• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:03
CEST 09:03
KST 16:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play0Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview8
Community News
[TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation05.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start)50ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo25Weekly Cups (June 8-14): Clem and Solar double, PTR tested0RSL: S6 Finals played at BlizzCon 202611
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) take on 5.0.16 ?Bug in new patch ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted
Tourneys
INu's Battles#17 <BO.9> RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL CK #4 20-21th June Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery Mutation # 530 One For All Mutation # 529 Opportunities Unleashed
Brood War
General
STARCRAFT MOVIE - Last Night at the Command center Fact based Zerg Upgrade Tier List BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Battle cruiser feet vs Carrier fleet
Tourneys
[BSL22] GosuLeague Casts - Tue & Thu 22:00 CEST [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSLAN 4 is Coming! Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Relatively freeroll strategies Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
Rogue Command ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread [H]Internet/Gaming Cafe Tips and Tricks The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How To Predict Tilt in Espor…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6880 users

[GSL 2019] Season 2 - Ro32 Group C - Page 8

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 All
Xain0n
Profile Joined November 2018
Italy3963 Posts
May 01 2019 15:47 GMT
#141
On May 02 2019 00:26 Elentos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2019 23:46 Seeker wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:40 Xain0n wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:20 Elentos wrote:
Eliminated in the Ro32 of GSL in 7 out of 10 attempts in LotV. Solar you madman.


Every Korean Zerg is specialized at choking in a different round of Code S: Solar in ro32, Rogue in ro8, Dark in ro4, soO in the grand final. Very cute, if you ask me!

Don’t forget Impact in Ro16.

It's not like Impact should finish higher than Ro16 honestly.


Most likely but we are speaking of results here as Solar, Dark, Rogue and soO are all potentially worth more than the placements they seem perpetually condmened tho; on the other hand, Impact looks like ro16 material but he is not stuck there every time(until now, at least).
starkiller123
Profile Joined January 2016
United States4030 Posts
May 01 2019 15:49 GMT
#142
Any decent games today?
Boggyb
Profile Joined January 2017
2855 Posts
May 01 2019 16:54 GMT
#143
On May 02 2019 00:49 starkiller123 wrote:
Any decent games today?

Zerg went 1-6 against Protoss, so, yes, there were 6.
Ej_
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
47656 Posts
May 01 2019 17:07 GMT
#144
On May 01 2019 23:04 argonautdice wrote:
Zergs and doing poorly in GSL. Name a more iconic duo.

BoggyB and whining about Zerg, regardless of the tournament in question.
"Technically the dictionary has zero authority on the meaning or words" - Rodya
Boggyb
Profile Joined January 2017
2855 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-01 17:40:36
May 01 2019 17:28 GMT
#145
On May 02 2019 02:07 Ej_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2019 23:04 argonautdice wrote:
Zergs and doing poorly in GSL. Name a more iconic duo.

BoggyB and whining about Zerg, regardless of the tournament in question.

I had no problem with Zerg's performance in the Super Tournament or WCS Winter: Americas.
BerserkSword
Profile Joined December 2018
United States2123 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-01 19:06:08
May 01 2019 19:04 GMT
#146
On May 01 2019 23:42 Boggyb wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2019 23:07 deacon.frost wrote:
On May 01 2019 23:03 Boggyb wrote:
On May 01 2019 22:54 deacon.frost wrote:
LotV has many design flaws which were made more glaring lately. You get used to it eventually.

The funny thing about that is the race with the worst hasn't been seriously touched in any of the redesign patches.

Yeah, Zergs really need that. The omnipotent queen reminds me a lot MSC

It should since it is a band aid patch that keeps together a flawed race. The Queen also fits more in WC3 design philosophy in that it is both an economic and military unit which makes it a giant aberration in SC2.

The redesign Zerg needed:
Delete Queen (combine that with deleting mules and chrono)
Remove vision from creep
Make whatever other changes are needed to make that playable (probably involves making Hydras tier 1)


I completely agree, but they will never delete the queen and remove vision from creep at this point in the game

the best they can do is fix zerg's weakness of being stuck with garbage ass roaches for so long

i don't even know why roaches are in the game tbh. they didnt need to make hydras stronger in SC2 at the cost of them coming later and being more expensive. the roach was a failure for zerg design wise since its inception in wol when its gimmick was the extremely fast HP regeneration.

all roaches do is give terran and protoss players MORE micro potential against zerg. it's absolutely idiotic that a well placed siege tank or a couple of micro'd immortal can kill droves of roaches, the supposed meat shield of zerg. and now you see protoss players like hurricane, instead of going stargate heavy, getting more muscle on the ground to build up and hold off high roach numbers until robo units are available (meanwhile zest stuck with phoenix openers and got rocked). and of course terran players continue to stomp zerg players.

Maybe the roach should be replaced with a nerfed ravager and i think the game would be better if zerg t1 comp would be something like ravager hydra (both weakened). make ravager somewhat more vulnerable while its bile is going off (like diruptor can't move while nova is en route). cheaper t1 hydra but lower hp and damage a bit so it doesnt shred every single gateway unit, and give it bonus damage to armor so zerg still has a way to fight air/robo/mech
TL+ Member
SoupedUpHellion
Profile Joined January 2019
20 Posts
May 01 2019 19:23 GMT
#147
Interesting thoughts on design, guys. Really agree with BerserkSword. Roaches are just so, so crappy.

Honestly I'd like queens to stay, but Zerg really needs 4 larva per inject back. That's what I think.
BerserkSword
Profile Joined December 2018
United States2123 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-01 19:38:17
May 01 2019 19:29 GMT
#148
On May 01 2019 21:37 M2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2019 21:26 Ej_ wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:22 M2 wrote:
why solar (and zergs overall) not going for spire to get rid of shuttle/oracle harass? its not good in SC2?

Because protoss makes phoenix and, congratulations, you've just wasted 600/600

Sometimes it can be done vs dt drop opening (as they have trouble defending a few mutas) but even without stargate it's risky since protoss can just come with archons and kill you while mutalisks try to be cute.

Let's not even talk about corruptors.

Well this sounds like a huge design flaw for zerg if they cannot fight for air priority at all. Not only air priority but also not having the tools to shut down air harass and make it actually risky for the opponent to fly things over the zerg base, different than the risk of not looking and fly over a ground anti-air


what he said is not true though.

there have been plenty of games where the zerg commits to muta and just steamrolls the protoss. phoenix counter mutas on paper of course but there are a few things to take into consideration

1) zerg tech switches are much faster. if you only just got out 1 phoenix when 8 mutas are flying to your base you have a major problem.
2) going off the back of zerg tech switching, if the zerg decides to commit to more mutas, then the onus is on the protoss to properly respond. most protoss will not blindly pump phoenix after the first wave of mutas is fended off/contained because phoenix will be dead supply against the ground army zerg can pop out at that point
4) archons destroy mutas on paper but they are slow and clunky while mutas are fast af and can even magic box. so while your archon is busy trying to get past your wall in or trying to rush through bases, the mutas can be ransacking the mineral line
3) if youre talking about fighting for air superiority, zerg actually have the advantage because they have the corruptors, which can keep the phonix away from mutas.

late game zerg has the advantage as well, as the carrier was heavily nerfed and zerg casters are really good at that point

all I'm saying is that zerg can contest protoss with air units, and it happens in pro games


As for why solar didnt make mutas against hurricane? it's because hurricane was stalker and sentry heavy instead of the more conventional immortal archon chargelot comp (which is what mutas really screw over). you cannot blindside a protoss players with mutas when the protoss players has that much anti air, and zerg cannot beat stalker immortal sentry comps without hydra/lurkers
TL+ Member
M2
Profile Joined December 2002
Bulgaria4168 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-01 19:57:54
May 01 2019 19:55 GMT
#149
On May 02 2019 04:29 BerserkSword wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2019 21:37 M2 wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:26 Ej_ wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:22 M2 wrote:
why solar (and zergs overall) not going for spire to get rid of shuttle/oracle harass? its not good in SC2?

Because protoss makes phoenix and, congratulations, you've just wasted 600/600

Sometimes it can be done vs dt drop opening (as they have trouble defending a few mutas) but even without stargate it's risky since protoss can just come with archons and kill you while mutalisks try to be cute.

Let's not even talk about corruptors.

Well this sounds like a huge design flaw for zerg if they cannot fight for air priority at all. Not only air priority but also not having the tools to shut down air harass and make it actually risky for the opponent to fly things over the zerg base, different than the risk of not looking and fly over a ground anti-air


what he said is not true though.

there have been plenty of games where the zerg commits to muta and just steamrolls the protoss. phoenix counter mutas on paper of course but there are a few things to take into consideration

1) zerg tech switches are much faster. if you only just got out 1 phoenix when 8 mutas are flying to your base you have a major problem.
2) going off the back of zerg tech switching, if the zerg decides to commit to more mutas, then the onus is on the protoss to properly respond. most protoss will not blindly pump phoenix after the first wave of mutas is fended off/contained because phoenix will be dead supply against the ground army zerg can pop out at that point
4) archons destroy mutas on paper but they are slow and clunky while mutas are fast af and can even magic box. so while your archon is busy trying to get past your wall in or trying to rush through bases, the mutas can be ransacking the mineral line
3) if youre talking about fighting for air superiority, zerg actually have the advantage because they have the corruptors, which can keep the phonix away from mutas.

late game zerg has the advantage as well, as the carrier was heavily nerfed and zerg casters are really good at that point

all I'm saying is that zerg can contest protoss with air units, and it happens in pro games


As for why solar didnt make mutas against hurricane? it's because hurricane was stalker and sentry heavy instead of the more conventional immortal archon chargelot comp (which is what mutas really screw over). you cannot blindside a protoss players with mutas when the protoss players has that much anti air, and zerg cannot beat stalker immortal sentry comps without hydra/lurkers

Honestly, thats how I understand zerg as well, mutas are not there to fight toe to toe with archons or other anti-air. However, what I find kind of odd is the fact that both terran and protoss (especially protoss) can fly a shuttle over the zerg continuously and endlessly until the end of the game, 1 shuttle can keep the zerg honest for unlimited period of time and the zerg has no counterplay besides of running around like a fool, trying to chase the winds xDD. Where is the Scourge equivalent from BW that allows them to shut air harass and force the other races to actually have to outplay the zerg to be able to hurt their economy?
Knife kitty, night kitty, put you on a slab. Stealthy kitty, hunter kitty, stab stab stab :-)
Boggyb
Profile Joined January 2017
2855 Posts
May 01 2019 20:09 GMT
#150
On May 02 2019 04:55 M2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2019 04:29 BerserkSword wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:37 M2 wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:26 Ej_ wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:22 M2 wrote:
why solar (and zergs overall) not going for spire to get rid of shuttle/oracle harass? its not good in SC2?

Because protoss makes phoenix and, congratulations, you've just wasted 600/600

Sometimes it can be done vs dt drop opening (as they have trouble defending a few mutas) but even without stargate it's risky since protoss can just come with archons and kill you while mutalisks try to be cute.

Let's not even talk about corruptors.

Well this sounds like a huge design flaw for zerg if they cannot fight for air priority at all. Not only air priority but also not having the tools to shut down air harass and make it actually risky for the opponent to fly things over the zerg base, different than the risk of not looking and fly over a ground anti-air


what he said is not true though.

there have been plenty of games where the zerg commits to muta and just steamrolls the protoss. phoenix counter mutas on paper of course but there are a few things to take into consideration

1) zerg tech switches are much faster. if you only just got out 1 phoenix when 8 mutas are flying to your base you have a major problem.
2) going off the back of zerg tech switching, if the zerg decides to commit to more mutas, then the onus is on the protoss to properly respond. most protoss will not blindly pump phoenix after the first wave of mutas is fended off/contained because phoenix will be dead supply against the ground army zerg can pop out at that point
4) archons destroy mutas on paper but they are slow and clunky while mutas are fast af and can even magic box. so while your archon is busy trying to get past your wall in or trying to rush through bases, the mutas can be ransacking the mineral line
3) if youre talking about fighting for air superiority, zerg actually have the advantage because they have the corruptors, which can keep the phonix away from mutas.

late game zerg has the advantage as well, as the carrier was heavily nerfed and zerg casters are really good at that point

all I'm saying is that zerg can contest protoss with air units, and it happens in pro games


As for why solar didnt make mutas against hurricane? it's because hurricane was stalker and sentry heavy instead of the more conventional immortal archon chargelot comp (which is what mutas really screw over). you cannot blindside a protoss players with mutas when the protoss players has that much anti air, and zerg cannot beat stalker immortal sentry comps without hydra/lurkers

Honestly, thats how I understand zerg as well, mutas are not there to fight toe to toe with archons or other anti-air. However, what I find kind of odd is the fact that both terran and protoss (especially protoss) can fly a shuttle over the zerg continuously and endlessly until the end of the game, 1 shuttle can keep the zerg honest for unlimited period of time and the zerg has no counterplay besides of running around like a fool, trying to chase the winds xDD. Where is the Scourge equivalent from BW that allows them to shut air harass and force the other races to actually have to outplay the zerg to be able to hurt their economy?

I'm glad that you used the expression "keep the Zerg honest". The reason Zerg doesn't have something easily accessible without a major trade off that lets them shut down harassment is their win rates would hit 100% if they did.
BerserkSword
Profile Joined December 2018
United States2123 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-01 20:13:01
May 01 2019 20:11 GMT
#151
On May 02 2019 04:55 M2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2019 04:29 BerserkSword wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:37 M2 wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:26 Ej_ wrote:
On May 01 2019 21:22 M2 wrote:
why solar (and zergs overall) not going for spire to get rid of shuttle/oracle harass? its not good in SC2?

Because protoss makes phoenix and, congratulations, you've just wasted 600/600

Sometimes it can be done vs dt drop opening (as they have trouble defending a few mutas) but even without stargate it's risky since protoss can just come with archons and kill you while mutalisks try to be cute.

Let's not even talk about corruptors.

Well this sounds like a huge design flaw for zerg if they cannot fight for air priority at all. Not only air priority but also not having the tools to shut down air harass and make it actually risky for the opponent to fly things over the zerg base, different than the risk of not looking and fly over a ground anti-air


what he said is not true though.

there have been plenty of games where the zerg commits to muta and just steamrolls the protoss. phoenix counter mutas on paper of course but there are a few things to take into consideration

1) zerg tech switches are much faster. if you only just got out 1 phoenix when 8 mutas are flying to your base you have a major problem.
2) going off the back of zerg tech switching, if the zerg decides to commit to more mutas, then the onus is on the protoss to properly respond. most protoss will not blindly pump phoenix after the first wave of mutas is fended off/contained because phoenix will be dead supply against the ground army zerg can pop out at that point
4) archons destroy mutas on paper but they are slow and clunky while mutas are fast af and can even magic box. so while your archon is busy trying to get past your wall in or trying to rush through bases, the mutas can be ransacking the mineral line
3) if youre talking about fighting for air superiority, zerg actually have the advantage because they have the corruptors, which can keep the phonix away from mutas.

late game zerg has the advantage as well, as the carrier was heavily nerfed and zerg casters are really good at that point

all I'm saying is that zerg can contest protoss with air units, and it happens in pro games


As for why solar didnt make mutas against hurricane? it's because hurricane was stalker and sentry heavy instead of the more conventional immortal archon chargelot comp (which is what mutas really screw over). you cannot blindside a protoss players with mutas when the protoss players has that much anti air, and zerg cannot beat stalker immortal sentry comps without hydra/lurkers

Honestly, thats how I understand zerg as well, mutas are not there to fight toe to toe with archons or other anti-air. However, what I find kind of odd is the fact that both terran and protoss (especially protoss) can fly a shuttle over the zerg continuously and endlessly until the end of the game, 1 shuttle can keep the zerg honest for unlimited period of time and the zerg has no counterplay besides of running around like a fool, trying to chase the winds xDD


What does "keeping the zerg honest" mean though?

making the zerg player pay attention and move around queens and roaches?

the zerg player then has an army that can overwhelm the protoss army in a straight up fight....then what.

the reason why protoss needs to keep "zerg honest" is because if they don't the zerg just outgrows them and steamrolls them.

this is the crux of stargate + archon drop harass. Protoss players use this to try and even the odds when it comes to expansion/map control vs zerg. this is what zest tried to do and it failed miserably because queens have a range of 8 and the zerg player just has to pay attention to keep the archons from killing nothing more than a queen, overloard, and or a few lings. and oracles and phoenix cant fend off a midgame zerg ground army

that's why you see players like hurricane who are not confident in their relative skill/later game play just say fuck it and go for two base timing attacks. he decided to live or die on the two base attack. and to be honest, solar threw game 3 and gifted hurricane the win, because hurricane had the weaker economy and did not have the unit composition to break a lurker wall on creep. solar just needed to sit back and get the bigger army he eventually would have

against terran it's a completely different story because it's ridiculously difficult for midgame zerg armies to break terran bases, while terran can project so much power for so little supply

TL+ Member
M2
Profile Joined December 2002
Bulgaria4168 Posts
May 01 2019 20:14 GMT
#152
All right I dont argue about that, as I said I am new to the game, so I would assume that its like you are explaining it and if zerg cannot be pressured like that they will become too strong. If this is the trade off, I am fine with it, I just found it odd since my understandings about the game dynamics are mostly from another game atm
Knife kitty, night kitty, put you on a slab. Stealthy kitty, hunter kitty, stab stab stab :-)
Tyrhanius
Profile Joined April 2011
France947 Posts
May 01 2019 22:12 GMT
#153
On May 02 2019 04:04 BerserkSword wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2019 23:42 Boggyb wrote:
On May 01 2019 23:07 deacon.frost wrote:
On May 01 2019 23:03 Boggyb wrote:
On May 01 2019 22:54 deacon.frost wrote:
LotV has many design flaws which were made more glaring lately. You get used to it eventually.

The funny thing about that is the race with the worst hasn't been seriously touched in any of the redesign patches.

Yeah, Zergs really need that. The omnipotent queen reminds me a lot MSC

It should since it is a band aid patch that keeps together a flawed race. The Queen also fits more in WC3 design philosophy in that it is both an economic and military unit which makes it a giant aberration in SC2.

The redesign Zerg needed:
Delete Queen (combine that with deleting mules and chrono)
Remove vision from creep
Make whatever other changes are needed to make that playable (probably involves making Hydras tier 1)


I completely agree, but they will never delete the queen and remove vision from creep at this point in the game

the best they can do is fix zerg's weakness of being stuck with garbage ass roaches for so long

i don't even know why roaches are in the game tbh. they didnt need to make hydras stronger in SC2 at the cost of them coming later and being more expensive. the roach was a failure for zerg design wise since its inception in wol when its gimmick was the extremely fast HP regeneration.

all roaches do is give terran and protoss players MORE micro potential against zerg. it's absolutely idiotic that a well placed siege tank or a couple of micro'd immortal can kill droves of roaches, the supposed meat shield of zerg. and now you see protoss players like hurricane, instead of going stargate heavy, getting more muscle on the ground to build up and hold off high roach numbers until robo units are available (meanwhile zest stuck with phoenix openers and got rocked). and of course terran players continue to stomp zerg players.

Maybe the roach should be replaced with a nerfed ravager and i think the game would be better if zerg t1 comp would be something like ravager hydra (both weakened). make ravager somewhat more vulnerable while its bile is going off (like diruptor can't move while nova is en route). cheaper t1 hydra but lower hp and damage a bit so it doesnt shred every single gateway unit, and give it bonus damage to armor so zerg still has a way to fight air/robo/mech

Roaches are bad because... they don't received any buffs since WOL.

The problem isn't roach or zerg design, it's the way they introduce some gamebreaking patch like 70 dmg for tank while they don't balance at all the rest. When you decide to nerf zerg eco, don't buff some zerg units, and give massive buffs to their counter, they become simply bad, that's intended.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland27026 Posts
May 01 2019 22:29 GMT
#154
On May 02 2019 07:12 Tyrhanius wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2019 04:04 BerserkSword wrote:
On May 01 2019 23:42 Boggyb wrote:
On May 01 2019 23:07 deacon.frost wrote:
On May 01 2019 23:03 Boggyb wrote:
On May 01 2019 22:54 deacon.frost wrote:
LotV has many design flaws which were made more glaring lately. You get used to it eventually.

The funny thing about that is the race with the worst hasn't been seriously touched in any of the redesign patches.

Yeah, Zergs really need that. The omnipotent queen reminds me a lot MSC

It should since it is a band aid patch that keeps together a flawed race. The Queen also fits more in WC3 design philosophy in that it is both an economic and military unit which makes it a giant aberration in SC2.

The redesign Zerg needed:
Delete Queen (combine that with deleting mules and chrono)
Remove vision from creep
Make whatever other changes are needed to make that playable (probably involves making Hydras tier 1)


I completely agree, but they will never delete the queen and remove vision from creep at this point in the game

the best they can do is fix zerg's weakness of being stuck with garbage ass roaches for so long

i don't even know why roaches are in the game tbh. they didnt need to make hydras stronger in SC2 at the cost of them coming later and being more expensive. the roach was a failure for zerg design wise since its inception in wol when its gimmick was the extremely fast HP regeneration.

all roaches do is give terran and protoss players MORE micro potential against zerg. it's absolutely idiotic that a well placed siege tank or a couple of micro'd immortal can kill droves of roaches, the supposed meat shield of zerg. and now you see protoss players like hurricane, instead of going stargate heavy, getting more muscle on the ground to build up and hold off high roach numbers until robo units are available (meanwhile zest stuck with phoenix openers and got rocked). and of course terran players continue to stomp zerg players.

Maybe the roach should be replaced with a nerfed ravager and i think the game would be better if zerg t1 comp would be something like ravager hydra (both weakened). make ravager somewhat more vulnerable while its bile is going off (like diruptor can't move while nova is en route). cheaper t1 hydra but lower hp and damage a bit so it doesnt shred every single gateway unit, and give it bonus damage to armor so zerg still has a way to fight air/robo/mech

Roaches are bad because... they don't received any buffs since WOL.

The problem isn't roach or zerg design, it's the way they introduce some gamebreaking patch like 70 dmg for tank while they don't balance at all the rest. When you decide to nerf zerg eco, don't buff some zerg units, and give massive buffs to their counter, they become simply bad, that's intended.

Surely Zerg design does play a big part too though? Whatever units they do have they tend to have a lot of them, so any changes will have a big effect, also Zergs have really good map vision and other tools that make changes really dicey to make, in PvZ especially.

Perhaps some tweaking is needed I wouldn’t necessarily dispute that either, it’s a bloody hard game to balance because they kept just adding more flashy stuff to avoid doing more fundamental alterations back in the day.

The warp prism in its current state is a bit of a case in point, it is really bloody strong both in pickup micro and augmenting pushes, but also just flying into bases. But without it Protoss is boned as things stand.

I’d at least lower the pickup range so there’s more counter-micro against it that’s possible. I like my flashy micro but not when it’s very difficult to counteract from the other player.

'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Topin
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Peru10120 Posts
May 02 2019 00:30 GMT
#155
congratz to Hurricane
i would define my style between a mix of ByuN, Maru and MKP
Prev 1 6 7 8 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 57m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
StateSC2 357
SortOf 138
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 2427
Tasteless 235
Aegong 56
Hm[arnc] 52
Dewaltoss 43
Hyuk 38
Icarus 6
Dota 2
Fuzer 71
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 1129
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King190
Other Games
summit1g7381
Doublelift529
Happy226
RuFF_SC220
ceh91
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick597
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 58
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH203
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1090
• Stunt908
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
2h 57m
OSC
9h 57m
Douyu Cup 2020
21h 57m
Oliveira vs Trap
Jieshi vs XY
soO vs FanTaSy
TY vs Coffee
OSC
1d 8h
Douyu Cup 2020
1d 21h
Neeb vs Impact
MacSed vs Cyan
Scarlett vs Kelazhur
INnoVation vs Dear
Douyu Cup 2020
2 days
Maestros of the Game
3 days
herO vs Classic
Maru vs Serral
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
3 days
Douyu Cup 2020
3 days
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-06-19
WardiTV Spring 2026
Heroes Pulsing #2

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Season 21: Qualifier 1
SCTL 2026 Spring
Maestros of the Game 2
Murky Cup 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026

Upcoming

CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Douyu Cup 2026
BCC 2026
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E1
Heroes Pulsing #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.