|
On January 12 2012 19:43 Seraphone wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:42 Wildmoon wrote: Inca didn't do anything wrong. It's just Bomber who didn't scout. It's his fault after all. Noone to blame You can't just go all in super reactively as Terran like you can Zerg. That's not a balance whine, it's just how to races work.
and that doesn't have anyting to do with my post. -_-"
|
Nevermind... Inca's dead.
|
Second base will kick in too hard for Oz now
|
Getting that obs sniped... so careless.
|
On January 12 2012 19:44 figq wrote: Inca is dead, unless he attacks immediately and gets lucky.
Getting lucky is how InCa wins games normally anyways.
|
On January 12 2012 19:42 Mobius_1 wrote: GSL Ro32 Group D S3 G1 FXOz vs oGsInCa Antiga Shipyard 1.2
FXOz spawns Red Protoss at 11 Inca spawns Blue Protoss at 5
0:00 Standard, standard, standard gate then gas for both, double gas for both, core for both, 2 gates for Oz and 3 gate Robo for Inca
5:50 Oz throws down Nexus, catches up on Robo while Inca makes Council
7:00 Inca adds 4th gate and researches Blink Oz making Immortal and saturating natural
9:00 Engagement at middle tower, Inca loses a couple of Stalkers as Blink is not done.
10:00 Oz pushes towards Natural but Blink Stalkers overwhelm single Immortal and very little other units
|
|
|
On January 12 2012 19:37 GhostFall wrote: I find it weird that people get angry when a player wins strategically instead of mechanically in an Real time Strategy game. This! So much this! <3
|
Losing that observer was more or less gameending :/
|
Inca is proof that if you play the percentages wisely, you can make it so difficult for opponents to play against you, even if your opponent has an edge skillwise. It reminds me of how playing optimal poker can be exploited by very good players at higher levels. He goes DT enough that it is a big risk for opponents not to prepare for it - this gives him the ability to get away with a variety of other builds because it forces his opponents to play safe if they are going for FE-style builds, which makes it very hard to punish Inca for doing greedy builds, and even if he just plays standard, in theory he should get a slight edge. It's actually very smart play. There are some very good players, especially foreigners, that could benefit from introducing this kind of unpredictability into their play, imo.
|
|
OZ! No cheese no win for inca
|
|
Beyonder
Netherlands15103 Posts
Wow, that was very strong play by OZ! WP!
|
On January 12 2012 19:42 Hassybaby wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2012 19:40 LeLfe wrote: Since I'll never ever bet on inca I guess my LB are screwed till players play DTproof every freaking game! you mean like how Bomber played in Game 1?
was surely safe but too passive in my opinion
|
Oz can definitely clean up a few things in his play but DAMN does he look good at times. I LOVE this guy.
|
There you have it. Macro > micro.
|
Expand and win in PvP. You rock Oz!
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
Poll: Recommend Oz vs InCa Game 1?Yes (23) 85% If you have time (4) 15% No (0) 0% 27 total votes Your vote: Recommend Oz vs InCa Game 1? (Vote): Yes (Vote): No (Vote): If you have time
|
|
|
|