WCG 2011 Grand Finals - Page 69
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Xkalibert
United States1404 Posts
| ||
|
swordboy
Canada299 Posts
| ||
|
Elem
Sweden4717 Posts
| ||
|
mordk
Chile8385 Posts
| ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
| ||
|
sunman1g
United States334 Posts
On December 08 2011 13:59 forsooth wrote: You can only do so much to show a good game when you're vastly superior to your opponent. Personally, I would find it insulting to both his opponent and me as a viewer if he did anything less than go for the throat. Leave the nerd corpses of the unworthy in your wake and move on. ahaha well said. he can't do that against opponents like em. you need to wait for good games... pretty much when the 3 koreans are in the top 4 or something along these lines :D | ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
| ||
|
s4life
Peru1519 Posts
| ||
|
nokz88
Brazil1253 Posts
Isn't it possible to go for a economic build instead of 1 base? Like, fast expo into 90 food army of 3/3 taurens and catapults? I've never seen such a game and I always wondered why | ||
|
Shinta)
United States1716 Posts
On December 08 2011 13:56 greatZERG wrote: I was referring to you thinking this is good enough quality video for a major tournament when it's the same video quality we were getting during WCG2003. And before you say beggars can't be choosers, I'd gladly pay for a good stream rather than an ad-assisted shit stream You're spoiled by the extremely high quality of modern day sc2 streams... People with a lot of money can afford to have really good streams. Even disregarding that though, you do realize that SC:BW streams look like this even now in 2011 right? Yes, I am very very certain that this is "good enough" video quality for a major tournament. WCG has become huge, and is regarded as huge today because of the amazing games they have been able to host over the years, not because they had tons of money or cutting edge technology. WCG is awesome today, because of the amazing games they are hosting, not because they have tons of money or cutting edge technology. Edit: On December 08 2011 14:02 nokz88 wrote: A complete wc3 noob question: Isn't it possible to go for a economic build instead of 1 base? Like, fast expo into 90 food army of 3/3 taurens and catapults? I've never seen such a game and I always wondered why Absolutely impossible. By the time you get 3/3 Tauren's, your opponent will have more units, plus easy counters to Tauren, and you'll get roflstomped. On top of that, it's much harder to get expansions up in WC3 than it is in SC. There are times when Night Elves try to fast expansions, but it's risky. Human's do fast expand, but Human's have the largest variety of strategies at their disposal. Orc and Undead have FE strategies, but they are much harder to execute, and usually you just won't be able to hold, and you'll just lose in a few minutes. | ||
|
dapierow
Serbia1316 Posts
| ||
|
TheDougler
Canada8306 Posts
| ||
|
JayJay_90
Germany1632 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:02 nokz88 wrote: A complete wc3 noob question: Isn't it possible to go for a economic build instead of 1 base? Like, fast expo into 90 food army of 3/3 taurens and catapults? I've never seen such a game and I always wondered why Fast expo is a pretty common strat for human. Not so much vs orc though. | ||
|
mordk
Chile8385 Posts
| ||
|
Forikorder
Canada8840 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:02 nokz88 wrote: A complete wc3 noob question: Isn't it possible to go for a economic build instead of 1 base? Like, fast expo into 90 food army of 3/3 taurens and catapults? I've never seen such a game and I always wondered why is it possible to fast expand and build an army of 3/3 thors? jsut think of WC3 as PvP before the patch ![]() | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:02 nokz88 wrote: A complete wc3 noob question: Isn't it possible to go for a economic build instead of 1 base? Like, fast expo into 90 food army of 3/3 taurens and catapults? I've never seen such a game and I always wondered why WCIII doesn't really work that way. | ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
//gay for Lyn | ||
|
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
| ||
|
terialk
United States770 Posts
On December 08 2011 14:01 swordboy wrote: F91 wins against Sen, according to the Facebook of Gamabears. What? WHAT? DDDD: Sad I couldn't see what happened ![]() | ||
|
I_Love_Bacon
United States5765 Posts
Even tasteless and artosis are well aware of the OP-ness of the Blademaster. | ||
| ||

