[WCS EU] RO32 Group A Premier Season 2 2013 - Page 28
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
chipmonklord17
United States11944 Posts
| ||
Deleted User 135096
3624 Posts
On June 26 2013 02:47 Zarahtra wrote: I'm quite confused, how can you loose from that position? :/ he got waaay to overeager. That and he kept making roaches vs marauder tank. | ||
ntssauce
Germany750 Posts
Poll: Poll: Recommend Tefel vs Mvp game 1? If you want a good laugh (68) Yes (8) No (3) Meh (1) 80 total votes Your vote: Poll: Recommend Tefel vs Mvp game 1? (Vote): Yes FYI | ||
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
On June 26 2013 02:48 Qwerty85 wrote: Stubbornly staying on roach tech instead of getting more ahead as Artosis would say. 200/200 roach sucks against tanks + bio + medivacs It was not bio, it was almost pure marauder xD | ||
Rustug
1488 Posts
| ||
![]()
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On June 26 2013 02:47 stuchiu wrote: So I just tuned in, exactly how far ahead was tefel before Mvp won? he had his 3rd and over 50 army on top on mvp. mvp was almost mined out and almost lost with roaches in his base, down to 16 workers to 43 of Tefel then Tefel started playing ridiculous, didn't expand, kept attacking in chokes and mvp took advantage. So painful to watch >< You always read about horrible foreigner games but that game was the definition of it. Never seen a worse game in all SCII games I've watched >< | ||
goody153
44020 Posts
On June 26 2013 02:47 TheDwf wrote: ![]() Mvp doesn't need SCVs anyway. i was like dafuq just happened ? it was like silver vs masters where the master allow the silver to have 5 minutes lead | ||
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On June 26 2013 02:49 Wunder wrote: That was crazy. I really don't understand some of Tefel's decisions there. "I can't possibly lose now so I'll just slam these armies until MVP finally ggs" | ||
Slimijs
Latvia65 Posts
On June 26 2013 02:48 yuliuswin1 wrote: is IMMVP too lucky?? Agree, no skill just lucky. If lucky, win no lucky - lose. MVP bad, just lucky. + Show Spoiler + <3 MC | ||
aicaramba
Netherlands110 Posts
Why not take 2 more bases and tech to muta or ultra's?? Maybe even broodlords after forcing so many tanks and marauders.. | ||
packrat386
United States5077 Posts
On June 26 2013 02:49 XaCez wrote: of course, its mvp | ||
Zarahtra
Iceland4053 Posts
On June 26 2013 02:48 Kinky wrote: You constantly engage in cost-inefficient trades and don't expand behind it. It was a rhetorical question :D I think my zerg could probably win it... Must've just shit his pants when he realized "I'm actually winning MVP, WTF!?" | ||
Panckaes
United States5 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
| ||
revoN
Japan804 Posts
| ||
packrat386
United States5077 Posts
1 - 0 Map is Newkirk Mvp is at the bot left Tefel is at the bot right | ||
ReignSupreme.
Australia4123 Posts
On June 26 2013 02:48 Qwerty85 wrote: Stubbornly staying on roach tech instead of getting more ahead as Artosis would say. 200/200 roach sucks against tanks + bio + medivacs it's practically irrelevant. One overseer to go by the cliff for the tanks and Tefel could have a-moved to victory (with a few grouped roaches to destroy tanks) ![]() | ||
Ophe
Sweden388 Posts
| ||
zestzorb
Thailand776 Posts
| ||
![]()
Wunder
United Kingdom2950 Posts
| ||
| ||