|
On January 12 2012 19:32 Hassybaby wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:29 bbQ4Aiur wrote:On January 12 2012 19:17 bbQ4Aiur wrote:On January 12 2012 19:14 MonkSEA wrote:Why does everyone hate InCa? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" I dont, Inca may have bad PvZ, but his PvP and PvT has always been quite nice. Go inca, bomb Bomber data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" like i said, Inca's PvT is good I maintain that he has some truly great builds in PvZ, but he's just bad at executing them. His series to DRG was a great example That'd be true...if DTs didn't blow in PvZ. 90% of the time when toss goes DTs its instawin unless you're IdrA.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
Poll: Recommend Oz vs Curious Game 3?Yes (8) 42% No (7) 37% If you have time (4) 21% 19 total votes Your vote: Recommend Oz vs Curious Game 3? (Vote): Yes (Vote): No (Vote): If you have time
|
Bomber played wayyy too passive/defensively, from his usual aggressive style. I think he gave too much stock into InCa's tendency to use DTs or something risky. Usually you see Bomber drop everywhere and pull the Protoss army in many directions. The Bomber playing today just tried to fight Protoss's deathball head on. He has good control, but that doesn't always make up for the fact that Protoss's deathball is more efficient.
Good job InCa for the mental games! Bomber, I really hope you win against Curious. (
|
On January 12 2012 19:33 Inflicted_ wrote:We all know why InCa just won that game... Show nested quote +Fionn's predictions:
Curious > Oz Bomber > Inca Bomber > Curious Oz > Inca Curious > Oz Inca and Oz will advance !
|
On January 12 2012 19:31 Fubi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:29 Elefanto wrote: PvT lategame looking tough for Terran. Time to innovate, because it doesn't seem to be working right now. Late game TvP has been like this for a very very long time. Terran just had a period where they just kill P w/o letting them get into the late games, but that seems to be over now, so yea it's definitely tough for T
Didn't seem to be a problem when they could carpet EMP the whole Protoss army.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
Poll: Recommend InCa vs Bomber Game 3?Yes (16) 67% If you have time (5) 21% No (3) 13% 24 total votes Your vote: Recommend InCa vs Bomber Game 3? (Vote): Yes (Vote): No (Vote): If you have time
|
The lyrics souds like.. "I know that im a real mangina!"
|
inca isn't an amazing player but he's fun to watch. someone like him might be able to create some general upsets and is a great wildcard to add drama to competition.
|
*checks results*
*sees Oz beat Curious*
I KNEW IT! I FUCKING TOLD YOU PEOPLE BUT YOU-
*sees InCa beat Bomber*
...Wat.
|
The English in these commercials/songs is out of control bad.
|
Taking blind risks is not the future of protoss play, at the very least. Worked fine vs Bombers style, but most terrans roll that shit
|
On January 12 2012 19:34 bittman wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:33 Fragile51 wrote:On January 12 2012 19:28 Hassybaby wrote:On January 12 2012 19:27 dinsim1 wrote:On January 12 2012 19:26 Asha` wrote: Watching Inca play is the most annoying thing ever. Really? I find it very creative and refreshing. Lol, creative.... Inca is like the Goody of Korean Protoss So strategically brilliant, and german? :p Good at drinking? Has long hair?
Modest and a bit shy ? Loves Hardrock ?
|
On January 12 2012 19:34 Seeker wrote:Poll: Recommend InCa vs Bomber Game 3?Yes (16) 67% If you have time (5) 21% No (3) 13% 24 total votes Your vote: Recommend InCa vs Bomber Game 3? (Vote): Yes (Vote): No (Vote): If you have time
You should have put an option like. OMFG BATTLECRUISER > DTS
|
On January 12 2012 19:32 bbQ4Aiur wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:30 Seraphone wrote:On January 12 2012 19:29 bigbeau wrote:On January 12 2012 19:27 Chrian wrote: I can't actually believe that InCa's going to win another game with DTs. Is everyone who plays him seriously taking stupid pills, what the hell. It's not like he just DT rushed...He plays extremely intelligent. He is exact opposite of intelligent. tbh, Inca out-macroed bomber in both of those games, bomber should really blame himself for not being aggressive when he had the advantage. So i dont know why people hate Inca even when he play macro game and win. What? Inca did a "I hope he doesn't scout my 3rd off of one Gate!!" build followed by "I hope he doesn't have detection!!" in game two.
Inca won the game when the coin happened to land on the side he guessed twice in a row.
|
I really liked that song. Wish there was some place I could listen to it again.
|
On January 12 2012 19:32 Shasta37 wrote: I think the results of Inca vs. Bomber are a pretty accurate depiction of the TvP matchup in mid-lategame. You mean, terrans don't scout at all, then engage as bad as possible, which ends into losing ?
|
On January 12 2012 19:30 Dodgin wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:30 Seraphone wrote:On January 12 2012 19:29 bigbeau wrote:On January 12 2012 19:27 Chrian wrote: I can't actually believe that InCa's going to win another game with DTs. Is everyone who plays him seriously taking stupid pills, what the hell. It's not like he just DT rushed...He plays extremely intelligent. He is exact opposite of intelligent. Haters gonna hate.
Intelligent is Nestea. Nestea plays safe, he scouts what his opponent is doing and reacts appropriately and hits timings that are good based on his opponents build.
Inca doesn't scout, he doesn't care what his opponent is doing.
He just takes massive risks, be it blind DT rush, three nexus's of one gate, DT/Collosus tech off the back of 1 sentry and 5 stalkers.
There is no intelligence in that at all.
|
On January 12 2012 19:33 Inflicted_ wrote:We all know why InCa just won that game... Show nested quote +Fionn's predictions:
Curious > Oz Bomber > Inca Bomber > Curious Oz > Inca Curious > Oz
Welp, thread over folks, looks like we know who's going to win today :p
|
On January 12 2012 19:33 Inflicted_ wrote:We all know why InCa just won that game... Show nested quote +Fionn's predictions:
Curious > Oz Bomber > Inca Bomber > Curious Oz > Inca Curious > Oz
Why do I have the exact same predictions as you do?
|
On January 12 2012 19:31 ControlMonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:29 JuneMay wrote: Hahaha Inca owning it up. And he was not even cheesing xD. First game was essentially an eco-cheese. But the second game was nice.
Yes but its Bombers fault for not punishing that eco cheese, and end of game 1 was just crushing, Bomber got outclassed its simple. Just Inca got too many haters. xD
|
|
|
|