|
On July 23 2012 02:09 Notfragile wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 02:04 Shiori wrote:On July 23 2012 02:03 TheDougler wrote:On July 23 2012 02:02 DwD wrote:On July 23 2012 02:01 Flanq wrote:On July 23 2012 02:01 DwD wrote:
And this is why you NEVER NEVER NEVER make carriers Wut? He almost lost them all to so few corruptors 21 corrupters is NOT a "few" corrupters. Still costs a lot less and takes less time to make than 15 Carriers. Dude you whine a lot. I didn't catch the rest of the games so I had not seen it before but I just love the instant analysis. Amazing idea and good execution. (Also mr.9 looks so dazzling!) wp by Oz, glad he started performing again. The oppener seemed to Stephano like a hardcore zealot 4gate. Perhaps as nani and oz have shown, P may have to add a little bit more to their arsenal than FFE, whose timings are so well mapped out.
Saying Carriers are bad units qualifies as whine now? I'll remember that next time Zerg wants a Hydra buff.
|
On July 23 2012 02:10 Quintum_ wrote:
Those Carriers seemed to melt so fast, seemed like he almost got broken. Without the dts i think oz might of lost. Mass VRs would do just as good in that situation and i think would of been better.
Those infestor would ve crushed all void rays.
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
Why do I think
"get real with apollo"
is gonna be something cheesy?
|
it just shows how weak carriers are, if oz made only zealots he could still beat that weak eco stephano.....
|
On July 23 2012 02:10 Quintum_ wrote:
Those Carriers seemed to melt so fast, seemed like he almost got broken. Without the dts i think oz might of lost. Mass VRs would do just as good in that situation and i think would of been better.
what you maybe did not see is how fast the corrupters died :D they're small though so it's easily missed.
|
On July 23 2012 02:05 Shiori wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 02:04 Ziggitz wrote:On July 23 2012 02:02 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
How are there so few posts in this thread? O_o
Insane game. So well played by Oz. It's because of posts like this that I stopped coming to live report threads. Oz did not play amazingly well. Stephano misread his build and Oz executed a build that any low masters player can execute. Because Stephano cut essentially 10 drones or so to produce those lings that couldn't attack, the game was over at that point. Everything else was superfluous. Too bad most low Masters players play less predictably than Stephano does. Maybe he should actually practice rather than relying on 1 build to win him everything.
Agreed with this. While Stephano does well tactically on the map, it always seems like he just does the same build over and over. Finally a toss caught on and made him pay for it.
|
On July 23 2012 02:10 Quintum_ wrote:
Those Carriers seemed to melt so fast, seemed like he almost got broken. Without the dts i think oz might of lost. Mass VRs would do just as good in that situation and i think would of been better.
Mass vr is the shittiest composition in the world against corruptor infestor
|
On July 23 2012 02:10 captainshards wrote:Nothing wrong with that. I want the best of the best only.
bound to happen if you do not invite enough Europeans.
|
On July 23 2012 02:03 pHelix Equilibria wrote:
That crushed arrogance, it'll be humbling.
Go home Stephano.
User was warned for this post
Stephano is good manner, chill bro, genius Zerg. I understand that reddit is trying to increase the quality of its posts, and people like you are in the process of being rooted out, but please find another place on the internet to spew mindless hate, not TL. Perhaps Bnet forums?
|
no mirror match up in grand finals, please! go alicia vs taeja!!!!!! dooooo it~
|
Finally MLG at a decent time for Europeans 
|
On July 23 2012 02:10 ACrow wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 02:08 Dfgj wrote:On July 23 2012 02:07 HolydaKing wrote:On July 23 2012 02:04 Hassybaby wrote:On July 23 2012 02:03 Coffin wrote:On July 23 2012 02:02 MuseMike wrote:On July 23 2012 02:01 DwD wrote:
And this is why you NEVER NEVER NEVER make carriers ? He is right actually, they were falling so fast, that investment could have proved fatal in a closer game I think. Start of fight: 27 Corrupters with infested Terran support vs 13 Carriers End of fight: 4 Corrupters vs 7 Carriers ..... Yeah, 3-3-3 upgrades carriers ARE cost efficiently. The upgrades are a must though. Er I tried maxed 3-3-3 carriers vs 3-3 corruptors in unit tester, all carriers die, 30% of corruptors die. But an army maxed out on carriers is something you can actually use, and army solely consisting of corrupters is useless. Not sure what your point is.
This. When has anyone maxed on corrupters?
|
On July 23 2012 02:10 ACrow wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 02:08 Dfgj wrote:On July 23 2012 02:07 HolydaKing wrote:On July 23 2012 02:04 Hassybaby wrote:On July 23 2012 02:03 Coffin wrote:On July 23 2012 02:02 MuseMike wrote:On July 23 2012 02:01 DwD wrote:
And this is why you NEVER NEVER NEVER make carriers ? He is right actually, they were falling so fast, that investment could have proved fatal in a closer game I think. Start of fight: 27 Corrupters with infested Terran support vs 13 Carriers End of fight: 4 Corrupters vs 7 Carriers ..... Yeah, 3-3-3 upgrades carriers ARE cost efficiently. The upgrades are a must though. Er I tried maxed 3-3-3 carriers vs 3-3 corruptors in unit tester, all carriers die, 30% of corruptors die. But an army maxed out on carriers is something you can actually use, and army solely consisting of corrupters is useless. Not sure what your point is.
how bout killing the maxed 3-3-3 carriers? :s
|
On July 23 2012 02:03 DwD wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 02:02 MuseMike wrote:On July 23 2012 02:01 DwD wrote:
And this is why you NEVER NEVER NEVER make carriers ? If Stephano had 5 more corruptors he would've died. They are sooo weak for the investment you make
5 more corrupters? Oz had like 12-13 carriers left. We only saw one clump on screen.
|
omg a First game on the main stream. Finally!
|
Honestly, I think Stephano been taking it easy since he won that 30k. I wonder how much he's really been practicing since then.
|
On July 23 2012 02:12 Talionis wrote:
omg a First game on the main stream. Finally!
this
|
On July 23 2012 02:11 Chytilova wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 02:10 ACrow wrote:On July 23 2012 02:08 Dfgj wrote:On July 23 2012 02:07 HolydaKing wrote:On July 23 2012 02:04 Hassybaby wrote:On July 23 2012 02:03 Coffin wrote:On July 23 2012 02:02 MuseMike wrote:On July 23 2012 02:01 DwD wrote:
And this is why you NEVER NEVER NEVER make carriers ? He is right actually, they were falling so fast, that investment could have proved fatal in a closer game I think. Start of fight: 27 Corrupters with infested Terran support vs 13 Carriers End of fight: 4 Corrupters vs 7 Carriers ..... Yeah, 3-3-3 upgrades carriers ARE cost efficiently. The upgrades are a must though. Er I tried maxed 3-3-3 carriers vs 3-3 corruptors in unit tester, all carriers die, 30% of corruptors die. But an army maxed out on carriers is something you can actually use, and army solely consisting of corrupters is useless. Not sure what your point is. This. When has anyone maxed on corrupters?
You understand that corrupters transform into brood lords, yes?
|
On July 23 2012 02:11 Chytilova wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 02:10 ACrow wrote:On July 23 2012 02:08 Dfgj wrote:On July 23 2012 02:07 HolydaKing wrote:On July 23 2012 02:04 Hassybaby wrote:On July 23 2012 02:03 Coffin wrote:On July 23 2012 02:02 MuseMike wrote:On July 23 2012 02:01 DwD wrote:
And this is why you NEVER NEVER NEVER make carriers ? He is right actually, they were falling so fast, that investment could have proved fatal in a closer game I think. Start of fight: 27 Corrupters with infested Terran support vs 13 Carriers End of fight: 4 Corrupters vs 7 Carriers ..... Yeah, 3-3-3 upgrades carriers ARE cost efficiently. The upgrades are a must though. Er I tried maxed 3-3-3 carriers vs 3-3 corruptors in unit tester, all carriers die, 30% of corruptors die. But an army maxed out on carriers is something you can actually use, and army solely consisting of corrupters is useless. Not sure what your point is. This. When has anyone maxed on corrupters?
The question was 'cost effectiveness', so you compare costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
