EPTBlizzcon Day 2 - Page 46
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Watch how you approach the topic of match fixing. You can speculate, saying "I'm not so sure about the finals, something doesn't sit right with me," but if you are going to outright accuse players of match fixing you need something more than your word. TL takes match fixing/abuse seriously and as such there is a burden a proof when you are accusing players. - p4NDemik | ||
|
IMSmooth
United States679 Posts
| ||
|
fenixauriga
Sweden205 Posts
| ||
|
Lann555
Netherlands5173 Posts
| ||
|
ZidaneTribal
United States2800 Posts
| ||
|
XaCez
Sweden6991 Posts
Really? Really now? | ||
|
Lamppost
Canada317 Posts
 | ||
|
Horuku
United States405 Posts
| ||
|
Xoronius
Germany6362 Posts
On October 23 2011 04:41 Louuster wrote: The same way MVP dropped a set to MMA last night But MMA is very good at TvT, whereas July is very bad at ZvZ. Those defeats are not very comparable. | ||
|
parker-
Germany285 Posts
On October 23 2011 04:37 ScootyPuffJr. wrote: Is the tournament going to finish today? yes, you will see all the matches today | ||
|
rfoster
United States1005 Posts
http://us.battle.net/blizzcon/en/event-info/schedule/friday-schedule games start in 15min i think | ||
|
Ketch
Netherlands7285 Posts
On October 23 2011 04:43 fenixauriga wrote: the baneling more exiting than the lurker... really blizzard?, really? Yes, it is, at least I feel so. Spider mine is more fun than siege tank as well | ||
|
Ariovist
Germany430 Posts
| ||
|
Leetley
1796 Posts
On October 23 2011 04:46 Xoronius wrote: But MMA is very good at TvT, whereas July is very bad at ZvZ. Those defeats are not very comparable. As said ZvZ is the most volatile MU. | ||
|
Gigaudas
Sweden1213 Posts
On October 23 2011 04:40 Beyonder wrote: Did they just state that the baneling was to be found more exciting than the lurker :D The baneling is actually a really exciting unit. The micro involved is in many ways more stimulating than that of lurkers. Lurkers in SC:BW sure challenged the Terran to micro feats but apart from being a bitch to handle due to the old UI they didn't make the Zerg's work much fun (this is talking micro, the lurker sure was a lot more interesting when it came to the actual tactics of attacking or defending). Banelings require an extremely fast hand to make them successfully follow splitting marines as you can't use A-move or they'll blow up where you don't want them to. Banelings vs. marines is a hugely successful game mechanic. | ||
|
humbre
353 Posts
On October 23 2011 04:46 Ariovist wrote: they really wanna tease us with those questions....how imba is the MULE? they mine twice as long so its equivalent of 3 scvs | ||
|
sixfour
England11061 Posts
| ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
|
scFoX
France454 Posts
On October 23 2011 04:43 fenixauriga wrote: the baneling more exiting than the lurker... really blizzard?, really? Arguably, yes. Even if I like both units, I feel that for pure entertainment value, having 15 marines explode into a pile of green goo is superior. The lurker still was an awesome unit in BW, though. | ||
|
Hikari
1914 Posts
| ||
|
sixfour
England11061 Posts
On October 23 2011 04:48 scFoX wrote: Arguably, yes. Even if I like both units, I feel that for pure entertainment value, having 15 marines explode into a pile of green goo is superior. The lurker still was an awesome unit in BW, though. ah, but stop lurkers | ||
| ||
