| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Lord_J
Kenya1085 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:08 Zarahtra wrote: Kind of think he must've thought BK would allin. That build is probably as safe as you can get Good point, it would definitely have crushed any kind of gateway allin. | ||
|
blacksheepwall
China1530 Posts
| ||
|
SilSol
Sweden2744 Posts
| ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
| ||
|
blooblooblahblah
Australia4163 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:07 Lord_J wrote: Seeing BabyKnight hold that push even with how badly he engaged, I'm curious how that build is supposed to work for Beasty. Another weird game. BabyKnight didn't engage well but Beasty's position was even worse. Most of his bio was attacking the 3rd so BabyKnight got all those tanks pretty much for free. | ||
|
ragnorr
Denmark6097 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:08 blacksheepwall wrote: I keep seeing tanks in TvP and they keep almost being good and then getting crushed. You just cant leave your tanks exposed to immortals like that. No matter what people feel about siege tanks, beasty fucked up majorly by allowing the protoss to just walk up to the tanks, no matter how terrible of a engagement he gets | ||
|
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
| ||
|
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:07 Lord_J wrote: Seeing BabyKnight hold that push even with how badly he engaged, I'm curious how that build is supposed to work for Beasty. Another weird game. He didn't have a stim at the time of the engagement, I think the build relies on your opponent scouting it and freaking out while you continue to power up, beasty only lost because of his mistimed stim, but he did freak out BabyK, who didn't really play well. | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:09 blooblooblahblah wrote: BabyKnight didn't engage well but Beasty's position was even worse. Most of his bio was attacking the 3rd so BabyKnight got all those tanks pretty much for free. Aside from the cliff, BK's engage wasn't actually bad at all. He hit the army from behind, engaged with storm and lots against the bio and immortals against the tanks. That's exactly as you would set it up as the protoss. Beasty wasn't prepared for BK to go fight immediately, and also wasn't prepared for his angle of attack. | ||
|
Kilby
Finland1069 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:09 JustPassingBy wrote: Come on beasty! TSL needs its first non-Korean terran qualificant! (Thorzain and Kas excluding) Didn't Ret qualify as well? | ||
|
SilSol
Sweden2744 Posts
| ||
|
SilSol
Sweden2744 Posts
yes but he said "non korean terran" ret is zerg  | ||
|
blacksheepwall
China1530 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:09 ragnorr wrote: You just cant leave your tanks exposed to immortals like that. No matter what people feel about siege tanks, beasty fucked up majorly by allowing the protoss to just walk up to the tanks, no matter how terrible of a engagement he gets Yeah, Byun (I think?) had a lot more success with them earlier today in the GSL, but it's just so hard to never have your tanks out of position against Immortals and mass Chargelots. Also, if you mostly clean up your opponent's stuff the reinforcement Chargelots tend to crush face. | ||
|
Kilby
Finland1069 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:11 SilSol wrote: yes but he said "non korean terran" ret is zerg Oh yeah, that is true. Sorry. | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
Everything in between feel very weak, beside the standart 1 rax FE into 3rax medivacs in TvP I guess. | ||
|
GDbushido
United States926 Posts
not so good when you forget your proxy pylon though lol | ||
|
ibo422
Belgium2844 Posts
| ||
|
m0ck
4194 Posts
| ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
| ||
|
Kilby
Finland1069 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Other Games Grubby3798 FrodaN1105 shahzam469 Mlord432 Sick173 C9.Mang0158 ArmadaUGS133 ToD80 ZombieGrub43 UpATreeSC38 JuggernautJason19 Organizations Other Games StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War |
|
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
