|
The ZOTAC Season II Final is where the 16 players that collected the most points during the weekly cups have to face each other and play for a total prize pool of 2,500 EUR.
The three-day Season Final will take place from the 19th of January until the 21st of January.
Previous Events:
![[image loading]](http://cdn1.gamesports.net/img/themes/admin/action_media.png) Season 1 Replay Pack
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/images/regular.png) Season 1 Thread
Season 2 Replay Pack
Season 2 Thread
Season 3 Thread
Website: http://sc2finals.zotac-cup.com
Default server: EU Server
Players: Top16 of the season ranking and successors
Mappool: 2015 Season 1 mappool
Schedule:
- Monday, Jan 19 5:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00)
- 18:00 CET - 20:30 CET: Group A
- 20:30 CET - 23:00 CET: Group B
- Tuesday, Jan 20 5:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00)
- 18:00 CET - 20:30 CET: Group C
- 20:30 CET - 23:00 CET: Group D
- Wednesday, Jan 21 5:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00)
- 18:00 CET - 21:00 CET: DE Playoffs
Prize money distribution:
- 1st place: 1,200 Euro
- 2nd place: 700 Euro
- 3rd place: 400 Euro
- 4th place: 200 Euro
![[image loading]](http://cdn0.gamesports.net/storage/42000/42523.png)
Group A:  eMotion ,  Happy ,  sLivko , Bly
Group B:Namshar , Lilbow , PrimeLoT , Elazer
Group C: ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/Zicon_small.png) Guru , Nerchio , Kas , CoolTea
Group D: Polt , fraer , Revolver , MarineLorD
Guru replaces ForGG
Namshar replaces First
PrimeLoT replaces jeysen
Successor: RandallFlag
Group A (Monday, Jan 19 5:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00))
+ Show Spoiler [eMotion vs. sLivko] +
+ Show Spoiler [Happy vs. Bly] +
+ Show Spoiler [Winners' Match] +
+ Show Spoiler [Losers' Match] +
+ Show Spoiler [2nd Place Match] +
+ Show Spoiler [Final Group Standings ] +
Group B (Monday, Jan 19 7:30pm GMT (GMT+00:00))
+ Show Spoiler [Namshar vs. Primelot] +
+ Show Spoiler [Lilbow vs. Elazer] +
+ Show Spoiler [Winners' Match] +
+ Show Spoiler [Losers' Match] +
+ Show Spoiler [2nd Place Match] +
+ Show Spoiler [Final Group Standings ] +
Group C (Tuesday, Jan 20 5:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00))
+ Show Spoiler [Guru vs. Kas] +
+ Show Spoiler [Nerchio vs. Cooltea] +
+ Show Spoiler [Winners' Match] +
+ Show Spoiler [Losers' Match] +
+ Show Spoiler [2nd Place Match] +
+ Show Spoiler [Final Group Standings ] +
Group D (Tuesday, Jan 20 7:30pm GMT (GMT+00:00))
+ Show Spoiler [Polt vs. Revolver] +
+ Show Spoiler [Fraer vs. MarineLorD] +
+ Show Spoiler [Winners' Match] +
+ Show Spoiler [Losers' Match] +
+ Show Spoiler [2nd Place Match] +
+ Show Spoiler [Final Group Standings ] +
Wednesday, Jan 21 5:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00)
+ Show Spoiler [Lower Bracket Round 1] +
+ Show Spoiler [Winner Bracket Semi Final] +
+ Show Spoiler [Lower Bracket Semi Final] +
+ Show Spoiler [Winner Bracket Final] +
+ Show Spoiler [Lower Bracket Final] +
+ Show Spoiler [Consolation Final] +
+ Show Spoiler [Grand Final] +
+ Show Spoiler [Final Standings & Prize Money] +
The ZOTAC StarCraft II Cup Season Final is a three-days tournament which is divided into two stages: the dual tournament system group stage and the double elimination playoffs.
The 16 invited players will be separated into 4 groups with 4 players for each group. Group A & B will be played on the 1st tournament day, group C & D will be played on the 2nd tournament day. The playoffs will be played in a double elimination bracket on the 3rd tournament day. The 1st place of each group will start in the winner bracket and the 2nd place of each group will start in the lower bracket.
All games will be Bo3 matches, only the grand final will be a full Bo5 match with no advantage for the participant coming from the winner bracket, respectively no disadvantage for the participant coming from the lower bracket by winning the consolation final.
![[image loading]](http://cdn0.gamesports.net/storage/42000/42527.png)
GL HF to all participants and we hope you all enjoy watching the ZOTAC SC2 Season Final!
|
France7248 Posts
|
This tournament is quite stacked. Hope Nerchio will do well, gogo!
|
Inferno pools is infernal indeed.
What a disgrace, Activision-Blizzard.
|
Love the way Bly plays :D For the swarm!
Edit: Happy´s push must be the slowest thing in the world.
Edit: Doompush with auto-turrets and PDD!!?!?!?
|
Ugh, is Khaldor ever going to fix his low fps on his stream....?
|
France7248 Posts
|
I think Happy wants to kill Slivsko and E-sports.
|
And people said that the 2 hours game are fault of the ravens and not the swarm host
They should know they're equally awful units
Also why is happy trying to defend a mine out base, he should be fighting to take that base that still has resources
|
Have to say i haven´t really seen this kind of mech before. Spamming auto-turrets actually is a style.
|
If you want to play Ravens, you really need to learn not to gg when you still have some!
|
On January 20 2015 04:33 RaFox17 wrote:
Have to say i haven´t really seen this kind of mech before. Spamming auto-turrets actually is a style.
But he wasn't meching(?) he made bio and got ravens
|
Khaldor is hillarious  "NOOO if happy looses, he plays Bly again, I am NOT gonna cast that AGAIN!"
|
Which sadly has relegated the interesting games to BTTV, whose stream is having serious issues.
|
On January 20 2015 04:36 Lexender wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2015 04:33 RaFox17 wrote:
Have to say i haven´t really seen this kind of mech before. Spamming auto-turrets actually is a style. But he wasn't meching(?) he made bio and got ravens
Yeah, i guess thats true. But the backbone of any successful mech play is usually raven so he just skimmed the fat away from mech :D
|
Secret Spring games are the goddamn US Congress.
|
Really, really!?!!? What just happened?
|
A beautiful ending.
Dying with 5000/5000 bank for lack of supply.
|
It seems that Slivko did not really practice this map enough, it plays out quite differently because the long running-around circular path. Could have been an awesome game, if he had not just blown it, the terran setup was really good.
|
I don't like how massing only stalkers and nothing else is a legit strategy and isn't an all-in
|
On January 20 2015 05:31 Alchemik wrote:
I don't like how massing only stalkers and nothing else is a legit strategy and isn't an all-in
Well, it is not exactly a very good tech development. Yes, there are strong blink builds from which you can transition, but often it is walking a tight rope, because when the time comes, the stalkers loose value very quickly.
|
I actually kind of enjoy BL vs BL in HotS. It's not nearly as stupid as it used to be back in WoL, when fungal was instacast, and Hydras were always slow.
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
Why am I watching Roro vs Symbol?
|
On January 20 2015 05:45 stuchiu wrote:
Why am I watching Roro vs Symbol?
your eyes are deceiving you
|
its like 2012 all over again
|
Uprooted spines and spores need to stop counting towards one's building count in regards to elimination.
|
On January 20 2015 06:28 Pontius Pirate wrote:
Uprooted spines and spores need to stop counting towards one's building count in regards to elimination.
why? they're buildings
|
|
|
|
|
On January 20 2015 06:28 Pontius Pirate wrote:
Uprooted spines and spores need to stop counting towards one's building count in regards to elimination.
By that logic, neither should floating buildings.
Also, that game was stupid
|
|
|
The only thing that bothers me is, didn't zerg buildings without creep lose health? I thought uprooted spines/spores did lose health
|
On January 20 2015 06:36 Lexender wrote:
The only thing that bothers me is, didn't zerg buildings without creep lose health? I thought uprooted spines/spores did lose health
Uprooted buildings act like zerg units and get slow regen when not stuck to the ground, I think.
|
are you sure? my suspicion is that they die over time. However, slivko had his walking over creep a large portion of the time so it regained its health then.
|
On January 20 2015 06:48 travis wrote:
are you sure? my suspicion is that they die over time. However, slivko had his walking over creep a large portion of the time so it regained its health then.
Nah he is right. When rooted and out of creep, zerg building lose health; else they gain health! (unrooted on or out of creep, or rooter on creep)
|
On January 20 2015 06:32 Solar424 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2015 06:28 Pontius Pirate wrote:
Uprooted spines and spores need to stop counting towards one's building count in regards to elimination. By that logic, neither should floating buildings. Also, that game was stupid
I'd be firmly in favor of that, except it would preclude any strategies of floating your first CC to a different base, like we used to see on Habitation Station. It's a neat mechanic, but unfortunately it's far too abusable.
|
Ha ha ha that MLord - Polt game !
|
Most unsuccessful proxy hatch ever
|
That map is sooooooooooo bad
|
On January 22 2015 03:29 [PkF] Wire wrote:That map is sooooooooooo bad
Yeah. But I think Lillbow also had no clue how to play it. Like he could put pylons on his gold base and then warp down for harass. Or pylons at the rocks to spot and warp in on the other side.
|
On January 22 2015 03:31 Big J wrote:Yeah. But I think Lillbow also had no clue how to play it. Like he could put pylons on his gold base and then warp down for harass. Or pylons at the rocks to spot and warp in on the other side.
Honeslty I didn't get Lilbow build like at all. You can do this build with double forge and reach 3-3 at 17:00, that is to say 1:30 after he made his first forge. It made no sense altogether.
|
That engagement was really awful.
|
Nerchio vs Happy rematch
Artur plz
|
Just in time for King Artur.
|
yo I hope it's roach/bane/infestor
|
|
|
Happy was playing bio/tank vs Nerchio's ling/bane/muta in their showmatch as well
|
disgusting flanking by Nerchio
|
Gotta love Nerchio's playstyle, win or lose.
|
haha, that ragequit
|
On January 22 2015 04:15 Musicus wrote:
Gotta love Nerchio's playstyle, win or lose.
he had 2 bad engagements throughout the game that made him lose 
|
On January 22 2015 04:16 Big J wrote:haha, that ragequit
What did Nerchio write? Couldn't read it in time :p
|
On January 22 2015 04:17 Tesarul wrote:What did Nerchio write? Couldn't read it in time :p
nothing
|
On January 22 2015 04:17 Tesarul wrote:What did Nerchio write? Couldn't read it in time :p
He just left without gg.
|
On January 22 2015 04:17 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 04:17 Tesarul wrote:On January 22 2015 04:16 Big J wrote:haha, that ragequit What did Nerchio write? Couldn't read it in time :p nothing
Oh ok
|
On January 22 2015 04:16 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 04:15 Musicus wrote:
Gotta love Nerchio's playstyle, win or lose. he had 2 bad engagements throughout the game that made him lose
Yep, but still a better outcome than playing swarmhosts  .
|
I think secret spring is the worst map ever as zerg, free natural and a really short rush distance for all-ins/pushes. Let's see how Nerchio plays this.
|
Nerchio fucked up right there
|
Happy seems to be the first player that has understood that map somewhat.
Edit: I guess I spoke too soon ^^
|
On January 22 2015 04:22 Musicus wrote:
I think secret spring is the worst map ever as zerg, free natural and a really short rush distance for all-ins/pushes. Let's see how Nerchio plays this.
"well mutas are strong there..."
|
On January 22 2015 04:28 Big J wrote:
Happy seems to be the first player that has understood that map somewhat.
I don't see how. This map seems perfect for a bio push through the middle for me. With mech you will get spread thin.
|
what a ridiculous game xD
|
Nerchio forgot to remake spire
|
|
|
|
|
This is Happy vs Hyun 2.0, except Nerchios army is stronger than Hyuns was
|
I hate when terrans are doing this. Just lose already
|
Wouldn't it be wiser for Nerchio to go for SH's and turtle up? Hope he still wins : /
|
On January 22 2015 04:45 ClueClueClue wrote:
Wouldn't it be wiser for Nerchio to go for SH's and turtle up? Hope he still wins : /
It probably would, but it;s Nerchio we're talking about.
|
On January 22 2015 04:44 OsaX Nymloth wrote:
I hate when terrans are doing this. Just lose already
Happys army is stronger, he would be stupid if he would GG..
|
|
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
|
yeah I think he wants to max out on mutas and just magic box
|
I hope there will be a timer on flying buildings in the future. They should start burning after 3 minutes in the air.
|
why does rifkin wants nerchio to makes corrupter? rofl....
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
|
Even roaches would be better than more mutas, I feel...
Finally!
|
On January 22 2015 04:49 ClueClueClue wrote:
Even roaches would be better than more mutas, I feel...
Finally!
i mean, 50 mutas destroy 10 thors EZ PZ... Not even close
|
Yeah, he ain't gonna win with Roachers, just go SH or at least some spell casters...
|
just make SH Artur
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On January 22 2015 04:50 Faefae wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 04:49 ClueClueClue wrote:
Even roaches would be better than more mutas, I feel...
Finally! i mean, 50 mutas destroy 10 thors EZ PZ... Not even close
Happy got PDDs tho, but Nerchio should still be able to kill it I think
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On January 22 2015 04:51 Ej_ wrote:just make SH Artur
He's keeping the host strats for NaNiwa
|
People like that should be forbidden to have internet
|
|
|
On January 22 2015 04:50 PepsiMaxxxx wrote:
Yeah, he ain't gonna win with Roachers, just go SH or at least some spell casters...
He would win with anything if he would attack. Double the army supply is more than enough.
|
On January 22 2015 04:51 Nerchio wrote:
People like that should be forbidden to have internet
:D
+1 for King Artur!
|
|
|
European StarCraft best StarCraft
|
On January 22 2015 04:51 Nerchio wrote:
People like that should be forbidden to have internet
ahahaha, well done :D
|
I've only ever seen someone play ring around the map with more than one full rotation during a base trade 1 other time.
|
On January 22 2015 04:55 Pontius Pirate wrote:
I've only ever seen someone play ring around the map with more than one full rotation during a base trade 1 other time.
Happy did the same with Hyun on Frost some time ago. He had a much much better mech army but couldnt finish Hyun, who expanded all over the map. Hyun eventually won
|
I'm not a fan of those new maps. Havnt found one i really like so far :/
|
On January 22 2015 04:59 BlackCompany wrote:
I'm not a fan of those new maps. Havnt found one i really like so far :/
Vaani is fine IMHO and I like Expedition Lost
Happy dies to mutas again lol
|
YES. Get rekt!
Seeing terran losing is so sweet, especially on that mine field.
|
|
|
|
|
On January 22 2015 05:08 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 04:59 BlackCompany wrote:
I'm not a fan of those new maps. Havnt found one i really like so far :/ Vaani is fine IMHO and I like Expedition Lost Happy dies to mutas again lol
Oh i wasnt talking about balance if you mean that, i have no clue if they are balanced or not. Expidition Lost is OK, i can agree on that, but i just dont like the others. I dont know why but i like the last mappool much more. And i normally love new maps because the older ones get boring.
Anyways, surprising seeing Happy loose like that even though he went bio
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
|
On January 22 2015 05:12 BlackCompany wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 05:08 Ej_ wrote:On January 22 2015 04:59 BlackCompany wrote:
I'm not a fan of those new maps. Havnt found one i really like so far :/ Vaani is fine IMHO and I like Expedition Lost Happy dies to mutas again lol Oh i wasnt talking about balance if you mean that, i have no clue if they are balanced or not. Expidition Lost is OK, i can agree on that, but i just dont like the others. I dont know why but i like the last mappool much more. And i normally love new maps because the older ones get boring. Anyways, surprising seeing Happy loose like that even though he went bio
I'm not talking about balance either. I think Vaani is really ok to play (haven't played that much though). SS and Inferno Pools I vetoed blindly because of how awful they look even on a preview.
|
On January 22 2015 05:14 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 05:12 BlackCompany wrote:On January 22 2015 05:08 Ej_ wrote:On January 22 2015 04:59 BlackCompany wrote:
I'm not a fan of those new maps. Havnt found one i really like so far :/ Vaani is fine IMHO and I like Expedition Lost Happy dies to mutas again lol Oh i wasnt talking about balance if you mean that, i have no clue if they are balanced or not. Expidition Lost is OK, i can agree on that, but i just dont like the others. I dont know why but i like the last mappool much more. And i normally love new maps because the older ones get boring. Anyways, surprising seeing Happy loose like that even though he went bio I'm not talking about balance either. I think Vaani is really ok to play (haven't played that much though). SS and Inferno Pools I vetoed blindly because of how awful they look even on a preview.
Vaani is too long for my liking. It's like a 2p Deadwing, especially with the backwards natural.
Really like Expedition Lost right now. I think it is a great map for mirror matchups, for the others the backdoor could be a problem.
|
On January 22 2015 05:14 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 05:12 BlackCompany wrote:On January 22 2015 05:08 Ej_ wrote:On January 22 2015 04:59 BlackCompany wrote:
I'm not a fan of those new maps. Havnt found one i really like so far :/ Vaani is fine IMHO and I like Expedition Lost Happy dies to mutas again lol Oh i wasnt talking about balance if you mean that, i have no clue if they are balanced or not. Expidition Lost is OK, i can agree on that, but i just dont like the others. I dont know why but i like the last mappool much more. And i normally love new maps because the older ones get boring. Anyways, surprising seeing Happy loose like that even though he went bio I'm not talking about balance either. I think Vaani is really ok to play (haven't played that much though). SS and Inferno Pools I vetoed blindly because of how awful they look even on a preview.
Haha yeah some of them look like 2010 4 player maps. But since i play mostly with a friend or two or vs AI/campaign i can still play the maps i like
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
|
Emil is such a boss :D
Like seriously, he's been lagging out of games for 4 years now and he is still going strong :p.
|
hm, Nerchio plays fairly weird, staying on low drone count for a while and then striking up to 66 immediately
|
Nerchio is slaying terrans left and right.
|
On January 22 2015 04:56 BlackCompany wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 04:55 Pontius Pirate wrote:
I've only ever seen someone play ring around the map with more than one full rotation during a base trade 1 other time. Happy did the same with Hyun on Frost some time ago. He had a much much better mech army but couldnt finish Hyun, who expanded all over the map. Hyun eventually won
That was probably the one that I was thinking of, actually.
|
On January 22 2015 05:31 Musicus wrote:
Nerchio is slaying terrans left and right.
He lost to Cooltea though, I fear for him against Naniwa...
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
|
oh man I missed the entire Catallena game
get out from Overgrowth though, Kas
|
King Arthur holds 2 rax ez
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
We're gonna see Polt vs Nerchio, cool
|
On January 22 2015 05:34 HolydaKing wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 05:31 Musicus wrote:
Nerchio is slaying terrans left and right. He lost to Cooltea though, I fear for him against Naniwa...
Well ZvP is not my best match up and currently but if not this season then next 
|
|
|
|
|
Toss all-ins are good shit...
|
lilbow playing like a true protoss.. so dirty :p
|
You were saying your ZvP was bad and then you 6-0d Naniwa
|
On January 22 2015 05:38 Nerchio wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 05:34 HolydaKing wrote:On January 22 2015 05:31 Musicus wrote:
Nerchio is slaying terrans left and right. He lost to Cooltea though, I fear for him against Naniwa... Well ZvP is not my best match up and currently but if not this season then next
hey if you are not going to win can you just SH stall Naniwa for me?
|
On January 22 2015 05:40 Errormx wrote:
You were saying your ZvP was bad and then you 6-0d Naniwa
baneling drop never forget
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:40 Errormx wrote:
You were saying your ZvP was bad and then you 6-0d Naniwa
Oh wow, I almost forgot about that one. That was glorious
|
On January 22 2015 05:41 Lorning wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 05:40 Errormx wrote:
You were saying your ZvP was bad and then you 6-0d Naniwa Oh wow, I almost forgot about that one. That was glorious
And you say you are my fan ?
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:41 Lorning wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 05:40 Errormx wrote:
You were saying your ZvP was bad and then you 6-0d Naniwa Oh wow, I almost forgot about that one. That was glorious
on remax, Naniwa describes it as his single worst experience he's ever had in SC2.
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:43 Nerchio wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 05:41 Lorning wrote:On January 22 2015 05:40 Errormx wrote:
You were saying your ZvP was bad and then you 6-0d Naniwa Oh wow, I almost forgot about that one. That was glorious And you say you are my fan ?
I'm ashamed. Gonna try to find the VODs and re watch it to refresh my memory D:
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:43 Lorning wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 05:43 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 05:41 Lorning wrote:On January 22 2015 05:40 Errormx wrote:
You were saying your ZvP was bad and then you 6-0d Naniwa Oh wow, I almost forgot about that one. That was glorious And you say you are my fan ? I'm ashamed. Gonna try to find the VODs and re watch it to refresh my memory D:
dont post to him you filthy casual
|
On January 22 2015 05:43 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 05:41 Lorning wrote:On January 22 2015 05:40 Errormx wrote:
You were saying your ZvP was bad and then you 6-0d Naniwa Oh wow, I almost forgot about that one. That was glorious on remax, Naniwa describes it as his single worst experience he's ever had in SC2.
He lost to a baneling drop I mean cmon
|
So... Nerchio, have you beaten NaNiwa as convincingly since Antiga Shipyard was taken out of rotation?
|
On January 22 2015 05:46 ClueClueClue wrote:
So... Nerchio, have you beaten NaNiwa as convincingly since Antiga Shipyard was taken out of rotation?
ahahahahah
|
|
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
KANG DONG HYUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUN
|
Wow Polt plays so bad today. It's almost like somebody else is playing on his account.
|
Polt holds BUT AT WHAT COST.
|
On January 22 2015 05:55 TurboMaN wrote:
Wow Polt plays so bad today. It's almost like somebody else is playing on his account.
maybe he's just boosted
|
Nerchio has done a roach nydus play in 4 out of his last 6 series vs Terran
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
|
|
|
wow
|
Nice Polt did still win this game
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
Well, Roach Hydra melts to Polt's bio, so not that surprised
|
Polt wins with 24 workers..
|
On January 22 2015 05:58 Lorning wrote:
Well, Roach Hydra melts to Polt's bio, so not that surprised
roach hydra melts to just about anything
|
I suppose ultimately Polt's drop would have done enough damage and traded much better than mostly Roaches so Nerchio was going to fall significantly behind. Still though, would liked to have seen him fight it out a bit more.
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:58 Musicus wrote:Polt wins with 24 workers..
So you're telling me, Polt got behind to win the game?
|
they forgot about that qualifier beef on Rifkin's liquipedia page
|
On January 22 2015 06:03 stuchiu wrote:So you're telling me, Polt got behind to win the game?
It's what he does man, he just waits until the right amount of workers was lost then he goes and kills every hatch/nexus on the map.
|
Polt made a mini DMZ there with all those Widow Mines.
|
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
|
On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins
Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player
|
On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins
well, you really can't say your control was that good
|
damn, was a really nice run Nerchio!
|
On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player
I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost
|
On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost
If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch!
|
On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch!
Which unit that is tell me please, it is definitely not baneling
|
On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch!
not ranged though, and have to be set off manually
|
On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch!
Banelings are suicide units and are wasted and aren't able to hit all units essentially. Not a fair comparison at all.
|
On January 22 2015 06:17 Nerchio wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch! Which unit that is tell me please, it is definitely not baneling
I'm not saying they're identical, but the cost-effectiveness can be achieved with zerg... it's funny how mines always happen to be OP when the other player loses.
|
On January 22 2015 06:21 ClueClueClue wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:17 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch! Which unit that is tell me please, it is definitely not baneling I'm not saying they're identical, but the cost-effectiveness can be achieved with zerg... it's funny how mines always happen to be OP when the other player loses.
Except Swarm Host that are a terrible unit and we all agree - zerg has nothing that is cost effective in this game, that's why it's always painful to win with zerg and we mostly see it by either starving(by starving i also mean 5 base vs 3 etc) your opponent or one big fight
|
On January 22 2015 06:19 PhoenixVoid wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch! Banelings are suicide units and are wasted and aren't able to hit all units essentially. Not a fair comparison at all.
They also cost half a supply, don't have to burrow before attacking, force quite a bit of micro out of the opponent and can be built close to a battle in a matter of seconds. My point was simply that each race has really cost-effective units...
|
On January 22 2015 06:23 ClueClueClue wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:19 PhoenixVoid wrote:On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch! Banelings are suicide units and are wasted and aren't able to hit all units essentially. Not a fair comparison at all. They also cost half a supply, don't have to burrow before attacking, force quite a bit of micro out of the opponent and can be built close to a battle in a matter of seconds. My point was simply that each race has really cost-effective units...
Banelings are so much more difficult to be cost effective with though dude that you can't compare the two.
|
On January 22 2015 06:22 Nerchio wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:21 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:17 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch! Which unit that is tell me please, it is definitely not baneling I'm not saying they're identical, but the cost-effectiveness can be achieved with zerg... it's funny how mines always happen to be OP when the other player loses. Except Swarm Host that are a terrible unit and we all agree - zerg has nothing that is cost effective in this game, that's why it's always painful to win with zerg and we mostly see it by either starving(by starving i also mean 5 base vs 3 etc) your opponent or one big fight
But zerg is not (majorly) underpowered overall... that's just the way the race is being played. If you don't like its mechanics and want the option of two basing/dropping hardcore; switch race?
|
|
|
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi.
|
On January 22 2015 06:25 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:23 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:19 PhoenixVoid wrote:On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch! Banelings are suicide units and are wasted and aren't able to hit all units essentially. Not a fair comparison at all. They also cost half a supply, don't have to burrow before attacking, force quite a bit of micro out of the opponent and can be built close to a battle in a matter of seconds. My point was simply that each race has really cost-effective units... Banelings are so much more difficult to be cost effective with though dude that you can't compare the two.
In a major engagement, I think they can be compared to one another. A widow mine in a mineral line is tough to clean up, and mines along your reinforcement path can also rack up quite a few kills over time, but in a fight, they both force out splits from your opponent and then do varying amounts of splash damage. In some engagements, none of the mines hit any banelings, and the terran loses horribly; in others, they get good hits off and the zerg forces are cleaned up. Is terran really that OP as to warrant a WM nerf? To me it seems that both races, in ling bling muta vs bio mine, have similar functions within their armies (even though the terran forces will ofc be a tad more cost-effective since z relies more on economy).
|
On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi.
lolol
preparing an anouncement ?
|
On January 22 2015 06:33 ClueClueClue wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:25 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:23 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:19 PhoenixVoid wrote:On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch! Banelings are suicide units and are wasted and aren't able to hit all units essentially. Not a fair comparison at all. They also cost half a supply, don't have to burrow before attacking, force quite a bit of micro out of the opponent and can be built close to a battle in a matter of seconds. My point was simply that each race has really cost-effective units... Banelings are so much more difficult to be cost effective with though dude that you can't compare the two. In a major engagement, I think they can be compared to one another. A widow mine in a mineral line is tough to clean up, and mines along your reinforcement path can also rack up quite a few kills over time, but in a fight, they both force out splits from your opponent and then do varying amounts of splash damage. In some engagements, none of the mines hit any banelings, and the terran loses horribly; in others, they get good hits off and the zerg forces are cleaned up. Is terran really that OP as to warrant a WM nerf? To me it seems that both races, in ling bling muta vs bio mine, have similar functions within their armies (even though the terran forces will ofc be a tad more cost-effective since z relies more on economy).
That doesn't take into consideration the fact that a baneling is much much more likely to do nothing. A terran with decent splits can nullify banelings pretty well, a widow mine is ALWAYS gonna do some damage as you have to sacrifice a unit to trigger it since it's too hard to snipe them off when they're burrowed and there's a big army near them. You need more banelings to be even close to effective than you need widow mines to do there job.
|
On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi.
lol :D
|
On January 22 2015 06:37 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:33 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:25 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:23 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:19 PhoenixVoid wrote:On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch! Banelings are suicide units and are wasted and aren't able to hit all units essentially. Not a fair comparison at all. They also cost half a supply, don't have to burrow before attacking, force quite a bit of micro out of the opponent and can be built close to a battle in a matter of seconds. My point was simply that each race has really cost-effective units... Banelings are so much more difficult to be cost effective with though dude that you can't compare the two. In a major engagement, I think they can be compared to one another. A widow mine in a mineral line is tough to clean up, and mines along your reinforcement path can also rack up quite a few kills over time, but in a fight, they both force out splits from your opponent and then do varying amounts of splash damage. In some engagements, none of the mines hit any banelings, and the terran loses horribly; in others, they get good hits off and the zerg forces are cleaned up. Is terran really that OP as to warrant a WM nerf? To me it seems that both races, in ling bling muta vs bio mine, have similar functions within their armies (even though the terran forces will ofc be a tad more cost-effective since z relies more on economy). That doesn't take into consideration the fact that a baneling is much much more likely to do nothing. A terran with decent splits can nullify banelings pretty well, a widow mine is ALWAYS gonna do some damage as you have to sacrifice a unit to trigger it since it's too hard to snipe them off when they're burrowed and there's a big army near them. You need more banelings to be even close to effective than you need widow mines to do there job.
Sure, but time is also a resource. How many factories would you have to build and how long would they have to be producing to amass the same amount of mines as a zerg has banelings? I'm not saying 1 baneling is similar to 1 mine, just that cost-effectiveness isn't a widow mine patent.
|
Oh Polt ... what about mines ?
|
You maybe need a factory to make mines ? ^^
Btw i stangle the next protoss talking about how he hates scv pushs :D (warpgate >> scv push for all-ining )
|
On January 22 2015 06:42 ClueClueClue wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:37 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:33 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:25 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:23 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:19 PhoenixVoid wrote:On January 22 2015 06:17 ClueClueClue wrote:On January 22 2015 06:14 Nerchio wrote:On January 22 2015 06:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 06:12 Nerchio wrote:
Eh I wonder when they are going to fix mines again so terrans don't get undeserved wins Luck is a skill, ask any Cardstone player I am not even talking about lucky mine bombs but the fact that a unit that costs 75/25 and pays for itself every time, can be even worth 10 times of it's cost If only zerg had a similar mechanic.... I've heard of a game between Scarlett and Bomber you could watch! Banelings are suicide units and are wasted and aren't able to hit all units essentially. Not a fair comparison at all. They also cost half a supply, don't have to burrow before attacking, force quite a bit of micro out of the opponent and can be built close to a battle in a matter of seconds. My point was simply that each race has really cost-effective units... Banelings are so much more difficult to be cost effective with though dude that you can't compare the two. In a major engagement, I think they can be compared to one another. A widow mine in a mineral line is tough to clean up, and mines along your reinforcement path can also rack up quite a few kills over time, but in a fight, they both force out splits from your opponent and then do varying amounts of splash damage. In some engagements, none of the mines hit any banelings, and the terran loses horribly; in others, they get good hits off and the zerg forces are cleaned up. Is terran really that OP as to warrant a WM nerf? To me it seems that both races, in ling bling muta vs bio mine, have similar functions within their armies (even though the terran forces will ofc be a tad more cost-effective since z relies more on economy). That doesn't take into consideration the fact that a baneling is much much more likely to do nothing. A terran with decent splits can nullify banelings pretty well, a widow mine is ALWAYS gonna do some damage as you have to sacrifice a unit to trigger it since it's too hard to snipe them off when they're burrowed and there's a big army near them. You need more banelings to be even close to effective than you need widow mines to do there job. Sure, but time is also a resource. How many factories would you have to build and how long would they have to be producing to amass the same amount of mines as a zerg has banelings? I'm not saying 1 baneling is similar to 1 mine, just that cost-effectiveness isn't a widow mine patent.
But you don't need the same amount of mines and banelings to do the same job. One factory making mines is more than enough, while you need a lot of banelings if you wanna do anything with them.
|
|
|
On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ?
Soon like very soon :D
|
|
|
On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D
Like in 17 hours ?!
|
On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?!
Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x
|
On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x
Don't spoil it :o
I'm going to post it on TL ASAP
|
On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP
I won't, don't worry.
|
On January 22 2015 07:14 Boucot wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP I won't, don't worry.
I want e-fame, can i post it?!
|
On January 22 2015 07:14 Boucot wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP I won't, don't worry.
is this the metal octopus thing?
|
On January 22 2015 07:15 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:14 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP I won't, don't worry. is this the metal octopus thing?
?!
Don't let my hopes rise like that!
|
On January 22 2015 07:15 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:14 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP I won't, don't worry. is this the metal octopus thing?
It might or might not be kinda related. Somehow someway.
|
On January 22 2015 07:16 Boucot wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:15 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 22 2015 07:14 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP I won't, don't worry. is this the metal octopus thing? It might or might not be kinda related. Somehow someway.
you're so mean :D
|
France7248 Posts
On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP
well its already on twitter =)
|
On January 22 2015 07:17 Yhamm wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP well its already on twitter =)
No, didn't you read?! It was an april fool joke obv!
|
On January 22 2015 07:17 Yhamm wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP well its already on twitter =)
There is a huge post on TL coming
|
France7248 Posts
On January 22 2015 07:18 Aeromi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:17 Yhamm wrote:On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP well its already on twitter =) There is a huge post on TL coming
still way too slow!
I could almost snipe you on it.
|
On January 22 2015 07:18 Aeromi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:17 Yhamm wrote:On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP well its already on twitter =) There is a huge post on TL coming
gogo, post it already!
|
On January 22 2015 07:20 Musicus wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:18 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:17 Yhamm wrote:On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP well its already on twitter =) There is a huge post on TL coming https://twitter.com/MarcSOlbertz/status/558024979812347904gogo, post it already!
Poor Aeromi
|
On January 22 2015 07:20 Musicus wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:18 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:17 Yhamm wrote:On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP well its already on twitter =) There is a huge post on TL coming https://twitter.com/MarcSOlbertz/status/558024979812347904gogo, post it already!
French stream announced?!
|
|
|
On January 22 2015 07:20 Faefae wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:20 Musicus wrote:On January 22 2015 07:18 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:17 Yhamm wrote:On January 22 2015 07:13 Aeromi wrote:On January 22 2015 07:12 Boucot wrote:On January 22 2015 07:10 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 07:06 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:On January 22 2015 06:35 Faefae wrote:On January 22 2015 06:31 OGamingTV SC2 wrote:
I don't get why Lilbow does not start with a map advantage. :/
Haha wrong account, it's Aeromi. lolol preparing an anouncement ? Soon like very soon :D Like in 17 hours ?! Like it wasn't already announced everywhere :x Don't spoil it :o I'm going to post it on TL ASAP well its already on twitter =) There is a huge post on TL coming https://twitter.com/MarcSOlbertz/status/558024979812347904gogo, post it already! Poor Aeromi
Don't worry, he's a god : http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/476149-ogaming-to-cast-wcs-in-2015
|
I thought I was being really funny but this was actually about a French stream lol?
|
On January 22 2015 07:23 Ej_ wrote:
I thought I was being really funny but this was actually about a French stream lol?
More is coming.
|
On January 22 2015 07:24 Aeromi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2015 07:23 Ej_ wrote:
I thought I was being really funny but this was actually about a French stream lol? More is coming.
is this about the ferrous cephalopod?
|
|
|
Dunno why protosses keep trying to blink all in polt. He was the terran player who was crushing this build early last year when it was a lot stronger. He's the worst possible player to try that build against.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://cdn0.gamesports.net/storage/42000/42515.png)
![[image loading]](http://cdn0.gamesports.net/storage/42000/42521.png)
![[image loading]](http://cdn0.gamesports.net/storage/42000/42517.png)
![[image loading]](http://cdn1.gamesports.net/img/flags/uk.gif)
Khaldor![[image loading]](http://cdn1.gamesports.net/img/flags/ca.gif)
BaseTradeTV with Rifkin & ZombieGrub![[image loading]](http://cdn1.gamesports.net/img/flags/de.gif)
MyStarCraft with Mori![[image loading]](http://cdn1.gamesports.net/img/flags/fr.gif)
MilleniumTV with Yogo![[image loading]](http://cdn1.gamesports.net/img/flags/pl.gif)
EmSc TV with Emil![[image loading]](http://cdn1.gamesports.net/img/flags/ru.gif)
GoodGame.RU with Pomi![[image loading]](http://cdn0.gamesports.net/storage/42000/42525.png)
![[image loading]](http://cdn0.gamesports.net/storage/42000/42533.png)
