better then the broncos. I actually joked before the game that the seahawks would mercy the broncos but I never thought they almost would
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
If there's one team that might be willing the embrace the heel role, it's this team.
Im actually just suprised how vegas odds had broncos as 2 point favorites. They are usually really accurate, and just way off on this. How you pick against a nearly unbeaten seahawks team made no sense to me
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
Fortunately the NFL doesn't cater to your opinions alone.
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
Fortunately the NFL doesn't cater to your opinions alone.
Of course they don't? I don't understand what you're saying here.
the survey link is not bad but it's also a pretty bad place to be doing these surveys. people who felt vindicated (heavy seattle favored) would be more inclined to vote and this is not really a good sample without that
On February 03 2014 11:47 Dogfoodboy16 wrote: Go home manning your career is done.
at 20 millions a year Id come back until they tell me not to.
Favre had is best year at 39. Remember the year after? That's Manning if comes back.
Remember the year Elway had after he won the Super Bowl in '97? Good thing he didn't try to come back and win again in '98.
Elwaydidn't pass nearly as much as manning. It was a completely differ game and time.
Very true. Anyways you acting as if you know how Manning will do next year based on... something something Favre?... is laughable.
Using past evidence to predict the future is the logical way of going about things. Manning and favre played the same way.
this year Peyton broke every record known to man.
hell do it again next year.
see what I did there?
I've got one! Manning will blow out his knee in the first game next season because Brady did it the year after he got the touchdown record last time! Using past trends is fun for the whole family!
On February 03 2014 11:47 Dogfoodboy16 wrote: Go home manning your career is done.
at 20 millions a year Id come back until they tell me not to.
Favre had is best year at 39. Remember the year after? That's Manning if comes back.
Remember the year Elway had after he won the Super Bowl in '97? Good thing he didn't try to come back and win again in '98.
Elwaydidn't pass nearly as much as manning. It was a completely differ game and time.
Very true. Anyways you acting as if you know how Manning will do next year based on... something something Favre?... is laughable.
Using past evidence to predict the future is the logical way of going about things. Manning and favre played the same way.
this year Peyton broke every record known to man.
hell do it again next year.
see what I did there?
I've got one! Manning will blow out his knee in the first game next season because Brady did it the year after he got the touchdown record last time! Using past trends is fun for the whole family!
On February 03 2014 11:47 Dogfoodboy16 wrote: Go home manning your career is done.
at 20 millions a year Id come back until they tell me not to.
Favre had is best year at 39. Remember the year after? That's Manning if comes back.
Remember the year Elway had after he won the Super Bowl in '97? Good thing he didn't try to come back and win again in '98.
Elwaydidn't pass nearly as much as manning. It was a completely differ game and time.
Very true. Anyways you acting as if you know how Manning will do next year based on... something something Favre?... is laughable.
Using past evidence to predict the future is the logical way of going about things. Manning and favre played the same way.
this year Peyton broke every record known to man.
hell do it again next year.
see what I did there?
I've got one! Manning will blow out his knee in the first game next season because Brady did it the year after he got the touchdown record last time! Using past trends is fun for the whole family!
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
Fortunately the NFL doesn't cater to your opinions alone.
Of course they don't? I don't understand what you're saying here.
Also, you like to see teams embarrass others?
I like seeing teams scoring without regard for how the other team FEELS about it.
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
Fortunately the NFL doesn't cater to your opinions alone.
Of course they don't? I don't understand what you're saying here.
Also, you like to see teams embarrass others?
It's funny seeing everybody's predictions get flipped aroun like this
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
Fortunately the NFL doesn't cater to your opinions alone.
Of course they don't? I don't understand what you're saying here.
Also, you like to see teams embarrass others?
I like seeing teams scoring without regard for how the other team FEELS about it.
It's not about hurting someone's feelings it's about hurting someone's career. Coaches get fired based on those kinds of blowouts all the time. If it was just feelings getting hurt I wouldn't care they could just deal with it.
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
Fortunately the NFL doesn't cater to your opinions alone.
Of course they don't? I don't understand what you're saying here.
Also, you like to see teams embarrass others?
It's funny seeing everybody's predictions get flipped aroun like this
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
Fortunately the NFL doesn't cater to your opinions alone.
Of course they don't? I don't understand what you're saying here.
Also, you like to see teams embarrass others?
It's funny seeing everybody's predictions get flipped aroun like this
On February 03 2014 11:47 Dogfoodboy16 wrote: Go home manning your career is done.
at 20 millions a year Id come back until they tell me not to.
Favre had is best year at 39. Remember the year after? That's Manning if comes back.
Remember the year Elway had after he won the Super Bowl in '97? Good thing he didn't try to come back and win again in '98.
Elwaydidn't pass nearly as much as manning. It was a completely differ game and time.
Very true. Anyways you acting as if you know how Manning will do next year based on... something something Favre?... is laughable.
Using past evidence to predict the future is the logical way of going about things.
Ryan Leaf was a draft bust so Jonny Manziel will also be a bust.
Am I doing this right?
Leaf and manziel play qb different. Favre and manning play the same. You can't compare those 2 qbs you chose as an example.
Favre was a gunslinger, he did a lot of really stupid shit that anyone would tell you is completely inadvisable. Sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn't but his legacy was taking chances.
Manning is a surgeon. He picks apart the other team. His legacy will be as the god of the regular season knowing how to make the other team look pedestrian with his knowledge.
They both throw a lot but they're entirely different players.
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
Fortunately the NFL doesn't cater to your opinions alone.
Of course they don't? I don't understand what you're saying here.
Also, you like to see teams embarrass others?
It's funny seeing everybody's predictions get flipped aroun like this
I don't understand.
Of course you wouldn't, I didn't expect you to
Probably because your post made no sense and I didn't say anything having to do with predictions.
But if you take pleasure in being ambiguous on the internet by all means continue.
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
Fortunately the NFL doesn't cater to your opinions alone.
Of course they don't? I don't understand what you're saying here.
Also, you like to see teams embarrass others?
I like seeing teams scoring without regard for how the other team FEELS about it.
It's not about hurting someone's feelings it's about hurting someone's career. Coaches get fired based on those kinds of blowouts all the time. If it was just feelings getting hurt I wouldn't care they could just deal with it.
But of course it's totally up to them.
So John Fox is going to get fired because he got blown out in a Superbowl? Please, there's a time and a place for your argument, but not in this thread. If you're not discussing events surrounding this year's superbowl then don't bring up the point.
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
Fortunately the NFL doesn't cater to your opinions alone.
Of course they don't? I don't understand what you're saying here.
Also, you like to see teams embarrass others?
I like seeing teams scoring without regard for how the other team FEELS about it.
It's not about hurting someone's feelings it's about hurting someone's career. Coaches get fired based on those kinds of blowouts all the time. If it was just feelings getting hurt I wouldn't care they could just deal with it.
But of course it's totally up to them.
So John Fox is going to get fired because he got blown out in a Superbowl? Please, there's a time and a place for your argument, but not in this thread. If you're not discussing events surrounding this year's superbowl then don't bring up the point.
Genuinely disappointed Smith won MVP over Harvin, there were three interceptions and his resulting touchdown was no more spectacular than the kick off return after the half that in my mind sealed the deal for the Seahawks.
On February 03 2014 12:20 Parlortricks wrote: Genuinely disappointed Smith won MVP over Harvin, there were three interceptions and his resulting touchdown was no more spectacular than the kick off return after the half that in my mind sealed the deal for the Seahawks.
How sick would that have been for Harvin to get paid a full salary to play in one game and then win the Super Bowl MVP and drive off in a new car.
On February 03 2014 12:20 Parlortricks wrote: Genuinely disappointed Smith won MVP over Harvin, there were three interceptions and his resulting touchdown was no more spectacular than the kick off return after the half that in my mind sealed the deal for the Seahawks.
you're forgetting that he also had 1 fumble recovery and 10 tackles (6 solo) as well as 1 pass defended.
well that was odd , I expected this game to be closer , but in the end the seahawks won....IN YOUR FACE MANNING !
EDIT : This is my 1st time staying up and going to a bar to watch the super bowl , even in my small country , you american's are crazy XD , I had the best time of my life , I cheered , I discussed , I pissed off every single Broncos fan in the house , landed me a hot chick for a date next week and I'm drunk as fuck..... thank you americans for creating this culture !
He said before the game he wasn't going to retire win or lose. I doubt he's going to retire because he's still getting paid and he is close to breaking the career regular season stats records. Super Bowl 49 will be Browns with godly Kirk Cousins vs Panthers
On February 03 2014 11:40 Penguinator wrote: Seattle could still make Superbowl history. Most points scored by the winning team is 55, and that was San Fransisco vs... Denver
If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
Fortunately the NFL doesn't cater to your opinions alone.
Of course they don't? I don't understand what you're saying here.
Also, you like to see teams embarrass others?
It's funny seeing everybody's predictions get flipped aroun like this
I don't understand.
Of course you wouldn't, I didn't expect you to
Probably because your post made no sense and I didn't say anything having to do with predictions.
But if you take pleasure in being ambiguous on the internet by all means continue.
I take considerable pleasure in seeing the Denver Broncos and all their fans humbled, absolutely, especially after the most commonly predicted score I saw from numerous people being "40-10" broncos. It was extremely enjoyable watchin them getting embarrassed.
On February 03 2014 12:47 Shellshock wrote: He said before the game he wasn't going to retire win or lose. I doubt he's going to retire because he's still getting paid and he is close to breaking the career regular season stats records. Super Bowl 49 will be Browns with godly Kirk Cousins vs Panthers
On February 03 2014 11:41 Darkhoarse wrote: [quote] If the seahawks have any class, they will stop scoring at this point unless they can't avoid it.
Class? Its a game score as many as you can
Unwritten rule that you don't embarrass the opposing coach and organization if you can help it and you don't have to jeopardize your own chance to win. Some choose to follow that some don't but I always thought it was the classy thing to do.
Fortunately the NFL doesn't cater to your opinions alone.
Of course they don't? I don't understand what you're saying here.
Also, you like to see teams embarrass others?
It's funny seeing everybody's predictions get flipped aroun like this
I don't understand.
Of course you wouldn't, I didn't expect you to
Probably because your post made no sense and I didn't say anything having to do with predictions.
But if you take pleasure in being ambiguous on the internet by all means continue.
I take considerable pleasure in seeing the Denver Broncos and all their fans humbled, absolutely, especially after the most commonly predicted score I saw from numerous people being "40-10" broncos. It was extremely enjoyable watchin them getting embarrassed.
I'm not even a broncos fan TT. I am not a fan of either team although I did predict the broncos to win 27-24.
On February 03 2014 12:47 Shellshock wrote: He said before the game he wasn't going to retire win or lose. I doubt he's going to retire because he's still getting paid and he is close to breaking the career regular season stats records. Super Bowl 49 will be Browns with godly Kirk Cousins vs Panthers
Um Panthers? No one else in the NFC can touch the West. Although I think your joking with saying the Browns.
I'm surprised the Dannon commercial with the full house people isn't getting more controversy for being sexist. Maybe it will tomorrow. Or am I just so prude and TV-ignorant that I didn't know cum and blowjob jokes are accepted now?
On February 03 2014 12:47 Shellshock wrote: He said before the game he wasn't going to retire win or lose. I doubt he's going to retire because he's still getting paid and he is close to breaking the career regular season stats records. Super Bowl 49 will be Browns with godly Kirk Cousins vs Panthers
Um Panthers? No one else in the NFC can touch the West. Although I think your joking with saying the Browns.
Its only time till it cycles back around. It wasn't long ago when the NFC West was the bottom of the NFC barrel and it will happen again in the future. Who knows what next year brings and if they can maintain two top NFC teams another year. There are simply way too many ways for a team to drop off in a year to year basis in the NFL.
I'm guessing that Seattle will lose a significant chunk of their roster during the offseason-- they have a lot of players who are probably coming off rookie contracts or becoming free agents, and there's no way all the other teams in the NFL won't make some nice offers to them.
On February 03 2014 14:23 ticklishmusic wrote: I'm guessing that Seattle will lose a significant chunk of their roster during the offseason-- they have a lot of players who are probably coming off rookie contracts or becoming free agents, and there's no way all the other teams in the NFL won't make some nice offers to them.
On February 03 2014 12:47 Shellshock wrote: He said before the game he wasn't going to retire win or lose. I doubt he's going to retire because he's still getting paid and he is close to breaking the career regular season stats records. Super Bowl 49 will be Browns with godly Kirk Cousins vs Panthers
Um Panthers? No one else in the NFC can touch the West. Although I think your joking with saying the Browns.
Its only time till it cycles back around. It wasn't long ago when the NFC West was the bottom of the NFC barrel and it will happen again in the future. Who knows what next year brings and if they can maintain two top NFC teams another year. There are simply way too many ways for a team to drop off in a year to year basis in the NFL.
Its crazy to think that four years ago the best team in the NFC West was 7-9
On February 03 2014 14:23 tuho12345 wrote: The worst superbowl ever.... Denver choked harder than I could ever imagine. Like even harder than Kaepernick in the 4th quarter vs Sehawks
55-10 is pretty bad, I'm not even sure this is Denver's worst Super Bowl ever.
Doesn't matter, recorded it anyways. Too bad Sherman couldn't be on the field when they won thanks to his injury (I mean he was on the sidelines but you get what I'm saying).
On February 03 2014 17:46 ejac wrote: As a Seattle local, fucking awesome the Seahawks won. That being said the game was fucking terrible. A safety in the first play of the game?!?!?!
For me the game was awesome, I didn't mind that the game was over after the first half. Seattle won on every side of the ball,, made Denver and Peyton Manning look like a joke. Eli "Not in my house one ring"
On February 03 2014 17:46 ejac wrote: As a Seattle local, fucking awesome the Seahawks won. That being said the game was fucking terrible. A safety in the first play of the game?!?!?!
The game was indeed terrible. Hosted a SB-party, trying to get a couple of friends into NFL - I don't think I was all that successful As a fan of neither team I had really hoped for a good game, but Denver just decided not to play in any of the 3 phases of the game.
On February 03 2014 17:46 ejac wrote: As a Seattle local, fucking awesome the Seahawks won. That being said the game was fucking terrible. A safety in the first play of the game?!?!?!
The game was indeed terrible. Hosted a SB-party, trying to get a couple of friends into NFL - I don't think I was all that successful As a fan of neither team I had really hoped for a good game, but Denver just decided not to play in any of the 3 phases of the game.
The exact same thing happened for me too. I told my friends how awesome the superballs had been in the past. They finally gave in and we did hot dogs and stuff and then this terrible game happened. Feels depressing...
On February 03 2014 14:23 tuho12345 wrote: The worst superbowl ever.... Denver choked harder than I could ever imagine. Like even harder than Kaepernick in the 4th quarter vs Sehawks
55-10 is pretty bad, I'm not even sure this is Denver's worst Super Bowl ever.
Hah, my buddies were all talking about that when we were watching. Elway must be having flashbacks.
On February 03 2014 17:46 ejac wrote: As a Seattle local, fucking awesome the Seahawks won. That being said the game was fucking terrible. A safety in the first play of the game?!?!?!
The game was indeed terrible. Hosted a SB-party, trying to get a couple of friends into NFL - I don't think I was all that successful As a fan of neither team I had really hoped for a good game, but Denver just decided not to play in any of the 3 phases of the game.
The exact same thing happened for me too. I told my friends how awesome the superballs had been in the past. They finally gave in and we did hot dogs and stuff and then this terrible game happened. Feels depressing...
What was so bad? We got to see a little bit of everything, yea it was from one team but it was impressive. Safety, pick six, kick off return how is that not exciting?
On February 03 2014 17:46 ejac wrote: As a Seattle local, fucking awesome the Seahawks won. That being said the game was fucking terrible. A safety in the first play of the game?!?!?!
The game was indeed terrible. Hosted a SB-party, trying to get a couple of friends into NFL - I don't think I was all that successful As a fan of neither team I had really hoped for a good game, but Denver just decided not to play in any of the 3 phases of the game.
The exact same thing happened for me too. I told my friends how awesome the superballs had been in the past. They finally gave in and we did hot dogs and stuff and then this terrible game happened. Feels depressing...
What was so bad? We got to see a little bit of everything, yea it was from one team but it was impressive. Safety, pick six, kick off return how is that not exciting?
Things are almost always more fun when, you know, it's a actually a competitive game. Just have them watch the NFC Championship game.
On February 03 2014 17:46 ejac wrote: As a Seattle local, fucking awesome the Seahawks won. That being said the game was fucking terrible. A safety in the first play of the game?!?!?!
The game was indeed terrible. Hosted a SB-party, trying to get a couple of friends into NFL - I don't think I was all that successful As a fan of neither team I had really hoped for a good game, but Denver just decided not to play in any of the 3 phases of the game.
The exact same thing happened for me too. I told my friends how awesome the superballs had been in the past. They finally gave in and we did hot dogs and stuff and then this terrible game happened. Feels depressing...
What was so bad? We got to see a little bit of everything, yea it was from one team but it was impressive. Safety, pick six, kick off return how is that not exciting?
Things are almost always more fun when, you know, it's a actually a competitive game. Just have them watch the NFC Championship game.
On February 03 2014 14:05 Doodsmack wrote: I'm surprised the Dannon commercial with the full house people isn't getting more controversy for being sexist. Maybe it will tomorrow. Or am I just so prude and TV-ignorant that I didn't know cum and blowjob jokes are accepted now?
Would hAve never thought I'd be prude by 28. But I really did miss the part where a straight up cum and blowjob commercial on national tv became nbd. Then again I never watch tv.
On February 03 2014 11:58 ticklishmusic wrote: Africa is about to get a ton of Denver broncos super bowl champs gear
rofl... funny because likely true
How so ? there is only 1 american football team there as far as I know , and that is the Nigerian National Team....well I hope they get it anyway , they need it to survive the 2015 American Football World Cup.
He means that someone produced tons of Broncos Super Bowl champ gear in the event that they won the Super Bowl. Now theres really nothing to do with it but give it to charity.
Here's some happy fans of the 2007 Bears Super Bowl champs!
Thought it was a pretty awesome match, it was like an exhibition of ways to win with special teams/ defence. Loved Percy Harvin's contribution, good for him. Feel sorry for Peyton. His O Line were not up to it and he picked a terrible time to have a bad game!
i thought the oline was wayyyyy more at fault than manning. you cant be getting shredded like that by four man fronts. they rushed only six times all game.
On February 04 2014 03:49 Doodsmack wrote: Would hAve never thought I'd be prude by 28. But I really did miss the part where a straight up cum and blowjob commercial on national tv became nbd. Then again I never watch tv.
You must have been watching a different commercial, because I didn't see any straight up cum or blowjobs.
On February 04 2014 05:30 QuanticHawk wrote: i thought the oline was wayyyyy more at fault than manning. you cant be getting shredded like that by four man fronts. they rushed only six times all game.
This. Every time a play ended, there seemed to be like no Broncos to be seen anywhere. Peyton was forced out of pocket in under two seconds almost every play (dunno if they actually count that stat).
On February 04 2014 03:49 Doodsmack wrote: Would hAve never thought I'd be prude by 28. But I really did miss the part where a straight up cum and blowjob commercial on national tv became nbd. Then again I never watch tv.
You must have been watching a different commercial, because I didn't see any straight up cum or blowjobs.
On February 04 2014 05:30 QuanticHawk wrote: i thought the oline was wayyyyy more at fault than manning. you cant be getting shredded like that by four man fronts. they rushed only six times all game.
This. Every time a play ended, there seemed to be like no Broncos to be seen anywhere. Peyton was forced out of pocket in under two seconds almost every play (dunno if they actually count that stat).
yup. that offense is is built on manning having ample time to let any of his wrs get some where and hit them for big yardage. cant do that if he's barely able to get back for his steps before getting pressured
On February 04 2014 07:31 AgentW wrote: Oh take your Brady fellation elsewhere. No one wants to hear that bullshit any longer.
But wait he hasn't posted his 300th completely unbiased article from the Pats#1AllTimeAllYourTeamsWishTheyWereThePats.com fanboards about why spygate was overblown.
On February 04 2014 03:49 Doodsmack wrote: Would hAve never thought I'd be prude by 28. But I really did miss the part where a straight up cum and blowjob commercial on national tv became nbd. Then again I never watch tv.
You must have been watching a different commercial, because I didn't see any straight up cum or blowjobs.
You're right it wasn't straight up, but a blowjob joke certainly goes further than what I've seen in commercials. And yes a blowjob joke is inherently female-submissive, especially when the other men say "she wasn't good for us anyway" after cock blocking.
On February 04 2014 03:49 Doodsmack wrote: Would hAve never thought I'd be prude by 28. But I really did miss the part where a straight up cum and blowjob commercial on national tv became nbd. Then again I never watch tv.
You must have been watching a different commercial, because I didn't see any straight up cum or blowjobs.
You're right it wasn't straight up, but a blowjob joke certainly goes further than what I've seen in commercials. And yes a blowjob joke is inherently female-submissive, especially when the other men say "she wasn't good for us anyway" after cock blocking.
Turns out human(and most mammalian) sexuality is female submissive. So I guess we just can't make sex jokes now?
There was a cleaning joke in there too, that's pretty sexist.
Pretty sure it was also in a kitchen, more sexism.
On February 04 2014 03:49 Doodsmack wrote: Would hAve never thought I'd be prude by 28. But I really did miss the part where a straight up cum and blowjob commercial on national tv became nbd. Then again I never watch tv.
You must have been watching a different commercial, because I didn't see any straight up cum or blowjobs.
You're right it wasn't straight up, but a blowjob joke certainly goes further than what I've seen in commercials. And yes a blowjob joke is inherently female-submissive, especially when the other men say "she wasn't good for us anyway" after cock blocking.
Turns out human(and most mammalian) sexuality is female submissive. So I guess we just can't make sex jokes now?
There was a cleaning joke in there too, that's pretty sexist.
Pretty sure it was also in a kitchen, more sexism.
What a terrible commercial!
Oh look, sexism exists in pop culture and animal culture, therefore we should propagate it. Instead of bettering our culture and trying to eliminate inequalities, let's become more animalistic!
On February 04 2014 03:49 Doodsmack wrote: Would hAve never thought I'd be prude by 28. But I really did miss the part where a straight up cum and blowjob commercial on national tv became nbd. Then again I never watch tv.
You must have been watching a different commercial, because I didn't see any straight up cum or blowjobs.
You're right it wasn't straight up, but a blowjob joke certainly goes further than what I've seen in commercials. And yes a blowjob joke is inherently female-submissive, especially when the other men say "she wasn't good for us anyway" after cock blocking.
Turns out human(and most mammalian) sexuality is female submissive. So I guess we just can't make sex jokes now?
There was a cleaning joke in there too, that's pretty sexist.
Pretty sure it was also in a kitchen, more sexism.
What a terrible commercial!
Oh look, sexism exists in pop culture and animal culture, therefore we should propagate it. Instead of bettering our culture and trying to eliminate inequalities, let's become more animalistic!
I am unaware of how a commercial joking about a woman initiating sexual activity is propagating inequality. What improvement to our culture happens if we stop making such jokes?
Superbowl MVP should have gone to the entire Seahawks D-line. They pretty much destroyed Broncos by themselves. All the big plays the secondary made was more or less directly caused by the d-line domination.
On February 04 2014 03:49 Doodsmack wrote: Would hAve never thought I'd be prude by 28. But I really did miss the part where a straight up cum and blowjob commercial on national tv became nbd. Then again I never watch tv.
You must have been watching a different commercial, because I didn't see any straight up cum or blowjobs.
You're right it wasn't straight up, but a blowjob joke certainly goes further than what I've seen in commercials. And yes a blowjob joke is inherently female-submissive, especially when the other men say "she wasn't good for us anyway" after cock blocking.
Turns out human(and most mammalian) sexuality is female submissive. So I guess we just can't make sex jokes now?
There was a cleaning joke in there too, that's pretty sexist.
Pretty sure it was also in a kitchen, more sexism.
What a terrible commercial!
I think you can discern the difference in degree of female submissiveness between a blowjob and most other sex acts.
On February 04 2014 10:38 Intact wrote: Superbowl MVP should have gone to the entire Seahawks D-line. They pretty much destroyed Broncos by themselves. All the big plays the secondary made was more or less directly caused by the d-line domination.
I (and pretty much everyone else that was at my house) said they should have given it to the entire defense. An extraordinary effort by the whole unit.
On February 04 2014 10:38 Intact wrote: Superbowl MVP should have gone to the entire Seahawks D-line. They pretty much destroyed Broncos by themselves. All the big plays the secondary made was more or less directly caused by the d-line domination.
I (and pretty much everyone else that was at my house) said they should have given it to the entire defense. An extraordinary effort by the whole unit.
I just don;t understand how they so outclassed the Denver offensive line... I mean the Seahawks have been good all season, but this was like a college team vs. a high school team.
On February 04 2014 10:38 Intact wrote: Superbowl MVP should have gone to the entire Seahawks D-line. They pretty much destroyed Broncos by themselves. All the big plays the secondary made was more or less directly caused by the d-line domination.
People tend to attribute a lot of a defensive effort to the D-line but they forget that the entire defense works as a unit together.
Peyton Manning, despite the outcome of the game, is exceptionally good at checking down his list of receivers. His average time from snap to releasing the football is 2.4 seconds. If we have a good D-line but bad pass coverage, chances are he can hit the quick slant or curl route for at least a moderate gain. Denver's YAC was also a significant factor in their offense throughout the regular season.
Having great pass coverage also gives our D-line time to reach Peyton and makes any pressured passes a huge risk. Having great pass rush gives our secondary chances to take the ball away. If he does manage to get the pass off and his receiver gets it, our linebackers and LOB have to be good enough to punish the receiver immediately for trying to run up the middle. Basically our entire defensive unit was on point the whole game and created opportunities for each other.
EPT
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/2TMerM0.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/images/forum/wiki_icon.png){kind=icon}
Super Bowl 2014 on ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/l43FFWo.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/images2/thumb/3/30/Writers_Icon.png/15px-Writers_Icon.png){kind=icon}
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/r9ZH0.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/GDfRGiP.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/LBr19.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/hpDvjxj.png)
Seattle Seahawks <MetLife Stadium> Denver Broncos 
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/bv8Kw.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/l6ikuaj.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/muQ5zxf.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/l9KggmR.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/l5YZ8.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/3wcCS.png)
![[image loading]](http://www.funny1060.com/Pics/Showcases/5800F/1521721_10152166570479100_455575304_n.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ivNjvPS.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/sfy4FyN.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110805114642/leagueoflegends/images/8/8e/Surrvoting.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/HgbBU1e.jpg)
![[image loading]](https://scontent-a-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/t1/q71/1601282_10153769528255302_1406610695_n.jpg)
![[image loading]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BfhAgFJIQAA8fmz.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/2jXOXqA.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.mentalfloss.com/sites/default/legacy/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/world-vision-super-bowl-bears.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://wac.9ebf.edgecastcdn.net/809EBF/ec-origin.boston.barstoolsports.com/files/2014/02/PeytonSB3.jpg)
