|
Have fun everyone and enjoy todays games! <3
~Nyovne |
On September 08 2011 20:57 Brutefidget wrote:In this thread (and this thread only,) Linkin Park is emo. These games are hilarious. Every one is more ridiculous than the last. And it will all be capped by the hilarious punchline of a 5 way tie. Please oh please....
I hope we see another 5 way tie afterwards, and then like boxers heading into the 9th round, players start dropping to like 50 APM or super cheesing, or super-long stalemate macro games where no one wants to attack.
|
On September 08 2011 20:56 Plexa wrote:
Please 5 way tie so GomTV actually consider creating a good Up/Down format. Please!!!
Fixed it for you Plexa 
(As "cool" as it is that a 5 way tie might happen...yeah it's not like we're seeing an extension on a game between MVP and Nestea...soooo tiebreaker will just cause me to close Gom Player =/ )
|
taeja 2-1
trickster 2-1
mkp 2-2
jyp 1-2
violet 1-2
violet vs taeja
trickster vs jyp
taeja and trickster control their own chances, a win for either puts them at 3-1 and in Code S
violet and jyp can lose and guarantee themselves code A
if only one player claims a spot in code S ^, there will be a 3-way tie at 2-2
if neither player claims a spot in code S, $$$$$ 5-way tie for the restart
|
On September 08 2011 20:58 Maghetti wrote:Show nested quote +On September 08 2011 20:52 FuzzyJAM wrote:
MKP didn't do what any variation of what is called the "1-1-1". The central components to that build are marines, tanks and banshees.
Edit: And yes, maybe he wanted to do a 1-1-1. That's not the point. He didn't. Stop claiming everything under the sun is a 1-1-1. At this point I am feeling that marines and tanks + what ever the hell terran wants from the starport is actually just as deadly as the standard 1/1/1. I haven't seen any of this stuff help even once still when executed well.
Yeah, every day you see a new 1-1-1 build emerge from no where, it seems like the more that Terran 1-1-1 the more cheeses they find they can do >_>
|
why are people complaining about the 5way tie, arent ppl happy like me to see a 5waytie so theres more starcraft games??????????????? :D 
|
On September 08 2011 20:57 Asha` wrote:Show nested quote +On September 08 2011 20:56 Caesarion wrote:On September 08 2011 20:54 Asha` wrote:On September 08 2011 20:51 RJGooner wrote:On September 08 2011 20:50 Asha` wrote:On September 08 2011 20:49 RJGooner wrote:On September 08 2011 20:47 Asha` wrote:
JYP dead, CheeseKingPrime still alive. Didn't JYP cheese as well? It's supposed to be a counter to a 1/1/1, except MKP did a different variation on it. MKP has tried it vs both Toss, and is generally relying on a huge number of 1base plays as a crutch nowadays. Ah ok. Did not know that. For the record I used to be a huge MKP fan, but his refusal to adapt to current trends in most match ups, and his increasingly heavy reliance on one basing after going through a period of great macro games at the start of the year has just steadily turned me off. --- On the plus side for the Protoss fans, you either get 1 more toss guaranteed to be in Code S, or you get a tiebreak with none of them out, so it's not all doom and gloom just yet. I guess that's true but I'm sure almost all of us would prefer JYP to Trickster. Yeah, it's pretty obvious which Toss is going to bring the more exciting and innovative play to Code S. Sadly Trickster being cheesy seems to be working more than good ol' macro-innovation ><
This entire group has been cheesy.
|
On September 08 2011 20:56 Plexa wrote:
Please 5 way tie. Please!!!
you only want this so they consider changing the format i guess? =)
|
On September 08 2011 20:57 mcc wrote:Show nested quote +On September 08 2011 20:54 Asha` wrote:On September 08 2011 20:51 RJGooner wrote:On September 08 2011 20:50 Asha` wrote:On September 08 2011 20:49 RJGooner wrote:On September 08 2011 20:47 Asha` wrote:
JYP dead, CheeseKingPrime still alive. Didn't JYP cheese as well? It's supposed to be a counter to a 1/1/1, except MKP did a different variation on it. MKP has tried it vs both Toss, and is generally relying on a huge number of 1base plays as a crutch nowadays. Ah ok. Did not know that. For the record I used to be a huge MKP fan, but his refusal to adapt to current trends in most match ups, and his increasingly heavy reliance on one basing after going through a period of great macro games at the start of the year has just steadily turned me off. --- On the plus side for the Protoss fans, you either get 1 more toss guaranteed to be in Code S, or you get a tiebreak with none of them out, so it's not all doom and gloom just yet. Tester is not one more Toss in code S, it is one toss that retains code s, but we should be thankful even for that 
Honestly at this point, just from a gsl fan perspective, I'm grateful for every guy who does not play terran and plays in code s, even if it's a non code s caliber player like tester.
|
|
|
On September 08 2011 20:54 Cheebah wrote:Show nested quote +On September 08 2011 20:52 mr_tolkien wrote:
The only decent match ups in SC2 atm are TvZ and ZvZ XD A third of the match ups are decently entertaining after 1 year. Good job Blizzard! If only one third of your posts were decent...
I'm sorry, but PvT and PvP currently are 1 base fests, PvZ is terrible because Protosses seem at a loss for a standard good opening, and TvT is... Well, TvT. It's a matter of taste on this one I agree, but the BFH on BFH trend is uninteresting to me.
|
On September 08 2011 20:58 Shootist wrote:Show nested quote +On September 08 2011 20:56 KimJongChill wrote:On September 08 2011 20:56 Shootist wrote:
Out of curiosity, is there a limit to the number of rounds of tiebreakers there can be? I mean, there has to be a limit to (1) how much they can cast/play in a single day, and (2) how many rounds they can play (assuming we are very lucky/unlucky to keep reaching tiebreakers) Theoretically, they could go on forever. Wow I thought there will be a limit to the no of rounds before they introduce some form of sudden death/alternate format. Like in soccer, after a set amount of extra time, it goes straight to penalty kicks.
Nope we just keep going around and around and around. And around and around and around. And around and around and around.
If today unseats yesterdays longest cast record.. just one day after it was set..
|
|
|
On September 08 2011 20:58 Maghetti wrote:Show nested quote +On September 08 2011 20:52 FuzzyJAM wrote:
MKP didn't do what any variation of what is called the "1-1-1". The central components to that build are marines, tanks and banshees.
Edit: And yes, maybe he wanted to do a 1-1-1. That's not the point. He didn't. Stop claiming everything under the sun is a 1-1-1. At this point I am feeling that marines and tanks + what ever the hell terran wants from the starport is actually just as deadly as the standard 1/1/1. I haven't seen any of this stuff help even once still when executed well.
Yeah, this issue is just the versatility of Terran one basing.
|
On September 08 2011 20:59 mr_tolkien wrote:Show nested quote +On September 08 2011 20:54 Cheebah wrote:On September 08 2011 20:52 mr_tolkien wrote:
The only decent match ups in SC2 atm are TvZ and ZvZ XD A third of the match ups are decently entertaining after 1 year. Good job Blizzard! If only one third of your posts were decent... I'm sorry, but PvT and PvP currently are 1 base fests, PvZ is terrible because Protosses seem at a loss for a standard good opening, and TvT is... Well, TvT. It's a matter of taste on this one I agree, but the BFH on BFH trend is uninteresting to me.
It's just the evolution of the game, don't know how that's on the shoulders of Blizz, they probably wanna see if players will work the game out of this trend before they start tossin changes everywhere.
|
come on JYP and Violet!!!! lol
|
On September 08 2011 21:00 Probe1 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 08 2011 20:58 Shootist wrote:On September 08 2011 20:56 KimJongChill wrote:On September 08 2011 20:56 Shootist wrote:
Out of curiosity, is there a limit to the number of rounds of tiebreakers there can be? I mean, there has to be a limit to (1) how much they can cast/play in a single day, and (2) how many rounds they can play (assuming we are very lucky/unlucky to keep reaching tiebreakers) Theoretically, they could go on forever. Wow I thought there will be a limit to the no of rounds before they introduce some form of sudden death/alternate format. Like in soccer, after a set amount of extra time, it goes straight to penalty kicks. Nope we just keep going around and around and around. And around and around and around. And around and around and around. If today unseats yesterdays longest cast record.. just one day after it was set..
Obviously if it takes way too long GOMTV will come up with something to stop the ties.
|
On September 08 2011 21:00 FuzzyJAM wrote:Show nested quote +On September 08 2011 20:58 Maghetti wrote:On September 08 2011 20:52 FuzzyJAM wrote:
MKP didn't do what any variation of what is called the "1-1-1". The central components to that build are marines, tanks and banshees.
Edit: And yes, maybe he wanted to do a 1-1-1. That's not the point. He didn't. Stop claiming everything under the sun is a 1-1-1. At this point I am feeling that marines and tanks + what ever the hell terran wants from the starport is actually just as deadly as the standard 1/1/1. I haven't seen any of this stuff help even once still when executed well. Yeah, this issue is just the versatility of Terran one basing.
Would you say terran has viable late game options against a Zerg who hasn't had his economy hampered?
When should the terran attack?
|
On September 08 2011 20:57 Huragius wrote:Show nested quote +On September 08 2011 20:52 mcc wrote:Well I hope karma(fate, whatever) is a working today and Tester and Taeja win and MKP goes to hell(code A) for his 111 ... You are one fucked-up person...
Because I want MKP to go to code A because he did 111. Yes I am a monster. Or maybe I just am not a fan of MKP and want others to go to code S.
|
Unless Violet wins, JYP has no chance right? Then, GO VIOLET!
|
Gogo Violet! Taeja's nerves are cracking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
