|
On March 08 2013 20:52 Rhaegar_tar wrote: Do some people find this game interesting? Players will keep doing this kind of strat and won't use HotS units(apart from Void ray BS).
Good job Blizzard.
It's Parting, what did you expect? You guys even bother watching the rest of the series or are you just butthurt Stephano fans?
|
On March 08 2013 20:54 DJHelium wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 20:52 FakeDeath wrote:On March 08 2013 20:51 ToKoreaWithLove wrote: Why oh why...have parting ever lost to roaches with his immortal push?
Life. Twice. Didn't Sniper beat him on Daybreak? Yes with a crisp build involving a hatch first .
|
well i think i wont be buying HotS, until it gets.. updated  this sound bug must be annoying
|
On March 08 2013 20:53 grungust wrote: ITT: People realizing Blizzard is terrible at game design for SC2. Get used to it folks.
ITT = i think that?
|
"I know what to do to defend it"
I didn't realize roaches counter immortals.
|
On March 08 2013 20:53 Type|NarutO wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 20:52 ES.Genie wrote:On March 08 2013 20:51 Jetaap wrote: So this is what hots looks like lol. Thanks, not buying. Hots = every game immo-sentry allin. kk bro Every ladder opponent = PartinG level also :D Obviously. Man, this build will ruin everything in HotS. Even TvT and TvZ. Definitely not going to buy this shit.
|
i guess im the only one whos just getting black screen instead of stream all of a sudden ? :|
|
On March 08 2013 20:55 nunez wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 20:53 grungust wrote: ITT: People realizing Blizzard is terrible at game design for SC2. Get used to it folks. ITT = i think that?
in this thread
|
I come here for some Zerg cry, GIMME SOME!!! NOW! :D
|
Immortal/sentry was already very strong in WoL. Now that Protoss got mothership core, but Zerg basically got nothing new that helps stop this timing, I'm curious how Zerg players react to this build in HotS.
This WoL thread won't die anytime soon. [G/D] ZvP - Defending the Immortal/Sentry all-in
|
It's funny how only three days of a tournament of a game that isn't out yet is getting so much crying for balance.
|
Not much balance crap and crying for now, I am impressed.
|
On March 08 2013 20:55 nunez wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 20:53 grungust wrote: ITT: People realizing Blizzard is terrible at game design for SC2. Get used to it folks. ITT = i think that? In this thread.
|
On March 08 2013 20:53 monkybone wrote: How was the mana vs nerchio series? Good or bad games?
well ppl on redit said it was gold/platinum level, but for me it was great mind games with back and forth action, and sick comback for 1 player
|
On March 08 2013 20:55 Everlong wrote: I come here for some Zerg cry, GIMME SOME!!! NOW! :D Calm down, there's plenty to go around... lol
|
On March 08 2013 20:54 Derez wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 20:52 Rhaegar_tar wrote: Do some people find this game interesting? Players will keep doing this kind of strat and won't use HotS units(apart from Void ray BS).
Good job Blizzard. Or maybe we shouldn't decide if a build can be held based on a single series where one of the guys has played barely any HotS at all. It's really simple. HotS midgame zerg not really buffed at all. In WoL, the immortal all-in was INCREDIBLY strong, now with mothership core. It should be virtually unstoppable with a player like Parting's control. Ultimately comes down to terrible game design. Terran still only well designed race. Protoss and Zerg and hilariously badly designed.
|
France12886 Posts
On March 08 2013 20:55 Andr3 wrote: "I know what to do to defend it"
I didn't realize roaches counter immortals. This build isn't pure immortal vs pure roahces, is it?
))
|
On March 08 2013 20:52 TTOMZ wrote: Terran have free seige mode and mines
Protoss forcefields and AOE slow
lol gg Zerg
Hm, yeah, I won't be playing the multiplayer anymore barring huge changes I think. Was looking forward to new units and such, but this doesn't look like any fun at all Very excited for the campaign though! That alone is well worth the money at least.
|
So much hate for HotS already.. I wonder, if you just burrow all your roaches in front of your third and unburrow when Protoss army is on top of you, would it work or would they jus tshred your roaches?
|
On March 08 2013 20:43 NeonFox wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 20:40 Talaris wrote:On March 08 2013 20:37 blade55555 wrote:On March 08 2013 20:36 Talaris wrote:On March 08 2013 20:32 Vindicare605 wrote:On March 08 2013 20:32 nihlon wrote: New ultralisks are pretty nice. With +3 they do 39 damage in cleave to all armor types. Yea. they are pretty good. oww, so thats almost ~50dps with an additional 1/3 as splash ? o.0 No wonder everything melted that fast They do the same damage to stalkers/colossi as they did in WoL. yeah, but I have rarely seen ultras in WoL, perhaps b/c they just did 20 dps vs zealots and archons, so more than doubling the dmg output vs the counter units might make us see more ultra play now (?) Yeah, before you had to go banelings with that comp to break the zealot wall or your ultras just swiped for 2 minutes at the zealots while the rest of the protoss army blasted away at them from the back. Now you don't have to invest that much gas into banelings and baneling speed so you can get more ultras/faster upgrades/more infestors to support. If you can go into a ling - infestor or ling -muta midgame ultras are a nice option. This build sucks horribly vs protoss air though.
Thanks for describing the small implications ! Did not get into HotS yet (I guess obviously, or I would not not have been so wow'ed by Ultras new dmg vs non-armored ^^;; ), so answers like this really help shedding some light on the contrast of hots <-> wol
|
|
|
|