EPT[WCS] DreamHack Austin 2017 - Page 46
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Nayolbi
325 Posts
| ||
Soularion
Canada2764 Posts
On April 30 2017 11:17 intotheheart wrote: Scheduling is an issue for SC for sure, but it's not as bad as the DotA ones rofl. It's impossible because of how high the variance in game time is. Not sure if I have a decent answer, honestly. | ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On April 30 2017 11:17 intotheheart wrote: Scheduling is an issue for SC for sure, but it's not as bad as the DotA ones rofl. Downtime wasn't even bad this time. It's just that the games ran long. | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
| ||
|
Fango
United Kingdom8987 Posts
On April 30 2017 11:11 Soularion wrote: That's pretty reasonable, although I think people overstate how 'bad' that is. I find it pretty exciting, and I still think the player who wins was the player who played better. Plus, game 2/3 have been pretty decision-oriented and not very disruptor-YOLO-fest. ngl, this era of PvP is horrible to watch for me (and I loved it in HoTS even when no one else did).The mass adepts, or disruptor 50/50, or carrier insta win. It's just so...uugh... It just feels like there's almost no real strategy involved. I really hate that it's so easy for a lesser player to beat an amazing player just because the meta involves it being coinflippy. | ||
|
Topin
Peru10080 Posts
On April 30 2017 11:14 intotheheart wrote: Did they play Cham vs. TRUE offscreen or something? Yikes... basetrade casted it | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
On April 30 2017 11:18 Soularion wrote: It's impossible because of how high the variance in game time is. Not sure if I have a decent answer, honestly. Yeah that's what I mean, they schedule an hour and a half I think for a Bo5, which isn't unreasonable but to be honest, sometimes you get 40-minute games. For the most part though, it's still not as bad as DOTA where drafts take a while, and games can actually just take forever. | ||
|
Fango
United Kingdom8987 Posts
On April 30 2017 11:18 Soularion wrote: It's impossible because of how high the variance in game time is. Not sure if I have a decent answer, honestly. Remember that one proleague game that lasted like 2 and a half hours and then ended in a draw. Now thats a sceduling disaster | ||
|
Soularion
Canada2764 Posts
On April 30 2017 11:18 Fango wrote: ngl, this era of PvP is horrible to watch for me (and I loved it in HoTS even when no one else did).The mass adepts, or disruptor 50/50, or carrier insta win. It's just so...uugh... It just feels like there's almost no real strategy involved. I really hate that it's so easy for a lesser player to beat an amazing player just because the meta involves it being coinflippy. Yeah I can see your point, although I feel with every meta of PvP people hate it in the moment and end up liking it afterwards. People hated HotS PvP when it was around, and now they love it. It's a hard matchup to get people to like. | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
On April 30 2017 11:19 Fango wrote: Remember that one proleague game that lasted like 2 and a half hours and then ended in a draw. Now thats a sceduling disaster J e e z, wasn't the follow-up game 1.5h or something too? | ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On April 30 2017 11:18 Fango wrote: ngl, this era of PvP is horrible to watch for me (and I loved it in HoTS even when no one else did).The mass adepts, or disruptor 50/50, or carrier insta win. It's just so...uugh... It just feels like there's almost no real strategy involved. I really hate that it's so easy for a lesser player to beat an amazing player just because the meta involves it being coinflippy. What's the last big PvP upset you remember? Tbh the results seem a lot more consistent than say TvT. | ||
|
OsaX Nymloth
Poland3244 Posts
| ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On April 30 2017 11:20 Soularion wrote: Yeah I can see your point, although I feel with every meta of PvP people hate it in the moment and end up liking it afterwards. People hated HotS PvP when it was around, and now they love it. It's a hard matchup to get people to like. I don't think many people miss the four-gate era. Part of it is just nostalgia of course. Even swarmhosts have more fans now than they had at the time they were plaguing tournament schedules. | ||
|
iamho
United States3347 Posts
| ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
| ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
|
OsaX Nymloth
Poland3244 Posts
On April 30 2017 11:24 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: Just got back. Why is neeb on just stalkers vs carrier/mothership? NA strats | ||
|
lolfail9001
Russian Federation40190 Posts
On April 30 2017 11:20 Soularion wrote: Yeah I can see your point, although I feel with every meta of PvP people hate it in the moment and end up liking it afterwards. People hated HotS PvP when it was around, and now they love it. It's a hard matchup to get people to like. HotS PvP was actually so fucking great. In 2013, anyways. Mass Muta HotS ZvZ was fun too, frankly. | ||
|
pvsnp
7676 Posts
| ||
|
Topin
Peru10080 Posts
On April 30 2017 11:24 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: Just got back. Why is neeb on just stalkers vs carrier/mothership? 7k mmr strats | ||
| ||
