EPTLone Star Clash 2: $35k SC2 + LoL, Nov 10-11 in TX - Page 83
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32751 Posts
| ||
|
Havik_
United States5585 Posts
On November 11 2012 04:46 Godwrath wrote: Looked like most my PvTs on ohana when i play Protoss. I am so bad that i have to starve my opponent because i can't just get a fucking way to kill my opponent. That's not you being bad, that's just it being hard to attack into Terran because of how that race is designed. | ||
|
n0ise
3452 Posts
On November 11 2012 04:51 Darpa wrote: well I prefer vikings, because 3 vikings is alot cheaper than 50 turrets. But to each their own! It's about eating into your maxed supply which represents your main/only advantage at that point At the same time, there's a few maps where 1 viking is preferable to the equivalent requirement in turrets | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On November 11 2012 04:53 PhoenixVoid wrote: qxc knows how to play TvT, he just needs to work on execution. QXC is very smart, listening to him he knows his stuff but execution falls apart when push comes to shove. | ||
|
revel8
United Kingdom3022 Posts
On November 11 2012 04:53 HwangjaeTerran wrote: At 3000+ mineral float it really doesn't matter, not against protoss with good economy. I prefer the Viking option, because they can reach those air spaces that turrets cannot reach. It also takes away the option of sneaking through a Warp-Prism and then just keeping it poised to strike at an opportune moment. | ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
On November 11 2012 04:51 Schelim wrote: he got the range upgrade as well as building armor, but yeah they don't really do much if you don't actually make turrets  did day9 just make up this mass reaper lategame thing thorzain supposedly plays in TvP? have never seen that. Yes, sometimes ThorZaIN does this to harass / deal with Protoss harass. | ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
| ||
|
clocked
111 Posts
| ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32751 Posts
| ||
|
n0ise
3452 Posts
| ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On November 11 2012 04:56 -_- wrote: Who else thinks Hawk will beat Naniwa? XDD Hawk is exactly the player naniwa should lose to. | ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
On November 11 2012 04:57 Fusilero wrote: Hawk is exactly the player naniwa should lose to. I don't like you guys. | ||
|
ACrow
Germany6583 Posts
On November 11 2012 04:51 Darpa wrote: well I prefer vikings, because 3 vikings is alot cheaper than 50 turrets. But to each their own! Don't need that many turrets if they have range. And the main point: turrets don't cost supply. At the late late game, you want to have as much supply available as possible for your army. | ||
|
MangoMountain
Norway2044 Posts
| ||
|
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
On November 11 2012 04:57 Fusilero wrote: Hawk is exactly the player naniwa should lose to. and then he should lose to whoever he faces in the loser bracket | ||
|
Whatson
United States5357 Posts
| ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32751 Posts
On November 11 2012 05:00 Whatson wrote: Polt never splits his bio against tank fire -.- Really? I saw quite a lot of splitting against Tanks, though it wasn't exactly top-tier. | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
On November 11 2012 04:59 Schelim wrote: and then he should lose to whoever he faces in the loser bracket How cute. | ||
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
On November 11 2012 05:00 Whatson wrote: Polt never splits his bio against tank fire -.- Yes he does. Watch last game. | ||
|
Whatson
United States5357 Posts
On November 11 2012 05:00 PhoenixVoid wrote: Polt takes it 2-0 as most people expected, though Kevin really did play well, and nearly matched Polt in the first game. But simply put, Polt is better than qxc. Well duh | ||
| ||
