|
United Kingdom50293 Posts
DRAZERK HE USED CONTAMINATE GET THE CHAMPAGNE.
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On July 29 2012 05:57 yeint wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 05:55 MCDayC wrote:On July 29 2012 05:54 yeint wrote:On July 29 2012 05:52 MCDayC wrote:On July 29 2012 05:51 Whatson wrote:On July 29 2012 05:50 MCDayC wrote:On July 29 2012 05:49 Drazerk wrote:On July 29 2012 05:48 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:46 Fragile51 wrote:On July 29 2012 05:44 Cyro wrote:
[quote]
My question is, why dont tournaments? It seems to be quite widely agreed that low focus with maxed textures and effects gives the best clarity, performance, etc, and with everything maxed and health bars not permanantly on makes things very confusing and painful without those few high level observers Because it looks fucking terrible for observing. Simple as that really... I disagree. IMO, higher settings look worse. The added stuff makes it much more difficult to quickly analyse situations Casual viewers like shiny things Don't have to be a casual viewer to enjoy high graphics settings  If my computer didn't die every time I set my graphics to anything higher than medium, I would totally play on Ultra every game. Yup, same, except I'm limited to low. I am too. GPU is fine, but CPU is a Core 2 Duo E6300 1.86GhZ overclocked to 2.4. When this was a good CPU, trilobites were the dominant subphylum on Earth. Erm... yes. I understand the things you said. MY COMPUTER IS SHITE
^_^
oh god I started a Stephano style chain!
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On July 29 2012 05:58 HaXXspetten wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 05:55 MCDayC wrote:On July 29 2012 05:53 HaXXspetten wrote:On July 29 2012 05:50 MCDayC wrote:On July 29 2012 05:49 Drazerk wrote:On July 29 2012 05:48 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:46 Fragile51 wrote:On July 29 2012 05:44 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:39 Whatson wrote:On July 29 2012 05:38 Cyro wrote:
Roach infestor battles on max graphics without health bars or stronger team colors or something was horrible earlier, its better with health bars tabbed on during the battle now but streams are much more enjoyable on low shaders etc, maxed textures and effects with health bars always on if not using a really good observer who ALWAYS has the right things selected (Adebisi, Legend) IMO
Am i the only one that prefers visual clarity to "higher" graphical settings, post processing, depth of field etcetc in esports? Almost all pros put their graphic settings to low when they play. My question is, why dont tournaments? It seems to be quite widely agreed that low focus with maxed textures and effects gives the best clarity, performance, etc, and with everything maxed and health bars not permanantly on makes things very confusing and painful without those few high level observers Because it looks fucking terrible for observing. Simple as that really... I disagree. IMO, higher settings look worse. The added stuff makes it much more difficult to quickly analyse situations Casual viewers like shiny things Don't have to be a casual viewer to enjoy high graphics settings you can't possibly believe that the majority of the community would prefer to watch low graphics over ultra, that's just absurd No of course not... Draz made it sound like the reason that high graphics are used is because of casual viewers new to the game, but I was saying that you don't have to be a casual viewer to enjoy SC2 on full graphics. More Graphics, not less! was referring to Cyro :s
Well then... carry on.
|
BabyKnight better thank those DTs if he wins this
|
Vortix attacks were pretty sexy this game, everything finished right on time even though he kind of botched the first one.
|
Been a fan of |3abyKnight since early dota scene. Go win TSL man!
|
Fuck yeah Major! Great win.
|
I hate to criticize, but I really dislike how Day[9] shouts over Husky even though Husky often times starts speaking first.
|
come on vortix, put 8 lings in the main during one of those battles.
|
Vortix hates drone it seems. He played this way to qualify too.
|
|
|
I don't understand Husky's point about DTs and warnings.
If you are being attacked by a DT during a big battle 1) if the battle is big enough, will the red cursor over your main where drones are dying disappear or 2) if the battle is big enough, you won't hear the voice?
If the former, how quickly does the red cursor disappear. As for the latter, doesn't the voice only speak once?
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On July 29 2012 05:59 MCDayC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 05:58 HaXXspetten wrote:On July 29 2012 05:55 MCDayC wrote:On July 29 2012 05:53 HaXXspetten wrote:On July 29 2012 05:50 MCDayC wrote:On July 29 2012 05:49 Drazerk wrote:On July 29 2012 05:48 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:46 Fragile51 wrote:On July 29 2012 05:44 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:39 Whatson wrote:
[quote]
Almost all pros put their graphic settings to low when they play. My question is, why dont tournaments? It seems to be quite widely agreed that low focus with maxed textures and effects gives the best clarity, performance, etc, and with everything maxed and health bars not permanantly on makes things very confusing and painful without those few high level observers Because it looks fucking terrible for observing. Simple as that really... I disagree. IMO, higher settings look worse. The added stuff makes it much more difficult to quickly analyse situations Casual viewers like shiny things Don't have to be a casual viewer to enjoy high graphics settings you can't possibly believe that the majority of the community would prefer to watch low graphics over ultra, that's just absurd No of course not... Draz made it sound like the reason that high graphics are used is because of casual viewers new to the game, but I was saying that you don't have to be a casual viewer to enjoy SC2 on full graphics. More Graphics, not less! was referring to Cyro :s Well then... carry on.
You're still a fool 
|
|
|
Sentries are like the worst thing to get vs baneling drops and he gets a ton.
|
On July 29 2012 06:01 Logros wrote:
Sentries are like the worst thing to get vs baneling drops and he gets a ton.
My thought just now^^
|
lol same tech all the way ftw
|
On July 29 2012 06:01 Logros wrote:
Sentries are like the worst thing to get vs baneling drops and he gets a ton.
ye didnt make sense to me at all.
|
United Kingdom50293 Posts
Let's be honest, it was that contaminate at the 3rd that won it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
