|
Haha what was that remark by Rotti? "chekky chekky kaelaris"
|
Flag Waving Skills: Polt > Zest
|
On April 05 2015 03:07 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2015 03:05 Alucen-Will- wrote:On April 05 2015 03:05 stuchiu wrote:On April 05 2015 03:03 royalroadweed wrote:On April 05 2015 03:02 Makro wrote:On April 05 2015 03:01 fixed_point wrote:
Can polt get any more handsome? yea zest level maybe Polt is already better looking than Zest. Face: Polt > Zest. Body: Zest > Polt. Personality: Polt > Zest Zest came off quite personable in his GSL clips and his interview with Susie Kim in Shenzen Polt took a foreigner crowd from Scarlett. Think about that.
Hard to argue with that, I think his wave is kinda cute, too.
|
On April 05 2015 03:01 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2015 03:00 Wildmoon wrote:On April 05 2015 02:57 Alchemik wrote:On April 05 2015 02:56 Wildmoon wrote:On April 05 2015 02:53 Alchemik wrote:On April 05 2015 02:53 Wildmoon wrote:On April 05 2015 02:52 Alchemik wrote:On April 05 2015 02:50 Wildmoon wrote:On April 05 2015 02:47 Ej_ wrote:On April 05 2015 02:46 royalroadweed wrote:
[quote]
Good point. Should have been a factory unit. So accustomed to mech being terrible that skyterran now qualifies as mech. I mean it's not mech playstyle wise. It's either sitting in 1 place and balling up units or amoving with hellbat thor. Nothing of the positional play and careful planning that made BW mech pure sex. edit: here's a baller blog by Falling explaining what mech is http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/360325-in-defence-of-mech Depending on MU. SC2 mech in TvT is pretty awesome. The best solution is to have mech and bio both viable. Too much bio in SC2 and too much mech in BW across all MUs. mech is just as viable as bio, in TvT it's a bit more interesting to watch, but, according to every Terran I've ever seen, way easier to play and horrible to play against Mech is far less viable than bio across all MUs in SC2. aside from TvP, that's incorrect It's correct. Mech is viable in TvZ and TvT but pure mech in both MU are less popular than bio or bio/tank. And Mech is crap in TvP. "less popular" doesn't mean "less viable" and yes, at very high level TvP mech is pretty bad It usually means less viable. It means bio can bring you more wins consistently in most case. I think pro players pick what comp to use based on what's the best comp and bio happens to be the one used much more frequently. Mech would probably be much less successful overall if Zergs blindly assumed mech and not bio. Buy saying it's far less viable is like saying 11/11 is a bad build just because it won't work if you do 11/11 only.
I don't understand your comparison. 11/11 is a strategy. Mech is a unit composition. You can have many strategies with mech but it really doesn't change that it's inferior to Bio in most case.
|
fast lair?
roach drop hype
edit: 
|
On April 05 2015 03:08 Deathstar wrote:
Flag Waving Skills: Polt > Zest
Thumbs down : Polt > Zest
|
On April 05 2015 03:07 herMan wrote:
Haha what was that remark by Rotti? "chekky chekky kaelaris"
a thing that apollo would say in wcs casts and now everybody says it as a joke
|
On April 05 2015 03:08 Boucot wrote:Thumbs down : Polt > Zest
Terranning: Polt > Zest
|
On April 05 2015 03:09 KingofdaHipHop wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2015 03:08 Boucot wrote:On April 05 2015 03:08 Deathstar wrote:
Flag Waving Skills: Polt > Zest Thumbs down : Polt > Zest Terranning: Polt > Zest
Americanning: Polt > Zest
|
On April 05 2015 03:09 KingofdaHipHop wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2015 03:08 Boucot wrote:On April 05 2015 03:08 Deathstar wrote:
Flag Waving Skills: Polt > Zest Thumbs down : Polt > Zest Terranning: Polt > Zest
Winning a Bo5 the quickest : Polt > Zest
|
On April 05 2015 03:08 Wildmoon wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2015 03:01 Ej_ wrote:On April 05 2015 03:00 Wildmoon wrote:On April 05 2015 02:57 Alchemik wrote:On April 05 2015 02:56 Wildmoon wrote:On April 05 2015 02:53 Alchemik wrote:On April 05 2015 02:53 Wildmoon wrote:On April 05 2015 02:52 Alchemik wrote:On April 05 2015 02:50 Wildmoon wrote:On April 05 2015 02:47 Ej_ wrote:[quote] I mean it's not mech playstyle wise. It's either sitting in 1 place and balling up units or amoving with hellbat thor. Nothing of the positional play and careful planning that made BW mech pure sex. edit: here's a baller blog by Falling explaining what mech is http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/360325-in-defence-of-mech Depending on MU. SC2 mech in TvT is pretty awesome. The best solution is to have mech and bio both viable. Too much bio in SC2 and too much mech in BW across all MUs. mech is just as viable as bio, in TvT it's a bit more interesting to watch, but, according to every Terran I've ever seen, way easier to play and horrible to play against Mech is far less viable than bio across all MUs in SC2. aside from TvP, that's incorrect It's correct. Mech is viable in TvZ and TvT but pure mech in both MU are less popular than bio or bio/tank. And Mech is crap in TvP. "less popular" doesn't mean "less viable" and yes, at very high level TvP mech is pretty bad It usually means less viable. It means bio can bring you more wins consistently in most case. I think pro players pick what comp to use based on what's the best comp and bio happens to be the one used much more frequently. Mech would probably be much less successful overall if Zergs blindly assumed mech and not bio. Buy saying it's far less viable is like saying 11/11 is a bad build just because it won't work if you do 11/11 only. I don't understand your comparison. 11/11 is a strategy. Mech is a unit composition. You can have many strategies with mech but it really doesn't change that it's inferior to Bio in most case.
I explained it. If you play like you were blindly expecting mech, you are going to have much easier time vs it, than if you were expecting bio (eg. Soulkey vs Gumiho or Life vs ForGG in CaseKing Invitational), because all "standard" builds are tailored to deal with bio while taking mech into consideration. The same way 11/11 works if it's not expected.
Mech openings aren't that different from each other and there's plenty of stuff you can do to shut them down.
|
On April 05 2015 03:11 Boucot wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2015 03:09 KingofdaHipHop wrote:On April 05 2015 03:08 Boucot wrote:On April 05 2015 03:08 Deathstar wrote:
Flag Waving Skills: Polt > Zest Thumbs down : Polt > Zest Terranning: Polt > Zest Winning a Bo5 the quickest : Polt > Zest
Metaphorically punching foreigners into retirement: Polt >>>> Zest
|
On April 05 2015 03:11 KingofdaHipHop wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2015 03:11 Boucot wrote:On April 05 2015 03:09 KingofdaHipHop wrote:On April 05 2015 03:08 Boucot wrote:On April 05 2015 03:08 Deathstar wrote:
Flag Waving Skills: Polt > Zest Thumbs down : Polt > Zest Terranning: Polt > Zest Winning a Bo5 the quickest : Polt > Zest Metaphorically punching foreigners into retirement: Polt >>>> Zest
Never forget
|
|
|
On April 05 2015 03:11 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2015 03:08 Wildmoon wrote:On April 05 2015 03:01 Ej_ wrote:On April 05 2015 03:00 Wildmoon wrote:On April 05 2015 02:57 Alchemik wrote:On April 05 2015 02:56 Wildmoon wrote:On April 05 2015 02:53 Alchemik wrote:On April 05 2015 02:53 Wildmoon wrote:On April 05 2015 02:52 Alchemik wrote:On April 05 2015 02:50 Wildmoon wrote:
[quote]
Depending on MU. SC2 mech in TvT is pretty awesome. The best solution is to have mech and bio both viable. Too much bio in SC2 and too much mech in BW across all MUs.
mech is just as viable as bio, in TvT it's a bit more interesting to watch, but, according to every Terran I've ever seen, way easier to play and horrible to play against Mech is far less viable than bio across all MUs in SC2. aside from TvP, that's incorrect It's correct. Mech is viable in TvZ and TvT but pure mech in both MU are less popular than bio or bio/tank. And Mech is crap in TvP. "less popular" doesn't mean "less viable" and yes, at very high level TvP mech is pretty bad It usually means less viable. It means bio can bring you more wins consistently in most case. I think pro players pick what comp to use based on what's the best comp and bio happens to be the one used much more frequently. Mech would probably be much less successful overall if Zergs blindly assumed mech and not bio. Buy saying it's far less viable is like saying 11/11 is a bad build just because it won't work if you do 11/11 only. I don't understand your comparison. 11/11 is a strategy. Mech is a unit composition. You can have many strategies with mech but it really doesn't change that it's inferior to Bio in most case. I explained it. If you play like you were blindly expecting mech, you are going to have much easier time vs it, than if you were expecting bio (eg. Soulkey vs Gumiho or Life vs ForGG in CaseKing Invitational), because all "standard" builds are tailored to deal with bio while taking mech into consideration. The same way 11/11 works if it's not expected. Mech openings aren't that different from each other and there's plenty of stuff you can do to shut them down.
and not just the openings, but the follow-ups that zerg can use if they know mech is coming (fast roach drops, nydus etc).
|
On April 05 2015 03:13 Noonius wrote:
mines are so unreliable
I give Polt 1/5 Dreams.
|
hydra's micro is pretty good
|
The way Thors hang below medivacs is really one the coolest animations in the game
|
polt is dead Hydra too stronk
|
HEIL HYDRA. HEIL HYDRA. HEIL HYDRA
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
