| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
poorcloud
Singapore2748 Posts
On January 12 2012 19:29 figq wrote: Inca is the future, guys! His mindgames man, ahead of everyone. He displayed his sick mind games skills in the past when he DTed Nestea 4 games in a row. Nestea was just too behind the curve to react accordingly and did the dumb move, which somehow went against Inca. | ||
|
Belisarius
Australia6233 Posts
On January 12 2012 19:34 RPR_Tempest wrote: *checks results* *sees Oz beat Curious* I KNEW IT! I FUCKING TOLD YOU PEOPLE BUT YOU- *sees InCa beat Bomber* ...Wat. lol /thread, so far at least. | ||
|
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Dammit you guys...I meant that he's known for having a certain style for a long time and them totally exploiting that to his advantage, like Goody did when he started to go bio more often. | ||
|
Hypemeup
Sweden2783 Posts
On January 12 2012 19:36 Seraphone wrote: Intelligent is Nestea. Nestea plays safe, he scouts what his opponent is doing and reacts appropriately and hits timings that are good based on his opponents build. Inca doesn't scout, he doesn't care what his opponent is doing. He just takes massive risks, be it blind DT rush, three nexus's of one gate, DT/Collosus tech off the back of 1 sentry and 5 stalkers. There is no intelligence in that at all. Yeah, and people say Inca prepared to play bomber by taking huge risks instead of the usual safe style bomber forces are wrong, Inca just plays like that because flipping coins works very well in this game right now. | ||
|
KiNGxXx
7928 Posts
| ||
|
GhostFall
United States830 Posts
| ||
|
farnham
1378 Posts
| ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Curse inca for being so darn good  | ||
|
Pajegetc
United States3158 Posts
We'll see both 4 gate every game. | ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38257 Posts
| ||
|
tdt
United States3179 Posts
| ||
|
Tobberoth
Sweden6375 Posts
On January 12 2012 19:35 FuzzyJAM wrote: What? Inca did a "I hope he doesn't scout my 3rd off of one Gate!!" build followed by "I hope he doesn't have detection!!" in game two. Inca won the game when the coin happened to land on the side he guessed twice in a row. And Bomber did the whole "Why scout when I can just sit in my base lolz. Wait what is going on." You can't blame a player for taking risks when it's working. That's how you get an advantage, you take a risk that pays off. | ||
|
Belisarius
Australia6233 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On January 12 2012 19:37 GhostFall wrote: I find it weird that people get angry when a player wins strategically instead of mechanically in an Real time Strategy game. Every time a fan favorite loses the whining begins, without fail. | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On January 12 2012 19:36 Seraphone wrote: Intelligent is Nestea. Nestea plays safe, he scouts what his opponent is doing and reacts appropriately and hits timings that are good based on his opponents build. Inca doesn't scout, he doesn't care what his opponent is doing. He just takes massive risks, be it blind DT rush, three nexus's of one gate, DT/Collosus tech off the back of 1 sentry and 5 stalkers. There is no intelligence in that at all. Nestea's intelligence is in his play, Inca's intelligence is in his preparation outside of the game. He knows he's known as a gimmicky player that likes dt's, so people are gonna play safe against him first game. He took a gigantic risk by going triple nexus, and it payed off and he made bomber look pretty bad. Bomber not wanting to have that happen again goes for a not-safe build next game, which inca is anticipating and slaps down with a weird tech build. It's gimmicky, for sure, but the risk he takes are definitely calculated, even though it's not reactive. | ||
|
weiliem
2071 Posts
On January 12 2012 19:33 Inflicted_ wrote: We all know why InCa just won that game... OMG, its Fionn again.... Stop predicting, u're making me sad.... T.T | ||
|
parazice
Thailand5517 Posts
| ||
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
On January 12 2012 19:38 tdt wrote: inca's gonna 2-0 when many thought 0-2...sound familiar...ganzi..supernova... No one thought Ganzi was going to 0-2. He's waaaaay better than Boxer/Sen. | ||
|
IMMABEASTBRUH
United States271 Posts
On January 12 2012 19:37 GhostFall wrote: I find it weird that people get angry when a player wins strategically instead of mechanically in an Real time Strategy game. Is it good strategy if you choose builds that are risky without scouting and they turn into wins? Derp | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18214 Posts
On January 12 2012 19:37 Hypemeup wrote: Yeah, and people say Inca prepared to play bomber by taking huge risks instead of the usual safe style bomber forces are wrong, Inca just plays like that because flipping coins works very well in this game right now. Especially if you wage psychological warfare in such a way that the coin is loaded in your favour, which is what inca does. It adds a funfactor to the tournament: you never know whether he will mindgame his opponent, or will get destroyed by another nestea. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Escore
LiuLi Cup
Serral vs Zoun
Cure vs Classic
Big Brain Bouts
ByuN vs GgMaChine
Serral vs Jumy
RSL Revival
RSL Revival
LiuLi Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
RSL Revival
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
