
GSL Season 2
Streams & Casters
Format
- Group Stage #2 (Round of 16): Dual Tournament Format.
- Group Nominations.
- All matches are Bo3.
Map Pool
Group D
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/4729.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/5308.jpg)


![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/663.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/611.jpg)


Results
+ Show Spoiler [Matchlist] +
CSS: FO-nTTaX
Awesomeness: Panda
Banner: GSL
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
![]()
Pandemona
![]()
Charlie Sheens House51452 Posts
![]() GSL Season 2Streams & CastersFormat
Map Pool Group D![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Results+ Show Spoiler [Matchlist] + CSS: FO-nTTaX Awesomeness: Panda Banner: GSL | ||
![]()
Pandemona
![]()
Charlie Sheens House51452 Posts
Poll: Who Advances? Patience & Stats (25) INnoVation & Dark (17) INnoVaton & Stats (9) Stats & Dark (9) Patience & INnoVation (3) Dark & Patience (2) 65 total votes Your vote: Who Advances? (Vote): INnoVaton & Stats | ||
xelnaga_empire
627 Posts
| ||
![]()
Nakajin
Canada8988 Posts
| ||
JJH777
United States4378 Posts
| ||
yht9657
1810 Posts
| ||
General_Winter
United States719 Posts
| ||
Moonerz
United States442 Posts
| ||
Jimmon
United States112 Posts
| ||
Charoisaur
Germany15878 Posts
| ||
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
| ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On May 31 2019 04:32 xelnaga_empire wrote: I would be surprised if the two Protoss don't make it out, Realistically speaking Dark or Inno should advance, my bet is on Stats & Dark. Inno will get PvTed out, Stats will PvP his way to glory and Dark is Dark, his RO4 elimination awaits. | ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
Inno has been looking surprisngly strong online and Dark is still Dark, but Protoss über alles. | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
sneakyfox
8216 Posts
| ||
starkiller123
United States4029 Posts
| ||
SamirDuran
Philippines894 Posts
| ||
neutralrobot
Australia1025 Posts
On May 31 2019 05:11 Xain0n wrote: Patience gets out of this group and wins Code S on top of his stellar PvP! Nah, soO is going to win the tournament with cheese strats every step of the way. He holds up the trophy and rips off his mask at the end to reveal that he's been BitByBit this whole time and playing the longest, most strategic con game we've ever seen in the history of eSports. "Cheese strats best strats!" he yells to a stunned audience. After a long silence, the strained voice of Artosis can be heard. "My god, I guess he's right," he says tearfully. "All this time, he had the whole game figured out, and the right way to play was by cheesing. My life is a lie." Tasteless chimes in, saying, "For those of you who don't know, cheesing is where you use a strategy intended to win in the opening through risky, usually very aggressive play." The end. | ||
DreamlnCode
United Kingdom77 Posts
Bet on Patience and Stats to actually make it through. | ||
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
| ||
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
On May 31 2019 10:48 neutralrobot wrote: Show nested quote + On May 31 2019 05:11 Xain0n wrote: Patience gets out of this group and wins Code S on top of his stellar PvP! Nah, soO is going to win the tournament with cheese strats every step of the way. He holds up the trophy and rips off his mask at the end to reveal that he's been BitByBit this whole time and playing the longest, most strategic con game we've ever seen in the history of eSports. "Cheese strats best strats!" he yells to a stunned audience. After a long silence, the strained voice of Artosis can be heard. "My god, I guess he's right," he says tearfully. "All this time, he had the whole game figured out, and the right way to play was by cheesing. My life is a lie." Tasteless chimes in, saying, "For those of you who don't know, cheesing is where you use a strategy intended to win in the opening through risky, usually very aggressive play." The end. That's a great story! | ||
SHODAN
United Kingdom1060 Posts
| ||
Ej_
47656 Posts
On May 31 2019 11:14 brickrd wrote: innovation and dark just because i want to laugh my head off watching the balance whiners strain their narrative after weeks of ALL tOsS rO8!!!! I mean, it's hard to deny Protoss dominance in Korea, no matter how you look at it, and 7 Protoss (and Poor soO) ro8 would at least be funny. Hoping for Dark personally. | ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On May 31 2019 11:14 brickrd wrote: innovation and dark just because i want to laugh my head off watching the balance whiners strain their narrative after weeks of ALL tOsS rO8!!!! Yeah, 8/16 RO16 and 5/8 RO8 seems completely fine from what can be called an equal race distribution in RO32. No reason to whine at all, right? | ||
Athenau
569 Posts
| ||
La1
United Kingdom659 Posts
![]() | ||
Zambrah
United States7183 Posts
On May 31 2019 20:52 Athenau wrote: I'm hoping for the fallback meme of 7 protoss + Soo myself. And then soO winning ofcourse. ![]() | ||
mierin
United States4943 Posts
On May 31 2019 10:48 neutralrobot wrote: Show nested quote + On May 31 2019 05:11 Xain0n wrote: Patience gets out of this group and wins Code S on top of his stellar PvP! Nah, soO is going to win the tournament with cheese strats every step of the way. He holds up the trophy and rips off his mask at the end to reveal that he's been BitByBit this whole time and playing the longest, most strategic con game we've ever seen in the history of eSports. "Cheese strats best strats!" he yells to a stunned audience. After a long silence, the strained voice of Artosis can be heard. "My god, I guess he's right," he says tearfully. "All this time, he had the whole game figured out, and the right way to play was by cheesing. My life is a lie." Tasteless chimes in, saying, "For those of you who don't know, cheesing is where you use a strategy intended to win in the opening through risky, usually very aggressive play." The end. This part had me rolling. Kudos. | ||
ByuuN
Poland678 Posts
![]() | ||
parksonsc
175 Posts
| ||
Ej_
47656 Posts
On June 01 2019 01:11 parksonsc wrote: Some people clearly dont watch Olimoleague, Inno just 3-1 Stats and 4-1 Gumiho recently. He's in a great form atm. Online Stats, truly a force to be reckoned with. | ||
fishjie
United States1519 Posts
On May 31 2019 10:48 neutralrobot wrote: Show nested quote + On May 31 2019 05:11 Xain0n wrote: Patience gets out of this group and wins Code S on top of his stellar PvP! Nah, soO is going to win the tournament with cheese strats every step of the way. He holds up the trophy and rips off his mask at the end to reveal that he's been BitByBit this whole time and playing the longest, most strategic con game we've ever seen in the history of eSports. "Cheese strats best strats!" he yells to a stunned audience. After a long silence, the strained voice of Artosis can be heard. "My god, I guess he's right," he says tearfully. "All this time, he had the whole game figured out, and the right way to play was by cheesing. My life is a lie." Tasteless chimes in, saying, "For those of you who don't know, cheesing is where you use a strategy intended to win in the opening through risky, usually very aggressive play." The end. "For those of you who don't know, cheesing is where you use a strategy intended to win in the opening through risky, usually very aggressive play." if i were drinking water i would have spit it out. i can even hear tasteless delivering that line perfectly in my head A++++++ punchline | ||
lolfail9001
Russian Federation40186 Posts
On May 31 2019 10:48 neutralrobot wrote: Show nested quote + On May 31 2019 05:11 Xain0n wrote: Patience gets out of this group and wins Code S on top of his stellar PvP! Nah, soO is going to win the tournament with cheese strats every step of the way. He holds up the trophy and rips off his mask at the end to reveal that he's been BitByBit this whole time and playing the longest, most strategic con game we've ever seen in the history of eSports. "Cheese strats best strats!" he yells to a stunned audience. After a long silence, the strained voice of Artosis can be heard. "My god, I guess he's right," he says tearfully. "All this time, he had the whole game figured out, and the right way to play was by cheesing. My life is a lie." Tasteless chimes in, saying, "For those of you who don't know, cheesing is where you use a strategy intended to win in the opening through risky, usually very aggressive play." The end. You know it hits too close to home when i hear Tasteless in my head spelling that out. | ||
royalroadweed
United States8301 Posts
On May 31 2019 20:52 Athenau wrote: I'm hoping for the fallback meme of 7 protoss + Soo myself. Soo actually ruined it for me. Now I'm pulling for inno and dark since the all protoss ro8 is dead. | ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
On May 31 2019 16:37 Xain0n wrote: Show nested quote + On May 31 2019 10:48 neutralrobot wrote: On May 31 2019 05:11 Xain0n wrote: Patience gets out of this group and wins Code S on top of his stellar PvP! Nah, soO is going to win the tournament with cheese strats every step of the way. He holds up the trophy and rips off his mask at the end to reveal that he's been BitByBit this whole time and playing the longest, most strategic con game we've ever seen in the history of eSports. "Cheese strats best strats!" he yells to a stunned audience. After a long silence, the strained voice of Artosis can be heard. "My god, I guess he's right," he says tearfully. "All this time, he had the whole game figured out, and the right way to play was by cheesing. My life is a lie." Tasteless chimes in, saying, "For those of you who don't know, cheesing is where you use a strategy intended to win in the opening through risky, usually very aggressive play." The end. That's a great story! a tournament full of cheese is act of killing against davey s wish.the man himself would come out of nowhere, kick the balance team s ass and finally fix this goddamn game | ||
Fango
United Kingdom8987 Posts
On June 01 2019 01:11 parksonsc wrote: Some people clearly dont watch Olimoleague, Inno just 3-1 Stats and 4-1 Gumiho recently. He's in a great form atm. INno has been killing in on ladder and online consistently for years. Yet hasn't looked like a dominating force on LAN since 2017. | ||
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
| ||
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
On May 31 2019 17:29 deacon.frost wrote: Show nested quote + On May 31 2019 11:14 brickrd wrote: innovation and dark just because i want to laugh my head off watching the balance whiners strain their narrative after weeks of ALL tOsS rO8!!!! Yeah, 8/16 RO16 and 5/8 RO8 seems completely fine from what can be called an equal race distribution in RO32. No reason to whine at all, right? take a statistics class | ||
FBTsingLoong
China410 Posts
| ||
Mlord
France135 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() | ||
Topin
Peru10041 Posts
On June 01 2019 11:32 Mlord wrote: Gogo patience and stats ![]() ![]() ![]() Ah, i see you are a man of culture as well. | ||
BretZ
United States1510 Posts
| ||
Andi_Goldberger
Germany1608 Posts
| ||
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
Patience will be blinking a lot if he makes it out. Dark: Has is so bad i can beat him with macro 12 pool. | ||
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
| ||
Zambrah
United States7183 Posts
Dark knows how to kick off a group for sure. | ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
On June 01 2019 13:18 Morbidius wrote: What happened? I looked away and Dark won. must be some reallllllllly dark shenanigan | ||
Zambrah
United States7183 Posts
On June 01 2019 13:18 Morbidius wrote: What happened? I looked away and Dark won. Nydus | ||
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
| ||
Captain Peabody
United States3096 Posts
| ||
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
Zambrah
United States7183 Posts
| ||
JJH777
United States4378 Posts
On June 01 2019 13:24 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: I'm sorry is someone playing another game in the background? Why do I hear gunshots? I thought I was going crazy. Hopefully they fix that asap. | ||
Andi_Goldberger
Germany1608 Posts
| ||
OsaX Nymloth
Poland3244 Posts
On June 01 2019 13:24 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: I'm sorry is someone playing another game in the background? Why do I hear gunshots? The right question, I thought something in my browser bugged out with a surprise ad or something | ||
![]()
Waxangel
United States33171 Posts
| ||
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On June 01 2019 13:26 Waxangel wrote: Patience realized he was about to be arrested for warcrimes and decided not to bring his prism along to micro He's been doing this for a while. It does mean that he won't just lose on the spot due to the warp prism getting sniped by ravagers, and can get consistent warp-ins as soon as the warp gates are back up rather than having to move the warp prism back first. | ||
![]()
Waxangel
United States33171 Posts
| ||
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
| ||
Zambrah
United States7183 Posts
| ||
sertman
United States540 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
Captain Peabody
United States3096 Posts
| ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
EDIT: Also, aren't tosses nowadays just protecting their warp prism, choosing to warp in units rather than juggling immortals? | ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
On June 01 2019 13:29 Captain Peabody wrote: The wind has changed...Protoss everywhere suddenly fear for their lives Because Patience lost to Dark? | ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
On June 01 2019 13:30 pdd wrote: Dark played that very well. He realised very quickly he couldn't save his 3rd and just retreated, teched up for detection and reset. EDIT: Also, aren't tosses nowadays just protecting their warp prism, choosing to warp in units rather than juggling immortals? they can bring a hero probe like lotv trailer and warp an pylon near zerg s natural tho | ||
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
| ||
eviltomahawk
United States11133 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On June 01 2019 13:34 seemsgood wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 13:30 pdd wrote: Dark played that very well. He realised very quickly he couldn't save his 3rd and just retreated, teched up for detection and reset. EDIT: Also, aren't tosses nowadays just protecting their warp prism, choosing to warp in units rather than juggling immortals? they can bring a hero probe like lotv trailer and warp an pylon near zerg s natural tho LotV trailer probe didn't have to deal with slow warp-ins. | ||
Andi_Goldberger
Germany1608 Posts
| ||
OsaX Nymloth
Poland3244 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
Captain Peabody
United States3096 Posts
On June 01 2019 13:29 Captain Peabody wrote: The wind has changed...Protoss everywhere suddenly fear for their lives Y'all didn't believe me | ||
Topin
Peru10041 Posts
| ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On June 01 2019 13:43 OsaX Nymloth wrote: Is this the group from which no protoss advances? Even Stats seems to get bopped this g1 It's k. Stats is just setting up the rematch curse. | ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
| ||
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
| ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
| ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
| ||
OsaX Nymloth
Poland3244 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
| ||
SHODAN
United Kingdom1060 Posts
| ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
| ||
Topin
Peru10041 Posts
| ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
| ||
OsaX Nymloth
Poland3244 Posts
Well Stats was off this series. Inno seems damn solid. | ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
On June 01 2019 13:56 pdd wrote: This game actually looks exactly the same as the game these two played in the recent Olimoleague on this map. this map gives map control to no race i believe | ||
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
| ||
Zambrah
United States7183 Posts
| ||
sertman
United States540 Posts
| ||
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
On June 01 2019 14:09 sertman wrote: Stats and Patience are playing like garbage. Inno and Dark should get out Never doubt the power of a rematch curse if it happens though. | ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
| ||
fastr
France901 Posts
| ||
Durnuu
13319 Posts
| ||
Durnuu
13319 Posts
On June 01 2019 14:16 Durnuu wrote: Of course Dark would go for the Dark build lmao Except he didn't commit, Dark has no balls | ||
OsaX Nymloth
Poland3244 Posts
| ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
| ||
OsaX Nymloth
Poland3244 Posts
| ||
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
Anc13nt
1557 Posts
| ||
OsaX Nymloth
Poland3244 Posts
On June 01 2019 14:21 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: i love that we're just calling it "the green" We should rename it to Green Fields Cruise '84 | ||
Noonius
Estonia17413 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
Andi_Goldberger
Germany1608 Posts
| ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
| ||
Topin
Peru10041 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On June 01 2019 14:23 OsaX Nymloth wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 14:21 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: i love that we're just calling it "the green" We should rename it to Green Fields Cruise '84 That name would be too long for Blizzard. It used to be Neo Tokyo Turbo Cruise '84, but they got it shortened. | ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
- Who said Turbo Cruise '84 was a bad map? It kinda forces a macro game around the sides - MMMM is a pretty fun build. | ||
Proko
United States1022 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On June 01 2019 14:24 pvsnp wrote: Petition to rename this map "The Green" Would make it awkward if Blizz recolored the Inhib zones again. They used to be red. | ||
Durnuu
13319 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
On June 01 2019 14:25 pdd wrote: Great game. - Who said Turbo Cruise '84 was a bad map? It kinda forces a macro game around the sides - MMMM is a pretty fun build. not simple as you think if people dislike and just veto it then they tend to cheese moar on the map they are not familiar with | ||
Topin
Peru10041 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
| ||
Durnuu
13319 Posts
On June 01 2019 14:33 ZigguratOfUr wrote: Whoever wins this series has a pretty easy road to the finals too. Definitely much weaker than the top half. Dark would especially be happy about topping the group considering his history vs Trap | ||
fastr
France901 Posts
| ||
![]()
Waxangel
United States33171 Posts
| ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
| ||
BerserkSword
United States2123 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
| ||
Anc13nt
1557 Posts
| ||
Snakestyle11
191 Posts
| ||
![]()
Waxangel
United States33171 Posts
| ||
fastr
France901 Posts
On June 01 2019 14:42 ZigguratOfUr wrote: Lategame Nydus usage is pretty fun to watch. Maybe Blizz. has finally found the sweet spot for the Nydus. I respectfully disagree. The game was amazing and they were basically even for the first 15 minutes, then Dark popped the nydus and a 5 minutes long terran death animation ensued. I hope you guys liked this tvz because it was most likely the last one this season, sadly. | ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
On June 01 2019 14:45 Snakestyle11 wrote: See blizzard... innovation versus dark.. its what sc2 should look like. Not 2 base all-ins deciding the game every game.. Protoss makes for such bad games in all match-ups. Because no defender advantage!! So protoss win 1 fight and its game over. I mean, we just watched a pretty decent TvP macro game (G2 of Stats vs Inno) and WCS Spring was full of great macro TvP games. TvZ is by far the best match up, but that doesn't mean other match ups can't be fun. | ||
BerserkSword
United States2123 Posts
On June 01 2019 14:45 Snakestyle11 wrote: See blizzard... innovation versus dark.. its what sc2 should look like. Not 2 base all-ins deciding the game every game.. Protoss makes for such bad games in all match-ups. Because no defender advantage!! So protoss win 1 fight and its game over. dude just stop the best games of 2019 were all TvP macro games | ||
Durnuu
13319 Posts
On June 01 2019 14:46 pdd wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 14:45 Snakestyle11 wrote: See blizzard... innovation versus dark.. its what sc2 should look like. Not 2 base all-ins deciding the game every game.. Protoss makes for such bad games in all match-ups. Because no defender advantage!! So protoss win 1 fight and its game over. I mean, we just watched a pretty decent TvP macro game (G2 of Stats vs Inno) and WCS Spring was full of great macro TvP games. TvZ is by far the best match up, but that doesn't mean other match ups can't be fun. I'm pretty sure any matchup that aren't TvT or TvZ are terribly imbalanced and unfun to watch and protoss should be deleted from the game | ||
JJH777
United States4378 Posts
| ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
Plebsmeister
15 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
Snakestyle11
191 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
Andi_Goldberger
Germany1608 Posts
| ||
OsaX Nymloth
Poland3244 Posts
MVP vs Tefel, never forget. | ||
Durnuu
13319 Posts
On June 01 2019 14:59 seemsgood wrote: 7 scvs LUL Could be doable if he saved all his orbitals Or at least 2 of them, but one? | ||
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
BerserkSword
United States2123 Posts
feelsbadman | ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On June 01 2019 15:00 OsaX Nymloth wrote: 7 SCV's? Inno can do it. MVP vs Tefel, never forget. Tefel had ~30 drones right? That's not too different from the 80 Dark had. | ||
Anc13nt
1557 Posts
| ||
Anc13nt
1557 Posts
| ||
Proko
United States1022 Posts
| ||
Kashim
Poland1147 Posts
| ||
Vindicare605
United States16055 Posts
On June 01 2019 15:00 Andi_Goldberger wrote: i love how they hype this when hes running on creep against 40 banes with pure marine marauder Up a ramp too no less. Dark just blind sided Innovation with those Mutas. It's completely unforgivable to be THAT unprepared for a Muta count that large. The fact Innovation had no information about the Spire is what lost him the game. | ||
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
| ||
fastr
France901 Posts
The terran brotherhood extends their best wishes of success to Dark. | ||
BerserkSword
United States2123 Posts
On June 01 2019 15:07 IshinShishi wrote: inno made a huge mistake by turning back, im pretty sure he just dumpsters Dark with his bigger army supply and 2/2 vs 1/1, he let Dark finish his upgrades and get a bigger army, just bad decision making from a probability point of view, i think he made the right choice | ||
DreamlnCode
United Kingdom77 Posts
| ||
Vindicare605
United States16055 Posts
On June 01 2019 15:07 fastr wrote: "Blizzard please patch protoss" ROFL The terran brotherhood extends their best wishes of success to Dark. It's unlikely that Protoss is going to get any nerfs vs Zerg as long as Serral rules the foreign scene with an iron fist. Just another negative consequence of having two separate scenes. | ||
BerserkSword
United States2123 Posts
patience is generally not on the same caliber as stats but can bring the heat to throw innovation off | ||
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
| ||
ByuuN
Poland678 Posts
| ||
ByuuN
Poland678 Posts
| ||
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
ByuuN
Poland678 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
| ||
BerserkSword
United States2123 Posts
On June 01 2019 15:23 IshinShishi wrote: damn, patience messed up the force fields, he just needed a little bit more time, that was sad considering he outplayed stats most of the game pvp is so overwhelmingly micro and composition based that patience's overall strategy couldnt pay off | ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
Give Pylons the passive ability called "Transmission Interference" with the ability to cause all enemy warp ins to pylons not within the range of a Nexus or Warpgate the 50% chance to warp in a unit under the control of his opponent instead. (Seriously though, would some sort ability to block warp ins that are not next to a Nexus or Warpgate, help give PvP a bit more defenders advantage) | ||
Proko
United States1022 Posts
| ||
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
On June 01 2019 15:26 BerserkSword wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 15:23 IshinShishi wrote: damn, patience messed up the force fields, he just needed a little bit more time, that was sad considering he outplayed stats most of the game pvp is so overwhelmingly micro and composition based that patience's overall strategy couldnt pay off patience only needed to forcefield Stats off, he let him through and that lost him the game, stats was desperate and basically needed Patience to make a big mistake. | ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On June 01 2019 15:31 IshinShishi wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 15:26 BerserkSword wrote: On June 01 2019 15:23 IshinShishi wrote: damn, patience messed up the force fields, he just needed a little bit more time, that was sad considering he outplayed stats most of the game pvp is so overwhelmingly micro and composition based that patience's overall strategy couldnt pay off patience only needed to forcefield Stats off, he let him through and that lost him the game, stats was desperate and basically needed Patience to make a big mistake. Not really. Patience's army was worse in a straight up fight and forcefields can only do so much against adepts. | ||
Proko
United States1022 Posts
| ||
BerserkSword
United States2123 Posts
On June 01 2019 15:31 IshinShishi wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 15:26 BerserkSword wrote: On June 01 2019 15:23 IshinShishi wrote: damn, patience messed up the force fields, he just needed a little bit more time, that was sad considering he outplayed stats most of the game pvp is so overwhelmingly micro and composition based that patience's overall strategy couldnt pay off patience only needed to forcefield Stats off, he let him through and that lost him the game, stats was desperate and basically needed Patience to make a big mistake. stats had a ~15 or so army supply lead, and with a composition that countered patience's to boot. patience had no prism to micro his stalkers and lone immortal either. it wasnt that stats was desperate - he was smart. patience committed too hard with his economy with the hope that stats wouldnt see his hidden base. the moment stats found it, he moved out with everything he had including probes because he knew that he had a huge advantage at that specific point in the game. i think patience played that pretty damn well. he had his ball of stalkers + immortal tucked away in the natural, and in range of many of the adepts. he tried to separate the adepts so he could pick them off, but stats was too good with his positioning | ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
| ||
Durnuu
13319 Posts
| ||
Zambrah
United States7183 Posts
| ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
On June 01 2019 15:43 Durnuu wrote: Cobalt game 2 HYPE Hopefully we get a cross spawn game for once. All games so far have been vertically close or horizontally close | ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
| ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
On June 01 2019 15:51 ZigguratOfUr wrote: Not having any vision across the LOS blockers really killed Stats there. Those three tanks each got off about a dozen shots | ||
Tsubbi
Germany7967 Posts
| ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
On June 01 2019 15:52 pvsnp wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 15:51 ZigguratOfUr wrote: Not having any vision across the LOS blockers really killed Stats there. Those three tanks each got off about a dozen shots The three tanks staying alive till the end of the game was perfect for Innovation. | ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
| ||
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
| ||
ByuuN
Poland678 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
| ||
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
| ||
Proko
United States1022 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
RaFox17
Finland4581 Posts
![]() | ||
JJH777
United States4378 Posts
| ||
Plebsmeister
15 Posts
| ||
Durnuu
13319 Posts
| ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
| ||
Alvis
876 Posts
| ||
Anc13nt
1557 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
On June 01 2019 16:14 Durnuu wrote: Inb4 Innovation wins this season so Terran gets its 8th code S win in a row least thing u want for inno as opponent is giving him too much time for prepation especialy in ro8 and beyond | ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
| ||
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
| ||
BerserkSword
United States2123 Posts
| ||
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
| ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Kappa | ||
Zambrah
United States7183 Posts
| ||
Anc13nt
1557 Posts
On June 01 2019 16:17 pvsnp wrote: Honestly I think Inno might be better off facing Trap than herO, even though Trap is way stronger. herO can pull out some nasty cheese and Inno tends to perform best against more orthodox Protoss like Trap. I agree. I think Inno's TvP is looking very strong though and herO was historically pretty strong against Inno so I think playing against Trap isn't too bad. I think he'll probably make finals if soO beats Classic, but soO's ZvT looks like it improved. I think Tastosis underrating Stats. It's been rough year but making IEM WC finals is huge. | ||
repomaniak
Poland324 Posts
GSL Innovation jason loves innovation GSL Tastosis last terran hope 55th live gsl 30 birthday bald guy / stats support GSL Artosis weird maps / Tastosis 10 years sign GSL Tastosis 10 years part 2 GSL Tastosis 10 years part 3 GSL gogo Winnovation GSL Tastosis 400 iq GSL cyber implant GSL Dark interview GSL Audience GSL Audience GSL Tasteless go TERRAN GSL Tasteless demon probe sc 1 probe GSL Tasteless Innovation slowling winning arm wresle GSL Tasteless Nintendo 64 GSL Tastosis Excitebike GSL Tastosis green bubble slow you down GSL Tastosis Excitebike GSL Innovation interview | ||
Charoisaur
Germany15878 Posts
On June 01 2019 16:14 Durnuu wrote: Inb4 Innovation wins this season so Terran gets its 8th code S win in a row *7th | ||
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
I have seen real imbalance in RTS and current Protoss is not even close to that. Inno winning this season would be immensely boring when so many great players in the ro8 are missing a Code S title, it's time to end Terran's domination. Dark finally reaching the objective, PartinG's resurgence from nothingness, soO eventually becoming champion, herO's first(and maybe last) chanche or Trap's definitive ascension are all much more interesting stories. | ||
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
Honestly, I think despite how we were considering a 8/8 Protoss playoffs....we're going to get ZvZ finals. Lucky 7 for soO | ||
Charoisaur
Germany15878 Posts
| ||
Mun_Su
France2063 Posts
| ||
ShAd_1337
Germany1042 Posts
![]() | ||
Penev
28451 Posts
and his play, geez | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24279 Posts
I’m not sure how well Inno’s gameplan will work against other Protoss players who play more aggressively and interrupt the rhythm of the game a lot more, it seems absolutely ideal against how Stats played today, especially given how he did it every game near enough. Not balance whine at all but is a single Raven the best boost to an army you can possibly have? Maybe a warp prism? | ||
sneakyfox
8216 Posts
![]() Just can't advance from the group of death when you're not playing well. Not watching his army (twice!) cost him the last game. | ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On June 01 2019 20:29 Penev wrote: good to have some better racial distribution but I'm sad about Stats not advancing and his play, geez It's worse than in RO16 ![]() | ||
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
| ||
Boggyb
2855 Posts
On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. | ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Yeah because 8/16 and 5/8 and 7/8 is completely normal race distribution... or 6/5/1 IIRC Also I don't think Classic will lose | ||
![]()
Nakajin
Canada8988 Posts
On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. A zvz final would be the only acceptable outcome beside pvp | ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On June 01 2019 22:19 Nakajin wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. A zvz final would be the only acceptable outcome beside pvp Doubt it, soO has to defeat Classic and Dark anyone in the RO4. Also there's that issue of preparational format when you play only 1 MU, there's not that many builds. | ||
Boggyb
2855 Posts
On June 01 2019 22:35 deacon.frost wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 22:19 Nakajin wrote: On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. A zvz final would be the only acceptable outcome beside pvp Doubt it, soO has to defeat Classic and Dark anyone in the RO4. Also there's that issue of preparational format when you play only 1 MU, there's not that many builds. If Dark beats herO, not even his ro4 curse can stop him from stomping to the finals. If soO beats Classic but then has to face Trap in the ro4, then maybe the limitation on number of builds will come into play but I feel like that is less of a Zerg issue than it is a Protoss or Terran issue. | ||
Charoisaur
Germany15878 Posts
On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. | ||
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Predicting seven or eight Protoss to go through and extensively whining about it has been a trend, recently; preemptive complaints seem a fitting response. | ||
Boggyb
2855 Posts
On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. | ||
Charoisaur
Germany15878 Posts
On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. there also has never been a time where people weren't complaining about Terran ore Zerg. | ||
![]()
Nakajin
Canada8988 Posts
On June 01 2019 23:32 Charoisaur wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. there also has never been a time where people weren't complaining about Terran ore Zerg. I mean I can't say I have seen someone complain about Terran since IEM Katowice There's also been moment when everyone was pretty ok with zerg, late HOTS for exemple. | ||
swarminfestor
Malaysia2429 Posts
| ||
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
| ||
Jerom
Netherlands588 Posts
![]() | ||
franzji
United States581 Posts
Finals look like they will be Dark vs. Innovation/soO. I just find it hilarious to hear them balance whine after destroying their opponents. I just hope the balance team is smart enough not to fall for it. What do you guys think? | ||
renaissanceMAN
United States1840 Posts
On June 02 2019 01:59 youngjiddle wrote: It gets tiring to hear the players who advance complain about balance. Finals look like they will be Dark vs. Innovation/soO. I just find it hilarious to hear them balance whine after destroying their opponents. I just hope the balance team is smart enough not to fall for it. What do you guys think? Stats losing today is more surprising than patience, but still not completely unexpected with the way Inno has been playing TvP lately—those timings are crisp. It’s still hard to deny that TvP isn’t quite right given the RO16 and now RO8 race distribution. Terrains are trying things, even mech (with some success) but the matchup doesn’t feel balanced. | ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
On June 01 2019 21:23 deacon.frost wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 20:29 Penev wrote: good to have some better racial distribution but I'm sad about Stats not advancing and his play, geez It's worse than in RO16 ![]() Clearly the meta is settling, we will only need to wait until 2025 for balanced representation to be restored. | ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On June 02 2019 01:59 youngjiddle wrote: It gets tiring to hear the players who advance complain about balance. Finals look like they will be Dark vs. Innovation/soO. I just find it hilarious to hear them balance whine after destroying their opponents. I just hope the balance team is smart enough not to fall for it. What do you guys think? Yeah, it's not like were just having P dominance that is worse than GomTvT statistically, but hey, eit's fine On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. Oh c'mon, sad zealot club? Dude, not nice, at least admit it's not balanced currently with the numbers we;re getting, hiding isn't helping. | ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
On June 01 2019 23:43 Nakajin wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 23:32 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. there also has never been a time where people weren't complaining about Terran ore Zerg. I mean I can't say I have seen someone complain about Terran since IEM Katowice There's also been moment when everyone was pretty ok with zerg, late HOTS for exemple. People are complaining extensively about Terran whiners in this very thread. How dare Terrans not rejoice at the 5/2/1 distribution, this is clearly the epitome of balance. I will never cease to be amazed at the shamelessness of people whining about whine. Winning isn't enough, disproportionate and dare I say imbalanced representation isn't enough, no, any hint of dissent must be totally suppressed and stamped out. | ||
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On June 02 2019 05:58 pvsnp wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 23:43 Nakajin wrote: On June 01 2019 23:32 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. there also has never been a time where people weren't complaining about Terran ore Zerg. I mean I can't say I have seen someone complain about Terran since IEM Katowice There's also been moment when everyone was pretty ok with zerg, late HOTS for exemple. People are complaining extensively about Terran whiners in this very thread. How dare Terrans not rejoice at the 5/2/1 distribution, this is clearly the epitome of balance. I will never cease to be amazed at the shamelessness of people whining about whine. Winning isn't enough, disproportionate and dare I say imbalanced representation isn't enough, no, any hint of dissent must be totally suppressed and stamped out. People defended broodlord infestor, GOMTvT and Blink Era, and said other races whined too much. Nothing new under the sun. | ||
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
On June 02 2019 05:58 pvsnp wrote: Show nested quote + On June 01 2019 23:43 Nakajin wrote: On June 01 2019 23:32 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. there also has never been a time where people weren't complaining about Terran ore Zerg. I mean I can't say I have seen someone complain about Terran since IEM Katowice There's also been moment when everyone was pretty ok with zerg, late HOTS for exemple. People are complaining extensively about Terran whiners in this very thread. How dare Terrans not rejoice at the 5/2/1 distribution, this is clearly the epitome of balance. I will never cease to be amazed at the shamelessness of people whining about whine. Winning isn't enough, disproportionate and dare I say imbalanced representation isn't enough, no, any hint of dissent must be totally suppressed and stamped out. Winning? One Super Tournament(against a Terran who isn't Maru or Inno), a competition Protoss dominated even in their subpar 2018? Oppressive, I dare to say... In the last six weeks Protoss, in GSL only, have had a presence slightly superior to Zerg's during BL Infestor era; GomTvT is tiers above. Those periods of imbalance, however(including Blinkfest), lasted much longer(four months or more) and produced a streak of champions of the same race in addiction to many mirror finals, not to mention the fact global winrates were heavily skewed in favor of the dominant faction; that's not definitely what we are seeing at the moment. It's undeniable that race distribution is not ideal at the moment and that Protoss need to have some of their early/mid game strenght nerfed and/or translated to the late game; people are instead whining as if Protoss was unbeatable in all the matchups and globally dominating for months, it's just disproportionate. | ||
M2
Bulgaria4100 Posts
| ||
Argonauta
Spain4902 Posts
On June 02 2019 06:39 M2 wrote: I joined SC2 fairly recently, so I dont have the background for an educated opinion, but isnt this Protoss dominated period not that long yet for steady conclusions regarding balance, since, it could be a temporary anomaly or perhaps the protoss players just playing better or adapting faster. Especially since this trend is only in Korea if I am not mistaken and also I see some people genuine discussing the possibility of no protoss reaching the final based on what they saw in Dark and Innovation game play, which should means that people believe that protoss is vulnerable when outskilled, hence, not imbalanced or at least not heavily unbalanced Its hard to make a believable statement saying all protoss players became much better than their peers of others races at the same time. | ||
M2
Bulgaria4100 Posts
On June 02 2019 06:57 Argonauta wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 06:39 M2 wrote: I joined SC2 fairly recently, so I dont have the background for an educated opinion, but isnt this Protoss dominated period not that long yet for steady conclusions regarding balance, since, it could be a temporary anomaly or perhaps the protoss players just playing better or adapting faster. Especially since this trend is only in Korea if I am not mistaken and also I see some people genuine discussing the possibility of no protoss reaching the final based on what they saw in Dark and Innovation game play, which should means that people believe that protoss is vulnerable when outskilled, hence, not imbalanced or at least not heavily unbalanced Its hard to make a believable statement saying all protoss players became much better than their peers of others races at the same time. sorry, I did not mean this, but I expressed myself incorrectly. I meant that perhaps more protoss players are playing well at the moment, doesnt mean that they were or are better players or became better miraculously somehow, but they are in better shape atm, especially since people consider that no protoss may reach the finals since its quite possible for them to lose to better players from the other races. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24279 Posts
On June 02 2019 06:57 Argonauta wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 06:39 M2 wrote: I joined SC2 fairly recently, so I dont have the background for an educated opinion, but isnt this Protoss dominated period not that long yet for steady conclusions regarding balance, since, it could be a temporary anomaly or perhaps the protoss players just playing better or adapting faster. Especially since this trend is only in Korea if I am not mistaken and also I see some people genuine discussing the possibility of no protoss reaching the final based on what they saw in Dark and Innovation game play, which should means that people believe that protoss is vulnerable when outskilled, hence, not imbalanced or at least not heavily unbalanced Its hard to make a believable statement saying all protoss players became much better than their peers of others races at the same time. Is that what people argue? It’s not they became better, they have been better, and for a long, long time than some of their peers. There are more Protoss players I’d put in the top 16 in Korea than those of the other races, guys with pedigree in winning big tournaments. They’re not however, better than the top players of other races, so they don’t dominate tournaments but they can maybe dominate the top 16/8 of a particular tournament. Zest, Parting, sOs, herO, Stats and Classic have all won big big tournaments. Dear has even won a GSL and Trap is a bloody good player. That’s 7 players who have a premier, many have multiples. Terran have what, 4 in Maru, Inno, Ty and Gumiho? The argument isn’t that Protoss have better players than those 4, it’s that they have better players than Bunny/Cure/Fantasy etc, which they do on historic achievement. | ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
On June 02 2019 06:34 Xain0n wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 05:58 pvsnp wrote: On June 01 2019 23:43 Nakajin wrote: On June 01 2019 23:32 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. there also has never been a time where people weren't complaining about Terran ore Zerg. I mean I can't say I have seen someone complain about Terran since IEM Katowice There's also been moment when everyone was pretty ok with zerg, late HOTS for exemple. People are complaining extensively about Terran whiners in this very thread. How dare Terrans not rejoice at the 5/2/1 distribution, this is clearly the epitome of balance. I will never cease to be amazed at the shamelessness of people whining about whine. Winning isn't enough, disproportionate and dare I say imbalanced representation isn't enough, no, any hint of dissent must be totally suppressed and stamped out. Winning? One Super Tournament(against a Terran who isn't Maru or Inno), a competition Protoss dominated even in their subpar 2018? Oppressive, I dare to say... In the last six weeks Protoss, in GSL only, have had a presence slightly superior to Zerg's during BL Infestor era; GomTvT is tiers above. Those periods of imbalance, however(including Blinkfest), lasted much longer(four months or more) and produced a streak of champions of the same race in addiction to many mirror finals, not to mention the fact global winrates were heavily skewed in favor of the dominant faction; that's not definitely what we are seeing at the moment. It's undeniable that race distribution is not ideal at the moment and that Protoss need to have some of their early/mid game strenght nerfed and/or translated to the late game; people are instead whining as if Protoss was unbeatable in all the matchups and globally dominating for months, it's just disproportionate. Our current PvPlayoffs has surpassed even GomTvT and BL/Infestor in terms of GSL (mis)representation. And why do we remember GomTvT and BL/Infestor so clearly after so many years? Because they were exceptionally imbalanced periods that persisted for far too long without intervention from Blizzard. At the time, many opportunistic hypocrites were happy to defend imbalance when it was in their favor. But who today will argue that Blizzard should have allowed those eras to continue? Now we are confronted by PvPlayoffs, and what do we hear? Opportunistic hypocrites once again advocating for continued imbalance, simply because it's in their favor. I wish I could say that I was surprised. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24279 Posts
Taeja to Mvp to injury were big losses to fans of Terran and fans of Starcraft. Byun hit the top of the mountain and had to vacate it for reasons outside his control. Flash had shown consistent improvement and won a tournament, Dream showed tournament winning potential. Zergs lost the most talented player they ever had IMO for extremely regrettable reasons. Protoss have basically had Rain depart and that’s basically it in terms of people who didn’t just fall off naturally | ||
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On June 02 2019 07:32 Wombat_NI wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 06:57 Argonauta wrote: On June 02 2019 06:39 M2 wrote: I joined SC2 fairly recently, so I dont have the background for an educated opinion, but isnt this Protoss dominated period not that long yet for steady conclusions regarding balance, since, it could be a temporary anomaly or perhaps the protoss players just playing better or adapting faster. Especially since this trend is only in Korea if I am not mistaken and also I see some people genuine discussing the possibility of no protoss reaching the final based on what they saw in Dark and Innovation game play, which should means that people believe that protoss is vulnerable when outskilled, hence, not imbalanced or at least not heavily unbalanced Its hard to make a believable statement saying all protoss players became much better than their peers of others races at the same time. Is that what people argue? It’s not they became better, they have been better, and for a long, long time than some of their peers. There are more Protoss players I’d put in the top 16 in Korea than those of the other races, guys with pedigree in winning big tournaments. They’re not however, better than the top players of other races, so they don’t dominate tournaments but they can maybe dominate the top 16/8 of a particular tournament. Zest, Parting, sOs, herO, Stats and Classic have all won big big tournaments. Dear has even won a GSL and Trap is a bloody good player. That’s 7 players who have a premier, many have multiples. Terran have what, 4 in Maru, Inno, Ty and Gumiho? The argument isn’t that Protoss have better players than those 4, it’s that they have better players than Bunny/Cure/Fantasy etc, which they do on historic achievement. Its embarassing that we have to read arguments such as ''My race has more good players'' in 2019. Its funny how you list every single Protoss player who achieved something and is still active as a argument. Lets do that for Zerg too? Losira is a GSL finalist, Leenock and Solar have won multiple premier tournaments, Scarlett won an IEM in Korea, why aren't Korean tournaments flooded by these amazing Zergs? The fact is you can do whatever mental gymnastics you want, the amount of good Protoss players is not more than the other two races combined times two as your logic and recent results would suggest. On June 02 2019 07:39 Wombat_NI wrote: I’ll also add that Terrans and Zergs have been unfortunate in Korea in terms of the players they’ve lost vs their Protoss equivalents. Taeja to Mvp to injury were big losses to fans of Terran and fans of Starcraft. Byun hit the top of the mountain and had to vacate it for reasons outside his control. Flash had shown consistent improvement and won a tournament, Dream showed tournament winning potential. Zergs lost the most talented player they ever had IMO for extremely regrettable reasons. Protoss have basically had Rain depart and that’s basically it in terms of people who didn’t just fall off naturally Oh yes, i wonder why these 2015 retirements took 4 years to change the competition. Byun, Life and Taeja retiring is certainly what allowed the GSL to be filled by players like Hurricane. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24279 Posts
On June 02 2019 07:38 pvsnp wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 06:34 Xain0n wrote: On June 02 2019 05:58 pvsnp wrote: On June 01 2019 23:43 Nakajin wrote: On June 01 2019 23:32 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. there also has never been a time where people weren't complaining about Terran ore Zerg. I mean I can't say I have seen someone complain about Terran since IEM Katowice There's also been moment when everyone was pretty ok with zerg, late HOTS for exemple. People are complaining extensively about Terran whiners in this very thread. How dare Terrans not rejoice at the 5/2/1 distribution, this is clearly the epitome of balance. I will never cease to be amazed at the shamelessness of people whining about whine. Winning isn't enough, disproportionate and dare I say imbalanced representation isn't enough, no, any hint of dissent must be totally suppressed and stamped out. Winning? One Super Tournament(against a Terran who isn't Maru or Inno), a competition Protoss dominated even in their subpar 2018? Oppressive, I dare to say... In the last six weeks Protoss, in GSL only, have had a presence slightly superior to Zerg's during BL Infestor era; GomTvT is tiers above. Those periods of imbalance, however(including Blinkfest), lasted much longer(four months or more) and produced a streak of champions of the same race in addiction to many mirror finals, not to mention the fact global winrates were heavily skewed in favor of the dominant faction; that's not definitely what we are seeing at the moment. It's undeniable that race distribution is not ideal at the moment and that Protoss need to have some of their early/mid game strenght nerfed and/or translated to the late game; people are instead whining as if Protoss was unbeatable in all the matchups and globally dominating for months, it's just disproportionate. Our current PvPlayoffs has surpassed even GomTvT and BL/Infestor in terms of GSL (mis)representation. And why do we remember GomTvT and BL/Infestor so many years later? Because they were exceptionally imbalanced periods that persisted for far too long without intervention from Blizzard. At the time, many opportunistic hypocrites were happy to defend imbalance when it was in their favor. But who today will argue that Blizzard should have allowed those eras to continue? Now we are confronted by PvPlayoffs, and what do we hear? Opportunistic hypocrites once again advocating for continued imbalance, simply because it's in their favor. Well no. BL/Infestor had periods where players placed highly or won tournaments who were never relevant again at the highest level, current period has Protoss players with historically consistent results doing well. BL/Infestor had obviously broken elements of the game that needed tweaked, not the case with this current period of Protoss doing well. There may be issues that need a rework sure, but some people can’t even point to what the actual problems are other then Protoss winning games. With BL/Infestor it was absolutely obvious, they could rush to BL/Infestor, fungal was too good and this was an issue in both ZvT and ZvP. What is the shared problem that is seeing Protoss doing well in both PvT and PvZ? | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24279 Posts
On June 02 2019 07:43 Morbidius wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 07:32 Wombat_NI wrote: On June 02 2019 06:57 Argonauta wrote: On June 02 2019 06:39 M2 wrote: I joined SC2 fairly recently, so I dont have the background for an educated opinion, but isnt this Protoss dominated period not that long yet for steady conclusions regarding balance, since, it could be a temporary anomaly or perhaps the protoss players just playing better or adapting faster. Especially since this trend is only in Korea if I am not mistaken and also I see some people genuine discussing the possibility of no protoss reaching the final based on what they saw in Dark and Innovation game play, which should means that people believe that protoss is vulnerable when outskilled, hence, not imbalanced or at least not heavily unbalanced Its hard to make a believable statement saying all protoss players became much better than their peers of others races at the same time. Is that what people argue? It’s not they became better, they have been better, and for a long, long time than some of their peers. There are more Protoss players I’d put in the top 16 in Korea than those of the other races, guys with pedigree in winning big tournaments. They’re not however, better than the top players of other races, so they don’t dominate tournaments but they can maybe dominate the top 16/8 of a particular tournament. Zest, Parting, sOs, herO, Stats and Classic have all won big big tournaments. Dear has even won a GSL and Trap is a bloody good player. That’s 7 players who have a premier, many have multiples. Terran have what, 4 in Maru, Inno, Ty and Gumiho? The argument isn’t that Protoss have better players than those 4, it’s that they have better players than Bunny/Cure/Fantasy etc, which they do on historic achievement. Its embarassing that we have to read arguments such as ''My race has more good players'' in 2019. Its funny how you list every single Protoss player who achieved something and is still active as a argument. Lets do that for Zerg too? Losira is a GSL finalist, Leenock and Solar have won multiple premier tournaments, Scarlett won an IEM in Korea, why aren't Korean tournaments flooded by these amazing Zergs? The fact is you can do whatever mental gymnastics you want, the amount of good Protoss players is not more than the other two races combined times two as your logic and recent results would suggest. Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 07:39 Wombat_NI wrote: I’ll also add that Terrans and Zergs have been unfortunate in Korea in terms of the players they’ve lost vs their Protoss equivalents. Taeja to Mvp to injury were big losses to fans of Terran and fans of Starcraft. Byun hit the top of the mountain and had to vacate it for reasons outside his control. Flash had shown consistent improvement and won a tournament, Dream showed tournament winning potential. Zergs lost the most talented player they ever had IMO for extremely regrettable reasons. Protoss have basically had Rain depart and that’s basically it in terms of people who didn’t just fall off naturally Oh yes, i wonder why these 2015 retirements took 4 years to change the competition. Byun, Life and Taeja retiring is certainly what allowed the GSL to be filled by players like Hurricane. Where’s the Terran or Zerg Hurricane then? Look you don’t like Protoss it’s cool, you’re in a pretty big club. If you want to argue that Cure or Bunny are better players then any of those Terran players who aren’t active, or any of the Protoss players I listed then go ahead | ||
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On June 02 2019 07:46 Wombat_NI wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 07:38 pvsnp wrote: On June 02 2019 06:34 Xain0n wrote: On June 02 2019 05:58 pvsnp wrote: On June 01 2019 23:43 Nakajin wrote: On June 01 2019 23:32 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. there also has never been a time where people weren't complaining about Terran ore Zerg. I mean I can't say I have seen someone complain about Terran since IEM Katowice There's also been moment when everyone was pretty ok with zerg, late HOTS for exemple. People are complaining extensively about Terran whiners in this very thread. How dare Terrans not rejoice at the 5/2/1 distribution, this is clearly the epitome of balance. I will never cease to be amazed at the shamelessness of people whining about whine. Winning isn't enough, disproportionate and dare I say imbalanced representation isn't enough, no, any hint of dissent must be totally suppressed and stamped out. Winning? One Super Tournament(against a Terran who isn't Maru or Inno), a competition Protoss dominated even in their subpar 2018? Oppressive, I dare to say... In the last six weeks Protoss, in GSL only, have had a presence slightly superior to Zerg's during BL Infestor era; GomTvT is tiers above. Those periods of imbalance, however(including Blinkfest), lasted much longer(four months or more) and produced a streak of champions of the same race in addiction to many mirror finals, not to mention the fact global winrates were heavily skewed in favor of the dominant faction; that's not definitely what we are seeing at the moment. It's undeniable that race distribution is not ideal at the moment and that Protoss need to have some of their early/mid game strenght nerfed and/or translated to the late game; people are instead whining as if Protoss was unbeatable in all the matchups and globally dominating for months, it's just disproportionate. Our current PvPlayoffs has surpassed even GomTvT and BL/Infestor in terms of GSL (mis)representation. And why do we remember GomTvT and BL/Infestor so many years later? Because they were exceptionally imbalanced periods that persisted for far too long without intervention from Blizzard. At the time, many opportunistic hypocrites were happy to defend imbalance when it was in their favor. But who today will argue that Blizzard should have allowed those eras to continue? Now we are confronted by PvPlayoffs, and what do we hear? Opportunistic hypocrites once again advocating for continued imbalance, simply because it's in their favor. Well no. BL/Infestor had periods where players placed highly or won tournaments who were never relevant again at the highest level, current period has Protoss players with historically consistent results doing well. BL/Infestor had obviously broken elements of the game that needed tweaked, not the case with this current period of Protoss doing well. There may be issues that need a rework sure, but some people can’t even point to what the actual problems are other then Protoss winning games. With BL/Infestor it was absolutely obvious, they could rush to BL/Infestor, fungal was too good and this was an issue in both ZvT and ZvP. What is the shared problem that is seeing Protoss doing well in both PvT and PvZ? Why do you think imbalance demands a big bad composition or push that affects all matchups? Terran in 2011 in Korean tournaments for many reasons, none of which could be applied to all matchups: shitty maps, 1/1/1, Blue Flame, Snipe. Imbalance comes in many different flavors. On June 02 2019 07:52 Wombat_NI wrote: Where’s the Terran or Zerg Hurricane then? Losing to good players players in the RO32 as they should. | ||
Anc13nt
1557 Posts
Edit: Actually I checked again and it still looks like Zerg is doing the best overall based on Balance Report. Protoss winrates I think improved and Terran looks like it's clearly the weakest race. | ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On June 02 2019 07:46 Wombat_NI wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 07:38 pvsnp wrote: On June 02 2019 06:34 Xain0n wrote: On June 02 2019 05:58 pvsnp wrote: On June 01 2019 23:43 Nakajin wrote: On June 01 2019 23:32 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. there also has never been a time where people weren't complaining about Terran ore Zerg. I mean I can't say I have seen someone complain about Terran since IEM Katowice There's also been moment when everyone was pretty ok with zerg, late HOTS for exemple. People are complaining extensively about Terran whiners in this very thread. How dare Terrans not rejoice at the 5/2/1 distribution, this is clearly the epitome of balance. I will never cease to be amazed at the shamelessness of people whining about whine. Winning isn't enough, disproportionate and dare I say imbalanced representation isn't enough, no, any hint of dissent must be totally suppressed and stamped out. Winning? One Super Tournament(against a Terran who isn't Maru or Inno), a competition Protoss dominated even in their subpar 2018? Oppressive, I dare to say... In the last six weeks Protoss, in GSL only, have had a presence slightly superior to Zerg's during BL Infestor era; GomTvT is tiers above. Those periods of imbalance, however(including Blinkfest), lasted much longer(four months or more) and produced a streak of champions of the same race in addiction to many mirror finals, not to mention the fact global winrates were heavily skewed in favor of the dominant faction; that's not definitely what we are seeing at the moment. It's undeniable that race distribution is not ideal at the moment and that Protoss need to have some of their early/mid game strenght nerfed and/or translated to the late game; people are instead whining as if Protoss was unbeatable in all the matchups and globally dominating for months, it's just disproportionate. Our current PvPlayoffs has surpassed even GomTvT and BL/Infestor in terms of GSL (mis)representation. And why do we remember GomTvT and BL/Infestor so many years later? Because they were exceptionally imbalanced periods that persisted for far too long without intervention from Blizzard. At the time, many opportunistic hypocrites were happy to defend imbalance when it was in their favor. But who today will argue that Blizzard should have allowed those eras to continue? Now we are confronted by PvPlayoffs, and what do we hear? Opportunistic hypocrites once again advocating for continued imbalance, simply because it's in their favor. Well no. BL/Infestor had periods where players placed highly or won tournaments who were never relevant again at the highest level, current period has Protoss players with historically consistent results doing well. BL/Infestor had obviously broken elements of the game that needed tweaked, not the case with this current period of Protoss doing well. There may be issues that need a rework sure, but some people can’t even point to what the actual problems are other then Protoss winning games. With BL/Infestor it was absolutely obvious, they could rush to BL/Infestor, fungal was too good and this was an issue in both ZvT and ZvP. What is the shared problem that is seeing Protoss doing well in both PvT and PvZ? The fuck? 1) We're not professional balancing team, they're payed by Blizzard. The last time I checked my payroll there wasn't anything about Blizzard at all. So the pure fact we can't see what should be fixed isn't an argument. There are people who are payed to see this and fix this. NOT US. 2) We're not even professional players here, FFS even not enough top GMs here. That's the place where balancing is happening. Why should we do someone else's job for free or try to point out GM things? What we see is that SC2 is broken. Terran is struggling for a long time, Zerg is struggling in Korea for even longer and isn't being helped just because of WCS. Blizzard shot themselves in both feet by splitting regions and not being able to address the game long term issues(e.g. WP pick up range, it was obvious much sooner it is an issue). Yes, it's not super obvious. So what, will we wait for ages until even *we* can see the issue? | ||
Moonerz
United States442 Posts
| ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24279 Posts
On June 02 2019 08:54 Moonerz wrote: If you actually watch the games i think its pretty clear that Toss can afford far more mistakes in both matchups than their opponents. Imo the fact that Patience is "good" is pretty telling. Its hard to say what exactly needs to be changed though. Did you watch any of Inno against Stats? Stats defended really bloody well in their last set, made a mistake on the last engagement and got EMPed, raven disabled and died Starcraft at that level is inherently unforgiving | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24279 Posts
On June 02 2019 08:30 deacon.frost wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 07:46 Wombat_NI wrote: On June 02 2019 07:38 pvsnp wrote: On June 02 2019 06:34 Xain0n wrote: On June 02 2019 05:58 pvsnp wrote: On June 01 2019 23:43 Nakajin wrote: On June 01 2019 23:32 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: [quote] Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. there also has never been a time where people weren't complaining about Terran ore Zerg. I mean I can't say I have seen someone complain about Terran since IEM Katowice There's also been moment when everyone was pretty ok with zerg, late HOTS for exemple. People are complaining extensively about Terran whiners in this very thread. How dare Terrans not rejoice at the 5/2/1 distribution, this is clearly the epitome of balance. I will never cease to be amazed at the shamelessness of people whining about whine. Winning isn't enough, disproportionate and dare I say imbalanced representation isn't enough, no, any hint of dissent must be totally suppressed and stamped out. Winning? One Super Tournament(against a Terran who isn't Maru or Inno), a competition Protoss dominated even in their subpar 2018? Oppressive, I dare to say... In the last six weeks Protoss, in GSL only, have had a presence slightly superior to Zerg's during BL Infestor era; GomTvT is tiers above. Those periods of imbalance, however(including Blinkfest), lasted much longer(four months or more) and produced a streak of champions of the same race in addiction to many mirror finals, not to mention the fact global winrates were heavily skewed in favor of the dominant faction; that's not definitely what we are seeing at the moment. It's undeniable that race distribution is not ideal at the moment and that Protoss need to have some of their early/mid game strenght nerfed and/or translated to the late game; people are instead whining as if Protoss was unbeatable in all the matchups and globally dominating for months, it's just disproportionate. Our current PvPlayoffs has surpassed even GomTvT and BL/Infestor in terms of GSL (mis)representation. And why do we remember GomTvT and BL/Infestor so many years later? Because they were exceptionally imbalanced periods that persisted for far too long without intervention from Blizzard. At the time, many opportunistic hypocrites were happy to defend imbalance when it was in their favor. But who today will argue that Blizzard should have allowed those eras to continue? Now we are confronted by PvPlayoffs, and what do we hear? Opportunistic hypocrites once again advocating for continued imbalance, simply because it's in their favor. Well no. BL/Infestor had periods where players placed highly or won tournaments who were never relevant again at the highest level, current period has Protoss players with historically consistent results doing well. BL/Infestor had obviously broken elements of the game that needed tweaked, not the case with this current period of Protoss doing well. There may be issues that need a rework sure, but some people can’t even point to what the actual problems are other then Protoss winning games. With BL/Infestor it was absolutely obvious, they could rush to BL/Infestor, fungal was too good and this was an issue in both ZvT and ZvP. What is the shared problem that is seeing Protoss doing well in both PvT and PvZ? The fuck? 1) We're not professional balancing team, they're payed by Blizzard. The last time I checked my payroll there wasn't anything about Blizzard at all. So the pure fact we can't see what should be fixed isn't an argument. There are people who are payed to see this and fix this. NOT US. 2) We're not even professional players here, FFS even not enough top GMs here. That's the place where balancing is happening. Why should we do someone else's job for free or try to point out GM things? What we see is that SC2 is broken. Terran is struggling for a long time, Zerg is struggling in Korea for even longer and isn't being helped just because of WCS. Blizzard shot themselves in both feet by splitting regions and not being able to address the game long term issues(e.g. WP pick up range, it was obvious much sooner it is an issue). Yes, it's not super obvious. So what, will we wait for ages until even *we* can see the issue? Ok yeah Zerg is struggling with their Blizzcon and GSL vs the world and 7 WCS titles and Terran is struggling with their 4 GSLs, Protoss is dominating with their two Super Tournaments though. You’re complaining, I’m not. I think the game is actually in a pretty good state overall, some tweaks maybe. If you’re complaining something is broken then, maybe you should have an idea of what is broken in the first place. I’ve suggested more actual balance fixes than most of the Terran whine crew have that are vaguely sensible, create a trade off with using the prism to warp in vs a pylon. More cost, slower warp in, sets gateway cooldowns back a bit. Any of those I’m fine with, the issue IMO is difficulty in scouting and responding, if a hard to scout all-in hits less hard because the prism is weaker as a reinforcement point, then reactive play is made stronger overall. Pick up range is stupid IMO and should be nerfed, it’s not actually a factor in a ton of games though | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24279 Posts
It’s extremely hard to figure if they’re just posturing and dicking around, but going macro game, or if they’re going to just all-in you. The prism enables this. Nerf the prism’s warp in potential and you make this less of an issue. Makes it harder to go from a few poking stalkers, spot a weakness and warp in a whole bunch of blink stalkers and all in. I think it’s this flexibility in transition from poking to game-ending aggression that is the actual issue here, and I do think it is absolutely an issue. Go too defensive and a Toss will just put up that third and go dual forge, go too greedy and you get all-inned. If Toss has less flexibility in making that decision I think it’s less of an issue. | ||
NbaLover
24 Posts
On June 02 2019 07:43 Morbidius wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 07:32 Wombat_NI wrote: On June 02 2019 06:57 Argonauta wrote: On June 02 2019 06:39 M2 wrote: I joined SC2 fairly recently, so I dont have the background for an educated opinion, but isnt this Protoss dominated period not that long yet for steady conclusions regarding balance, since, it could be a temporary anomaly or perhaps the protoss players just playing better or adapting faster. Especially since this trend is only in Korea if I am not mistaken and also I see some people genuine discussing the possibility of no protoss reaching the final based on what they saw in Dark and Innovation game play, which should means that people believe that protoss is vulnerable when outskilled, hence, not imbalanced or at least not heavily unbalanced Its hard to make a believable statement saying all protoss players became much better than their peers of others races at the same time. Is that what people argue? It’s not they became better, they have been better, and for a long, long time than some of their peers. There are more Protoss players I’d put in the top 16 in Korea than those of the other races, guys with pedigree in winning big tournaments. They’re not however, better than the top players of other races, so they don’t dominate tournaments but they can maybe dominate the top 16/8 of a particular tournament. Zest, Parting, sOs, herO, Stats and Classic have all won big big tournaments. Dear has even won a GSL and Trap is a bloody good player. That’s 7 players who have a premier, many have multiples. Terran have what, 4 in Maru, Inno, Ty and Gumiho? The argument isn’t that Protoss have better players than those 4, it’s that they have better players than Bunny/Cure/Fantasy etc, which they do on historic achievement. Its embarassing that we have to read arguments such as ''My race has more good players'' in 2019. Its funny how you list every single Protoss player who achieved something and is still active as a argument. Lets do that for Zerg too? Losira is a GSL finalist, Leenock and Solar have won multiple premier tournaments, Scarlett won an IEM in Korea, why aren't Korean tournaments flooded by these amazing Zergs? The fact is you can do whatever mental gymnastics you want, the amount of good Protoss players is not more than the other two races combined times two as your logic and recent results would suggest. Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 07:39 Wombat_NI wrote: I’ll also add that Terrans and Zergs have been unfortunate in Korea in terms of the players they’ve lost vs their Protoss equivalents. Taeja to Mvp to injury were big losses to fans of Terran and fans of Starcraft. Byun hit the top of the mountain and had to vacate it for reasons outside his control. Flash had shown consistent improvement and won a tournament, Dream showed tournament winning potential. Zergs lost the most talented player they ever had IMO for extremely regrettable reasons. Protoss have basically had Rain depart and that’s basically it in terms of people who didn’t just fall off naturally Oh yes, i wonder why these 2015 retirements took 4 years to change the competition. Byun, Life and Taeja retiring is certainly what allowed the GSL to be filled by players like Hurricane. It's more embarrassing that you think any of those listed zerg players are better than any of the top tier toss players lol. You are probably one of those terran kids who also think bunny/cure are top tier players too. | ||
pvsnp
7676 Posts
On June 02 2019 09:11 Wombat_NI wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 08:30 deacon.frost wrote: On June 02 2019 07:46 Wombat_NI wrote: On June 02 2019 07:38 pvsnp wrote: On June 02 2019 06:34 Xain0n wrote: On June 02 2019 05:58 pvsnp wrote: On June 01 2019 23:43 Nakajin wrote: On June 01 2019 23:32 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: [quote] Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. there also has never been a time where people weren't complaining about Terran ore Zerg. I mean I can't say I have seen someone complain about Terran since IEM Katowice There's also been moment when everyone was pretty ok with zerg, late HOTS for exemple. People are complaining extensively about Terran whiners in this very thread. How dare Terrans not rejoice at the 5/2/1 distribution, this is clearly the epitome of balance. I will never cease to be amazed at the shamelessness of people whining about whine. Winning isn't enough, disproportionate and dare I say imbalanced representation isn't enough, no, any hint of dissent must be totally suppressed and stamped out. Winning? One Super Tournament(against a Terran who isn't Maru or Inno), a competition Protoss dominated even in their subpar 2018? Oppressive, I dare to say... In the last six weeks Protoss, in GSL only, have had a presence slightly superior to Zerg's during BL Infestor era; GomTvT is tiers above. Those periods of imbalance, however(including Blinkfest), lasted much longer(four months or more) and produced a streak of champions of the same race in addiction to many mirror finals, not to mention the fact global winrates were heavily skewed in favor of the dominant faction; that's not definitely what we are seeing at the moment. It's undeniable that race distribution is not ideal at the moment and that Protoss need to have some of their early/mid game strenght nerfed and/or translated to the late game; people are instead whining as if Protoss was unbeatable in all the matchups and globally dominating for months, it's just disproportionate. Our current PvPlayoffs has surpassed even GomTvT and BL/Infestor in terms of GSL (mis)representation. And why do we remember GomTvT and BL/Infestor so many years later? Because they were exceptionally imbalanced periods that persisted for far too long without intervention from Blizzard. At the time, many opportunistic hypocrites were happy to defend imbalance when it was in their favor. But who today will argue that Blizzard should have allowed those eras to continue? Now we are confronted by PvPlayoffs, and what do we hear? Opportunistic hypocrites once again advocating for continued imbalance, simply because it's in their favor. Well no. BL/Infestor had periods where players placed highly or won tournaments who were never relevant again at the highest level, current period has Protoss players with historically consistent results doing well. BL/Infestor had obviously broken elements of the game that needed tweaked, not the case with this current period of Protoss doing well. There may be issues that need a rework sure, but some people can’t even point to what the actual problems are other then Protoss winning games. With BL/Infestor it was absolutely obvious, they could rush to BL/Infestor, fungal was too good and this was an issue in both ZvT and ZvP. What is the shared problem that is seeing Protoss doing well in both PvT and PvZ? The fuck? 1) We're not professional balancing team, they're payed by Blizzard. The last time I checked my payroll there wasn't anything about Blizzard at all. So the pure fact we can't see what should be fixed isn't an argument. There are people who are payed to see this and fix this. NOT US. 2) We're not even professional players here, FFS even not enough top GMs here. That's the place where balancing is happening. Why should we do someone else's job for free or try to point out GM things? What we see is that SC2 is broken. Terran is struggling for a long time, Zerg is struggling in Korea for even longer and isn't being helped just because of WCS. Blizzard shot themselves in both feet by splitting regions and not being able to address the game long term issues(e.g. WP pick up range, it was obvious much sooner it is an issue). Yes, it's not super obvious. So what, will we wait for ages until even *we* can see the issue? If you’re complaining something is broken then, maybe you should have an idea of what is broken in the first place. PvZ is very obvious, it's the warp prism. Nerfing pickup range is a low-hanging fix but I would much prefer a warp-in time nerf because pickup micro, while flashy, contributes way less to snowballing those brutal Protoss pushes than reinforcing instantly does. I've lost count of how many engagements were decided by a dozen chargelots coming in while the other guy's equal supply of reinforcements were still rallying. As for PvT, here's an explanation I stole from reddit that I think distills the matchup's problems pretty well: "PvT is much more complex; its problems go all the way back to Patch 4.0 and the removal of the MSC. That being said, the biggest single problem for Terran is the earlygame before stim. Unstimmed bio is horrible, not to put too fine a point on it, and its uselessness is the reason Terran needs to tech up quickly and use things like Widow Mines or Cyclones or Banshees or Siege Tanks, some unit that can actually threaten Protoss in some way. It’s very important to highlight that this is not a new problem whatsoever–it goes back to 2011–but Patch 4.0 ripped away the WM cloak bandaid while simultaneously buffing Stalkers, a buff that disproportionately affects their interaction with unstimmed bio. This problem in turn leads to Terran massing large amounts of units on 2 bases just to stay alive, which in turn forces them to delay their third CC while Protoss expands, which in turn forces them to attack because they already have a lot of units and Protoss is already ahead of them economically. Compare TvP and TvZ. Terrans have no problems at all going up to 3CC against Zerg, because Hellions serve as a transition unit before Terran gets stim. Hellions are totally useless at defending against Protoss, nor is there any real replacement, so Terrans take their thirds far slower against Protoss. Which wouldn’t be a problem if Terran could apply reciprocal pressure, except they can't, so Protoss doesn’t need to make that same sacrifice when taking their third nexus and so runs away economically." There are a lot of ways to fix PvT, but they're less obvious than PvZ's warp prism. Stalkers could be nerfed, or Terran's earlygame defensive options buffed. Reducing stim research time would probably be the simplest solution. A crazy idea I had was to give Cyclones a transformation option like Hellions have right now, into a slower, tankier Hellbat-esque unit that could fill the earlygame defense niche. Something more like the old Cyclone. Call it the Typhoon. | ||
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
On May 31 2019 11:14 brickrd wrote: innovation and dark just because i want to laugh my head off watching the balance whiners strain their narrative after weeks of ALL tOsS rO8!!!! hilarious thread, hilarious tournament, terrans have really reached trump levels of head in the sand fake news complaints about fake problems. ro8 could have been 7 terrans and they'd still be in here talking about how terran is "forced to do one strategy" that "isn't viable for ladder players" ![]() | ||
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
On June 02 2019 07:38 pvsnp wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 06:34 Xain0n wrote: On June 02 2019 05:58 pvsnp wrote: On June 01 2019 23:43 Nakajin wrote: On June 01 2019 23:32 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 21:38 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 21:27 Xain0n wrote: If I didn't want Inno out as soon as possible, I'd be delighted to see the "Era of Protoss" leading to a TvZ Grand Final. Semis are going to be 2 Zerg, 1 Terran, and 1 Protoss. Finals are going to be either a TvZ or a ZvZ. And people will still complain about Protoss. Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. there also has never been a time where people weren't complaining about Terran ore Zerg. I mean I can't say I have seen someone complain about Terran since IEM Katowice There's also been moment when everyone was pretty ok with zerg, late HOTS for exemple. People are complaining extensively about Terran whiners in this very thread. How dare Terrans not rejoice at the 5/2/1 distribution, this is clearly the epitome of balance. I will never cease to be amazed at the shamelessness of people whining about whine. Winning isn't enough, disproportionate and dare I say imbalanced representation isn't enough, no, any hint of dissent must be totally suppressed and stamped out. Winning? One Super Tournament(against a Terran who isn't Maru or Inno), a competition Protoss dominated even in their subpar 2018? Oppressive, I dare to say... In the last six weeks Protoss, in GSL only, have had a presence slightly superior to Zerg's during BL Infestor era; GomTvT is tiers above. Those periods of imbalance, however(including Blinkfest), lasted much longer(four months or more) and produced a streak of champions of the same race in addiction to many mirror finals, not to mention the fact global winrates were heavily skewed in favor of the dominant faction; that's not definitely what we are seeing at the moment. It's undeniable that race distribution is not ideal at the moment and that Protoss need to have some of their early/mid game strenght nerfed and/or translated to the late game; people are instead whining as if Protoss was unbeatable in all the matchups and globally dominating for months, it's just disproportionate. Our current PvPlayoffs has surpassed even GomTvT and BL/Infestor in terms of GSL (mis)representation. And why do we remember GomTvT and BL/Infestor so clearly after so many years? Because they were exceptionally imbalanced periods that persisted for far too long without intervention from Blizzard. At the time, many opportunistic hypocrites were happy to defend imbalance when it was in their favor. But who today will argue that Blizzard should have allowed those eras to continue? Now we are confronted by PvPlayoffs, and what do we hear? Opportunistic hypocrites once again advocating for continued imbalance, simply because it's in their favor. I wish I could say that I was surprised. I already wrote down the numbers Terran had in GomTvT and they were far superior to the ones Protoss are having now: in a single round(ro8) of a single tournament(Super Tournament I 2019) the latter had a better representation; so don't worry, we are extremely far from that. In Korea, Protoss have a wider range of top tier players(they sent four players to BlizzCon last year, for example) compared to the other races, that's a given and it has nothing to deal with balance. You misunderstand, actual imbalance can't be defended. Those ugly and super effective timing pushes most likely need to be toned down, but you need to give Protoss back valuable options later in the game; Blizzard won't stand still, don't worry, and we won't have another period of extended monorace domination. The point, however, is that you guys act as if we were already at this point, while we just had a overrepresentation in(mostly) the early stages of the playoffs: Protoss are not reigning, they are not even winning more tournaments than last year and might very well not win this season. What is undeniable is that Terran has been winning this tournament for years. | ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On June 02 2019 09:11 Wombat_NI wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 08:30 deacon.frost wrote: On June 02 2019 07:46 Wombat_NI wrote: On June 02 2019 07:38 pvsnp wrote: On June 02 2019 06:34 Xain0n wrote: On June 02 2019 05:58 pvsnp wrote: On June 01 2019 23:43 Nakajin wrote: On June 01 2019 23:32 Charoisaur wrote: On June 01 2019 23:12 Boggyb wrote: On June 01 2019 22:56 Charoisaur wrote: [quote] Pre-emptive complaining about hypothetical balance whine about results that didn't happen yet. Truly next level. Has there ever been a time in SC2 when people weren't complaining about Protoss? I'm pretty sure Zerg were still complaining about Protoss in early 2018 when the match up was Wings of Liberty levels of broken. If GSL were 16 Terran, 15 Zerg, and 1 Protoss, people would still be calling Protoss OP. there also has never been a time where people weren't complaining about Terran ore Zerg. I mean I can't say I have seen someone complain about Terran since IEM Katowice There's also been moment when everyone was pretty ok with zerg, late HOTS for exemple. People are complaining extensively about Terran whiners in this very thread. How dare Terrans not rejoice at the 5/2/1 distribution, this is clearly the epitome of balance. I will never cease to be amazed at the shamelessness of people whining about whine. Winning isn't enough, disproportionate and dare I say imbalanced representation isn't enough, no, any hint of dissent must be totally suppressed and stamped out. Winning? One Super Tournament(against a Terran who isn't Maru or Inno), a competition Protoss dominated even in their subpar 2018? Oppressive, I dare to say... In the last six weeks Protoss, in GSL only, have had a presence slightly superior to Zerg's during BL Infestor era; GomTvT is tiers above. Those periods of imbalance, however(including Blinkfest), lasted much longer(four months or more) and produced a streak of champions of the same race in addiction to many mirror finals, not to mention the fact global winrates were heavily skewed in favor of the dominant faction; that's not definitely what we are seeing at the moment. It's undeniable that race distribution is not ideal at the moment and that Protoss need to have some of their early/mid game strenght nerfed and/or translated to the late game; people are instead whining as if Protoss was unbeatable in all the matchups and globally dominating for months, it's just disproportionate. Our current PvPlayoffs has surpassed even GomTvT and BL/Infestor in terms of GSL (mis)representation. And why do we remember GomTvT and BL/Infestor so many years later? Because they were exceptionally imbalanced periods that persisted for far too long without intervention from Blizzard. At the time, many opportunistic hypocrites were happy to defend imbalance when it was in their favor. But who today will argue that Blizzard should have allowed those eras to continue? Now we are confronted by PvPlayoffs, and what do we hear? Opportunistic hypocrites once again advocating for continued imbalance, simply because it's in their favor. Well no. BL/Infestor had periods where players placed highly or won tournaments who were never relevant again at the highest level, current period has Protoss players with historically consistent results doing well. BL/Infestor had obviously broken elements of the game that needed tweaked, not the case with this current period of Protoss doing well. There may be issues that need a rework sure, but some people can’t even point to what the actual problems are other then Protoss winning games. With BL/Infestor it was absolutely obvious, they could rush to BL/Infestor, fungal was too good and this was an issue in both ZvT and ZvP. What is the shared problem that is seeing Protoss doing well in both PvT and PvZ? The fuck? 1) We're not professional balancing team, they're payed by Blizzard. The last time I checked my payroll there wasn't anything about Blizzard at all. So the pure fact we can't see what should be fixed isn't an argument. There are people who are payed to see this and fix this. NOT US. 2) We're not even professional players here, FFS even not enough top GMs here. That's the place where balancing is happening. Why should we do someone else's job for free or try to point out GM things? What we see is that SC2 is broken. Terran is struggling for a long time, Zerg is struggling in Korea for even longer and isn't being helped just because of WCS. Blizzard shot themselves in both feet by splitting regions and not being able to address the game long term issues(e.g. WP pick up range, it was obvious much sooner it is an issue). Yes, it's not super obvious. So what, will we wait for ages until even *we* can see the issue? Ok yeah Zerg is struggling with their Blizzcon and GSL vs the world and 7 WCS titles and Terran is struggling with their 4 GSLs, Protoss is dominating with their two Super Tournaments though. You’re complaining, I’m not. I think the game is actually in a pretty good state overall, some tweaks maybe. If you’re complaining something is broken then, maybe you should have an idea of what is broken in the first place. I’ve suggested more actual balance fixes than most of the Terran whine crew have that are vaguely sensible, create a trade off with using the prism to warp in vs a pylon. More cost, slower warp in, sets gateway cooldowns back a bit. Any of those I’m fine with, the issue IMO is difficulty in scouting and responding, if a hard to scout all-in hits less hard because the prism is weaker as a reinforcement point, then reactive play is made stronger overall. Pick up range is stupid IMO and should be nerfed, it’s not actually a factor in a ton of games though I have no clue why my car isn't starting. It's broken, it can't start. I have no idea how to fix it. Yet I demand a fix. Can you see the similarity now? I have no clue why the Terran struggle so much, I have no clue why the Zergs in Korea struggle so much yet I demand a fix. I don't have to see the fix nor what's broken ,that's the beauty of being a customer. Titles mean shit when you have this race distribution. I don't understand why people like you pretend titles mean something. Mvp was winning during BL infestor era, was BL infestor balanced? If I apply your logic it had to be, the race distribution in RO16/RO8 meant nothing. Maru was getting pretty high during the blink era, was it balanced? This is nonsense, titles don't mean anything about balance, especially when we look at the WCS which is a chapter of its own with their "we need region lock" and the only top player there can win anything he desires unless he fucks up. + Show Spoiler + to be fair I can identify some issues like WP in PvZ and the issue of large map vs slow bio units without stim without transport(which is T3 for some reason) but how to fix it and not break TvZ is beyond me, luckily we have the silent professionals of Blizzard | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24279 Posts
I don’t think you can balance the game around Korean Tournament racial distributions without making Protoss actually underpowered. Absolutely not to Super Tournament levels but I do think they have more strong players I do think there are issues, especially the lack of communication from Blizzard. Even just to give us a sense of what they are looking at and thinking of, although I imagine some people will discard anything that isn’t their preferred solution out of hand, I think many of us would at least want to know what’s being considered. | ||
tskarzyn
United States516 Posts
On June 02 2019 21:21 Wombat_NI wrote: No, but BL/Infestor and blink era were obviously broken and players couldn’t come up with reliable solutions, and especially the former players became relevant at the top level who never were before or after. I don’t think you can balance the game around Korean Tournament racial distributions without making Protoss actually underpowered. Absolutely not to Super Tournament levels but I do think they have more strong players I do think there are issues, especially the lack of communication from Blizzard. Even just to give us a sense of what they are looking at and thinking of, although I imagine some people will discard anything that isn’t their preferred solution out of hand, I think many of us would at least want to know what’s being considered. Yep, Hurricane, Trap, Patience, cheesO, Zest, these guys are so good a balanced game would be broken. Lol, get real dude. Can't tell if you are trolling. | ||
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
On June 02 2019 22:31 tskarzyn wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 21:21 Wombat_NI wrote: No, but BL/Infestor and blink era were obviously broken and players couldn’t come up with reliable solutions, and especially the former players became relevant at the top level who never were before or after. I don’t think you can balance the game around Korean Tournament racial distributions without making Protoss actually underpowered. Absolutely not to Super Tournament levels but I do think they have more strong players I do think there are issues, especially the lack of communication from Blizzard. Even just to give us a sense of what they are looking at and thinking of, although I imagine some people will discard anything that isn’t their preferred solution out of hand, I think many of us would at least want to know what’s being considered. Yep, Hurricane, Trap, Patience, cheesO, Zest, these guys are so good a balanced game would be broken. Lol, get real dude. Can't tell if you are trolling. You are the one trolling by including Zest and Trap. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24279 Posts
On June 03 2019 07:05 Xain0n wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2019 22:31 tskarzyn wrote: On June 02 2019 21:21 Wombat_NI wrote: No, but BL/Infestor and blink era were obviously broken and players couldn’t come up with reliable solutions, and especially the former players became relevant at the top level who never were before or after. I don’t think you can balance the game around Korean Tournament racial distributions without making Protoss actually underpowered. Absolutely not to Super Tournament levels but I do think they have more strong players I do think there are issues, especially the lack of communication from Blizzard. Even just to give us a sense of what they are looking at and thinking of, although I imagine some people will discard anything that isn’t their preferred solution out of hand, I think many of us would at least want to know what’s being considered. Yep, Hurricane, Trap, Patience, cheesO, Zest, these guys are so good a balanced game would be broken. Lol, get real dude. Can't tell if you are trolling. You are the one trolling by including Zest and Trap. Ah Terran fanboys can be fun Don’t really understand why people can’t just enjoy the game and be reasonable outside of their own particular race I’m not even against changes, I’ve literally suggested Protoss nerfs because I don’t like certain aspects of how Protoss works atm I just don’t think you get to good racial parity in GSL without having the likes of Bunny, Cure and Bunny outperform their Protoss equivalents, who are probably better players based on historic pedigree. I had a brief look over this season, not super in depth but a lot of Terran exits had suffered a vZ loss as well, or we get Maru and Inno having their mirror because they lost to a Zerg and Protoss. Ty goes out yeah but Special took out sOs pretty convincingly, and I think most would concede Ty is the better player, but Special played really well. Especially when Protoss aren’t converting that to consistent tournament wins, and WCS while not GSL level is actually pretty good for racial distribution. | ||
SSNYC77
43 Posts
There is no guarantee that these discussions can be fruitful but bickering like little children and denying the obvious makes it completely pointless. | ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On June 02 2019 21:21 Wombat_NI wrote: No, but BL/Infestor and blink era were obviously broken and players couldn’t come up with reliable solutions, and especially the former players became relevant at the top level who never were before or after. I don’t think you can balance the game around Korean Tournament racial distributions without making Protoss actually underpowered. Absolutely not to Super Tournament levels but I do think they have more strong players I do think there are issues, especially the lack of communication from Blizzard. Even just to give us a sense of what they are looking at and thinking of, although I imagine some people will discard anything that isn’t their preferred solution out of hand, I think many of us would at least want to know what’s being considered. That's not true, when the BL/infestor era was ending(well, WoL was ending ![]() The biggest issue is that Terran was based around low economy harassment. The fact they cut off the early game and didn't give enough aggressive options to Terrans without redesign of the race just screams it. The issue is you can't just easily balance this as this is a design issue(same with queens). No, but if you have Terran missing in several tournaments in a row it's not about race distribution but about the fact that while all Protoss get good miraculously all Terrans got bad while the Zergs in Korea cry in the corner forgotten by everone because "serral wins at WCS everything's fine". On June 03 2019 16:57 SSNYC77 wrote: How are these arguments any different than what we saw during the GoMTvT era? People were saying exact same things. Terrans are better players and all that, confusing cause and effect. Opinions dont matter, what matters are the facts(in this case-results) and they suggest that Protoss are too powerful. Now once people accept that you can discuss the actual possible solutions, because the game of startcraft is complex enough to have different balance states in different stages of the game, and of course there is that possibility that it should be attempted to balance it at all skill levels to keep the audience. There is no guarantee that these discussions can be fruitful but bickering like little children and denying the obvious makes it completely pointless. Exactly. On June 03 2019 07:42 Wombat_NI wrote: Show nested quote + On June 03 2019 07:05 Xain0n wrote: On June 02 2019 22:31 tskarzyn wrote: On June 02 2019 21:21 Wombat_NI wrote: No, but BL/Infestor and blink era were obviously broken and players couldn’t come up with reliable solutions, and especially the former players became relevant at the top level who never were before or after. I don’t think you can balance the game around Korean Tournament racial distributions without making Protoss actually underpowered. Absolutely not to Super Tournament levels but I do think they have more strong players I do think there are issues, especially the lack of communication from Blizzard. Even just to give us a sense of what they are looking at and thinking of, although I imagine some people will discard anything that isn’t their preferred solution out of hand, I think many of us would at least want to know what’s being considered. Yep, Hurricane, Trap, Patience, cheesO, Zest, these guys are so good a balanced game would be broken. Lol, get real dude. Can't tell if you are trolling. You are the one trolling by including Zest and Trap. Ah Terran fanboys can be fun Don’t really understand why people can’t just enjoy the game and be reasonable outside of their own particular race I’m not even against changes, I’ve literally suggested Protoss nerfs because I don’t like certain aspects of how Protoss works atm I just don’t think you get to good racial parity in GSL without having the likes of Bunny, Cure and Bunny outperform their Protoss equivalents, who are probably better players based on historic pedigree. I had a brief look over this season, not super in depth but a lot of Terran exits had suffered a vZ loss as well, or we get Maru and Inno having their mirror because they lost to a Zerg and Protoss. Ty goes out yeah but Special took out sOs pretty convincingly, and I think most would concede Ty is the better player, but Special played really well. Especially when Protoss aren’t converting that to consistent tournament wins, and WCS while not GSL level is actually pretty good for racial distribution. Stop with the tournament wins nonsense. Mvp and BL/infestor era. Again. And again. And again. BL/infestor era was fine, Mvp got some tournament wins? If your logic cannot be applied to this then it can't be applied to now... | ||
| ||
PiG Sty Festival
PiGFest 6.0 Group C
Creator vs ShoWTimELIVE!
herO vs Cure
[ Submit Event ] |
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Sea Dota 2![]() Jaedong ![]() Bisu ![]() Flash ![]() Hyuk ![]() Stork ![]() Larva ![]() Zeus ![]() Leta ![]() Mini ![]() [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • StrangeGG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s Dota 2 League of Legends |
OSC
Replay Cast
SpeCial vs Cham
PiG Sty Festival
Reynor vs Bunny
Dark vs Astrea
The PondCast
OSC
Replay Cast
OSC
SOOP
Bunny vs SHIN
PiG Sty Festival
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
Hatchery Cup
PassionCraft
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Sparkling Tuna Cup
PiG Sty Festival
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Afreeca Starleague
Snow vs Rain
Afreeca Starleague
Soulkey vs Rush
GSL Code S
Cure vs sOs
Reynor vs Solar
|
|