|
The usual rules apply. No caster/player bashing etc. |
On March 05 2013 21:56 Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo wrote: Hmm goes to show that Zerg is just pretty much worse early game because there's nothing new they can take advantage of while e.g. Phoenixes are much better now.
not like it's a real problem as long as it doesn't dramastically improve the efficiency of some P 2b all ins.
|
On March 05 2013 21:56 LimitSEA wrote: Mutas vs 2 stargate and fleet beacon.
Uh oh
|
anion pulse crystals.. what a name eh? gg blizzard.
|
lol wat happened to apollo?
I heard Group B has started guys
|
On March 05 2013 21:53 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2013 21:52 Gevna wrote:On March 05 2013 21:46 HotShizz wrote: yeah i agree with a lot of the sentiments about lack of HotS units. I mean, for all of the vipers, swarm hosts, etc. there is a lot of muta into bl corruptor deathball v deathball. It's still early for the game, so people are just doing what they know, I guess, but I feel like this breaking up the deathball plan has been pure fail so far. again, still early, but I feel underwhelmed. I feel it's only true for protoss. I'm really sad that protoss still revolves (and more than before) around deathball. MSC and tempest are just designed to be used in deathball. I've good faith in other matchups. sky T is a deathball too, and the best comp a T can get. So don't get too much hopes. Thing is sky T is really hard to get too. It can be done but is really really difficult
|
Great results, have there been good games?
|
On March 05 2013 21:57 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2013 21:56 Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo wrote: Hmm goes to show that Zerg is just pretty much worse early game because there's nothing new they can take advantage of while e.g. Phoenixes are much better now. not like it's a real problem as long as it doesn't dramastically improve the efficiency of some P 2b all ins.
It is a real problem. Phoenix openings have always been viable, +1 range is a huge upgrade when it come down to it.
|
Mannnn, Phoenix vs Mutas with the range upgrade is pretty awesome/gruesome looking.
|
On March 05 2013 21:57 MarcH wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2013 21:53 sAsImre wrote:On March 05 2013 21:52 Gevna wrote:On March 05 2013 21:46 HotShizz wrote: yeah i agree with a lot of the sentiments about lack of HotS units. I mean, for all of the vipers, swarm hosts, etc. there is a lot of muta into bl corruptor deathball v deathball. It's still early for the game, so people are just doing what they know, I guess, but I feel like this breaking up the deathball plan has been pure fail so far. again, still early, but I feel underwhelmed. I feel it's only true for protoss. I'm really sad that protoss still revolves (and more than before) around deathball. MSC and tempest are just designed to be used in deathball. I've good faith in other matchups. sky T is a deathball too, and the best comp a T can get. So don't get too much hopes. Thing is sky T is really hard to get too. It can be done but is really really difficult
it's more map dependant than hard to get.
|
What a bright idea get mutas againts phoenixes.
|
Gotta love the mass phoenix
|
United Kingdom12022 Posts
Nerchio is playing so badly.
He saw the phoenixs super early and still went mutas. What the?
|
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On March 05 2013 21:57 CCa1ss1e wrote: anion pulse crystals.. what a name eh? gg blizzard. Well obviously if you negatively charge crystals it makes them fire further, makes perfect sense. :p
|
YongHwaaaa, you beast. Lookin' good man.
|
On March 05 2013 21:58 Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2013 21:57 sAsImre wrote:On March 05 2013 21:56 Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo wrote: Hmm goes to show that Zerg is just pretty much worse early game because there's nothing new they can take advantage of while e.g. Phoenixes are much better now. not like it's a real problem as long as it doesn't dramastically improve the efficiency of some P 2b all ins. It is a real problem. Phoenix openings have always been viable, +1 range is a huge upgrade when it come down to it.
so viable that they were rarely seen since it delays a lot the 3rd of the P without doing too much damage in WoL.
|
|
Seems like phoenix needs the same range as in WOL again (4 and 6 with upgrade) Saw so many games like this on streams already
|
Still going mutas after seeing that many phoenixes =\
|
On March 05 2013 21:59 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2013 21:58 Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo wrote:On March 05 2013 21:57 sAsImre wrote:On March 05 2013 21:56 Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo wrote: Hmm goes to show that Zerg is just pretty much worse early game because there's nothing new they can take advantage of while e.g. Phoenixes are much better now. not like it's a real problem as long as it doesn't dramastically improve the efficiency of some P 2b all ins. It is a real problem. Phoenix openings have always been viable, +1 range is a huge upgrade when it come down to it. so viable that they were rarely seen since it delays a lot the 3rd of the P without doing too much damage in WoL.
Phoenix openings seriously cannot be considered rare in WoL. I hope you're kidding.
|
I'm deliriously happy that the most interesting group for me personally will be played on Thursday, the day that is most convenient for me. Grubby, TLO, Stephano and MVP in the same group? Fuck me sideways...
|
|
|
|