EPTSick surround by Sen though :D .
NASL Week 4 Day 5 - Page 16
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
schmutttt
Australia3856 Posts
Sick surround by Sen though :D . | ||
|
Vorenius
Denmark1979 Posts
On May 09 2011 10:38 sermokala wrote: While an awesome poll, it's also pretty 'spoilering' for people wondering what matches to watch later  | ||
|
Grampz
United States2147 Posts
| ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
| ||
|
TheHova
United Kingdom2612 Posts
On May 09 2011 10:39 Looky wrote: he had blink. if he blink away he wouldve won that fight Would have lost all the rest of what little gateway army he had left and the colossus that were being protected by the stalkers. He couldn't blink. He needed forcefields. | ||
|
haffy
United Kingdom430 Posts
On May 09 2011 10:39 quiet noise wrote: haha whenever zerg wins against a protoss everyone wants to recommend the game... and when protoss wins its either colossus or force fields that are op. just sayin Most people recommended banelings. | ||
|
AndreiDaGiant
United States394 Posts
On May 09 2011 10:38 cca1ss1e wrote: yeah I agree.. FFs would have been invaluable there. it would have minimized it but that was such a fast surround in a huge open area... woulda been hard | ||
|
Percutio
United States1672 Posts
I would have much preferred an inclusion of high templars a la hasuobs. The storm softens up the army and overlords simultaneously as you retreat from the baneling drops. Not to mention the templar are affordable considering you can skimp on sentries at that point. | ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
On May 09 2011 10:38 zidaneshead wrote: I timed it as less than a second.... ...less than a second for Idra's whole argument about the Protoss deathball being unstoppable being totally and utterly shat on. well to be fair it wasn't a real death ball more like an attack that had to happen because they P was so far behind and that was likely his only opportunity. I think Mana had 2 sentries? ForceFields could have negated a lot of those flanks. Either way Sen was a monster. | ||
|
loveeholicce
Korea (South)785 Posts
On May 09 2011 10:38 Backpack wrote: Well protoss is clearly so OP that a zerg with no corruptors can't stand a chance against 5 colossi deathball oh wait... Protoss is so clearly OP every time protoss loses we have to make a huge deal about it and extrapolate information about balance? How about sen was the better player, and mana needed to retain his sentry count so he could put up some forcefields instead of letting banelings walk up to his army. On a serious note though, it's nice to see zergs winning a lot more, gives some hope for when I play this matchup : D | ||
|
MonsieurGrimm
Canada2441 Posts
On May 09 2011 10:40 Ezze wrote: I swear to god if people on ladder start doing this shit to me now I'm gonna switch from protoss. It's not enough dealing with the stupid 2 base roach/ling now I have to look out for this stupid overlord baneling stuff. Mana had to do some insane micro and still barely managed to survived those attacks, goes up to like 6 collossus + stalkers and his army disappears in a split second???? go ahead, please switch to zerg. the swarm is always welcoming :D | ||
|
Kurr
Canada2338 Posts
I know there were games that were closer, had more clever use of banelings in the past (drops, baneling bombs, etc) but this one was just nuts. Perfect timing on all fronts. | ||
|
Ikaros
United States16 Posts
On May 09 2011 10:40 Vorenius wrote: While an awesome poll, it's also pretty 'spoilering' for people wondering what matches to watch later No one should read live report if they don't want to get spoiled. | ||
|
Latto
235 Posts
it's been a problem for more than a week now why is it not fixed... | ||
|
Omegalisk
United States337 Posts
On May 09 2011 10:39 quiet noise wrote: haha whenever zerg wins against a protoss everyone wants to recommend the game... and when protoss wins its either colossus or force fields that are op. just sayin The reason that MaNa lost was because he was on 2-base versus almost 5-base. The reason other Protoss win is because it's 2-base versus 4-base. | ||
|
Looky
United States1608 Posts
| ||
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
| ||
|
Throat
United States156 Posts
On May 09 2011 10:40 Ezze wrote: I swear to god if people on ladder start doing this shit to me now I'm gonna switch from protoss. It's not enough dealing with the stupid 2 base roach/ling now I have to look out for this stupid overlord baneling stuff. Mana had to do some insane micro and still barely managed to survived those attacks, goes up to like 6 collossus + stalkers and his army disappears in a split second???? Payback for us having to deal with your deathball bullshit for a couple months... and you're acting like it is easy. Sen was up 3 bases in both games, give me a break. | ||
|
jackdaleaper
Philippines1216 Posts
On May 09 2011 10:38 Mailing wrote: Mana's army was better. His lack of force field lost him the game. Exactly, when Sen lost all those roaches he made up for it by sniping Mana's sentries, there were only 2 at the end. | ||
|
lgn!
Italy224 Posts
| ||
| ||
