|
On July 29 2012 05:48 Cyro wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 05:46 Fragile51 wrote:On July 29 2012 05:44 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:39 Whatson wrote:On July 29 2012 05:38 Cyro wrote:
Roach infestor battles on max graphics without health bars or stronger team colors or something was horrible earlier, its better with health bars tabbed on during the battle now but streams are much more enjoyable on low shaders etc, maxed textures and effects with health bars always on if not using a really good observer who ALWAYS has the right things selected (Adebisi, Legend) IMO
Am i the only one that prefers visual clarity to "higher" graphical settings, post processing, depth of field etcetc in esports? Almost all pros put their graphic settings to low when they play. My question is, why dont tournaments? It seems to be quite widely agreed that low focus with maxed textures and effects gives the best clarity, performance, etc, and with everything maxed and health bars not permanantly on makes things very confusing and painful without those few high level observers Because it looks fucking terrible for observing. Simple as that really... I disagree. IMO, higher settings look worse. The added stuff makes it much more difficult to quickly analyse situations
Like I said before, texture quality on ultra while the rest is on medium looks really sharp and clean. They used that in the first 2 games of the broadcast today but when I mention it they changed to ultra settings for everything. -_-;;
|
Vortix not even trying to force a cannon/zealot...
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On July 29 2012 05:49 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 05:48 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:46 Fragile51 wrote:On July 29 2012 05:44 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:39 Whatson wrote:On July 29 2012 05:38 Cyro wrote:
Roach infestor battles on max graphics without health bars or stronger team colors or something was horrible earlier, its better with health bars tabbed on during the battle now but streams are much more enjoyable on low shaders etc, maxed textures and effects with health bars always on if not using a really good observer who ALWAYS has the right things selected (Adebisi, Legend) IMO
Am i the only one that prefers visual clarity to "higher" graphical settings, post processing, depth of field etcetc in esports? Almost all pros put their graphic settings to low when they play. My question is, why dont tournaments? It seems to be quite widely agreed that low focus with maxed textures and effects gives the best clarity, performance, etc, and with everything maxed and health bars not permanantly on makes things very confusing and painful without those few high level observers Because it looks fucking terrible for observing. Simple as that really... I disagree. IMO, higher settings look worse. The added stuff makes it much more difficult to quickly analyse situations Casual viewers like shiny things
Don't have to be a casual viewer to enjoy high graphics settings 
|
what's the intro song?
BABYK FIGHTING !~
|
On July 29 2012 05:50 MCDayC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 05:49 Drazerk wrote:On July 29 2012 05:48 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:46 Fragile51 wrote:On July 29 2012 05:44 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:39 Whatson wrote:On July 29 2012 05:38 Cyro wrote:
Roach infestor battles on max graphics without health bars or stronger team colors or something was horrible earlier, its better with health bars tabbed on during the battle now but streams are much more enjoyable on low shaders etc, maxed textures and effects with health bars always on if not using a really good observer who ALWAYS has the right things selected (Adebisi, Legend) IMO
Am i the only one that prefers visual clarity to "higher" graphical settings, post processing, depth of field etcetc in esports? Almost all pros put their graphic settings to low when they play. My question is, why dont tournaments? It seems to be quite widely agreed that low focus with maxed textures and effects gives the best clarity, performance, etc, and with everything maxed and health bars not permanantly on makes things very confusing and painful without those few high level observers Because it looks fucking terrible for observing. Simple as that really... I disagree. IMO, higher settings look worse. The added stuff makes it much more difficult to quickly analyse situations Casual viewers like shiny things Don't have to be a casual viewer to enjoy high graphics settings
If my computer didn't die every time I set my graphics to anything higher than medium, I would totally play on Ultra every game.
|
Imagine if 20 speedlings run through the gap between the gateway and forge right now, there's not even a cannon.
this build is just banking on the current meta of zerg doesn't do those early all-ins anymore.
|
Vortix already reads that it is going to be DTs. Nice.
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On July 29 2012 05:51 Whatson wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 05:50 MCDayC wrote:On July 29 2012 05:49 Drazerk wrote:On July 29 2012 05:48 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:46 Fragile51 wrote:On July 29 2012 05:44 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:39 Whatson wrote:On July 29 2012 05:38 Cyro wrote:
Roach infestor battles on max graphics without health bars or stronger team colors or something was horrible earlier, its better with health bars tabbed on during the battle now but streams are much more enjoyable on low shaders etc, maxed textures and effects with health bars always on if not using a really good observer who ALWAYS has the right things selected (Adebisi, Legend) IMO
Am i the only one that prefers visual clarity to "higher" graphical settings, post processing, depth of field etcetc in esports? Almost all pros put their graphic settings to low when they play. My question is, why dont tournaments? It seems to be quite widely agreed that low focus with maxed textures and effects gives the best clarity, performance, etc, and with everything maxed and health bars not permanantly on makes things very confusing and painful without those few high level observers Because it looks fucking terrible for observing. Simple as that really... I disagree. IMO, higher settings look worse. The added stuff makes it much more difficult to quickly analyse situations Casual viewers like shiny things Don't have to be a casual viewer to enjoy high graphics settings If my computer didn't die every time I set my graphics to anything higher than medium, I would totally play on Ultra every game. Yup, same, except I'm limited to low.
|
On July 29 2012 05:51 Dodgin wrote:
Imagine if 20 speedlings run through the gap between the gateway and forge right now, there's not even a cannon.
this build is just banking on the current meta of zerg doesn't do those early all-ins anymore.
You don't even have to all-in, just run 4 zerglings in and cost him a ton of mining time.
|
On July 29 2012 05:50 MCDayC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 05:49 Drazerk wrote:On July 29 2012 05:48 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:46 Fragile51 wrote:On July 29 2012 05:44 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:39 Whatson wrote:On July 29 2012 05:38 Cyro wrote:
Roach infestor battles on max graphics without health bars or stronger team colors or something was horrible earlier, its better with health bars tabbed on during the battle now but streams are much more enjoyable on low shaders etc, maxed textures and effects with health bars always on if not using a really good observer who ALWAYS has the right things selected (Adebisi, Legend) IMO
Am i the only one that prefers visual clarity to "higher" graphical settings, post processing, depth of field etcetc in esports? Almost all pros put their graphic settings to low when they play. My question is, why dont tournaments? It seems to be quite widely agreed that low focus with maxed textures and effects gives the best clarity, performance, etc, and with everything maxed and health bars not permanantly on makes things very confusing and painful without those few high level observers Because it looks fucking terrible for observing. Simple as that really... I disagree. IMO, higher settings look worse. The added stuff makes it much more difficult to quickly analyse situations Casual viewers like shiny things Don't have to be a casual viewer to enjoy high graphics settings
you can't possibly believe that the majority of the community would prefer to watch low graphics over ultra, that's just absurd
|
On July 29 2012 05:52 MCDayC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 05:51 Whatson wrote:On July 29 2012 05:50 MCDayC wrote:On July 29 2012 05:49 Drazerk wrote:On July 29 2012 05:48 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:46 Fragile51 wrote:On July 29 2012 05:44 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:39 Whatson wrote:On July 29 2012 05:38 Cyro wrote:
Roach infestor battles on max graphics without health bars or stronger team colors or something was horrible earlier, its better with health bars tabbed on during the battle now but streams are much more enjoyable on low shaders etc, maxed textures and effects with health bars always on if not using a really good observer who ALWAYS has the right things selected (Adebisi, Legend) IMO
Am i the only one that prefers visual clarity to "higher" graphical settings, post processing, depth of field etcetc in esports? Almost all pros put their graphic settings to low when they play. My question is, why dont tournaments? It seems to be quite widely agreed that low focus with maxed textures and effects gives the best clarity, performance, etc, and with everything maxed and health bars not permanantly on makes things very confusing and painful without those few high level observers Because it looks fucking terrible for observing. Simple as that really... I disagree. IMO, higher settings look worse. The added stuff makes it much more difficult to quickly analyse situations Casual viewers like shiny things Don't have to be a casual viewer to enjoy high graphics settings If my computer didn't die every time I set my graphics to anything higher than medium, I would totally play on Ultra every game. Yup, same, except I'm limited to low.
I am too. GPU is fine, but CPU is a Core 2 Duo E6300 1.86GhZ overclocked to 2.4. When this was a good CPU, trilobites were the dominant subphylum on Earth.
|
Why would VortiX let the DT live.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Haven't we already seen a series only use drop? 
|
Is he known for not spreading creep?
|
I think Vortix used this ling-drop strat against Squirtle
|
Husky getting the game confused with BW there for a bit...
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On July 29 2012 05:53 HaXXspetten wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 05:50 MCDayC wrote:On July 29 2012 05:49 Drazerk wrote:On July 29 2012 05:48 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:46 Fragile51 wrote:On July 29 2012 05:44 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:39 Whatson wrote:On July 29 2012 05:38 Cyro wrote:
Roach infestor battles on max graphics without health bars or stronger team colors or something was horrible earlier, its better with health bars tabbed on during the battle now but streams are much more enjoyable on low shaders etc, maxed textures and effects with health bars always on if not using a really good observer who ALWAYS has the right things selected (Adebisi, Legend) IMO
Am i the only one that prefers visual clarity to "higher" graphical settings, post processing, depth of field etcetc in esports? Almost all pros put their graphic settings to low when they play. My question is, why dont tournaments? It seems to be quite widely agreed that low focus with maxed textures and effects gives the best clarity, performance, etc, and with everything maxed and health bars not permanantly on makes things very confusing and painful without those few high level observers Because it looks fucking terrible for observing. Simple as that really... I disagree. IMO, higher settings look worse. The added stuff makes it much more difficult to quickly analyse situations Casual viewers like shiny things Don't have to be a casual viewer to enjoy high graphics settings you can't possibly believe that the majority of the community would prefer to watch low graphics over ultra, that's just absurd
No of course not...
Draz made it sound like the reason that high graphics are used is because of casual viewers new to the game, but I was saying that you don't have to be a casual viewer to enjoy SC2 on full graphics.
More Graphics, not less!
|
Oh god he mentioned stephano style.
|
On July 29 2012 05:54 Mozdk wrote:
Is he known for not spreading creep?
Maybe he isn't doing because of the drop play? Idk it's pretty bad right now.
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On July 29 2012 05:54 yeint wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 05:52 MCDayC wrote:On July 29 2012 05:51 Whatson wrote:On July 29 2012 05:50 MCDayC wrote:On July 29 2012 05:49 Drazerk wrote:On July 29 2012 05:48 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:46 Fragile51 wrote:On July 29 2012 05:44 Cyro wrote:On July 29 2012 05:39 Whatson wrote:On July 29 2012 05:38 Cyro wrote:
Roach infestor battles on max graphics without health bars or stronger team colors or something was horrible earlier, its better with health bars tabbed on during the battle now but streams are much more enjoyable on low shaders etc, maxed textures and effects with health bars always on if not using a really good observer who ALWAYS has the right things selected (Adebisi, Legend) IMO
Am i the only one that prefers visual clarity to "higher" graphical settings, post processing, depth of field etcetc in esports? Almost all pros put their graphic settings to low when they play. My question is, why dont tournaments? It seems to be quite widely agreed that low focus with maxed textures and effects gives the best clarity, performance, etc, and with everything maxed and health bars not permanantly on makes things very confusing and painful without those few high level observers Because it looks fucking terrible for observing. Simple as that really... I disagree. IMO, higher settings look worse. The added stuff makes it much more difficult to quickly analyse situations Casual viewers like shiny things Don't have to be a casual viewer to enjoy high graphics settings If my computer didn't die every time I set my graphics to anything higher than medium, I would totally play on Ultra every game. Yup, same, except I'm limited to low. I am too. GPU is fine, but CPU is a Core 2 Duo E6300 1.86GhZ overclocked to 2.4. When this was a good CPU, trilobites were the dominant subphylum on Earth.
Erm... yes.
I understand the things you said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
