EPT[Code S] RO32 Group F GSL 2012 Season 3 - Page 25
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
LagR
United Kingdom6 Posts
| ||
|
aznball123
2759 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:52 Douillos wrote: btw im rooting for symbol, but I dont understand the decision to produce ultras thats all. He went banelings, ultra's were to crush force fields. | ||
|
Thugtronik
New Zealand452 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:52 Poltergeist- wrote: True :D I wasn't complaining, just thought it was kinda funny. indeed ^^ both of them playing awesome! | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:52 Fubi wrote: Thought I was the only one that caught that; that was pretty funny Tasteless: "Um, Symbol is at like... 211/200 supplies..." Artosis: "Uh huh..." 10 seconds later... Artosis: "OMFGGG!!! SYMBOL IS AT 211/200!! HE IS HACKINGG!! OMFG!!!!" Tasteless: "..." inb4 artosis lost his passion :< | ||
|
samurai80
Japan4225 Posts
On June 19 2012 15:03 Fragile51 wrote: Have you seen Parting as of late? I think it's very very probable tbh. Parting is not in the shape he was the last couple of seasons. These 2 games show what I meant. Great level, pretty close games, not like Parting was gonna crush everyone but he's able to defend his chances and I didn't see him being 2-0'ed. | ||
|
SC2ShoWTimE
Germany722 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:52 Douillos wrote: btw im rooting for symbol, but I dont understand the decision to produce ultras thats all. ultra bling is just super scary as toss when you dont have storm. no way you can stop the banelings from connecting. | ||
|
eFonSG
United States255 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:53 FakeDeath wrote: Lame game? This is way BETTER THAN BLs+Infestors against tossdeathball+mothership. Ultra+banes is more exciting to watch. Why? Theres even LESS micro to it. Its just aesthetically pleasing, but thats not why im watching sc2 | ||
|
Loxley
Netherlands2480 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:51 Douillos wrote: Come on guys, gotta admit, ultras were un called for there, mass banelings did everything. Euhm Ultra's break forcefields? Plus they soak an awesome amount of shots from the mobile blink stalkers making the banelings survive. Just a great composition. | ||
|
blooblooblahblah
Australia4163 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:52 Douillos wrote: btw im rooting for symbol, but I dont understand the decision to produce ultras thats all. The removal of forcefields was actually quite effective. Also, if u can get good fungals on the stalkers, ultralisks with banelings and lings does a ton of damage to them. | ||
|
Daray
6006 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:52 blacksheepwall wrote: I really like Symbol, but I wasn't totally impressed with his play there. Some sloppy reactions and engagements that game. Well, Parting didnt really have a chance that game. At no time was he ahead or close to winning. | ||
|
pyro19
6575 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:53 aznball123 wrote: He went banelings, ultra's were to crush force fields. Didn"t he kill all the sentries way before he went Ultras? | ||
|
michielbrands
Netherlands1146 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:51 Douillos wrote: Come on guys, gotta admit, ultras were un called for there, mass banelings did everything. the banelings could do everything because the ultra's destroyed the FF | ||
|
Douillos
France3195 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:52 Thinasy wrote: The ultras did remove the possibility of forcefields though which is great, haven't really been thinking of this before, I need to try this shit lol Yeah your right, didnt think of that right away. | ||
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
| ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:53 samurai80 wrote: These 2 games were show what I meant. Great level, pretty close games, not like Parting was gonna crush everyone but he's able to defend his chances and I didn't see him being 2-0'ed. He's been looking way better today then he has in the past, and i'm glad because im a big fan :p | ||
|
blacklist_member
Australia318 Posts
Hate my Aussie internet, on second the stream is lagging in SQ free live and now its working at HQ live ..... -_- | ||
|
FakeDeath
Malaysia6060 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:53 eFonSG wrote: Why? Theres even LESS micro to it. Its just aesthetically pleasing, but thats not why im watching sc2 Wtf? If Symbol went for Bls+Infestor,we would be seeing a 40++minutes of turtling against toss deathball+ mothership. Is that better? It is worse. | ||
|
heaveshade
China330 Posts
| ||
|
Talack
Canada2742 Posts
Far far far more entertaining than the usual PvZ. BLIZZARD TAKE THIS HINT, if you want your game to grow we need less broodlord/infestor and more bane/ultra games! Put in more micro and less anti-micro! | ||
|
Darkong
United Kingdom418 Posts
On June 19 2012 18:54 pyro19 wrote: Didn"t he kill all the sentries way before he went Ultras? No, he used the ultras to crush the force fields and let the banes get into the sentries, if he had no ultras his stuff would have been forcefielded and slaughtered. He didn't remake ultras until late on, probably in case there were new sentreies, but there weren't, so they looked unnecessary at the end. | ||
| ||
