| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Beastyqt
Serbia516 Posts
On October 31 2011 04:58 CryMeAReaper wrote: beasty did the same thing vs morrow g1 yesterday, take it slow man :D yeah I know thats the big problem I have in my games sometimes :/ BUT mech works on xel naga very good, I won many many games with it  I just wasnt sieged ^^ | ||
|
MuK_x
743 Posts
On October 31 2011 04:59 CosmicSpiral wrote: I think replicators will skew the TvP matchup even harder towards bio. Obviously,just get 3x siege tank and 2x warhound,its over. | ||
|
chestnutman
176 Posts
| ||
|
Riskr
Germany403 Posts
| ||
|
CryMeAReaper
Denmark1135 Posts
On October 31 2011 05:00 Empire.Beastyqt wrote: yeah I know thats the big problem I have in my games sometimes :/ BUT mech works on xel naga very good, I won many many games with it I just wasnt sieged ^^but you're aware of it and its scary how quick you're improving! if you can just iron out those few things you could be a serious contender for best euro terran imo! love ur project with ur stream btw i watch a lot edit: btw didnt you just win go4sc2 xd? | ||
|
RJGooner
United States2076 Posts
On October 31 2011 05:00 chestnutman wrote: funfact: one archon and one immortal kill a PF It was more than one archon and one immortal, maybe you should consider watching the game first before commenting. | ||
|
TheStonerer
Canada278 Posts
So yeah, i personally knew axslav would win this one when the hellions did no damage (they looked at the resource tab and axslav was always on par even after loosing so mayn probes). | ||
|
ThisGS
Germany255 Posts
On October 31 2011 05:01 Riskr wrote: so mouz won the whole thing again?i have to say as expected,best non-korean team in my opinion. no, they are in overall finals already, but thats it. i think beastyqt did missclick since he sieged all his tanks, but instead of shooting, he unsieged them again to just siege them once more. After that process he lost 80 supply before shooting once. | ||
|
ThisGS
Germany255 Posts
On October 31 2011 05:02 TheStonerer wrote: In my opinion PainUser sounded quite biased. It seemed clear (at least for me) that Axslav was in a great shape throughout the game. the hellions never did the damage they needed to, with axslav on 3 bases with a gold. Beastyqt had no map control at all. Axslav could lose a few units here and there, keeping beasty in his base. So yeah, i personally knew axslav would win this one when the hellions did no damage (they looked at the resource tab and axslav was always on par even after loosing so mayn probes). no, he wasnt. Beasty had the perfect army but screwed up the fight as bad as possible (read my last post about that). I cant belive no1 saw that and just says mech ghost is bad vs P which is complete bullshit | ||
|
1Eris1
United States5797 Posts
On October 31 2011 05:00 chestnutman wrote: funfact: one archon and one immortal kill a PF 350/400 beats 550/150 =P. thats suprising | ||
|
chestnutman
176 Posts
On October 31 2011 05:02 RJGooner wrote: It was more than one archon and one immortal, maybe you should consider watching the game first before commenting. I watched the game, but I actually just tried it out, 1 archon and 1 immortal is enough if the PF is not repaired. | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
On October 31 2011 05:02 RJGooner wrote: It was more than one archon and one immortal, maybe you should consider watching the game first before commenting. He didn't talk about that game. That's why it's a fun fact :p | ||
|
RJGooner
United States2076 Posts
On October 31 2011 05:04 chestnutman wrote: I watched the game, but I actually just tried it out, 1 archon and 1 immortal is enough if the PF is not repaired. My bad.  Sorry | ||
|
TheStonerer
Canada278 Posts
On October 31 2011 05:03 ThisGS wrote: no, he wasnt. Beasty had the perfect army but screwed up the fight as bad as possible (read my last post about that). I cant belive no1 saw that and just says mech ghost is bad vs P which is complete bullshit I disagree. Beasty was on 3 bases, axslav had a lot more bases. Didn't you know when you lose your army as mech you're pretty much screwed? Beasty would have lost his army, axslav would have pumped gate units and cleaned up. And chargelots are really good against tanks. | ||
|
gh0un
601 Posts
On October 31 2011 04:47 Elean wrote: Stop watching Idra, start watching other zerg streams and you will see it. Idra simply does not have the right mentality to improve, he will keep loosing to it again and again, while others have found solution against it. If you can't defend without scouting it, just scout the dam thing. You don't have to be a genius to come up with the idea. And you know what, if you scout it, you can prevent the bunkers to be place "in exactly that fashion". OMG, I'm sure you've never thought about that. I have seen stephano die to exactly that rush, i have seen nerchio die to exactly that rush, i have seen ret die to exactly that rush, i have seen nestea die to exactly that rush. What is your point? On some maps, i have seen idra smash that rush, stephano smash that rush, nerchio smash that rush, ret smash that rush, nestea smash that rush. Its still a terrible strategy that has the potential of taking away from the game and make for terrible games and it is happening quite frequently. The opening makes for terrible games and i dont support it, i suppose you are a supporter of terrible games. | ||
|
damod
1106 Posts
well 4 stalkers 500/200 will lose against a planetary 550/150  | ||
|
Elean
689 Posts
On October 31 2011 04:50 I_Love_Bacon wrote: He asks for a specific example. Either supply an example or don't bother responding with blanket, meaningless statements. Dude, I told him where to find the answer on how to defend it. Why the hell should I bother searching for an example where the zergs defend it after letting the bunker get started, while the usual solution is to not let the bunkers start in those position to begin with. Your comment just lack any reasoning. Is someone ask "find me a replay where the zerg defends after loosing his expo and his pool". I won't bother searching such a replay, but I will still say that the zerg could have defended it. | ||
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
On October 31 2011 05:00 cklrkzk wrote: Obviously,just get 3x siege tank and 2x warhound,its over. The synergy between siege tanks and a normal Protoss army is scary. And with the immobility of mech already allowing Protoss to get more bases (and hence more geysers), I don't see why Protosses wouldn't get 4-5 siege tanks in the mid-late game. Especially since they don't have to pay for any of the upgrades. | ||
|
redviper
Pakistan2333 Posts
edit: nvm looks like was just me. | ||
|
PredY
Czech Republic1731 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Shuttle Dota 2 3190Bisu 2522Jaedong  1432Hyuk 964EffOrt 882Horang2 734Light  585Stork 417Rush 329Snow 291[ Show more ] Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games singsing2030 hiko1027 B2W.Neo806 Lowko273 Hui .257 mouzStarbuck224 Liquid`VortiX221 KnowMe110 Pyrionflax100 ArmadaUGS73 OGKoka  62Trikslyr15 ceh91 |
|
RotterdaM Event
Replay Cast
The PondCast
OSC
IntoTheTV X SOOP
CranKy Ducklings
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
Mixu vs TBD
Spirit vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
Afreeca Starleague
Soma vs Shuttle
BeSt vs Rush
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
