EPT[TSL4] Ro16 Monday (Previously Day 1) - Page 33
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Roachu
Sweden692 Posts
| ||
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
At all. | ||
|
Sp00ly
United Kingdom1546 Posts
| ||
|
imre
France9263 Posts
On August 14 2012 04:31 Roachu wrote: Zergs have over a years experience with Broodlords, Protoss just startet getting used to having Carriers on that map. Yes Carriers must suck. the map sucks tho. | ||
|
pAzand
Sweden539 Posts
On August 14 2012 04:29 imallinson wrote: Yes but you have to kill off the infestors. They let Curious stall till he could remax with corrupters. Yeah if you mine gas.. He shouldn't have won that game but it was a nice try! Even a zealot flank with 15-20 zealots would have helped alot imo but what do I know, I (rightly) assume Squirtle knows better than me! | ||
|
Salteador Neo
Andorra5591 Posts
On August 14 2012 04:30 lannisport wrote: That is truly what won curious the game. He kept on sniping squirtle's gas bases with 3-4 infestors. Squirtle couldn't even remake his mothership and felt that he needed to force the kill then and there. And he was right IMO. Game had to be won with his carrier/HT/MS army or it was gg anyway. | ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
| ||
|
Roachu
Sweden692 Posts
Yes it does. | ||
|
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
| ||
|
justinpal
United States3810 Posts
On August 14 2012 04:31 Roachu wrote: Zergs have over a years experience with Broodlords, Protoss just startet getting used to having Carriers on that map. Yes Carriers must suck. Correct me if I'm wrong, but 1.5 changed the way Carriers are micro-d as well. | ||
|
imre
France9263 Posts
On August 14 2012 04:32 pAzand wrote: Yeah if you mine gas.. He shouldn't have won that game but it was a nice try! Even a zealot flank with 15-20 zealots would have helped alot imo but what do I know, I (rightly) assume Squirtle knows better than me! imo he was banking on immortal carriers and you need a good bank to make again and again interceptors, but yeah he definitely knows better than us | ||
|
sage_francis
France1823 Posts
| ||
|
Weavel
Finland9221 Posts
| ||
|
DODswe4
Sweden2157 Posts
| ||
|
imre
France9263 Posts
| ||
|
Topdoller
United Kingdom3860 Posts
On August 14 2012 04:33 sage_francis wrote: 20-5 lawl Could be 20-8 after these games  | ||
|
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
On August 14 2012 04:28 Necro)Phagist( wrote: Or maybe make it so fungals can't hit interceptors? that might actually make Carriers decent vs zerg. Doesn't really matter either way, they are gone in HotS sure they are, coz blizzard is to lazy to fix em and prefers to replace them with an ugly, a-move but absurd range unit. Completely agreeing with you though. But just imagine how this battle could have gone with bw-carriers (move and attack at the same time) | ||
|
sage_francis
France1823 Posts
def hope so | ||
|
Roachu
Sweden692 Posts
On August 14 2012 04:33 justinpal wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but 1.5 changed the way Carriers are micro-d as well. They did? I didn't know that. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
 | ||
| ||
