|
On October 22 2011 05:24 Omnipresent wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 05:22 Phaded wrote: Dunno bout you guys, but there's too much content in Blizzcon. Too many awesome panels This is what happens when they stream an event that's intended to be seen live. We wouldn't be bored if we could walk around and see booths/demonstrations. I'm not at the event. I bought the virtual ticket. Nonstop content is good
|
On October 22 2011 05:02 sirreginold wrote: I like JP as the host of SOTG but not as much as a caster.
well apart from day9 and artosis there arnt alot of casters who have good ingame knowledge(rotterdam has good knowledge in p matchups), 90% of the casters just describe the game as they see it
why do u think hs3 was such a huge sucess? the knowledge that gamers have compared to regular casters is unmatchable because casters dont play the game at a high enought lvl so their understanding of the game extremely limited
|
On October 22 2011 05:24 Malaz wrote: Am I the only one that hopes the event will get into some trouble with Battlenet and not having a lan mode? ^^
Ahah! Let's call that truck guy to crash again :D
|
|
Nani is still in the loser bracket ? Just arrived :o
|
On October 22 2011 05:25 Daok wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 05:24 Malaz wrote: Am I the only one that hopes the event will get into some trouble with Battlenet and not having a lan mode? ^^ would be hilarious :D :D
Haha, I thought about this earlier today. I'd love for this to happen :D
|
I am trying to watch the stream but it isn't working, I get the mainstage 4 split info board saying there's stuff happening on all sides but I can only click the RTS stage page and when I do nothing happens :s
|
United States97276 Posts
On October 22 2011 05:26 Grettin wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 05:26 Exarl25 wrote: Blizzcon takes the crown from MLG for worst downtime to games shown ratio? Thats why you should watch the other panels meanwhile.  I think that's the point of the down time lol.
|
On October 22 2011 05:26 Grettin wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 05:26 Exarl25 wrote: Blizzcon takes the crown from MLG for worst downtime to games shown ratio? Thats why you should watch the other panels meanwhile.  Fun fact: You have to purchase ticket
|
United Kingdom16710 Posts
On October 22 2011 05:26 GDbushido wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 05:24 below66 wrote: This is pretty disappointing, first blizzcon I've ever watched so I didn't know what to expect... but this is hardly a tourney for viewers at home. its NOT a tourney. or rather, the SC2 tourney is just one attraction featured at Blizzcon. this is a convention intended to hype all Blizzard products, not an all-day SC2 extravaganza. It's got a pretty ridiculous prize pool for a non-tournament.
|
On October 22 2011 05:26 Exarl25 wrote: Blizzcon takes the crown from MLG for worst downtime to games shown ratio? Well if you payed for the virtual ticket you would have more streams in between the matches like main stage and panels.
|
On October 22 2011 05:26 Exarl25 wrote: Blizzcon takes the crown from MLG for worst downtime to games shown ratio?
To be fair I don't think the SC2 tournament free stream is their biggest concern, and I wasn't expecting it to be all that great compared to dedicated SC2 events.
|
On October 22 2011 05:23 Daok wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 05:22 Terminal wrote: Seriously guys, they can't show EVERY GAME featuring MVP/Nestea. I'm sure we'll get to see enough of them later on. but wtf is Terran? 0o
Major.
Number 5 in the foreign ranking in that side bar...see?! Currently training in the TSL house.
|
On October 22 2011 05:26 Exarl25 wrote: Blizzcon takes the crown from MLG for worst downtime to games shown ratio?
Blizzcon is always like this.
|
On October 22 2011 05:24 HaXXspetten wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 05:23 RogerChillingworth wrote:On October 22 2011 05:22 Terminal wrote: Seriously guys, they can't show EVERY GAME featuring MVP/Nestea. I'm sure we'll get to see enough of them later on. just like we were sure about LAN. And that they would cut down on destructible rocks... ...instead they now add collapsable rocks o.o
Not enough. I demand that the new protoss unit be able to clone destructible rocks.
|
On October 22 2011 05:24 Azarkon wrote:
That's a good point. I had a subscription at Orlando too, and I think that's what made it such a great tournament. But still, even with a subscription you wouldn't be able to see more games at Blizzcon.
Yeah, but that's not the point. What I said was that MLG's scheduling of a fixed 60 minutes per BO3 was already absurd enough, and Blizzard comes up with an even more idiotic 90 minutes. The only games that long I've ever seen are mech TvT on the older metagame. And still, they lasted about 60 "faster" minutes.
|
On October 22 2011 05:26 Exarl25 wrote: Blizzcon takes the crown from MLG for worst downtime to games shown ratio?
Wrong. IPL3 had the LONGEST downtime EVER
|
On October 22 2011 05:28 j3i wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 05:24 HaXXspetten wrote:On October 22 2011 05:23 RogerChillingworth wrote:On October 22 2011 05:22 Terminal wrote: Seriously guys, they can't show EVERY GAME featuring MVP/Nestea. I'm sure we'll get to see enough of them later on. just like we were sure about LAN. And that they would cut down on destructible rocks... ...instead they now add collapsable rocks o.o Not enough. I demand that the new protoss unit be able to clone destructible rocks. in legacy of the void they will introduce new resource : rocks
|
Gotta ask: Does anyone know the singer of this Opera song?
|
On October 22 2011 05:28 Clazziquai10 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 05:26 Exarl25 wrote: Blizzcon takes the crown from MLG for worst downtime to games shown ratio? Wrong. IPL3 had the LONGEST downtime EVER MLG Dallas, yo.
|
|
|
|