|
On August 14 2011 13:24 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 13:23 jmbthirteen wrote: When there are that many infestors you need to have HT's out. Gotta get those feedbacks Incontrol tried that earlier, destiny used neural parasite on the ht's and fedback incontrol's ht. That's.... just evil D: Hilarious, intelligent even but EVIL.
|
On August 14 2011 13:25 Utinni wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 13:22 Moralez wrote:On August 14 2011 13:07 hitpoint wrote:On August 14 2011 12:54 Moralez wrote:On August 14 2011 12:53 jmbthirteen wrote:On August 14 2011 12:51 r4pture wrote: Ugh. InControl is all-ining because he knows he can't deal with Destiny late game. Its working but it really sucks to watch. ummm that wasn't an all in 6 gate no tech not an all in data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" Twilight council and dark shrine is tech. Ok now i want some explanations, he did the same thing did no damage and lost. You still beleave that's not an all in ? He wasn't far behind until he threw his army away to kill the third... He just failed after the mid-late game push.
lol ? he was far behind all game after that push failed.
|
On August 14 2011 13:22 AntiGrav1ty wrote: Not even his macro is good. He was at 1,7k minerals there. What the hell is incontrol doing today?? I agree that iNcontroL didn't play too well, but he was floating so many minerals because he had to cancel about 4 buildings when Destiny found his fourth before it finished building.
|
gg all. @incontrol - woulda prefered to see you try to win, rather than showcase fun builds. GL nexttime anyways.
|
On August 14 2011 13:23 AntiGrav1ty wrote:Indeed. After the blizzard invitational this was really not great to watch...
Well what do you expect, these two are of a lower tier than those who participated in the Blizzard Invitational. Although Destiny's not that bad of a player than I previously thought he was. :p
|
On August 14 2011 13:24 iNcontroL wrote: gg's! Kinda sad to see so much negativity in here.. not really worth playing destiny when so many haters want to make this less than fun.
Tried to make it fun and did different stuff each game. He won and played really well. Wish it could be more about the games!
Until next time!
They were great games man! The blink stalker play on metalopolis was sick.
|
On August 14 2011 13:24 iNcontroL wrote: gg's! Kinda sad to see so much negativity in here.. not really worth playing destiny when so many haters want to make this less than fun.
Tried to make it fun and did different stuff each game. He won and played really well. Wish it could be more about the games!
Until next time!
Aka I played it for fun and not to win.
= boring games when you try things in a game you have never or almost never done.
:/
|
On August 14 2011 13:24 iNcontroL wrote: gg's! Kinda sad to see so much negativity in here.. not really worth playing destiny when so many haters want to make this less than fun.
Tried to make it fun and did different stuff each game. He won and played really well. Wish it could be more about the games!
Until next time! i really enjoyed you play, you did very well data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
god people love to ruin the fun so much, so annoying.
gg's, atleast i found it fun to watch.
|
On August 14 2011 13:25 CidO wrote:I'm a little confused why continue with DT instead of HT? HT = Storm, which would tickle the roach... but also feedback the overseer? Most zergs don't run with multiple detectors just like most protoss don't run multiple obs. Even doing feedback then using DTs would still give you an advantage, you just need to fire off your spells before fungals/NPs go down, or just... feedback everything + dark templars = win. almost like incontrol had the typical zerg player mentality "mash roaches/zerglings until i lose" except in his case more archons which get NP'd data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" i'm very sadface data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt=""
Why do people say storm "tickles" roaches?
You do know it does 65% of their HP right? It's the same vs marauders.
|
On August 14 2011 13:23 AntiGrav1ty wrote:Indeed. After the blizzard invitational this was really not great to watch...
Not fair to compare, the two, blizz invitiational had the best in each region, this was a showmatch between two mid range pros.
Enjoyed it nonetheless, sometimes you just gotta take it for what it is.
|
On August 14 2011 13:24 iNcontroL wrote: gg's! Kinda sad to see so much negativity in here.. not really worth playing destiny when so many haters want to make this less than fun.
Tried to make it fun and did different stuff each game. He won and played really well. Wish it could be more about the games!
Until next time!
Its because you showed us that you play terribly vs Infestor builds and still complain about them being imba.
|
Was a fun series to watch, good games by both.
|
On August 13 2011 02:35 iNcontroL wrote: pvz is pretty fucking hard these days but I am looking forward for the opportunity to play a match of meaning in a matchup that needs work! ty for the invite, will do my best to make some gg's! i'm sorry incontrol i like you alot, and maybe you missed typed, but you say this match-up needs work, I think it does but only for protoss to not be dumb, sorry man, but when I watch people bitch when there gateway armies are crushed by infestors, and they don't get HT I have no sympathy, even when they do get HT's they get like 4 HT's to like 20 infestors, doesn't work, you can feedback infestors before they can get a spell off, so the MU doesn't need work but the counter does, mass HT's counter mass infestor and no one has done that so far, so I have zero sympathy for someone who whines about it.
|
On August 14 2011 13:26 SafeAsCheese wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 13:25 CidO wrote:I'm a little confused why continue with DT instead of HT? HT = Storm, which would tickle the roach... but also feedback the overseer? Most zergs don't run with multiple detectors just like most protoss don't run multiple obs. Even doing feedback then using DTs would still give you an advantage, you just need to fire off your spells before fungals/NPs go down, or just... feedback everything + dark templars = win. almost like incontrol had the typical zerg player mentality "mash roaches/zerglings until i lose" except in his case more archons which get NP'd data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" i'm very sadface data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" Why do people say storm "tickles" roaches? You do know it does 65% of their HP right? It's the same vs marauders. If all the damage connects, which it pretty much never does.
|
On August 14 2011 13:25 Moralez wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 13:25 Utinni wrote:On August 14 2011 13:22 Moralez wrote:On August 14 2011 13:07 hitpoint wrote:On August 14 2011 12:54 Moralez wrote:On August 14 2011 12:53 jmbthirteen wrote:On August 14 2011 12:51 r4pture wrote: Ugh. InControl is all-ining because he knows he can't deal with Destiny late game. Its working but it really sucks to watch. ummm that wasn't an all in 6 gate no tech not an all in data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" Twilight council and dark shrine is tech. Ok now i want some explanations, he did the same thing did no damage and lost. You still beleave that's not an all in ? He wasn't far behind until he threw his army away to kill the third... He just failed after the mid-late game push. lol ? he was far behind all game after that push failed.
No he wasn't, he was ahead on supply and even on bases right after the push.
|
On August 14 2011 13:26 Regulate140 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 13:23 AntiGrav1ty wrote:On August 14 2011 13:23 JediGamer wrote: This was an awful set..... Indeed. After the blizzard invitational this was really not great to watch... Not fair to compare, the two, blizz invitiational had the best in each region, this was a showmatch between two mid range pros. Enjoyed it nonetheless, sometimes you just gotta take it for what it is.
Your probably right. I guess i expected too much.
|
I think zealots should be traded for more cannons and more bases in this build, then a bit more probes and gas.
Infestors are really slow, which should allow a Toss to expand and build enough cannons.
Archons/immortals/(Storm), and some way to work in carriers would be awesome.
Great showmatch though !
|
I liked the games although there was a pretty obvious pattern to the games (early = inc's chance, late = destiny win)
Anyway, I really don't think people should be using chargelot/archon in PvZ. Not a balance thing, it's just an unviable comp. My 2c.
|
iNcontroL needs to get IdrA to play like that so I he can practice against it - he just seemed flustered by it all.
|
On August 14 2011 13:24 iNcontroL wrote: gg's! Kinda sad to see so much negativity in here.. not really worth playing destiny when so many haters want to make this less than fun.
Tried to make it fun and did different stuff each game. He won and played really well. Wish it could be more about the games!
Until next time!
Its strange to hear you complain about fanboyism. It is worth playing the games for the legit fans that don't run their mouth (of which there are plenty.... 6k viewers, less than a couple of hundred posting, maybe half of which are being negative. No need to highlight the negativity.
|
|
|
|