EPTOn March 21 2015 06:50 Werwolf wrote:
Would be great if could see 2v2 brackets with all info on Liquipedia
Would be great if could see 2v2 brackets with all info on Liquipedia
agreed
2v2 Ting Cup 5000$ Kappa StarLeague - Page 4
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
odem
143 Posts
agreed | ||
|
BaneRiders
Sweden3630 Posts
Yeah, that would make a difference alright.  Here we go today in any case! | ||
|
masterrn
72 Posts
I have no way of contacting the opponents - they are not responding Is there a designated group chat like ESL group chat? .... | ||
|
Werwolf
Russian Federation29 Posts
 | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
| ||
|
paddyz
Ireland628 Posts
Either way I am super excited for this one, more so then GSL finals even. Could have invited better teams though, now there is a reasonable chance Larry and Legacy win O.o. | ||
|
odem
143 Posts
http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/2zukks/shoutout_to_ting_for_the_ting_2v2_cup/cpmvhxe | ||
|
SilverBullet
Canada79 Posts
| ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
| ||
|
odem
143 Posts
On March 04 2015 11:33 woopr wrote: there is no such thing as high level 2v2 players in sc2 and they will always get beaten by a team of high level 1v1 players. There is no such thing as high level 1v1 players in sc2 and they will always get beaten by random team 2v2 players. | ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
On March 24 2015 01:49 odem wrote: There is no such thing as high level 1v1 players in sc2 and they will always get beaten by random team 2v2 players. Can 2v2 players can be considered good ? | ||
|
odem
143 Posts
We shouldn't go that far. I think considering their existence not to be unrealistic is enough for now. | ||
|
BaneRiders
Sweden3630 Posts
Only if they are non-foreigners obviously  . Don't mention the G-word where foreigners qualify!! | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
A top korean 2on2 team will probably beat two random pro 1on1 players that have never played 2on2 seriously in a bo3. But the two pro 1on1 players will not need many hours (serious) practice before they will figure out the builds and timings enough to beat the top 2on2 team on better mechanics. So predict a team of 1on1 pros that actually spent some time to seriously practice 2on2 before the tournament to win. | ||
|
Yrr
Germany796 Posts
On March 24 2015 20:31 Cascade wrote: This is my guess of 1on1 vs 2on2 skill: A top korean 2on2 team will probably beat two random pro 1on1 players that have never played 2on2 seriously in a bo3. But the two pro 1on1 players will not need many hours (serious) practice before they will figure out the builds and timings enough to beat the top 2on2 team on better mechanics. So predict a team of 1on1 pros that actually spent some time to seriously practice 2on2 before the tournament to win. The sole reason for this is that skilled players are more likely to choose the more prestigious format which is 1v1. | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On March 24 2015 20:58 Yrr wrote: The sole reason for this is that skilled players are more likely to choose the more prestigious format which is 1v1. Why so aggressive? >_> Thought we were here to watch a great 2on2 tournament! Who do you think will win? | ||
|
Motlu
Australia884 Posts
Gogo Catz+Hydra and Crank + Heart! | ||
|
RandomPlayer
Russian Federation374 Posts
| ||
|
Yrr
Germany796 Posts
On March 24 2015 21:20 Cascade wrote: Why so aggressive? >_> Thought we were here to watch a great 2on2 tournament! Who do you think will win? Sorry if I sounded agressive, I misinterpreted yours for a 1v1 masterrace statement. I hope we will see more awesome strats that exploit the 2 player setup. | ||
|
paddyz
Ireland628 Posts
| ||
| ||
