EPTMLG Spring Arena [Day 2] - Page 97
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
mango_destroyer
Canada3914 Posts
| ||
|
MonsterBeast
Canada193 Posts
| ||
|
Ghoststrikes
Canada1356 Posts
On April 22 2012 11:31 Ghoststrikes wrote: Here, I'll break it down: 3 way tie, so to separate them, they take the total map score in games between these players since the matches scores are all 1-1. Map scores between them: Heart: 4-2 DRG: 3-3 Parting: 2-4 Parting is out, DRG should be 6th I had it 20 minutes ago (more than that just deciding to post it later when no one understood) There. GG | ||
|
CuteZergling
641 Posts
| ||
|
DSVader
United States28 Posts
| ||
|
Eruism
United States312 Posts
| ||
|
IMNasty
663 Posts
| ||
|
jobber123rd
United States501 Posts
On April 22 2012 11:48 JoelB wrote: oh god MLG Why are you trying to invent the wheel all over again? Just take it from Champions League, WC or whatever ... Score > Head to Head > Difference between Won and Lost maps > Overall Won maps ... easy and fair ... no need for a stupid "mini pool" You do realize that the UEFA Champions League group stage uses H2H goal differential (and H2H goals scored, and H2H away goals) before group goal differential to break ties, right? That seems analogous to using H2H map score before overall map score for this tournament. | ||
|
Femari
United States2900 Posts
| ||
|
diddLY
United States215 Posts
Makes it through | ||
|
Lorelia
England28 Posts
On April 22 2012 11:50 Ghoststrikes wrote: Maybe but you can't know that for sure. For instance, when Heart was leading 2-0 against Parting, it turns out the 3rd game was the game that would decide the fate of both players (If I'm right and I am) Edit: Ninajed just above :D I see, but then that kind of makes things worse imo, as it gave some games a lot more relevance than others. Like how that 3rd game was a deciding factor, but DRG's 3rd game against MKP and Partings 3rd game against MC were pointless. | ||
|
Scribble
2077 Posts
| ||
ZeromuS
Canada13408 Posts
On April 22 2012 11:50 Femari wrote: MLG dropped the ball with their rules. It should go match record (all three are 3-4), winning percentage (Heart is no longer tied), then head to head/match record between the tied players. Not this confusing nonsense. Heart would be eliminated from the Tiebreaker as soon as he goes ahead of the others. But the thing is in this case Heart breaks his tie alongside DRG who also tiebreaks parting at the same time. If it was heart with most wins, then DRG/Parting were both with the same w/l record amongst the three then what you said would work. | ||
|
iAmJeffReY
United States4262 Posts
| ||
|
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
Ghoststrikes
Canada1356 Posts
On April 22 2012 11:54 Lorelia wrote: I see, but then that kind of makes things worse imo, as it gave some games a lot more relevance than others. Like how that 3rd game was a deciding factor, but DRG's 3rd game against MKP and Partings 3rd game against MC were pointless. Not really, because the players can't know for sure that those games will be pointless. So you have to play your best every game. With this format, it's almost guaranteed that some 3rd game will be important | ||
|
spatz
Germany153 Posts
| ||
|
Lorizean
Germany1330 Posts
On April 22 2012 11:54 Lorelia wrote: I see, but then that kind of makes things worse imo, as it gave some games a lot more relevance than others. Like how that 3rd game was a deciding factor, but DRG's 3rd game against MKP and Partings 3rd game against MC were pointless. That is true, but you don't know that in advance, do you? The ties could've been different. Also, I suspect that part of the 3-games-no-matter-what rule is due to them wanting a maximum number of games for the spectators. And since you don't know if it's gonna be a meaningful game till the end, players will try hard too. | ||
|
Ruscour
5233 Posts
| ||
| ||
