|
On January 12 2012 19:29 figq wrote: Inca is the future, guys!
His mindgames man, ahead of everyone. He displayed his sick mind games skills in the past when he DTed Nestea 4 games in a row. Nestea was just too behind the curve to react accordingly and did the dumb move, which somehow went against Inca.
|
On January 12 2012 19:34 RPR_Tempest wrote: *checks results*
*sees Oz beat Curious*
I KNEW IT! I FUCKING TOLD YOU PEOPLE BUT YOU-
*sees InCa beat Bomber*
...Wat.
lol /thread, so far at least.
|
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On January 12 2012 19:34 bittman wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:33 Fragile51 wrote:On January 12 2012 19:28 Hassybaby wrote:On January 12 2012 19:27 dinsim1 wrote:On January 12 2012 19:26 Asha` wrote: Watching Inca play is the most annoying thing ever. Really? I find it very creative and refreshing. Lol, creative.... Inca is like the Goody of Korean Protoss So strategically brilliant, and german? :p Good at drinking? Has long hair?
Dammit you guys...I meant that he's known for having a certain style for a long time and them totally exploiting that to his advantage, like Goody did when he started to go bio more often.
|
On January 12 2012 19:36 Seraphone wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:30 Dodgin wrote:On January 12 2012 19:30 Seraphone wrote:On January 12 2012 19:29 bigbeau wrote:On January 12 2012 19:27 Chrian wrote: I can't actually believe that InCa's going to win another game with DTs. Is everyone who plays him seriously taking stupid pills, what the hell. It's not like he just DT rushed...He plays extremely intelligent. He is exact opposite of intelligent. Haters gonna hate. Intelligent is Nestea. Nestea plays safe, he scouts what his opponent is doing and reacts appropriately and hits timings that are good based on his opponents build. Inca doesn't scout, he doesn't care what his opponent is doing. He just takes massive risks, be it blind DT rush, three nexus's of one gate, DT/Collosus tech off the back of 1 sentry and 5 stalkers. There is no intelligence in that at all.
Yeah, and people say Inca prepared to play bomber by taking huge risks instead of the usual safe style bomber forces are wrong, Inca just plays like that because flipping coins works very well in this game right now.
|
Eskimo Protoss vs Invisible Protoss
|
I find it weird that people get angry when a player wins strategically instead of mechanically in an Real time Strategy game.
|
|
|
"we get to learn about the modern pvp style"
We'll see both 4 gate every game.
|
United Kingdom38149 Posts
PvP? Time for breakfast =p
|
inca's gonna 2-0 when many thought 0-2...sound familiar...ganzi..supernova...
|
On January 12 2012 19:35 FuzzyJAM wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:32 bbQ4Aiur wrote:On January 12 2012 19:30 Seraphone wrote:On January 12 2012 19:29 bigbeau wrote:On January 12 2012 19:27 Chrian wrote: I can't actually believe that InCa's going to win another game with DTs. Is everyone who plays him seriously taking stupid pills, what the hell. It's not like he just DT rushed...He plays extremely intelligent. He is exact opposite of intelligent. tbh, Inca out-macroed bomber in both of those games, bomber should really blame himself for not being aggressive when he had the advantage. So i dont know why people hate Inca even when he play macro game and win. What? Inca did a "I hope he doesn't scout my 3rd off of one Gate!!" build followed by "I hope he doesn't have detection!!" in game two. Inca won the game when the coin happened to land on the side he guessed twice in a row. And Bomber did the whole "Why scout when I can just sit in my base lolz. Wait what is going on."
You can't blame a player for taking risks when it's working. That's how you get an advantage, you take a risk that pays off.
|
Actually, in all the DT rush stuff, I'd forgotten Inca used to have a reputation as a PvP god. This might actually be a good game...
|
On January 12 2012 19:37 GhostFall wrote: I find it weird that people get angry when a player wins strategically instead of mechanically in an Real time Strategy game.
Every time a fan favorite loses the whining begins, without fail.
|
On January 12 2012 19:36 Seraphone wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:30 Dodgin wrote:On January 12 2012 19:30 Seraphone wrote:On January 12 2012 19:29 bigbeau wrote:On January 12 2012 19:27 Chrian wrote: I can't actually believe that InCa's going to win another game with DTs. Is everyone who plays him seriously taking stupid pills, what the hell. It's not like he just DT rushed...He plays extremely intelligent. He is exact opposite of intelligent. Haters gonna hate. Intelligent is Nestea. Nestea plays safe, he scouts what his opponent is doing and reacts appropriately and hits timings that are good based on his opponents build. Inca doesn't scout, he doesn't care what his opponent is doing. He just takes massive risks, be it blind DT rush, three nexus's of one gate, DT/Collosus tech off the back of 1 sentry and 5 stalkers. There is no intelligence in that at all.
Nestea's intelligence is in his play, Inca's intelligence is in his preparation outside of the game. He knows he's known as a gimmicky player that likes dt's, so people are gonna play safe against him first game. He took a gigantic risk by going triple nexus, and it payed off and he made bomber look pretty bad. Bomber not wanting to have that happen again goes for a not-safe build next game, which inca is anticipating and slaps down with a weird tech build. It's gimmicky, for sure, but the risk he takes are definitely calculated, even though it's not reactive.
|
On January 12 2012 19:33 Inflicted_ wrote:We all know why InCa just won that game... Show nested quote +Fionn's predictions:
Curious > Oz Bomber > Inca Bomber > Curious Oz > Inca Curious > Oz OMG, its Fionn again.... Stop predicting, u're making me sad.... T.T
|
|
United States23455 Posts
On January 12 2012 19:38 tdt wrote: inca's gonna 2-0 when many thought 0-2...sound familiar...ganzi..supernova...
No one thought Ganzi was going to 0-2. He's waaaaay better than Boxer/Sen.
|
On January 12 2012 19:37 GhostFall wrote: I find it weird that people get angry when a player wins strategically instead of mechanically in an Real time Strategy game.
Is it good strategy if you choose builds that are risky without scouting and they turn into wins?
Derp
|
On January 12 2012 19:37 Hypemeup wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:36 Seraphone wrote:On January 12 2012 19:30 Dodgin wrote:On January 12 2012 19:30 Seraphone wrote:On January 12 2012 19:29 bigbeau wrote:On January 12 2012 19:27 Chrian wrote: I can't actually believe that InCa's going to win another game with DTs. Is everyone who plays him seriously taking stupid pills, what the hell. It's not like he just DT rushed...He plays extremely intelligent. He is exact opposite of intelligent. Haters gonna hate. Intelligent is Nestea. Nestea plays safe, he scouts what his opponent is doing and reacts appropriately and hits timings that are good based on his opponents build. Inca doesn't scout, he doesn't care what his opponent is doing. He just takes massive risks, be it blind DT rush, three nexus's of one gate, DT/Collosus tech off the back of 1 sentry and 5 stalkers. There is no intelligence in that at all. Yeah, and people say Inca prepared to play bomber by taking huge risks instead of the usual safe style bomber forces are wrong, Inca just plays like that because flipping coins works very well in this game right now. Especially if you wage psychological warfare in such a way that the coin is loaded in your favour, which is what inca does. It adds a funfactor to the tournament: you never know whether he will mindgame his opponent, or will get destroyed by another nestea.
|
|
|
|