EPT[Asus ROG] Day 2 Final Bracket - Page 116
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
DizzySheep
Australia1144 Posts
| ||
Destructicon
4713 Posts
| ||
|
cutler
Germany609 Posts
| ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
On February 26 2012 00:30 Onos wrote: Next question? Poor terran were going to lose any game without ghosts. To be fair, that was really shakky way to beat infestor BLs. Not a lot of players can do that. In comparaison controling BL infestor is like so easy. | ||
|
Math.random();
433 Posts
| ||
|
Ketch
Netherlands7285 Posts
| ||
|
MrKn4rz
Germany2153 Posts
On February 26 2012 00:31 KiNGxXx wrote: Yeah, all we need now for late game vs zerg is Polt's army control! Pretty easy  Isnt that what we want? A game where skill matters? | ||
|
Eee
Sweden2712 Posts
On February 26 2012 00:29 frequency wrote: Why were they talking like Lucky was ahead? lol They didn't, they mentioned from time to time that Lucky was going hive tech on 3 base and that his bane-bust failed and even put Polt ahead, where you listening to the french commentary or something? | ||
|
Bazinga
Germany132 Posts
| ||
|
Resolve
Singapore679 Posts
| ||
|
jupiter6
205 Posts
On February 26 2012 00:30 Onos wrote: Next question? Poor terran were going to lose any game without ghosts. yes lets ignore the fact polt was ahead all game along with better eco and almost lost to defwhoring zerg on 3 bases who rushed to bl/infestor 1a gayball | ||
|
getSome[703]
United States753 Posts
On February 26 2012 00:31 WigglingSquid wrote: Impressive lategame management. Maybe I am missing something obvious, but I found Polt's strategy and execution scary good. Did Lucky have any drones left? If so, I think he shouldn't have engaged. Like 14? He had to engage, he had literally 0 tech. | ||
|
Testuser
6469 Posts
On February 26 2012 00:31 ceaRshaf wrote: For your own personal sake you shouldn't read the LR thread during a cast. I agree with this. | ||
|
Stiluz
Norway688 Posts
| ||
|
Zarahtra
Iceland4053 Posts
On February 26 2012 00:30 TotalBiscuit wrote: We weren't, get your ears checked. All we want is good caster feedback that is based in reality so we can improve :[ Well I'd say Lucky was actually far ahead(by just teching to BL + infestor that is, else polt had better econ and played way better), just no drop defense... I mean if you don't want to use slings, use spores/spines to kill shit as it comes freom the medivacs | ||
|
Mowr
Sweden791 Posts
| ||
|
arQ
1033 Posts
| ||
|
KiNGxXx
7928 Posts
On February 26 2012 00:32 MrKn4rz wrote: Isnt that what we want? A game where skill matters? Polt is like 10 times better than Lucky but it was a close game. No, that's not what we want. | ||
|
LittLeD
Sweden7973 Posts
On February 26 2012 00:31 Demonaz wrote: I can't figure out why Lucky didn't simply go for Polt's main with the infestor-BL while he had zero vikings... That's exactly what he should had done. He had 13-15 infestors right? Leave 2 at the third and 2 at the main, push with all the broodlords and ~9 infestors against a terran without ghosts or vikings? Its gg right there. | ||
|
Ansinjunger
United States2451 Posts
On February 26 2012 00:30 ClysmiC wrote: My prediction: expect to see Mr. Sean Plott analyzing that game in the near future. Some great textbook play and decision-making on both sides. I saw only good decision making on Polt's side. Lucky should have won that game if he didn't lose everything to drops. Why are people even talking about Ghosts not being built? There was no economy for that. | ||
| ||
