EPT
$200 FRB Grand Tournament! - Page 13
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
minilance
Canada500 Posts
| ||
|
Juliette
United States6003 Posts
the casting is really good however. I really really like 3 port banshee... | ||
|
monitor
United States2408 Posts
| ||
|
-Archangel-
Croatia7457 Posts
On April 14 2012 09:44 monitor wrote: Not the best start for showcasing 6m maps lol... I hope the rest of the games go well though!! Good enough considering Rainbow is a much better player. | ||
|
cablesc
United States1540 Posts
On April 14 2012 09:37 Quotidian wrote: what's the reasoning behind the high yield gas? Cutting two gases down to one would be a 50% reduction which is too drastic, so they're trying out one high yield instead. | ||
|
Ruscour
5233 Posts
On April 14 2012 09:44 monitor wrote: Not the best start for showcasing 6m maps lol... I hope the rest of the games go well though!! The first game was sick. | ||
|
monitor
United States2408 Posts
I might have missed an earlier game, but the first I saw was the 3port banshee all-in off of one base; it beat a three base protoss. Rainbow is considerably better though, so it doesn't really show anything. | ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17725 Posts
On April 14 2012 09:51 monitor wrote: I might have missed an earlier game, but the first I saw was the 3port banshee all-in off of one base; it beat a three base protoss. Rainbow is considerably better though, so it doesn't really show anything. 3 port banshee was game 2 | ||
|
Ruscour
5233 Posts
On April 14 2012 09:51 monitor wrote: I might have missed an earlier game, but the first I saw was the 3port banshee all-in off of one base; it beat a three base protoss. Rainbow is considerably better though, so it doesn't really show anything. Game one was a back and forth crazy game with like 8 basetrades and never a 200/200 engagement. It was kinda stereotypically what FRB is supposed to be lol | ||
|
dmfg
United Kingdom591 Posts
| ||
|
Seriox
Germany373 Posts
| ||
00Visor
4337 Posts
On April 14 2012 09:37 Quotidian wrote: what's the reasoning behind the high yield gas? you have 75% minerals (6 instead of 8 patches) how do you provide 75% gas? solution is one high yield gas The problem I see is that gas becomes cheaper this way, if you mine it more efficiently. This messes with the game design. To counter this, I suggest to put the gas further back, so that you need 4-5 (maybe 4.5?) workers to saturate it. | ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17725 Posts
| ||
|
Ruscour
5233 Posts
| ||
|
Telsh
United States148 Posts
| ||
|
Ruscour
5233 Posts
On April 14 2012 10:14 Telsh wrote: I'm watching this and it seems unnecessary. If you follow the korean scene their games have been going away from death ball fights more and more so altering the game like this is just a recipe for awful http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=321242 read then come back | ||
|
Quotidian
Norway1937 Posts
On April 14 2012 10:16 Ruscour wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=321242 read then come back he's not wrong though, especially tvp has developed into a lot of small fights all game long.. | ||
|
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
|
Ruscour
5233 Posts
On April 14 2012 10:24 Quotidian wrote: he's not wrong though, especially tvp has developed into a lot of small fights all game long.. TvP is going through a huge metagame shift because Terrans are having a tough time, and it's not just about more engagements, there's a lot more thought into securing more expansions which just diversifies gameplay. Look at the state of PvZ, you either 2 base all in or 3 base turtle because nothing else is viable. Balanced or not, PvZ is a stupid matchup and I'm really interested to see what FRB does with it. Back to TvP though, Terrans are constantly pressuring Protoss to try and avoid that lategame deathball situation, which comes from Protoss having easy thirds on just about every tournament map. FRB changes that completely. The current TvP isn't constantly attacking to deny position, or force an army away, it's just constantly poking for vulnerabilities and hoping that the toss will make a mistake, it's not accomplishing anything specific. FRB would make far more opportunities for that kind of thing. | ||
|
Quotidian
Norway1937 Posts
On April 14 2012 10:30 Ruscour wrote: Look at the state of PvZ, you either 2 base all in or 3 base turtle because nothing else is viable. Balanced or not, PvZ is a stupid matchup and I'm really interested to see what FRB does with it. although it was an entertaining game, it still looked like pvz to me... | ||
| ||
