EPTOn August 18 2013 22:38 Zeon0 wrote:
this stream without healthbars is so damn annoying...
this stream without healthbars is so damn annoying...
I really wish more streams would just keep HP on. Damaged only is the worst option imo
[WCS EU] Challenger Groups G+H Season 2 2013 - Page 6
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
DusTerr
2520 Posts
I really wish more streams would just keep HP on. Damaged only is the worst option imo | ||
|
lolfail9001
Russian Federation40186 Posts
On August 18 2013 22:43 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: I can't stand the decision to not show healthbars/ only show energy bars. I understand wanting to remove clutter, but I prefer being able to see everything. ForGG 2-1. gg. Don't they enable those 'smart' health bars. It seems it became popular lazy boy option. | ||
|
ImperialFist
790 Posts
this was not the real ForGG T_T | ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
| ||
|
lolfail9001
Russian Federation40186 Posts
On August 18 2013 22:44 ImperialFist wrote: holy crap that was horrible by ForGG, 2 massive supply blocks, the one at 121 lasted for 30 seconds until he started 5 depots. this was not the real ForGG T_T Still good enough to survive the timing. P. S. I am hinting at the fact that Innovation did die to it at those infamous finals :D | ||
|
chuky500
France473 Posts
Congrats anyways Fircake, games looked pretty thight, no reason to say you suck. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43827 Posts
On August 18 2013 22:44 lolfail9001 wrote: Don't they enable those 'smart' health bars. It seems it became popular lazy boy option. I believe so, which ends up with an uneven number of colored bars on the screen once some units take damage. | ||
|
lolfail9001
Russian Federation40186 Posts
On August 18 2013 22:47 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: I believe so, which ends up with an uneven number of colored bars on the screen once some units take damage. Yeah, pretty annoying. I usuallly prefer always on or selected only (when there is actually good observer). | ||
|
BaneRiders
Sweden3630 Posts
 | ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
On August 18 2013 22:50 BaneRiders wrote: Beastyqt will beat MaNa now I believe, and then FireCake will beat Beastyqt. Any takers? I'm afraid you're right. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43827 Posts
I'm thinking Mana > Beastyqt but FireCake > Mana again. | ||
|
purgerinho
Croatia919 Posts
On August 18 2013 22:50 BaneRiders wrote: Beastyqt will beat MaNa now I believe, and then FireCake will beat Beastyqt. Any takers? i hope so because zergs in premier are needed | ||
|
pmp10
3247 Posts
| ||
|
Gudge
542 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43827 Posts
| ||
|
DusTerr
2520 Posts
On August 18 2013 23:13 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Mana seemed pretty strong in game one I would say his PvT has always been strong | ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5213 Posts
One of them went on about how Beasty needed more than 4 Vikings, when he had 8. Then he said "well that's a good number I hope he doesn't build more" as 2 more are finishing. Then Beasty builds another one, also going unnoticed. They also didn't realize that Mana had a big supply lead for most of the game, calling the game even at points. They also missed that Mana picked off all of Beasty Vikings prior to the final engagement, and this is why Beasty gged. His army was tiny, he had no Vikings, he was 50 supply down, and 30 workers down. Mana dominated him, and they are calling it insanely close, and seem shocked that Beasty gged. These casters need to stop and think before speaking. Spectators wouldn't stand for such obviously wrong calls from NFL announcers. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43827 Posts
I agree; that's why I predicted him to beat Beasty. | ||
|
Zeon0
Austria2995 Posts
On August 18 2013 22:49 lolfail9001 wrote: Yeah, pretty annoying. I usuallly prefer always on or selected only (when there is actually good observer). maybe we should start a poll and every caster should use the most popular option... | ||
|
pmp10
3247 Posts
Almost missed another mech attempt. | ||
| ||
