EPTZOTAC SC2 Season 4 Final 2014 (Jan 19 - 21) - Page 8
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32754 Posts
| ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:58 Musicus wrote: Polt wins with 24 workers..  So you're telling me, Polt got behind to win the game? | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
| ||
|
Musicus
Germany23579 Posts
On January 22 2015 06:03 stuchiu wrote: So you're telling me, Polt got behind to win the game? It's what he does man, he just waits until the right amount of workers was lost then he goes and kills every hatch/nexus on the map. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32754 Posts
| ||
|
Nerchio
Poland2633 Posts
| ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
| ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote: Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player | ||
|
Alchemik
Poland7124 Posts
On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote: Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins well, you really can't say your control was that good | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23579 Posts
| ||
|
Nerchio
Poland2633 Posts
On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost | ||
|
ClueClueClue
Sweden1203 Posts
On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote: I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch! | ||
|
Nerchio
Poland2633 Posts
On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote: If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch! Which unit that is tell me please, it is definitely not baneling | ||
|
GoloSC2
713 Posts
On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote: If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch! not ranged though, and have to be set off manually | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32754 Posts
On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote: If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch! Banelings are suicide units and are wasted and aren't able to hit all units essentially. Not a fair comparison at all. | ||
|
ClueClueClue
Sweden1203 Posts
On January 22 2015 06:17 Nerchio wrote: Which unit that is tell me please, it is definitely not baneling I'm not saying they're identical, but the cost-effectiveness can be achieved with zerg... it's funny how mines always happen to be OP when the other player loses. | ||
|
Nerchio
Poland2633 Posts
On January 22 2015 06:21 ClueClueClue wrote: I'm not saying they're identical, but the cost-effectiveness can be achieved with zerg... it's funny how mines always happen to be OP when the other player loses. Except Swarm Host that are a terrible unit and we all agree - zerg has nothing that is cost effective in this game, that's why it's always painful to win with zerg and we mostly see it by either starving(by starving i also mean 5 base vs 3 etc) your opponent or one big fight | ||
|
ClueClueClue
Sweden1203 Posts
On January 22 2015 06:19 PhoenixVoid wrote: Banelings are suicide units and are wasted and aren't able to hit all units essentially. Not a fair comparison at all. They also cost half a supply, don't have to burrow before attacking, force quite a bit of micro out of the opponent and can be built close to a battle in a matter of seconds. My point was simply that each race has really cost-effective units... | ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
On January 22 2015 06:23 ClueClueClue wrote: They also cost half a supply, don't have to burrow before attacking, force quite a bit of micro out of the opponent and can be built close to a battle in a matter of seconds. My point was simply that each race has really cost-effective units... Banelings are so much more difficult to be cost effective with though dude that you can't compare the two. | ||
|
ClueClueClue
Sweden1203 Posts
On January 22 2015 06:22 Nerchio wrote: Except Swarm Host that are a terrible unit and we all agree - zerg has nothing that is cost effective in this game, that's why it's always painful to win with zerg and we mostly see it by either starving(by starving i also mean 5 base vs 3 etc) your opponent or one big fight But zerg is not (majorly) underpowered overall... that's just the way the race is being played. If you don't like its mechanics and want the option of two basing/dropping hardcore; switch race? | ||
| ||
