• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:49
CEST 06:49
KST 13:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash3[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy9ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win42026 KungFu Cup Announcement6BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled12
StarCraft 2
General
What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Potential Updates Coming to the SC2 CN Server Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash ASL21 General Discussion Pros React To: SoulKey vs Ample RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site KK Platform will provide 1 million CNY
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group C [ASL21] Ro24 Group D [ASL21] Ro24 Group B
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Darkest Dungeon Path of Exile
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 12324 users

[GSL 2019] Season 2 - Ro32 Group C - Page 8

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 All
Xain0n
Profile Joined November 2018
Italy3963 Posts
May 01 2019 15:47 GMT
#141
On May 02 2019 00:26 Elentos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2019 23:46 Seeker wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:40 Xain0n wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:20 Elentos wrote:
Eliminated in the Ro32 of GSL in 7 out of 10 attempts in LotV. Solar you madman.


Every Korean Zerg is specialized at choking in a different round of Code S: Solar in ro32, Rogue in ro8, Dark in ro4, soO in the grand final. Very cute, if you ask me!

Don’t forget Impact in Ro16.

It's not like Impact should finish higher than Ro16 honestly.


Most likely but we are speaking of results here as Solar, Dark, Rogue and soO are all potentially worth more than the placements they seem perpetually condmened tho; on the other hand, Impact looks like ro16 material but he is not stuck there every time(until now, at least).
starkiller123
Profile Joined January 2016
United States4030 Posts
May 01 2019 15:49 GMT
#142
Any decent games today?
Boggyb
Profile Joined January 2017
2855 Posts
May 01 2019 16:54 GMT
#143
On May 02 2019 00:49 starkiller123 wrote:
Any decent games today?

Zerg went 1-6 against Protoss, so, yes, there were 6.
Ej_
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
47656 Posts
May 01 2019 17:07 GMT
#144
On May 01 2019 23:04 argonautdice wrote:
Zergs and doing poorly in GSL. Name a more iconic duo.

BoggyB and whining about Zerg, regardless of the tournament in question.
"Technically the dictionary has zero authority on the meaning or words" - Rodya
Boggyb
Profile Joined January 2017
2855 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-01 17:40:36
May 01 2019 17:28 GMT
#145
On May 02 2019 02:07 Ej_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2019 23:04 argonautdice wrote:
Zergs and doing poorly in GSL. Name a more iconic duo.

BoggyB and whining about Zerg, regardless of the tournament in question.

I had no problem with Zerg's performance in the Super Tournament or WCS Winter: Americas.
BerserkSword
Profile Joined December 2018
United States2123 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-01 19:06:08
May 01 2019 19:04 GMT
#146
On May 01 2019 23:42 Boggyb wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2019 23:07 deacon.frost wrote:
On May 01 2019 23:03 Boggyb wrote:
On May 01 2019 22:54 deacon.frost wrote:
LotV has many design flaws which were made more glaring lately. You get used to it eventually.

The funny thing about that is the race with the worst hasn't been seriously touched in any of the redesign patches.

Yeah, Zergs really need that. The omnipotent queen reminds me a lot MSC

It should since it is a band aid patch that keeps together a flawed race. The Queen also fits more in WC3 design philosophy in that it is both an economic and military unit which makes it a giant aberration in SC2.

The redesign Zerg needed:
Delete Queen (combine that with deleting mules and chrono)
Remove vision from creep
Make whatever other changes are needed to make that playable (probably involves making Hydras tier 1)


I completely agree, but they will never delete the queen and remove vision from creep at this point in the game

the best they can do is fix zerg's weakness of being stuck with garbage ass roaches for so long

i don't even know why roaches are in the game tbh. they didnt need to make hydras stronger in SC2 at the cost of them coming later and being more expensive. the roach was a failure for zerg design wise since its inception in wol when its gimmick was the extremely fast HP regeneration.

all roaches do is give terran and protoss players MORE micro potential against zerg. it's absolutely idiotic that a well placed siege tank or a couple of micro'd immortal can kill droves of roaches, the supposed meat shield of zerg. and now you see protoss players like hurricane, instead of going stargate heavy, getting more muscle on the ground to build up and hold off high roach numbers until robo units are available (meanwhile zest stuck with phoenix openers and got rocked). and of course terran players continue to stomp zerg players.

Maybe the roach should be replaced with a nerfed ravager and i think the game would be better if zerg t1 comp would be something like ravager hydra (both weakened). make ravager somewhat more vulnerable while its bile is going off (like diruptor can't move while nova is en route). cheaper t1 hydra but lower hp and damage a bit so it doesnt shred every single gateway unit, and give it bonus damage to armor so zerg still has a way to fight air/robo/mech
TL+ Member
SoupedUpHellion
Profile Joined January 2019
20 Posts
May 01 2019 19:23 GMT
#147
Interesting thoughts on design, guys. Really agree with BerserkSword. Roaches are just so, so crappy.

Honestly I'd like queens to stay, but Zerg really needs 4 larva per inject back. That's what I think.
BerserkSword
Profile Joined December 2018
United States2123 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-01 19:38:17
May 01 2019 19:29 GMT
#148
On May 01 2019 21:37 M2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2019 21:26 Ej_ wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:22 M2 wrote:
why solar (and zergs overall) not going for spire to get rid of shuttle/oracle harass? its not good in SC2?

Because protoss makes phoenix and, congratulations, you've just wasted 600/600

Sometimes it can be done vs dt drop opening (as they have trouble defending a few mutas) but even without stargate it's risky since protoss can just come with archons and kill you while mutalisks try to be cute.

Let's not even talk about corruptors.

Well this sounds like a huge design flaw for zerg if they cannot fight for air priority at all. Not only air priority but also not having the tools to shut down air harass and make it actually risky for the opponent to fly things over the zerg base, different than the risk of not looking and fly over a ground anti-air


what he said is not true though.

there have been plenty of games where the zerg commits to muta and just steamrolls the protoss. phoenix counter mutas on paper of course but there are a few things to take into consideration

1) zerg tech switches are much faster. if you only just got out 1 phoenix when 8 mutas are flying to your base you have a major problem.
2) going off the back of zerg tech switching, if the zerg decides to commit to more mutas, then the onus is on the protoss to properly respond. most protoss will not blindly pump phoenix after the first wave of mutas is fended off/contained because phoenix will be dead supply against the ground army zerg can pop out at that point
4) archons destroy mutas on paper but they are slow and clunky while mutas are fast af and can even magic box. so while your archon is busy trying to get past your wall in or trying to rush through bases, the mutas can be ransacking the mineral line
3) if youre talking about fighting for air superiority, zerg actually have the advantage because they have the corruptors, which can keep the phonix away from mutas.

late game zerg has the advantage as well, as the carrier was heavily nerfed and zerg casters are really good at that point

all I'm saying is that zerg can contest protoss with air units, and it happens in pro games


As for why solar didnt make mutas against hurricane? it's because hurricane was stalker and sentry heavy instead of the more conventional immortal archon chargelot comp (which is what mutas really screw over). you cannot blindside a protoss players with mutas when the protoss players has that much anti air, and zerg cannot beat stalker immortal sentry comps without hydra/lurkers
TL+ Member
M2
Profile Joined December 2002
Bulgaria4141 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-01 19:57:54
May 01 2019 19:55 GMT
#149
On May 02 2019 04:29 BerserkSword wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2019 21:37 M2 wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:26 Ej_ wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:22 M2 wrote:
why solar (and zergs overall) not going for spire to get rid of shuttle/oracle harass? its not good in SC2?

Because protoss makes phoenix and, congratulations, you've just wasted 600/600

Sometimes it can be done vs dt drop opening (as they have trouble defending a few mutas) but even without stargate it's risky since protoss can just come with archons and kill you while mutalisks try to be cute.

Let's not even talk about corruptors.

Well this sounds like a huge design flaw for zerg if they cannot fight for air priority at all. Not only air priority but also not having the tools to shut down air harass and make it actually risky for the opponent to fly things over the zerg base, different than the risk of not looking and fly over a ground anti-air


what he said is not true though.

there have been plenty of games where the zerg commits to muta and just steamrolls the protoss. phoenix counter mutas on paper of course but there are a few things to take into consideration

1) zerg tech switches are much faster. if you only just got out 1 phoenix when 8 mutas are flying to your base you have a major problem.
2) going off the back of zerg tech switching, if the zerg decides to commit to more mutas, then the onus is on the protoss to properly respond. most protoss will not blindly pump phoenix after the first wave of mutas is fended off/contained because phoenix will be dead supply against the ground army zerg can pop out at that point
4) archons destroy mutas on paper but they are slow and clunky while mutas are fast af and can even magic box. so while your archon is busy trying to get past your wall in or trying to rush through bases, the mutas can be ransacking the mineral line
3) if youre talking about fighting for air superiority, zerg actually have the advantage because they have the corruptors, which can keep the phonix away from mutas.

late game zerg has the advantage as well, as the carrier was heavily nerfed and zerg casters are really good at that point

all I'm saying is that zerg can contest protoss with air units, and it happens in pro games


As for why solar didnt make mutas against hurricane? it's because hurricane was stalker and sentry heavy instead of the more conventional immortal archon chargelot comp (which is what mutas really screw over). you cannot blindside a protoss players with mutas when the protoss players has that much anti air, and zerg cannot beat stalker immortal sentry comps without hydra/lurkers

Honestly, thats how I understand zerg as well, mutas are not there to fight toe to toe with archons or other anti-air. However, what I find kind of odd is the fact that both terran and protoss (especially protoss) can fly a shuttle over the zerg continuously and endlessly until the end of the game, 1 shuttle can keep the zerg honest for unlimited period of time and the zerg has no counterplay besides of running around like a fool, trying to chase the winds xDD. Where is the Scourge equivalent from BW that allows them to shut air harass and force the other races to actually have to outplay the zerg to be able to hurt their economy?
Knife kitty, night kitty, put you on a slab. Stealthy kitty, hunter kitty, stab stab stab :-)
Boggyb
Profile Joined January 2017
2855 Posts
May 01 2019 20:09 GMT
#150
On May 02 2019 04:55 M2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2019 04:29 BerserkSword wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:37 M2 wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:26 Ej_ wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:22 M2 wrote:
why solar (and zergs overall) not going for spire to get rid of shuttle/oracle harass? its not good in SC2?

Because protoss makes phoenix and, congratulations, you've just wasted 600/600

Sometimes it can be done vs dt drop opening (as they have trouble defending a few mutas) but even without stargate it's risky since protoss can just come with archons and kill you while mutalisks try to be cute.

Let's not even talk about corruptors.

Well this sounds like a huge design flaw for zerg if they cannot fight for air priority at all. Not only air priority but also not having the tools to shut down air harass and make it actually risky for the opponent to fly things over the zerg base, different than the risk of not looking and fly over a ground anti-air


what he said is not true though.

there have been plenty of games where the zerg commits to muta and just steamrolls the protoss. phoenix counter mutas on paper of course but there are a few things to take into consideration

1) zerg tech switches are much faster. if you only just got out 1 phoenix when 8 mutas are flying to your base you have a major problem.
2) going off the back of zerg tech switching, if the zerg decides to commit to more mutas, then the onus is on the protoss to properly respond. most protoss will not blindly pump phoenix after the first wave of mutas is fended off/contained because phoenix will be dead supply against the ground army zerg can pop out at that point
4) archons destroy mutas on paper but they are slow and clunky while mutas are fast af and can even magic box. so while your archon is busy trying to get past your wall in or trying to rush through bases, the mutas can be ransacking the mineral line
3) if youre talking about fighting for air superiority, zerg actually have the advantage because they have the corruptors, which can keep the phonix away from mutas.

late game zerg has the advantage as well, as the carrier was heavily nerfed and zerg casters are really good at that point

all I'm saying is that zerg can contest protoss with air units, and it happens in pro games


As for why solar didnt make mutas against hurricane? it's because hurricane was stalker and sentry heavy instead of the more conventional immortal archon chargelot comp (which is what mutas really screw over). you cannot blindside a protoss players with mutas when the protoss players has that much anti air, and zerg cannot beat stalker immortal sentry comps without hydra/lurkers

Honestly, thats how I understand zerg as well, mutas are not there to fight toe to toe with archons or other anti-air. However, what I find kind of odd is the fact that both terran and protoss (especially protoss) can fly a shuttle over the zerg continuously and endlessly until the end of the game, 1 shuttle can keep the zerg honest for unlimited period of time and the zerg has no counterplay besides of running around like a fool, trying to chase the winds xDD. Where is the Scourge equivalent from BW that allows them to shut air harass and force the other races to actually have to outplay the zerg to be able to hurt their economy?

I'm glad that you used the expression "keep the Zerg honest". The reason Zerg doesn't have something easily accessible without a major trade off that lets them shut down harassment is their win rates would hit 100% if they did.
BerserkSword
Profile Joined December 2018
United States2123 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-01 20:13:01
May 01 2019 20:11 GMT
#151
On May 02 2019 04:55 M2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2019 04:29 BerserkSword wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:37 M2 wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:26 Ej_ wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:22 M2 wrote:
why solar (and zergs overall) not going for spire to get rid of shuttle/oracle harass? its not good in SC2?

Because protoss makes phoenix and, congratulations, you've just wasted 600/600

Sometimes it can be done vs dt drop opening (as they have trouble defending a few mutas) but even without stargate it's risky since protoss can just come with archons and kill you while mutalisks try to be cute.

Let's not even talk about corruptors.

Well this sounds like a huge design flaw for zerg if they cannot fight for air priority at all. Not only air priority but also not having the tools to shut down air harass and make it actually risky for the opponent to fly things over the zerg base, different than the risk of not looking and fly over a ground anti-air


what he said is not true though.

there have been plenty of games where the zerg commits to muta and just steamrolls the protoss. phoenix counter mutas on paper of course but there are a few things to take into consideration

1) zerg tech switches are much faster. if you only just got out 1 phoenix when 8 mutas are flying to your base you have a major problem.
2) going off the back of zerg tech switching, if the zerg decides to commit to more mutas, then the onus is on the protoss to properly respond. most protoss will not blindly pump phoenix after the first wave of mutas is fended off/contained because phoenix will be dead supply against the ground army zerg can pop out at that point
4) archons destroy mutas on paper but they are slow and clunky while mutas are fast af and can even magic box. so while your archon is busy trying to get past your wall in or trying to rush through bases, the mutas can be ransacking the mineral line
3) if youre talking about fighting for air superiority, zerg actually have the advantage because they have the corruptors, which can keep the phonix away from mutas.

late game zerg has the advantage as well, as the carrier was heavily nerfed and zerg casters are really good at that point

all I'm saying is that zerg can contest protoss with air units, and it happens in pro games


As for why solar didnt make mutas against hurricane? it's because hurricane was stalker and sentry heavy instead of the more conventional immortal archon chargelot comp (which is what mutas really screw over). you cannot blindside a protoss players with mutas when the protoss players has that much anti air, and zerg cannot beat stalker immortal sentry comps without hydra/lurkers

Honestly, thats how I understand zerg as well, mutas are not there to fight toe to toe with archons or other anti-air. However, what I find kind of odd is the fact that both terran and protoss (especially protoss) can fly a shuttle over the zerg continuously and endlessly until the end of the game, 1 shuttle can keep the zerg honest for unlimited period of time and the zerg has no counterplay besides of running around like a fool, trying to chase the winds xDD


What does "keeping the zerg honest" mean though?

making the zerg player pay attention and move around queens and roaches?

the zerg player then has an army that can overwhelm the protoss army in a straight up fight....then what.

the reason why protoss needs to keep "zerg honest" is because if they don't the zerg just outgrows them and steamrolls them.

this is the crux of stargate + archon drop harass. Protoss players use this to try and even the odds when it comes to expansion/map control vs zerg. this is what zest tried to do and it failed miserably because queens have a range of 8 and the zerg player just has to pay attention to keep the archons from killing nothing more than a queen, overloard, and or a few lings. and oracles and phoenix cant fend off a midgame zerg ground army

that's why you see players like hurricane who are not confident in their relative skill/later game play just say fuck it and go for two base timing attacks. he decided to live or die on the two base attack. and to be honest, solar threw game 3 and gifted hurricane the win, because hurricane had the weaker economy and did not have the unit composition to break a lurker wall on creep. solar just needed to sit back and get the bigger army he eventually would have

against terran it's a completely different story because it's ridiculously difficult for midgame zerg armies to break terran bases, while terran can project so much power for so little supply

TL+ Member
M2
Profile Joined December 2002
Bulgaria4141 Posts
May 01 2019 20:14 GMT
#152
All right I dont argue about that, as I said I am new to the game, so I would assume that its like you are explaining it and if zerg cannot be pressured like that they will become too strong. If this is the trade off, I am fine with it, I just found it odd since my understandings about the game dynamics are mostly from another game atm
Knife kitty, night kitty, put you on a slab. Stealthy kitty, hunter kitty, stab stab stab :-)
Tyrhanius
Profile Joined April 2011
France947 Posts
May 01 2019 22:12 GMT
#153
On May 02 2019 04:04 BerserkSword wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2019 23:42 Boggyb wrote:
On May 01 2019 23:07 deacon.frost wrote:
On May 01 2019 23:03 Boggyb wrote:
On May 01 2019 22:54 deacon.frost wrote:
LotV has many design flaws which were made more glaring lately. You get used to it eventually.

The funny thing about that is the race with the worst hasn't been seriously touched in any of the redesign patches.

Yeah, Zergs really need that. The omnipotent queen reminds me a lot MSC

It should since it is a band aid patch that keeps together a flawed race. The Queen also fits more in WC3 design philosophy in that it is both an economic and military unit which makes it a giant aberration in SC2.

The redesign Zerg needed:
Delete Queen (combine that with deleting mules and chrono)
Remove vision from creep
Make whatever other changes are needed to make that playable (probably involves making Hydras tier 1)


I completely agree, but they will never delete the queen and remove vision from creep at this point in the game

the best they can do is fix zerg's weakness of being stuck with garbage ass roaches for so long

i don't even know why roaches are in the game tbh. they didnt need to make hydras stronger in SC2 at the cost of them coming later and being more expensive. the roach was a failure for zerg design wise since its inception in wol when its gimmick was the extremely fast HP regeneration.

all roaches do is give terran and protoss players MORE micro potential against zerg. it's absolutely idiotic that a well placed siege tank or a couple of micro'd immortal can kill droves of roaches, the supposed meat shield of zerg. and now you see protoss players like hurricane, instead of going stargate heavy, getting more muscle on the ground to build up and hold off high roach numbers until robo units are available (meanwhile zest stuck with phoenix openers and got rocked). and of course terran players continue to stomp zerg players.

Maybe the roach should be replaced with a nerfed ravager and i think the game would be better if zerg t1 comp would be something like ravager hydra (both weakened). make ravager somewhat more vulnerable while its bile is going off (like diruptor can't move while nova is en route). cheaper t1 hydra but lower hp and damage a bit so it doesnt shred every single gateway unit, and give it bonus damage to armor so zerg still has a way to fight air/robo/mech

Roaches are bad because... they don't received any buffs since WOL.

The problem isn't roach or zerg design, it's the way they introduce some gamebreaking patch like 70 dmg for tank while they don't balance at all the rest. When you decide to nerf zerg eco, don't buff some zerg units, and give massive buffs to their counter, they become simply bad, that's intended.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26473 Posts
May 01 2019 22:29 GMT
#154
On May 02 2019 07:12 Tyrhanius wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2019 04:04 BerserkSword wrote:
On May 01 2019 23:42 Boggyb wrote:
On May 01 2019 23:07 deacon.frost wrote:
On May 01 2019 23:03 Boggyb wrote:
On May 01 2019 22:54 deacon.frost wrote:
LotV has many design flaws which were made more glaring lately. You get used to it eventually.

The funny thing about that is the race with the worst hasn't been seriously touched in any of the redesign patches.

Yeah, Zergs really need that. The omnipotent queen reminds me a lot MSC

It should since it is a band aid patch that keeps together a flawed race. The Queen also fits more in WC3 design philosophy in that it is both an economic and military unit which makes it a giant aberration in SC2.

The redesign Zerg needed:
Delete Queen (combine that with deleting mules and chrono)
Remove vision from creep
Make whatever other changes are needed to make that playable (probably involves making Hydras tier 1)


I completely agree, but they will never delete the queen and remove vision from creep at this point in the game

the best they can do is fix zerg's weakness of being stuck with garbage ass roaches for so long

i don't even know why roaches are in the game tbh. they didnt need to make hydras stronger in SC2 at the cost of them coming later and being more expensive. the roach was a failure for zerg design wise since its inception in wol when its gimmick was the extremely fast HP regeneration.

all roaches do is give terran and protoss players MORE micro potential against zerg. it's absolutely idiotic that a well placed siege tank or a couple of micro'd immortal can kill droves of roaches, the supposed meat shield of zerg. and now you see protoss players like hurricane, instead of going stargate heavy, getting more muscle on the ground to build up and hold off high roach numbers until robo units are available (meanwhile zest stuck with phoenix openers and got rocked). and of course terran players continue to stomp zerg players.

Maybe the roach should be replaced with a nerfed ravager and i think the game would be better if zerg t1 comp would be something like ravager hydra (both weakened). make ravager somewhat more vulnerable while its bile is going off (like diruptor can't move while nova is en route). cheaper t1 hydra but lower hp and damage a bit so it doesnt shred every single gateway unit, and give it bonus damage to armor so zerg still has a way to fight air/robo/mech

Roaches are bad because... they don't received any buffs since WOL.

The problem isn't roach or zerg design, it's the way they introduce some gamebreaking patch like 70 dmg for tank while they don't balance at all the rest. When you decide to nerf zerg eco, don't buff some zerg units, and give massive buffs to their counter, they become simply bad, that's intended.

Surely Zerg design does play a big part too though? Whatever units they do have they tend to have a lot of them, so any changes will have a big effect, also Zergs have really good map vision and other tools that make changes really dicey to make, in PvZ especially.

Perhaps some tweaking is needed I wouldn’t necessarily dispute that either, it’s a bloody hard game to balance because they kept just adding more flashy stuff to avoid doing more fundamental alterations back in the day.

The warp prism in its current state is a bit of a case in point, it is really bloody strong both in pickup micro and augmenting pushes, but also just flying into bases. But without it Protoss is boned as things stand.

I’d at least lower the pickup range so there’s more counter-micro against it that’s possible. I like my flashy micro but not when it’s very difficult to counteract from the other player.

'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Topin
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Peru10110 Posts
May 02 2019 00:30 GMT
#155
congratz to Hurricane
i would define my style between a mix of ByuN, Maru and MKP
Prev 1 6 7 8 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 11m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 142
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 7367
Zeus 1500
Snow 82
Bale 22
ZergMaN 10
Icarus 8
League of Legends
JimRising 703
Counter-Strike
m0e_tv356
Other Games
summit1g12987
WinterStarcraft499
Mew2King51
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta40
• practicex 36
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1122
• HappyZerGling71
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
4h 11m
Afreeca Starleague
5h 11m
Light vs Calm
Royal vs Mind
Wardi Open
6h 11m
Monday Night Weeklies
11h 11m
Replay Cast
19h 11m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 5h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 5h
Rush vs PianO
Flash vs Speed
PiGosaur Cup
1d 19h
Replay Cast
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
BeSt vs Leta
Queen vs Jaedong
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
OSC
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
TriGGeR vs Cure
ByuN vs Rogue
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
BSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2026 Changsha Offline CUP
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
Escore Tournament S2: W1
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.