| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
FairForever
Canada2392 Posts
On July 22 2012 05:16 wildstyle1337 wrote: i dont understand, oz missed dorciefields and stephano just a moved with tons of lings Wasn't a-move... that's the amazing thing about Stephano's play... he has a 200/200 army and still focus fires down sentries and whatnot with the right number of units. I wish I could do that *sigh* | ||
|
Shiori
3815 Posts
On July 22 2012 05:17 nojok wrote: What? This was not standard at all, Oz opening led stephano to make lot of useless lings but then Stephano put just the right amount of pressure to take the harvester advantage from 41vs47 harvesters to 84vs57 then the game went standard. Stephano's engagements are his strength & no zerg is close to him in this aspect of the game. The opening from Oz was nonstandard, but everything Stephano did was completely standard. He didn't change up his play 1 bit from what we saw at NASL. Lol. Are Zerg players really impressed by focus firing? Do they not watch TvP? | ||
|
Wingblade
United States1806 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
Just like how you don't play the immortal sentry zvp vs two base muta. Different strategies require different reactions, and a different mindset to play with. In other news, MLG is fucking awesome. | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
On July 22 2012 05:17 paintfive wrote: LOL is that what they are doing? I'm not surprised, even though theyre doing is a good job at it. Is it not a good idea? I mean that's what i would do. Where would you get critique from? Bnet? | ||
|
Aeroplaneoverthesea
United Kingdom1977 Posts
On July 22 2012 05:17 Medrea wrote: MLG getting game critiques from TL again. The LR genuinely does understand the game better than casters. Now obviously Artosis and Day9 probably do realise that Oz was ahead and threw the game away with shit forcefields but for whatever reason they seem to think everyone wants to be lied to so they talk about bullshit like how well Stephano played or other random nonsense when forcefields were the only part of the game which mattered. | ||
|
samw
England443 Posts
| ||
|
Necro)Phagist(
Canada6657 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Poisonblack
452 Posts
| ||
|
Knorre
Austria151 Posts
On July 22 2012 05:18 Bashion wrote: Man, Axslav is amazing Oh yes, he does a really good job. | ||
|
sc2pal
Poland624 Posts
| ||
|
MrKn4rz
Germany2153 Posts
On July 22 2012 05:18 teddyoojo wrote: this analysis thing is so fucking retarded What? How? | ||
|
-TesteR-
Canada1165 Posts
On July 22 2012 05:15 HolyArrow wrote: The onus was completely upon Protoss to hold that with good FFs, and Oz just screwed up bigtime. This is a case where you can objectively say oz lost that battle more than stephano won it. | ||
|
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
| ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32740 Posts
On July 22 2012 05:18 Wingblade wrote: Stephano simply doesn't lose a PvZ. He's so incredible, I cant understand why he won't join the GSL. He would win a ton of money if he competed, he really should try it. Please don't bring this argument to here...... It always sparks 20 pages of irrelevent content and arguing. | ||
|
ContrailNZ
New Zealand306 Posts
| ||
|
Killerkrack
664 Posts
On July 22 2012 05:18 teddyoojo wrote: this analysis thing is so fucking retarded Completely disagree, it's awesome. | ||
|
DertoQq
France906 Posts
On July 22 2012 05:18 teddyoojo wrote: this analysis thing is so fucking retarded Actualy it's quite interesting. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On July 22 2012 05:18 Wingblade wrote: Stephano simply doesn't lose a PvZ. He's so incredible, I cant understand why he won't join the GSL. He would win a ton of money if he competed, he really should try it. He will compete in Code S August. He already got the seed. | ||
| ||
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Group Stage 2 - Group D
Classic vs Percival
Spirit vs NightMare
WardiTV574
[ Submit Event ] |
|
|
|
SC Evo League
CSO Cup
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Sparkling Tuna Cup
SC Evo League
Replay Cast
Afreeca Starleague
Queen vs HyuN
EffOrt vs Calm
Wardi Open
RotterdaM Event
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
