| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
babylon
8765 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:03 Forikorder wrote: is it possible to fast expand and build an army of 3/3 thors? jsut think of WC3 as PvP before the patch  Calling War3 PvP is such an insult. Please don't say that again. =__= It is so much more complicated than that. | ||
|
Dingobloo
Australia1903 Posts
| ||
|
Alpino
Brazil4390 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:02 nokz88 wrote: A complete wc3 noob question: Isn't it possible to go for a economic build instead of 1 base? Like, fast expo into 90 food army of 3/3 taurens and catapults? I've never seen such a game and I always wondered why because you will die if you try that against a good player, he will see what you're doing and kill you. | ||
|
Stamper
Germany148 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:03 Shinta) wrote: You're spoiled by the extremely high quality of modern day sc2 streams... People with a lot of money can afford to have really good streams. Even disregarding that though, you do realize that SC:BW streams look like this even now in 2011 right? Yes, I am very very certain that this is "good enough" video quality for a major tournament. WCG has become huge, and is regarded as huge today because of the amazing games they have been able to host over the years, not because they had tons of money or cutting edge technology. WCG is awesome today, because of the amazing games they are hosting, not because they have tons of money or cutting edge technology. Money is certainly not the reason for the horrible looking main stage stream. The side stage stream looks amazing. | ||
|
Kira__
Sweden2672 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:02 nokz88 wrote: A complete wc3 noob question: Isn't it possible to go for a economic build instead of 1 base? Like, fast expo into 90 food army of 3/3 taurens and catapults? I've never seen such a game and I always wondered why Humans can fast expand quite easily with militia... It was very common many years ago when I followed wc3, don't know about now :p However, you can't really sit and defend. You need to be able to go out on the map and farm the neutral units. If you don't build an army you'll never have any map control and you'll get out farmed. | ||
|
Forikorder
Canada8840 Posts
| ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:04 terialk wrote: What? WHAT? DDDD: Sad I couldn't see what happened  Those guys have always been evenly matched throughout the years. At least we will get the replays eventually. D= | ||
|
alewind
United States4 Posts
right now is MVP vs Deny | ||
|
RPR_Tempest
Australia7798 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:01 swordboy wrote: F91 wins against Sen, according to the Facebook of Gamabears. Oh shit, I'm worried for mOOnGLaDe... | ||
|
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
true, if you do that, you lose mapcontrol. means, the opponent will have 5-5 heros and expand then, the game is pretty much over from that point | ||
|
yOiyuK
United States108 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:00 zestzorb wrote: It used to be DH, but yeah BM has been all the rage for a while. Okay, so it seems pratically everyone agrees it is blademaster. Makes sense, when I used to play WC3 that unit annoyed me the most. Best undead hero? | ||
|
requieml
Canada72 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:02 nokz88 wrote: A complete wc3 noob question: Isn't it possible to go for a economic build instead of 1 base? Like, fast expo into 90 food army of 3/3 taurens and catapults? I've never seen such a game and I always wondered why because at 50 food or below u mine the most efficiently, 10 per pop. at 70+, u only mine 4 per pop while 10 gets taken away from ur mine so ur mining even slower than 1base | ||
GTR
51594 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:05 Forikorder wrote: it saids on the schedule that after this LoL/counterstrike there will be 2 SC2 games broadcasted anyone know what games are going to be broadcasted?  Kas vs  XiGua and Sen vs JacK | ||
|
Mithridates
United States446 Posts
| ||
|
Forikorder
Canada8840 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:04 babylon wrote: Calling War3 PvP is such an insult. Please don't say that again. =__= It is so much more complicated than that. its like taking PvP and TvT and smashing them together better? | ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:05 KalWarkov wrote: true, if you do that, you lose mapcontrol. means, the opponent will have 5-5 heros and expand then, the game is pretty much over from that point To be fair, when playing against Orc, you lose map control the moment his BM gets out of the altar. | ||
|
greatZERG
Australia755 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:03 Shinta) wrote: You're spoiled by the extremely high quality of modern day sc2 streams... People with a lot of money can afford to have really good streams. Even disregarding that though, you do realize that SC:BW streams look like this even now in 2011 right? Yes, I am very very certain that this is "good enough" video quality for a major tournament. WCG has become huge, and is regarded as huge today because of the amazing games they have been able to host over the years, not because they had tons of money or cutting edge technology. WCG is awesome today, because of the amazing games they are hosting, not because they have tons of money or cutting edge technology. I think you mean WCG became huge, it hasn't been an amazing tournament for a very long time and their inability to actually bring us the tournament in a reasonable broadcast only compounds this. Take off the rose-tinted glasses mate. WCG is a dying dinosaur of a tournament | ||
|
mordk
Chile8385 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:03 Shinta) wrote: You're spoiled by the extremely high quality of modern day sc2 streams... People with a lot of money can afford to have really good streams. Even disregarding that though, you do realize that SC:BW streams look like this even now in 2011 right? Yes, I am very very certain that this is "good enough" video quality for a major tournament. WCG has become huge, and is regarded as huge today because of the amazing games they have been able to host over the years, not because they had tons of money or cutting edge technology. WCG is awesome today, because of the amazing games they are hosting, not because they have tons of money or cutting edge technology. BW stream still looks like this because the aspect ratio and res on the game itself means it looks good even on this stream quality. Modern games don't. Which is also why WC3 looks better than SC2 on these streams I like the production and everything, but you have to face reality, for such a huge tournament, WCG's technology is pretty ancient. | ||
|
Dexington
Canada7276 Posts
| ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:06 babylon wrote: To be fair, when playing against Orc, you lose map control the moment his BM gets out of the altar. ha ha ha ;D Sad because it's true. o; | ||
| ||
|
|
Escore
The PondCast
WardiTV Invitational
Zoun vs Ryung
Lambo vs ShoWTimE
Big Brain Bouts
Fjant vs Bly
Serral vs Shameless
OSC
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
RSL Revival
SHIN vs Bunny
ByuN vs Shameless
WardiTV Invitational
Krystianer vs TriGGeR
Cure vs Rogue
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
