EPTOn July 05 2012 08:02 MCDayC wrote:
Tanks in TvP is getting popular, and I like it, I hope this works.
Tanks in TvP is getting popular, and I like it, I hope this works.
Same as always.
[TSL4] Qualifier 11 - EU/NA #8 - Page 47
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
Same as always. | ||
|
Entropic
Canada2837 Posts
| ||
|
ibo422
Belgium2844 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:03 Asha` wrote: bwahahahaha omg I can't believe he just crushed that no support from the bio.. -__- | ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
Initially that looked good, but he never connected the marines to the Immortals and all the tanks just melted. | ||
|
happyness
United States2400 Posts
| ||
|
Makrel
Denmark150 Posts
| ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
| ||
|
blooblooblahblah
Australia4163 Posts
That was a terrible engagment from Beasty though. He left all his tanks exposed. | ||
|
Warpish
834 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:03 Dexington wrote: Tanks are laughably bad against Protoss Hots will solve that probem introducing the Tempest that can kill tanks from a 22 range.  | ||
|
ragnorr
Denmark6097 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:03 Entropic wrote: Are tanks supposed to be good in TvP lol. Not against immorrtals alone no, beasty fucked up that engagement majorly by just letting the immortals rampart though the tanks | ||
|
Jarree
Finland1004 Posts
| ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
| ||
|
Toadvine
Poland2234 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:03 Entropic wrote: Are tanks supposed to be good in TvP lol. Not if you leave them with no support against Immortals and Archons, apparently. | ||
|
Zarahtra
Iceland4053 Posts
Idd, a questionable opening, but with those terrain positions with the tanks and no spotting on the highground, Beasty probably could've taken that game there if the bio had helped kill the immos | ||
|
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:04 blooblooblahblah wrote: That was a terrible engagment from Beasty though. He left all his tanks exposed. Also a terrible engagement by Babyknight though, you have to admit. | ||
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:05 StarVe wrote: Also a terrible engagement by Babyknight though, you have to admit. terrible terrible damage all around! | ||
|
MangoMountain
Norway2044 Posts
| ||
|
Lord_J
Kenya1085 Posts
| ||
|
ibo422
Belgium2844 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:05 Zarahtra wrote: Idd, a questionable opening, but with those terrain positions with the tanks and no spotting on the highground, Beasty probably could've taken that game there if the bio had helped kill the immos Well, he was also behind in the upgrades, he most prolly would have lost anyways but it would be much closer than 1 sided stomping from babyknight.  | ||
|
Zarahtra
Iceland4053 Posts
On July 05 2012 08:07 Lord_J wrote: Seeing BabyKnight hold that push even with how badly he engaged, I'm curious how that build is supposed to work for Beasty. Another weird game. Kind of think he must've thought BK would allin. That build is probably as safe as you can get | ||
| ||
