|
On July 14 2022 02:12 Elentos wrote: Getting to switch races between games is absolute bullshit. People veto maps based on matchups. agree. At some point it could become an issue, you should pick up your race for the series.
|
Everyone should just tryhard practice ZvZ and then race switch right before the game starts to troll Reynor. It's not against the rules!
Imagine the meta that is when Reynor tries to last second last second counter race switch.
|
|
Wait, so Reynor started as Toss in the first match, lost, then switched back to Zerg to win the match. Then now hes switching back to Toss again? I am all for player creativity and freedom, but this is just a waste of time to be honest. There is absolutely no stake in all of this, and I am supised ESL has no rules about switching race mid-series like this.
|
On July 14 2022 02:46 tigera6 wrote: Wait, so Reynor started as Toss in the first match, lost, then switched back to Zerg to win the match. Then now hes switching back to Toss again? I am all for player creativity and freedom, but this is just a waste of time to be honest. There is absolutely no stake in all of this, and I am supised ESL has no rules about switching race mid-series like this.
ESL has rules about switching races between matches and games - it's explicitly allowed.
I agree with you that this expresses player creativity and freedom. However why do you think it's a waste of time and lacks stake? Explain please
|
On July 14 2022 04:17 warnull wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2022 02:46 tigera6 wrote: Wait, so Reynor started as Toss in the first match, lost, then switched back to Zerg to win the match. Then now hes switching back to Toss again? I am all for player creativity and freedom, but this is just a waste of time to be honest. There is absolutely no stake in all of this, and I am supised ESL has no rules about switching race mid-series like this. ESL has rules about switching races between matches and games - it's explicitly allowed. I agree with you that this expresses player creativity and freedom. However why do you think it's a waste of time and lacks stake? Explain please Waste of time since the player basically can offrace with no stakes. It's a lose-lose for the other player: either they lose against somebody else's off race, or they win and have to deal with the switcher's main race anyway, which negates all their effort in the first game. There is no real stake in the first game against an off racer: even though the match up was close in the first game, the match itself is not.
I think that's the main sentiment. I think it also feels a bit disrespectful: "play against my offrace, and only if you do reasonably then I'll play you with my main" as if their opponents don't deserve to play against their main races. Fairest thing would probably be to declare race for the entire series, then do vetos. Then there are stakes to off racing in a match, rather than just being able to fall back on your main.
I think it's good entertainment to see off race from time to time, But it would be good if it came from a place of real "you can't beat my offrace" confidence, rather than a "I can always just play seriously starting next game" sentiment. It's like a sports team starting the match with half their players, then only putting in the other half if they're losing.
Edit: But my main gripe is with the rules; it's a little bit rude to play this way, but the onus is ultimately on organizers to have good rules that keep everybody's best interests in mind. I do hope we still see off race games from pros, especially good ones, but I just don't think it should be at the expense of underdogs, who are already in a tough spot.
|
On July 14 2022 06:34 yubo56 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2022 04:17 warnull wrote:On July 14 2022 02:46 tigera6 wrote: Wait, so Reynor started as Toss in the first match, lost, then switched back to Zerg to win the match. Then now hes switching back to Toss again? I am all for player creativity and freedom, but this is just a waste of time to be honest. There is absolutely no stake in all of this, and I am supised ESL has no rules about switching race mid-series like this. ESL has rules about switching races between matches and games - it's explicitly allowed. I agree with you that this expresses player creativity and freedom. However why do you think it's a waste of time and lacks stake? Explain please Waste of time since the player basically can offrace with no stakes. It's a lose-lose for the other player: either they lose against somebody else's off race, or they win and have to deal with the switcher's main race anyway, which negates all their effort in the first game. There is no real stake in the first game against an off racer: even though the match up was close in the first game, the match itself is not. I think that's the main sentiment. I think it also feels a bit disrespectful: "play against my offrace, and only if you do reasonably then I'll play you with my main" as if their opponents don't deserve to play against their main races. Fairest thing would probably be to declare race for the entire series, then do vetos. Then there are stakes to off racing in a match, rather than just being able to fall back on your main. I think it's good entertainment to see off race from time to time, But it would be good if it came from a place of real "you can't beat my offrace" confidence, rather than a "I can always just play seriously starting next game" sentiment. It's like a sports team starting the match with half their players, then only putting in the other half if they're losing. Edit: But my main gripe is with the rules; it's a little bit rude to play this way, but the onus is ultimately on organizers to have good rules that keep everybody's best interests in mind. I do hope we still see off race games from pros, especially good ones, but I just don't think it should be at the expense of underdogs, who are already in a tough spot.
I don't quite agree that there aren't stakes -- there's literal money on the line and these are professional players. If serral decided to just 12 pool every game because he wants to show off his micro, that's his prerogative, however "disrespectful" it may be. And sure, while beating him won't feel that impressive (because you just held a cheese nothing more), at the end of the day you win and he loses.
I think the most compelling arguments against race switching mid series are
1. maps are picked / vetoed based on a given matchup 2. this can lead to an unstable equilibrium -- if two race switchers just can't agree on which race they wanna play (i.e. for every possible match up at least one player wants to switch) then it's unclear how to actually decide who gets what race.
Besides that... I say let them knock themselves out. Reynor actually came close to not qualifying for TSL which seems a good enough "punishment" to me.
|
On July 14 2022 08:23 angry_maia wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2022 06:34 yubo56 wrote:On July 14 2022 04:17 warnull wrote:On July 14 2022 02:46 tigera6 wrote: Wait, so Reynor started as Toss in the first match, lost, then switched back to Zerg to win the match. Then now hes switching back to Toss again? I am all for player creativity and freedom, but this is just a waste of time to be honest. There is absolutely no stake in all of this, and I am supised ESL has no rules about switching race mid-series like this. ESL has rules about switching races between matches and games - it's explicitly allowed. I agree with you that this expresses player creativity and freedom. However why do you think it's a waste of time and lacks stake? Explain please Waste of time since the player basically can offrace with no stakes. It's a lose-lose for the other player: either they lose against somebody else's off race, or they win and have to deal with the switcher's main race anyway, which negates all their effort in the first game. There is no real stake in the first game against an off racer: even though the match up was close in the first game, the match itself is not. I think that's the main sentiment. I think it also feels a bit disrespectful: "play against my offrace, and only if you do reasonably then I'll play you with my main" as if their opponents don't deserve to play against their main races. Fairest thing would probably be to declare race for the entire series, then do vetos. Then there are stakes to off racing in a match, rather than just being able to fall back on your main. I think it's good entertainment to see off race from time to time, But it would be good if it came from a place of real "you can't beat my offrace" confidence, rather than a "I can always just play seriously starting next game" sentiment. It's like a sports team starting the match with half their players, then only putting in the other half if they're losing. Edit: But my main gripe is with the rules; it's a little bit rude to play this way, but the onus is ultimately on organizers to have good rules that keep everybody's best interests in mind. I do hope we still see off race games from pros, especially good ones, but I just don't think it should be at the expense of underdogs, who are already in a tough spot. I don't quite agree that there aren't stakes -- there's literal money on the line and these are professional players. If serral decided to just 12 pool every game because he wants to show off his micro, that's his prerogative, however "disrespectful" it may be. And sure, while beating him won't feel that impressive (because you just held a cheese nothing more), at the end of the day you win and he loses. I think the most compelling arguments against race switching mid series are 1. maps are picked / vetoed based on a given matchup 2. this can lead to an unstable equilibrium -- if two race switchers just can't agree on which race they wanna play (i.e. for every possible match up at least one player wants to switch) then it's unclear how to actually decide who gets what race. Besides that... I say let them knock themselves out. Reynor actually came close to not qualifying for TSL which seems a good enough "punishment" to me. There isnt enough stakes imo if you can just switch back to your main race down a game or 2. Flash ran through the ASL playing random, which is even harder, but he doesnt switch to Terran (not sure if ASL even allow it) within a series, although he didnt win it ultimately, its still a great experience to watch. And huge credit to Reynor, down 0-2 in PvZ against Denver and still dig in playing 2 more series in PvZ to even the score before switching back to Zerg. It seems that Reynor switching to Protoss in a PvZ is a strategic choice, because he want to avoid the clown-fest in ZvZ where the opponent can yolo at X number of drones at any given time. So I dont mind it at all if that is the case. I think its a waste of time in other situation, like in PvT where Reynor clearly wasnt as good (I know he beat HM before), get beaten and switching back to Zerg immediately. I dont think its "disrepectful" toward the opponent, but I am not just interested in watching it if player can bail out while doing off-race. Btw, I saw Special also start to do some off-race in the LA qualifier, and it was an eyesore to watch as his Protoss isnt even that great. He got his butt kicked by Zerg until he switch back to Terran and advance, but that wasnt pretty to watch. So yeah, while I dont mind the off-racing if it actually IMPROVE your chance of winning, we gotta set some limit so that everyone not gonna start off-racing between games and make it longer while the quality isnt as good. This is more like watch-it rather than a "all hell break loose" type of situation though, and I still do want to see Maru vs Reynor PvP in a Bo7 Grand Final.
|
So yeah, while I dont mind the off-racing if it actually IMPROVE your chance of winning, we gotta set some limit so that everyone not gonna start off-racing between games and make it longer while the quality isnt as good.
I see so this is the core of your argument? Basically you think that if people keep offracing game quality will go down and that's just bad? Sorry just clarifying.
|
Frankly I think the off racing is a lot of fun. The only reason I watched TSL qualis was to see Maru and Reynor offracing
|
On July 14 2022 14:06 serendipitous wrote: Frankly I think the off racing is a lot of fun. The only reason I watched TSL qualis was to see Maru and Reynor offracing
I don't think anyone is saying that the players cannot play off-race. It's just that picking an off-race *after* map vetoes is not strictly fair, and the fact that you get to pick a race after each map is also the other rule that people are not happy about. I assume that they would rather the players announce the race that they would play, and only allow that one race throughout the series.
|
On July 14 2022 12:53 angry_maia wrote:Show nested quote +So yeah, while I dont mind the off-racing if it actually IMPROVE your chance of winning, we gotta set some limit so that everyone not gonna start off-racing between games and make it longer while the quality isnt as good. I see so this is the core of your argument? Basically you think that if people keep offracing game quality will go down and that's just bad? Sorry just clarifying. Yeah, I totally support off-racing if that give you a competitive advantage. Ultimately, if Reynor can play Protoss against Serral and Maru main-race, that would be amazing. But I dont like off-racing when players evidently cant provide as good quality games, only to walk back to their main race after being down 1-2 games in the series. As for the rule, if off-racing is allowed between maps within a match, then players need to declare the race for each of the map they pick before the match begin.
|
On July 14 2022 16:11 tigera6 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2022 12:53 angry_maia wrote:So yeah, while I dont mind the off-racing if it actually IMPROVE your chance of winning, we gotta set some limit so that everyone not gonna start off-racing between games and make it longer while the quality isnt as good. I see so this is the core of your argument? Basically you think that if people keep offracing game quality will go down and that's just bad? Sorry just clarifying. Yeah, I totally support off-racing if that give you a competitive advantage. Ultimately, if Reynor can play Protoss against Serral and Maru main-race, that would be amazing. But I dont like off-racing when players evidently cant provide as good quality games, only to walk back to their main race after being down 1-2 games in the series. As for the rule, if off-racing is allowed between maps within a match, then players need to declare the race for each of the map they pick before the match begin.
Would you happen to know the off-racing rules in GSL? Is it the same as ESLs?
|
Absolutely love the idea they allow race switching between games. You pick a race you're nowhere near as good as at as your main and that more than balances the fact the other player is unable to play a match-up he anticipated on a given map (using his main race).
|
On July 14 2022 14:58 buzz_bender wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2022 14:06 serendipitous wrote: Frankly I think the off racing is a lot of fun. The only reason I watched TSL qualis was to see Maru and Reynor offracing I don't think anyone is saying that the players cannot play off-race. It's just that picking an off-race *after* map vetoes is not strictly fair, and the fact that you get to pick a race after each map is also the other rule that people are not happy about. I assume that they would rather the players announce the race that they would play, and only allow that one race throughout the series.
Mastering a second race is extremely hard no matter the map you play in and should came up as a reward tho.
|
People (me included) where at least sceptical about to many korean slots, when there are so many Koreans that can t leave Korea due to the Military. Today Nightmare Proved us all wrong, pretty decent run, beating both Scarlett and Nice. Ggs
|
France12761 Posts
On July 15 2022 00:48 dbRic1203 wrote: People (me included) where at least sceptical about to many korean slots, when there are so many Koreans that can t leave Korea due to the Military. Today Nightmare Proved us all wrong, pretty decent run, beating both Scarlett and Nice. Ggs The lower level Korean players should not be underestimated imo, outside of the top European players they are competitive
|
Even without Trap/Cure/Rogue/Zest, KRs are still about the same as EU at the very top (top 1-3), and KR are better all around outside of top 5.
|
|
We just had Ryung of all players perform better than all but 3 foreigners at the world championship. The gap has only closed significantly for the top 3-4 foreigners. Everyone else is still very far behind their KR equivalent.
|
|
|
|