|
On January 12 2012 19:40 FuzzyJAM wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:38 Tobberoth wrote:On January 12 2012 19:35 FuzzyJAM wrote:On January 12 2012 19:32 bbQ4Aiur wrote:On January 12 2012 19:30 Seraphone wrote:On January 12 2012 19:29 bigbeau wrote:On January 12 2012 19:27 Chrian wrote:
I can't actually believe that InCa's going to win another game with DTs. Is everyone who plays him seriously taking stupid pills, what the hell. It's not like he just DT rushed...He plays extremely intelligent. He is exact opposite of intelligent. tbh, Inca out-macroed bomber in both of those games, bomber should really blame himself for not being aggressive when he had the advantage. So i dont know why people hate Inca even when he play macro game and win. What? Inca did a "I hope he doesn't scout my 3rd off of one Gate!!" build followed by "I hope he doesn't have detection!!" in game two. Inca won the game when the coin happened to land on the side he guessed twice in a row. And Bomber did the whole "Why scout when I can just sit in my base lolz. Wait what is going on." You can't blame a player for taking risks when it's working. That's how you get an advantage, you take a risk that pays off. Yeah, Bomber fucked up game one. Doesn't change the fact that neither games were "macro games" and that Inca didn't play super intelligently, he simply hoped his opponent messed up.
So whats a macro game by your definition? Inca's strategy are "ways" (tricks whatever u called it)to get into what I called "macro-games".
|
Inca didn't do anything wrong. It's just Bomber who didn't scout. It's his fault after all. Noone to blame
|
GSL Ro32 Group D
S3 G1
FXOz vs oGsInCa
Antiga Shipyard 1.2
FXOz spawns Red Protoss at 11
Inca spawns Blue Protoss at 5
0:00
Standard, standard, standard gate then gas for both, double gas for both, core for both, 2 gates for Oz and 3 gate Robo for Inca
|
Poll: Do you enjoy watching Inca's style of play?Yes, I love his creativity! (32) 84% No, too cheesey (6) 16% 38 total votes Your vote: Do you enjoy watching Inca's style of play? (Vote): Yes, I love his creativity!
(Vote): No, too cheesey
|
On January 12 2012 19:40 LeLfe wrote:
Since I'll never ever bet on inca I guess my LB are screwed till players play DTproof every freaking game!
Dont think it would help much.
Look at Goody. He goes every game reaper>bunker rush > helion >heavy mech (or bio against P) and he still wins.
On January 12 2012 19:40 Seeker wrote:
Ozzzzzz win this!!!
You know that Fion had pick Oz wining this also?
|
On January 12 2012 19:40 Whalecore wrote:
Wowww so many Inca haters... really
I haven't really studied Bomber a lot, but I can say that every TvP I've seen from him, he's played a really predictable style where he goes 3 CC very early. Inca game 1 just used this to his advantage and got 3 ultra fast nexus which basically snowballed into a simple victory.
Game 2 was also very nice.. notice how he doesn't try to win the games with DT tech alone, he transitions out of it, we saw the same last year with Inca's PvTs,,, he always has a follow up.
So stop hating!! Inca January, February, March and April code S champion
If he's that predicable, then why the fuck didn't he go 3 CC early in either game?!
|
Looks like now OZ is way way ahead
|
On January 12 2012 19:42 Wildmoon wrote:
Inca didn't do anything wrong. It's just Bomber who didn't scout. It's his fault after all. Noone to blame
You can't just go all in super reactively as Terran like you can Zerg. That's not a balance whine, it's just how to races work.
|
4 sentries against blink stalkers, Inca should definitely have the advantage here.
|
Oz is just going to die here....
|
On January 12 2012 19:39 Seraphone wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:37 Hypemeup wrote:On January 12 2012 19:36 Seraphone wrote:On January 12 2012 19:30 Dodgin wrote:On January 12 2012 19:30 Seraphone wrote:On January 12 2012 19:29 bigbeau wrote:On January 12 2012 19:27 Chrian wrote:
I can't actually believe that InCa's going to win another game with DTs. Is everyone who plays him seriously taking stupid pills, what the hell. It's not like he just DT rushed...He plays extremely intelligent. He is exact opposite of intelligent. Haters gonna hate. Intelligent is Nestea. Nestea plays safe, he scouts what his opponent is doing and reacts appropriately and hits timings that are good based on his opponents build. Inca doesn't scout, he doesn't care what his opponent is doing. He just takes massive risks, be it blind DT rush, three nexus's of one gate, DT/Collosus tech off the back of 1 sentry and 5 stalkers. There is no intelligence in that at all. Yeah, and people say Inca prepared to play bomber by taking huge risks instead of the usual safe style bomber forces are wrong, Inca just plays like that because flipping coins works very well in this game right now. Well unfortunately a lot of lower league players who don't understand the game think Inca just outplayed someone and is some genius Protoss now.
As a series strategy, playing super greedy when you're known to cheese and then cheesing are smart risks to take. They were big risks, but there was thought behind them.
Bomber also took big risks (three blind bunkers? Really?) because of Inca's reputation, and they didn't pay off.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
Oh damn..... Oz with zealots in the main!!!
|
Inca is dead, unless he attacks immediately and gets lucky.
|
On January 12 2012 19:43 artrea wrote:
Looks like now OZ is way way ahead
Doesn't look like it, no 
|
[Deleted pre-emptively. This was a bad post]
|
|
|
So many probes. Oz has this.
|
Lol, not being able to watch the stream is kicking my ass right now, who the hell is ahead? It seems to alternate with every post :p
|
|
|
On January 12 2012 19:43 Seraphone wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:42 Wildmoon wrote:
Inca didn't do anything wrong. It's just Bomber who didn't scout. It's his fault after all. Noone to blame You can't just go all in super reactively as Terran like you can Zerg. That's not a balance whine, it's just how to races work.
How is the a response to what Wildmoon said? Bomber didn't need to all in to check what Inca was doing. He could have just sent an scv or two. Even having units at the ramp outside the 3rd might have been suspicious enough to warrant a scan there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
