| Forum Index > Sports |
Time to move on to the next thread http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sports/460943-2014-2015-football-thread | ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
On April 20 2014 22:27 Pandemona wrote: Has 8 in the premier league ;_; The same as West Ham Keeper, Sunderland Keeper and Newcastle keeper. FPL site says 10. Oh well. Compare that to Boruc, who has missed nearly 10 games to injury, who has 12 CS. | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28701 Posts
| ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28701 Posts
 | ||
|
zeo
Serbia6299 Posts
| ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
First start in ages and Ramsey has a goal and an assist. Hurts to imagine where we could have been with him fit all season. | ||
|
Terminal
United Kingdom2109 Posts
but yeah oh well | ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28701 Posts
| ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On April 20 2014 22:12 Pandemona wrote: Mourinho is not perfect, but you can't say Yanited and Pool are in their own bubble away from this stuff. Look at Fergie as well, went years without speaking to a Jouranlist from BBC over a tough question or two ^_^ Has to be said mr Twisted, for someone who complains that their is tactical inept in the Premier League your backing the team who has no back 4 and keeper....who has had i think 1 clean sheet all season? Cannot defend a set piece for toffee and win through having the best inform striker in the world, backed up by a guy who can score tappins and an 18 year old who is lightning quick it puts people on their ass's for fun. They are the worst team tactically, their only tactic is "give the ball to suarez and lets roll the dice" I didnt say anything about players, I am talking about managers and are you seriously comparing Ferguson to Mourinho ? If Mourinho contributes even a sliver to English football what Fergie did fine with me, he can do whatever he wants. And Fergie for all his hypocrisy and controversy was never a smug asshole. And its not like Fergie showed up won 2 years got booted and came back after a club went through an assembly line of coaches. Mou lost to Sunderland and he had the fucking gall to start calling out Mike Riley? Are you kidding me? Thats all you've got ? You should be mauling Sunderland, You should have the Sunderland ballboy reffing the game and still win, thats what champions do. As for Liverpool and tactics, are you off your blooming rocker? It is a documented fact that Brendan Rodgers has out thought managers at the top level this season on a consistent basis. Nor does any other team play the variety of formations Liverpool can as evidenced by their game today and last week no less. Also what the fuck is with this consistently bullshit argument that teams need to be great defensively or they clearly dont deserve to win. If anything winning with a leaky defensive is admirable. Finally a team scores near a 100 goals in a season. You should remember the last team that did that very well. It was a team that played with pace, power and would knock you over pound for pound with technically gifted players to boot. Not this "wailll my striker suck so Imma deeefeense bullshit" | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Oh my Berba On April 20 2014 23:23 Rebs wrote: I didnt say anything about players, I am talking about managers and are you seriously comparing Ferguson to Mourinho ? If Mourinho contributes even a sliver to English football what Fergie did fine with me, he can do whatever he wants. And Fergie for all his hypocrisy and controversy was never a smug asshole. And its not like Fergie showed up won 2 years got booted and came back after a club went through an assembly line of coaches. Mou lost to Sunderland and he had the fucking gall to start calling out Mike Riley? Are you kidding me? Thats all you've got ? You should be mauling Sunderland, You should have the Sunderland ballboy reffing the game and still win, thats what champions do. As for Liverpool and tactics, are you off your blooming rocker? It is a documented fact that Brendan Rodgers has out thought managers at the top level this season on a consistent basis. Nor does any other team play the variety of formations Liverpool can as evidenced by their game today and last week no less. Also what the fuck is with this consistently bullshit argument that teams need to be great defensively or they clearly dont deserve to win. If anything winning with a leaky defensive is admirable. Finally a team scores near a 100 goals in a season. You should remember the last team that did that very well. It was a team that played with pace, power and would knock you over pound for pound with technically gifted players to boot. Not this "wailll my striker suck so Imma deeefeense bullshit" Mourhino contributed to the permier league alot already. He has boosted viewing figures and attraction with the way he acted when he first joined Chelsea in 2005. This is fact, he made the premier league exciting (or even more so) he helped with that thanks to the way he was and the rivalries he had. No im saying Fergie wasn't all that nice to anyone he didn't like either. See again you take the wrong point from what Mourinho said after the game, what he said was. I want to thank my team for their efforts and "CONGRATULATIONS TO SUNDERLAND" he said well done to them, then he mentioned how shite the referee was. Also you do not know the conversations Mike Rilley has had with Mourinho this season thus you cannot comment on when he directly points a finger at him! Admirable to have a leaky defense yet the "premier league" gets labelled as a league with no tactical prowess anymore? I think somewhere something has gone wrong with the postings of people. One minute it's there is no tactics, next minute Liverpool are tactically sound what? They are far from it, they got picked apart by Villa for playing 4-4-2 and Rodgers spent a good 40 minutes of being pounded on the counter until he changed it that is NOT good management. That game i remember as i had 2 Liverpool fans spamming skype with the same shit of "WHY HASNT HE CHANGED IT WTF". Rodgers tactics are to keep the ball and play like he was doing at Swansea, which the last few games to highlight this, they cannot do with the defense they have. Sakho and Johnson giving the ball away and a LB who is to new to the game and a bit of a loose cannon at times. When Chelsea won the league with 100 goals in 2010 we had a decent defensive record but not the best, but what we had then was the ability to score goals and big when we needed to. We started that season with 4 6-0s in a row. Conceded though just shy of 0.9 goal a game so...not the best ;_; Liverpool are about to win it with what probably eventually, close to 1.4/1.5 goals a game so they might score alot but they cant defend ;_; That is far from the Liverpool who were tactically sound under Rafa, the problem with Rafa's Liverpool was he made to many squad rotations with a weak squad. But he knew that and was making a point to the owners at the time im sure that he wanted more money for a bigger squad. | ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
| ||
|
soujiro_
Uruguay5195 Posts
| ||
|
Pantagruel
United States1427 Posts
On April 20 2014 23:29 Pandemona wrote: https://vine.co/v/M1Ez9iqjDti Oh my Berba Mourhino contributed to the permier league alot already. He has boosted viewing figures and attraction with the way he acted when he first joined Chelsea in 2005. This is fact, he made the premier league exciting (or even more so) he helped with that thanks to the way he was and the rivalries he had. No im saying Fergie wasn't all that nice to anyone he didn't like either. See again you take the wrong point from what Mourinho said after the game, what he said was. I want to thank my team for their efforts and "CONGRATULATIONS TO SUNDERLAND" he said well done to them, then he mentioned how shite the referee was. Also you do not know the conversations Mike Rilley has had with Mourinho this season thus you cannot comment on when he directly points a finger at him! Admirable to have a leaky defense yet the "premier league" gets labelled as a league with no tactical prowess anymore? I think somewhere something has gone wrong with the postings of people. One minute it's there is no tactics, next minute Liverpool are tactically sound what? They are far from it, they got picked apart by Villa for playing 4-4-2 and Rodgers spent a good 40 minutes of being pounded on the counter until he changed it that is NOT good management. That game i remember as i had 2 Liverpool fans spamming skype with the same shit of "WHY HASNT HE CHANGED IT WTF". Rodgers tactics are to keep the ball and play like he was doing at Swansea, which the last few games to highlight this, they cannot do with the defense they have. Sakho and Johnson giving the ball away and a LB who is to new to the game and a bit of a loose cannon at times. When Chelsea won the league with 100 goals in 2010 we had a decent defensive record but not the best, but what we had then was the ability to score goals and big when we needed to. We started that season with 4 6-0s in a row. Conceded though just shy of 0.9 goal a game so...not the best ;_; Liverpool are about to win it with what probably eventually, close to 1.4/1.5 goals a game so they might score alot but they cant defend ;_; That is far from the Liverpool who were tactically sound under Rafa, the problem with Rafa's Liverpool was he made to many squad rotations with a weak squad. But he knew that and was making a point to the owners at the time im sure that he wanted more money for a bigger squad. Liverpool are definitely tactically competent in attack which is ultimately why we all watch. I don't give a rats ass about defense. When I think of defense I think of small teams in the league that don't have the talent and creativity to produce anything offensively. I don't blame those teams for playing as they do because playing conservatively is conducive to being a mid table team and not getting relegated. A team with the talent of Chelsea or United to me is disgraceful to watch how they play. For that reason alone I'd prefer Pool or City to win the league. Regardless, saying Pool don't deserve to win the league because they have a suspect defense is absurd. They play beautiful enterprising football, trying to win games rather then ensuring they don't lose. If they win the league they will easily have deserved it on their play. | ||
|
zeo
Serbia6299 Posts
Jumping into the Liverpool discussion, if they win the league they will have played the least amount of games any champion has played since the 50's. Like 40 games for the whole season. | ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On April 20 2014 23:29 Pandemona wrote: https://vine.co/v/M1Ez9iqjDti Oh my Berba Mourhino contributed to the permier league alot already. He has boosted viewing figures and attraction with the way he acted when he first joined Chelsea in 2005. This is fact, he made the premier league exciting (or even more so) he helped with that thanks to the way he was and the rivalries he had. No im saying Fergie wasn't all that nice to anyone he didn't like either. See again you take the wrong point from what Mourinho said after the game, what he said was. I want to thank my team for their efforts and "CONGRATULATIONS TO SUNDERLAND" he said well done to them, then he mentioned how shite the referee was. Also you do not know the conversations Mike Rilley has had with Mourinho this season thus you cannot comment on when he directly points a finger at him! Admirable to have a leaky defense yet the "premier league" gets labelled as a league with no tactical prowess anymore? I think somewhere something has gone wrong with the postings of people. One minute it's there is no tactics, next minute Liverpool are tactically sound what? They are far from it, they got picked apart by Villa for playing 4-4-2 and Rodgers spent a good 40 minutes of being pounded on the counter until he changed it that is NOT good management. That game i remember as i had 2 Liverpool fans spamming skype with the same shit of "WHY HASNT HE CHANGED IT WTF". Rodgers tactics are to keep the ball and play like he was doing at Swansea, which the last few games to highlight this, they cannot do with the defense they have. Sakho and Johnson giving the ball away and a LB who is to new to the game and a bit of a loose cannon at times. When Chelsea won the league with 100 goals in 2010 we had a decent defensive record but not the best, but what we had then was the ability to score goals and big when we needed to. We started that season with 4 6-0s in a row. Conceded though just shy of 0.9 goal a game so...not the best ;_; Liverpool are about to win it with what probably eventually, close to 1.4/1.5 goals a game so they might score alot but they cant defend ;_; That is far from the Liverpool who were tactically sound under Rafa, the problem with Rafa's Liverpool was he made to many squad rotations with a weak squad. But he knew that and was making a point to the owners at the time im sure that he wanted more money for a bigger squad. The Chelsea googles are so thick im just not even going to bother, not sure why I even tried. My bad, lets hope the entire world plays cagey counter attacking football so you end up with 2 teams sitting in their own halves waiting for the other to do something. I think the league has run out of refs for Mou to criticize at this point. | ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28701 Posts
and united has 67% possession, but has not looked dangerous once. not once! | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
On April 21 2014 00:59 Rebs wrote: The Chelsea googles are so thick im just not even going to bother, not sure why I even tried. My bad, lets hope the entire world plays cagey counter attacking football so you end up with 2 teams sitting in their own halves waiting for the other to do something. I think the league has run out of refs for Mou to criticize at this point. What no ;_; You just dont understand my point. Your saying Mourinho is blaming mike riley for our defeat no. He is saying the ref missed alot of decisions and mentions mike riley the head of refs who he speaks to ALOT if you didn't realize..........He also said gz Sunderland won. What else you want him to do? Ignore all the incidents of the game and be a yes man and have no emotion? Your just trying to make a point of how bad Mourinho is and how much better Liverpool and United managers are....i think you forget certain things pretty quickly. “We had a referee from Manchester for the game” – Rodgers after they City away game. If that was Mourinho id have that thrown at my face at every moment, but because it Liverpool manager lets not mention it? Manchester United boss David Moyes took a veiled cut at referee Andre Marriner and his officials after last night’s semi-final first leg defeat at the Stadium of Light.“We are having to play the opposition and the officials at this moment... maybe I’ve got to understand that’s what happens at Man United,” said the Scotsman last night. Yanited's manager.... ;_; Every manager does this....why flag Mourinho up on it? Also im ot saying Mourinho is perfect and does nothing wrong, i know he does, but he hasn't done ANYTHING wrong in England yet since his return. He has moaned about refs like every other manager? What is wrong with that, sometimes it is justified others is not. Yesterday he just lost the league and his unbeaten home record and a chance at an historic double. Also, that game in HIS opinion the referee missed penalty calls for us and theirs was soft. Not easy to swallow when you get a microphoned shoved under your nose at full time xD Pretty sure if it was me id be suspended by the FA after it! | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18484 Posts
On April 21 2014 01:25 Pandemona wrote: What no ;_; You just dont understand my point. Your saying Mourinho is blaming mike riley for our defeat no. He is saying the ref missed alot of decisions and mentions mike riley the head of refs who he speaks to ALOT if you didn't realize..........He also said gz Sunderland won. What else you want him to do? Ignore all the incidents of the game and be a yes man and have no emotion? Your just trying to make a point of how bad Mourinho is and how much better Liverpool and United managers are....i think you forget certain things pretty quickly. “We had a referee from Manchester for the game” – Rodgers after they City away game. If that was Mourinho id have that thrown at my face at every moment, but because it Liverpool manager lets not mention it? Yanited's manager.... ;_; Every manager does this....why flag Mourinho up on it? Because the majority of football fans only have their knowledge from the media and act all high and mighty ^^ | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Lol, oh well could be worst..I could be a Yanited fan  | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18484 Posts
They really manage to completely ignore Kagawa on the field. Each time Kagawa is in a better position they rather try on their own or pass back... If I were Kagawa I'd be so fed up by the whole club | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games summit1g6812 shahzam610 Day[9].tv546 C9.Mang0292 ViBE238 Skadoodle185 Maynarde143 fpsfer  2WinterStarcraft1 |
|
The PondCast
OSC
Wardi Open
CranKy Ducklings
Safe House 2
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Safe House 2
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
|
|
|
EPT
