EPTEGStephano @EGStephanoRC
I've thrown away that game. Shouldn't have taken the fight on the highground without my vipers.
I've thrown away that game. Shouldn't have taken the fight on the highground without my vipers.
[IEM] World Championship Day 3 - Page 141
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Musicus
Germany23579 Posts
| ||
|
Insoleet
France1806 Posts
On March 08 2013 01:19 vojnik wrote: Roaches should be one of the options not the only one i feel  Well you can probably go 8 queens too. With transfuse you can probably deal with mines/reapers/hellions. | ||
|
Insoleet
France1806 Posts
On March 08 2013 01:20 Musicus wrote: Very cool from steph to share his thought during the games, so that we discover HOTS at the same time as him :D | ||
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
On March 08 2013 01:19 Bagi wrote: If you don't care about the balance, why are you here commenting? You're saying its too strong, you're saying its overpowered, you are balance whining. Stop with this bullshit about "terrible readers", there is nothing subtle about your posts. Rofl. Go back and read what I said. It's too strong vs current standard zerg for that current standard to be viable. There might be other standard-capable openings for zerg. Putting it into the most simple words for you so you don't have to think: Current terran openings > current standard zerg opening. Current zerg opening might have to be changed by zerg. How the flying f- is that balance whine. Also, I don't have to deeply care about balance in a matchup to realize when something beats something. | ||
|
Mambo
Denmark1338 Posts
| ||
|
vojnik
Macedonia923 Posts
On March 08 2013 01:19 Wombat_NI wrote: I hope this trend towards passive macro is gone, hopefully for good. Aggressive openers should be a risk vs safe openers, greedy openers should be exploitable i dont want passive macro, i like the new terran aggression, zerg air doesn't come till Lair... | ||
|
Crownlol
United States3726 Posts
On March 08 2013 01:17 vojnik wrote: i feel that widow mines really shut down variety for zerg, at least attack vs air should be removed so that terran can not safely go 3 CC with minimal defenses Huh. I wonder what this reminds me of. Some unit... that completely makes it safe to go up to 3 bases very easily... In all seriousness though, Widow Mines are a little over strong, but not by a crazy amount. I must be forgetting a unit though, because it doesn't seem like Terran really got anything to replace the Warhound... its just WoL Terran with an OP ground+air splash damage unit. | ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
But... normally each zerg unit needs a building tech to be produced, right ? | ||
|
furo
Germany449 Posts
| ||
|
samurai80
Japan4225 Posts
| ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24604 Posts
| ||
|
Everlong
Czech Republic1973 Posts
On March 08 2013 01:20 Musicus wrote: Exactly, how it is supposed to FUCKING be!!! All those whiners here, oh my god.. He made mistake, he lost, period.. Skill matters, game is very balanced now in terms of skill requirement to pull of vicotry.. | ||
|
Leetley
1796 Posts
On March 08 2013 01:18 Insoleet wrote: I agree Reapers, hellions, mines harass would be strong, but no anti air. So, zerg could answer by going mutalisks and harass the hell out of the greedy terran. Hum, I can kinda agree too. Terrans have their turrets and marines to defend from mutas, so they don't necessarily need widow mines too. | ||
|
Hylirion
Netherlands968 Posts
On March 08 2013 01:18 Insoleet wrote: Reapers, hellions, mines harass would be strong, but no anti air. So, zerg could answer by going mutalisks and harass the hell out of the greedy terran. Yeah because harrassing is cleary a greedy play... | ||
|
jj33
802 Posts
On March 08 2013 01:18 Lysanias wrote: Why do people still play terran then i wonder ? More easy to play other races after all in both games. IN the hands a pro like MVP, terran is extremely effective. Terran at the upmost level has a extremely high skill ceiling/reward. | ||
|
Surili
United Kingdom1141 Posts
| ||
|
TimENT
United States1425 Posts
On March 08 2013 01:21 DarkLordOlli wrote: Rofl. Go back and read what I said. It's too strong vs current standard zerg for that current standard to be viable. There might be other standard-capable openings for zerg. Putting it into the most simple words for you so you don't have to think: Current terran openings > current standard opening. Current zerg opening might have to be changed by zerg. How the flying f- is that balance whine. You are the sole reason people hate LR threads. Always arguing about pointless bullshit and starting more bullshit arguments. | ||
|
Elairec
United States410 Posts
On March 08 2013 01:21 DarkLordOlli wrote: Rofl. Go back and read what I said. It's too strong vs current standard zerg for that current standard to be viable. There might be other standard-capable openings for zerg. Putting it into the most simple words for you so you don't have to think: Current terran openings > current standard opening. Current zerg opening might have to be changed by zerg. How the flying f- is that balance whine. Amazing how a comment that started off innocent enough, blew up into this dumbshit argument. Just let it go Bagi. | ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
On March 08 2013 01:18 DJHelium wrote: Other than defending the hellion drop, I think Stephano played very well. Antiga is a hard map with roach/hydra just because of the weakness vs drops and the strength of bio/tank. I don't know shit, but I saw HyuN bring spore crawlers to feed the vipers. If Stephano had done that then he wouldn't have to bring them back home, and perhaps continue to hold the middle with his army intact. | ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5221 Posts
On March 08 2013 01:21 furo wrote: stephano should try ling bane into ultra, macro games with roach infesters are pretty meh vs 3+ base terran... I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure Lings and Banes are dead in ZvT because of Widow Mines... Mines are too good versus Lings and Banes for those units to be viable. | ||
| ||
